Guest Jon,

I think I mentioned in my post that the author did complain that the British Government did not accredit him - that was his beef. He also clearly stated that what he had written was accurate and relevant - which in your post, raising the subject, seemed to pour scorn on.

There is a tremendous difference between the standard of work one would expect from a student when compared to that of a post-graduate writing a thesis for a Doctorate.

The document prepared and presented to the British Government, contained only parts of the post-graduates work, it also contained passages from publications such a Jane's, that were relevant to the subject being presented - those parts of the document only provided back-ground information.