Leprechaun, how about this scenario: Dubya has proof that Columbia has WMD's in violation of a treaty, but he can't show us the proof because it would compromise the sources. Does that mean we can invade? What if it were Canada? You can't honestly expect us to take a president's word alone as solid proof for war, when we won't take it for proof that he didn't have an affair. And Kim C, life would be a lot easier if it were a novel in which everything was bound to come out all right, but it's not.