|
|||||||
BS: 1984 was right, but not quite........... |
Share Thread
|
Subject: RE: BS: 1984 was right, but not quite........... From: Iains Date: 29 Oct 17 - 09:58 AM I think we are way past 1984. Here you can say what you like-so long as you toe the party line. The ministry of truth rules OK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Subject: RE: BS: 1984 was right, but not quite........... From: Greg F. Date: 29 Oct 17 - 09:13 AM I suppose "Artificial Intelligence" is better than "No Intelligence" Then why are you so fond of President Id-Baby? Poor, poor pitiful you. Now, back to the subject of the thread..... |
Subject: RE: BS: 1984 was right, but not quite........... From: Backwoodsman Date: 29 Oct 17 - 08:18 AM In short this section will die" Bring it on. |
Subject: RE: BS: 1984 was right, but not quite........... From: akenaton Date: 29 Oct 17 - 07:13 AM I wouldn't have expected you, Richard, to have any interest in the preservation of free speech. Your printed history here has been dedicated to the concealment of any societal problems. |
Subject: RE: BS: 1984 was right, but not quite........... From: Richard Bridge Date: 29 Oct 17 - 07:03 AM Aw diddums |
Subject: RE: BS: 1984 was right, but not quite........... From: Iains Date: 29 Oct 17 - 05:56 AM Mr Red. Your approach is not very sporting. You are supposed to play by their rules. A joker in the pack is a definite no-no! |
Subject: BS: 1984 was right, but not quite........... From: Mr Red Date: 29 Oct 17 - 05:18 AM like all predictions/warnings it never quite paints the right colours, the correct vista even though it looks in the right direction. In the Trump election I warned "Be afraid, America, be very afraid!" - not because I could see the future. But after the Arab Spring, Brexit, and all those ads that follow your recent surfing and some pretty extreme idiocy from a "friend" who posted the most egregious crap he obviously believed - I glimpsed the gears grinding. Call me paranoiac but this lady on TED.com explains it better, and at length. We're building an artificial intelligence-powered dystopia. It is why we are getting left-field political results. Because the movers understand Goggle and Fakebook better and use them better. It is also polarizing people. We are more than ever a divided society. And my chosen appellations for them are a heads up, not a whimsey. My solution? Not much of one, but intend to browse for the most uninteresting (to me) stuff. Give them algorithms some serious noise. |