|
|||||||
BS: Should Hussain stay |
Share Thread
|
Subject: RE: BS: Should Hussain stay From: Hrothgar Date: 25 May 04 - 07:53 AM Good boy that Jones. Played junior rugby for Eastern Districts in Brisbane. |
Subject: RE: BS: Should Hussain stay From: John MacKenzie Date: 25 May 04 - 06:37 AM I think if Nasser wants to go then let him, it is better to go at a time of his own choosing, than to be dropped after a run of poor performances. The boy done well, and if he goes now, he will be remembered with affection. JGM |
Subject: RE: BS: Should Hussain stay From: GUEST,Elfcall Date: 25 May 04 - 03:34 AM It is sad to note that Alf Valentine passed away within the last couple of weeks. Elfcall |
Subject: ADD: Victory Calypso (Egbert Moore/Lord Beginner) From: Gareth Date: 24 May 04 - 07:55 PM Hmmm ! Mentioned before, but here be the words. VICTORY CALYPSO - Egbert Moore ("Lord Beginner") Cricket lovely Cricket, At Lord's where I saw it; Cricket lovely Cricket, At Lord's where I saw it; Yardley tried his best But Goddard won the test. They gave the crowd plenty fun; Second Test and West Indies won. Chorus:With those two little pals of mine Ramadhin and Valentine. The King was there well attired, So they started with Rae and Stollmeyer; Stolly was hitting balls around the boundary; But Wardle stopped him at twenty. Rae had confidence, So he put up a strong defence; He saw the King was waiting to see, So he gave him a century. Chorus:With those two little pals of mine Ramadhin and Valentine. West Indies first innings total was three-twenty-six Just as usual When Bedser bowled Christiani The whole thing collapsed quite easily; England then went on, And made one-hundred-fifty-one; West Indies then had two-twenty lead And Goddard said, "That's nice indeed." Chorus:With those two little pals of mine Ramadhin and Valentine. Yardley wasn't broken-hearted When the second innings started; Jenkins was like a target Getting the first five in his basket. But Gomez broke him down, While Walcott licked them around; He was not out for one-hundred and sixty-eight, Leaving Yardley to contemplate. Chorus:The bowling was superfine Ramadhin and Valentine. West Indies was feeling homely, Their audience had them happy. When Washbrook's century had ended, West Indies voices all blended. Hats went in the air. They jumped and shouted without fear; So at Lord's was the scenery Bound to go down in history. Chorus:After all was said and done Second Test and the West Indies won! Gareth |
Subject: RE: BS: Should Hussain stay From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 24 May 04 - 03:47 PM Any cricket folk music? Yes. See this thread:Songs about the game of Cricket? |
Subject: RE: BS: Should Hussain stay From: Ed. Date: 24 May 04 - 02:43 PM Well Hussain has said that he might decide to retire now, which would solve the problem. Personally I hope that he doesn't. He batted really well today, and fielded brilliantly throughout the match. I can't agree with you about Thorpe being the only world-class batsman we have, Peter K. Michael Vaughan was the number one batsman in the world - according to the PriceWaterhouseCoopers rankings published on 13th April 2003. His batting average was 50.93. Not too shoddy... I'm unsure on the Read/Jones arguement. Jones is certainly a much classier batsman, but he's a messy keeper. Certainly his batting more than compensates for a few byes, but if he drops people who then score a hundred it will be a different matter. Anyway, these are nicer 'problems' than the English team has had in a good while! |
Subject: RE: BS: Should Hussain stay From: Peter K (Fionn) Date: 24 May 04 - 01:20 PM Thorpe certainly should stay around as long as possible, as he's the only batsman England have who is - or has been - worldclass, and younger players can learn from him. No chance of Hussain being dropped either, now, but he'll still have to do OK in the next test to hang in for the third. So... it looks like Butcher for the chop. If England had a Jim Laker or Derek Underwood in the team, I'd go for Read as wicketkeeper because he's far better at that than Jones, and would feature in more dismissals. As things stand, I'd stay with Jones. Jones no doubt conceded more extras than Read would have done, but the difference in their batting more than compensates. |
Subject: RE: BS: Should Hussain stay From: GUEST Date: 24 May 04 - 12:41 PM You mean you've never heard those friends of mine - Ramadhin and Valentine, Amos... A cricket calypso! |
Subject: RE: BS: Should Hussain stay From: Raedwulf Date: 24 May 04 - 12:38 PM 1) Jones is a much better batsman than Read. Read *might* be a better keeper, but the difference is not enough to warrant change at Test level. Your keeper needs to be able to do both jobs. Jones can, Read is only barely a Test batsman. 2) There is a strong case for dropping both Hussain & Thorpe. Both are ageing. Neither contributed much in the first innings against NZ. If Strauss proves that this match wasn't a fluke, the argument becomes more compelling. Keep H & T for the next test, perhaps, but if the top order keeps producing runs, look at the middle order batsmen & ask for how much longer they can fulfill the team's needs... 3) As to Vaughn, I've no idea, whichever question you're asking! R |
Subject: RE: BS: Should Hussain stay From: Amos Date: 24 May 04 - 12:26 PM Wandered in from some other site, did we? Any cricket folk music? A |
Subject: RE: BS: Should Hussain stay From: Ellenpoly Date: 24 May 04 - 12:25 PM Oh dear. Cricket. |
Subject: BS: Should Hussain stay From: muppett Date: 24 May 04 - 12:00 PM So Hussain & Thorpe have almost guided England to anothe win but, 1)should Hussian stop in the team. 2)who are they going to drop to let Vaughn back in. 3) Should Vaughn drop down the batting order 4) Should Jones be keeping wicket instead of Reid. What do the catters think. |