Beccy, I have some bad news for you.

I am not a liberal. You've learned Limbaugh's definition of a liberal. To "Rush" and apparantly to you it just a label, a perjoritive to be used in arguement. By calling me that you thoroughly prove my point. Which is that Limbaugh debases debate. He labels, stereotypes and insults. He is indoctrinating others.

The "opinion" on Estrada on Limbaugh's website is racist. Rush knows, and I'm sure that you know that the Democrats in the senate are not opposing him because of his race. The way he bring race into the arguement is gratuitous and devisive. Or is it just another example of his "humour".

Beccy, Listening to both sides of a debate so that you can pick hole in the "other" side is not being open minded. Labeling someone instead of talking about the merits of their agrument is not debate.

Having a "friend" who is a "liberal" doesn't mean a person isn't close minded any more than having black friend is proof that a man is not bigotted.

I didn't say this:
"The way you insist that half of his listening audience is racist and abusive to women?"
Neither did Nicole, you did. It is a common Limbaugh tactic. Say that your "oponent" said something outraegous and argue that instead of the point.

Can you prove this? It seems like one of the racist things that Limbaugh would say. Are these you words or his?
" but Miguel Estrada doesn't count, because a nifty special interest group deemed him "Not Hispanic enough.""