BS: Republicans: What if Bush Loses?

Subject: RE: BS: Republicans: What if Bush Loses?
From: GUEST
Date: 24 Oct 04 - 05:22 PM

No of course I don't think that Jack. I just thought it would be interesting to discuss the NY Times articles. It changes the subject from the same old shit, to something more future oriented. Something different, less tiresome.

You seem to have a problem with that. What is it you want to discuss in this and the What if Kerry Loses thread instead, Jack? You seem to need to hijack the threads. So what is it you wish us to discuss instead?

Subject: RE: BS: Republicans: What if Bush Loses?
From: Jack the Sailor
Date: 24 Oct 04 - 05:19 PM

GUEST, your unfounded arrogance is very funny.

What I said on the other thread you started only more so. Do you think you have some exclusive franchise for cutting and pasting?

Subject: RE: BS: Republicans: What if Bush Loses?
From: Ron Davies
Date: 24 Oct 04 - 05:15 PM

This Republican will look forward to Kerry, who, in addition to being somebody other than the clueless yahoo who alleges to head the country, has some good ideas, and is both able and willing to think.

Subject: RE: BS: Republicans: What if Bush Loses?
From: GUEST
Date: 24 Oct 04 - 05:09 PM

Uh, Jack I think you're posting to the wrong thread. This thread isn't about the Rolling Stone interview with Kerry, it is about a NY Times article about the Republican party after the election.

Would you please try and keep on topic, and save the quote for the appropriate thread (ie the Rolling Stone interview thread)?

Thanks very much.

Subject: RE: BS: Republicans: What if Bush Loses?
From: Jack the Sailor
Date: 24 Oct 04 - 04:57 PM

"Rolling Stone" interviewer:

What do you think of Karl Rove? Is he an evil genius?

John Kerry:

I don't know him. I've met him once. I'll tell you November 3rd.

Subject: BS: Republicans: What if Bush Loses?
From: GUEST
Date: 24 Oct 04 - 04:43 PM

You must be a NY Times subscriber to read this article about what happens to the GOP if Bush loses, but here is an excerpt:

"For starters, Karl Rove, Mr. Bush's powerful political adviser, would no longer be called a boy genius, although party insiders insist there would be less blame of him and Mr. Bush than might be expected. Assuming that the party hangs on to the Senate, Bill Frist, the majority leader, would emerge as one of the most important Republicans in the country. So would Senator John McCain of Arizona, Mr. Bush's onetime nemesis. Paul Wolfowitz, the neo-conservative who urged the president into war with Iraq, would not."