This is good. We're getting some intelligent, substantial discussion of the Constitution here, and some good points being raised, which is what I had hoped for.

Guest - Actually, I AM in favour of a law prosecuting drinking and driving, as well as being stoned and driving, or drinking/being stoned and handling a gun at the time or flying an airplane at the time.

Why? Because cars, guns, and airplanes (and other vehicles) are potentially lethal weapons that can VERY easily be mishandled under the influence of mind-altering substances. It's a special situation that demands a specific response.

I am NOT in favour of people being prosecuted for being under the influence of such substances under most circumstances, but when they're handling guns or heavy equipment, then YES I am.

I trust this answers your concern on that question.

In general, I see that the weakness of the Constitution is the same as the weakness of the Bible...it can be interpreted in various conflicting and even contradictory ways by people, according to what agenda they are pushing.

This is not surprising. It happens with virtually all hallowed documents.

- LH