We know what the intention of the amendment was, I am just questioning if in law, the words used actually mean that. It is hardly wishful thinking either - for I rather hope that the words do reflect the intention.

I am looking for reason and logic and we are led to expect to find that in the legal profession. I am assuming that the draftspersons know the difference between the meaning of the words AND and OR and have used the words they have for a reason. Or have they cocked-up?