most of these folks wouldn't agree that war was the way to settle the problem with Saddam if it were proven that he supplied the terrorist with the vial of anthrax that killed thousands of people in one of our major cities.

This scenario hasn't happened. I don't recall anyone saying what they would think about war with Iraq if it did happen. Other than that some people would have suspicions that it was the US government that was responsible for such an attack. But in the event that it was proven even beyond even these people's doubts that it was Saddam who did such a thing, the question just hasn't been addressed in these threads.

Prove me wrong.