As has been said all along, its what's in the bill that matters, not what's in the guidance, because experience says that will be largely ignored. So to that extent it doesn't really matter in the end whether the guidance is written by DCMS or the MU.

I'm all for the MU, EFDSS etc being involved in the guidance, but not in a way that implies reducing the effort in getting the bill improved, or can be interpreted as those bodies 'approving' the end result.