Pretty sound analysis, LH. But as someone who is just reading this with some interest, I would like daylia to answer the questions so we can get to the meat of this thread. I am troubled lately by the gratuitous assertions that are continually made without the benefit of how folks arrived at the positions they espouse. Daylia jumps out with a thread that obviously wasn't thought out before she posted. I have seen her do it before, and when called on it she makes cute little patronizing comments, misdirects the conversation and then skips out. While I agree with your analysis about how this is going, it does not take away from the legitimate questions that were directed at daylia. She made the assertions, she should answer the questions with something more than a couple of cites. I understand where Ira is coming from...............I don't understand where daylia is coming from.

Mick