Dreaded Guest, here's where I'm having some problems with the particular conspiricy theories you subscribe to. I think some of the information you're getting is probaby correct, but some of the sites you're getting it from, that are drawing conclusions about that information, have agendas that are not in my interests.

This is what I think. I think that much of the information you put here in the Mudcat has at least some basis in fact. But I also think that the sites whose conclusions you adhere to are trying to make the UN look bad because it's good for their agendas and bad for the rest of us. That's my conspiricy theory.