The problem with this multiplicity of threads on essentially the same subject, is that if you have something to say, you don't know where the hell to post it so that other people will see it. There are so many threads on the same subject that sometimes I can't remember which ones I've posted to. I actually have a life away from the computer and I don't have the time to go through all this stuff. Some of it is good and informative, but much of it is repetitive ranting and raving. It's ridiculous for someone to start a new thread every time he or she discovers what they think is a new and subtle nuance of the issue. It dilutes the discussion as a whole.

And by the way, as far as lengthy cut-and-paste jobs are concerned, I glance at the first sentence or two to see if it's a matter of real interest, and if so, I might read a bit further, but unless it really grabs me, I skip the rest—and I'll bet most other people do too. So it's a double waste of bandwidth.

I don't start very many threads, and I think carefully before I do. I started one yesterday ("BS: Constitutional Guarantees") because it's something I feel is a matter of deep concern to everyone. It's separate from the Iraqi war issue—not just a subtle variation on a theme. It's more related to the "security vs. freedom" issues raised by recent anti-terrorist legislation, and I asked people to try to stick to the subject of the Constitution (sort of like trying to herd a flock of nervous chickens) and not turn it into another anti-war thread, of which there are more that plenty.

A little moderation and self-control, okay? Do what you have to do, Joe. I'm with you.

Don Firth