BS: Mudelfs editing again

Subject: BS: Mudelfs editing again
From: beardedbruce
Date: 28 Apr 12 - 05:01 PM

No idea why MY post was removed, and then the thread was closed. It looks like Greg F has a mudelf in his pockets.

Subject: RE: BS: Mudelfs editing again
From: beardedbruce
Date: 28 Apr 12 - 05:07 PM

Excuse me. It looks like Richard Bridges owns the mudelf.

Subject: RE: BS: Mudelfs editing again
From: Joe Offer
Date: 28 Apr 12 - 05:21 PM

Bruce, are you still obsessing about that October post from Greg F? This is April now, Bruce. Don't you think maybe the moderators are tired of you fighting the same fight over and over again, in one thread after another?

Gee, I'm glad I don't do "disciplinary" moderation any more. It's far more fun watching and not having to do anything about it.

Calm down, Bruce. You'll give yourself an ulcer, or you'll make people think you're crazy and they'll take you away, or something.

Life is good. Enjoy it.

-Joe-

Subject: RE: BS: Mudelfs editing again
From: beardedbruce
Date: 28 Apr 12 - 05:47 PM

This is about the mudelfs acting to take sides, when I point out the RB has NOT presented the quote in context and is lying.

MY post ( that gnu refers to) was deleted, the the thread closed AFTER RB repeated his effective lie of an out of context quote.

THE ONLY REASN to have removed my post would have been to let RB lies stand, and the only reason to close the thread would be to make it seem like he was telling the truth, WHEN HE WAS NOT.


If this is how fairness is determined here, I fail to see any reason to even pretend to have discussions- Just have the mudelfs tell us what we are supposed to say and support, and stop playing that anything other than the "party line" will be allowed.

---

This is why your remark was deleted and the thread closed:

I read it Ricky... yer guilty as charged. In your own words. Denying it and not apologizing for it just makes you look like a Richard.. er, Dick. Yeah, that's it... a big Dick.

[snip]
. . . If you, and YOU know who you are, ever do that again, I will fuck you over in any way that I can you ignorant piece of shit. The least you could do is become a member you fucking coward."

Name calling and physical threats are not called for. They were deleted. Due to general sense of snotty behavior going on the entire thread was closed rather than wasting time going back and cutting out more remarks. --mudelf

---

If you have a problem, take it up with Max. It's nearly impossible to delete all the nasty messages when the whole thread turns nasty. Bruce, there's a reason you get deleted and threads you (and some others) are in routinely get closed. If it's "taking sides", it's taking the side that people should try to be civil to one another. Those who don't have no right to complain. -Mod