kat: I read the article. It was about what I would expect from an organization whose soul purpose for existance is based on the prevention of war, regardless of the legitimacy of the war effort. It is a well written piece of propaganda in my opinion. You will note that their position paper is not confined to the health aspects but also contains several political jibes. If they wanted the paper to be taken seriously, they would have confined the report to health. That, supposedly, is their expertise.

Much is predicated in the report on the use of nuclear, biological and chemical weapons. Since Iraq has none of these, the meat of the whole report is suspect I believe. Saddam did swear that they had none, right?

Bobert: Rave on.

DougR