The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #61322   Message #995814
Posted By: The Shambles
03-Aug-03 - 02:10 AM
Thread Name: Licensing Bill - How will it work ?
Subject: RE: Licensing Bill - How will it work ?
The following from Hamish Birchall

The Guardian has published a tirade against virtually all musicians who use amplification, including the statement 'I want to firebomb the Musicians' Union'. This is, apparently, for delaying the licensing Bill by a few days arguing for a fairer regime. Perhaps the author works for the DCMS Bill team, or could David Stubbs be a pseudonym for Kim Howells?

The Guardian's letter page email address is: letters@guardian.co.uk

~ ~ ~

Guardian, The Guide, p21, Sat 02 August 2003

David Stubbs is backing Blair all the way


On July 3, the House of Lords failed to block government moves to introduce a new law requiring pubs, clubs and cafes to apply for costly new licences if they wish to provide live entertainment. The measures will, reported The Guardian, "act as a deterrent to small venues wishing to host live groups". As organisations like the Musicians' Union protest, the dangers this new legislation proposes to curb, such as overcrowding and unruly behaviour, are already covered by existing law.

Loopholes allow for the exemption of, for example, morris dancers and pubs with widescreen TV - musicians who use amplified instruments are being scapegoated. These new laws are flawed, vindictive, inconsistent and I, along with every sane person I know back them to the hilt.

Let's be clear about who's hit hardest by this legislation - talentless, timewasting pub bands. Amateurs. White blues combos from Peterborough with podgy bassists, drowning the works of Howlin' Wolf in their own sweat and phlegm. Trad jazz bands, all beards and sandals, playing When The Saints Go Marching In (Yeah? Well, one more peep out of that clarinet and it'll be the police who go marching in, suckers). Bands with the word Rockin' in their names, who reduce rock to raucous, untreated sewage. Legions of uninspired, unashamed no-hopers who, even within a music industry benevolent enough to indulge The Thrills, can't get signed and resort to ruining the lives of innocent drinkers with their relentlessly, drearily competent bletherings. Bands who can't get arrested - well, they will be now, thank Christ.

No serious lover of music seeks out dingy old pubs with blackboards boasting LIVE ENTERTAINMENT TONIGHT, much as no serious lover of wine seeks out bottles with party balloons on their label. It could be argued that these excremental outfits constitute the manure from which the roses of tomorrow will bloom. Unlikely - most new talent is hatched in bedrooms on iMacs, not in back bars. Even if it were, however, better that this vast swill of pestilential conversation-drowners be suppressed and, though we be denied the new Coral, punters have their peace restored.

These bands are flogging the dead horsemeat of long-dead genres. Jazz. Blues (very dead). Rock (recently dead). So it's intensely galling that efforts to throw out this legislation has resulted in the delaying of the overall Licensing Bill, liberalising opening hours in line with civilisation as a whole, which would otherwise have been law by now. When I think of the convivial occasions I've recently enjoyed interrupted just as they were getting going by some aproned minion barking "Time, gentlemen!", of how such premature ejection is down to liberal hand-wringing over the rights of Bonnie Tyler-wannabes to inflict their renditions of I Will Always Love You on undeserving patrons, I want to firebomb the Musicians' Union. History may forgive you over Iraq, Mr Blair, but only because you've bequeathed us this wonderful legislation. Thank you, sir.

ENDS