The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #56684 Message #887606
Posted By: GUEST
11-Feb-03 - 09:15 AM
Thread Name: BS: Found on U.K folk newsgroup.
Subject: BS: Found on U.K folk newsgroup.
The recent story from Mr Gall, of a pub's PEL charges increasing 500% in one-fell-swoop - came on the same day as I received a block e-mail from a well established live music pub venue, The Running Horse in Nottingham.
This week, the Running Horse received a telephone call from The PRS (Performing Rights Society), announcing that the pub's annual PRS charges are to rise from £1670.40 to £3298.00 (+ VAT.). No arguments. The reason being given is that - having been recently reassessed - this venue promotes and encourages musicians to play - who also write their own original material as well as playing covers.
As a result, the pub - which struggles to keep going and to keep audiences coming on narrow margins - may have to close. It's not a folk venue, but a blues venue presenting electric and acoustic blues from the UK and the USA (relevant here nevertheless) with tickets from around the 2 quid up to 10 quid (for something special) mark.
If it closes down, there'll be some 360 less live performances, with 360 less opportunities for live acts - many of them local musicians - who'll earn nothing further from this venue, nor have a place to play. Doubly sad when in the past year under its new management, it has managed to re-establish itself with live music after years of being run-down.
Forgetting that the pub also provides an outlet for bands to sell their CD's to a specialist audience, where will such closures of live venues like this leave the artistes and bands (or the workers from the PRS) and anyone else connected with the music biz - when there is no-one and no-where left to play live?
How does the PRS justify these hiked and hyped charges. How does the PRS actually distribute the money it collects? No-one seems to know... What makes me think that the very artistes that the RH presents, will be the last bods to receive any of the monies collected? Over the years, I've heard nothing good said by anyone about this organisation.
Isn't it about time that the Michael Jacksons, Paul McCartneys, Elton Johns Eminems and the many other up and coming billionaires quit being so damned greedy and put something back into music?
Isn't it also about time we collectively stopped pandering to them and refused to go on paying the glamour queens who can afford to squander their 'hard earned' millions on mindless trivialities.
Then ...in the same week, the very same venue also had notice from the Council which put their PEL in question. This was regarding an 'anonymous complaint' from an alleged neighbour, regarding noise levels. As a result their late music license has been withdrawn to appease Council officials.
The venue which has had very good relations with all its neighbours especially over the last year or so, has gone to great lengths to educate and control patrons and performers to noise levels inside and outside. Surprised, it has since done further research with all its adjoining neighbours - all of whom were surprised and also of whom none have apparently made any such noise complaint.
I wonder how long it will be before the The Running Horse and other venues like it, are forced to drop live music altogether in favour of perhaps big screen football, or kareoke and pool tables. So much easier to make money too.
Who on earth would ever want to run a live music venue in this climate of attack and of being milked dry? Who said live music was slowly dying? It's increasingly looking - for one reason or another - that way.