Matthew, you would never be vindictive or mean. You can disagree without calling names or insulting personally. This person couldn't and refused all steps toward reconciliation from the injured party.

Dick, I don't think it's actually censorship. We couldn't have a discussion without an evil influence imposing itself in the conversation. It wasn't what was said, it was how it was said. The ideas this person had would have been accepted, if disagreed with, if not for the hate and evil behind it. That's not censorship, that's removing an an nonproductive influence.

There was no love or respect there or even simple human dignity. I hate censorship as much as you, (read my post in the censorship thread) but enough is enough!

He's even making YOU think of leaving us. That's not a good thing.

Love (but not for that party), annap