I had thought that the original aticle was on this thread? The Western Morning Press appear to have slightly 'tinkered' with the wording to fit the story into their campaign against the Bill. I must admit that am more pleased that they ran the story, rather than upset at the small change they made.

I think this is slightly more preferable than local authority officers, misleading the public, misleading their members, tinkering with the law and using it against beneficial folk music activities.

But I may well be biased?