"But at the same time insisting that the 'clones' cannot, for whatever reason, post anonymously."

I didn't say that. I said "I also see a serious problem with clones masquerading as guests to post personal attacks on forum users."

If the clones wish to post anonymously to participate in conversations, I have no problem with that whatsoever. What I am objecting to is a specific behavior of Joe and some clones, seen (as but one example) in the "Thread Proliferation Control" thread. Objections to Joe and clones personally attacking specific forum users, both members and guests, was commented upon by a couple of members and myself in that thread.

Here is the deal. I participate in a number of discussion groups. Forum admins and maintainers do sometimes participate in the conversations. But I have never seen forum admins and forum maintainers attacking forum users as I have here.

It seems to me that this place could take a few lessons from someone like Guy Libido, the moderator of the eFolkMusic.com forums. Which, BTW, doesn't require membership, and allows for anonymous posting too. Without any rancor, flaming, etc. I might add.

Flaming and insulting Mudcat forum users is a privlege afforded the Mudcat Royals, which includes Joe and the clones. My point is, what is good for the goose should also be good for the gander. Personal attacks by Joe and the clones shouldn't be tolerated any more than personal attacks by anyone should be tolerated.

Unfortunately, there is a culture of viciousness, that celebrates flaming particular marginalized posters in this place that is being fostered from the top down.