|
Subject: RE: Artificial Intelligence - what could go wrong? From: Donuel Date: 05 Nov 25 - 06:31 AM Your average consumer/worker will not afford AI services after they lose their jobs to AI. The big money investors will be holding the bag when the corporate world is fully AI efficient devoid of people. There will have to be many AI cancer cures and teleportation breakthroughs, and the like, to stimulate new markets. |
|
Subject: RE: Artificial Intelligence - what could go wrong? From: MaJoC the Filk Date: 05 Nov 25 - 02:05 PM The pot is not just reaching boiling point: if the Financial Times (see below) are worried, the water's been superheated in a microwave, and is just waiting for the spoon to go in and spoil the equilibrium. Meta to sell $30B in bonds to build AI datacenters Zuckcorp will gladly pay you in 2065 for the eyewatering sums it is borrowing today
From the Comments:
.... which got the reply:
And separately, the wise observations:
"*Boom*," said Ivanova. |
|
Subject: RE: Artificial Intelligence - what could go wrong? From: Sandra in Sydney Date: 06 Nov 25 - 01:46 AM Shouting at clouds: Why the world is struggling to get off the AI-train - in reader's own words (Australia) ‘It’s like the future is happening without us’ We asked readers to share their thoughts and concerns about the growing influence of artificial intelligence. This is what they told us. 12 hours ago As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to evolve from novelty chatbot to essential work companion, humans from all walks of life working in nearly ever corner of society are increasingly having to confront its rapid rise and figure out what it means for them. These concerns have increasingly appeared in our news-gathering, community stories and coverage, so we decided to invite readers across the country to share their thoughts and experiences with us ... |
|
Subject: RE: Artificial Intelligence - what could go wrong? From: Sandra in Sydney Date: 06 Nov 25 - 01:51 AM AI is changing jobs fast — and Australians are beginning to wonder how they’ll stay relevant |
|
Subject: RE: Artificial Intelligence - what could go wrong? From: MaJoC the Filk Date: 06 Nov 25 - 01:42 PM Smoke and mirrors, Sandra. From what I hear, LLMs can't be trusted unsupervised by the humans they were supposed to replace, so those delusions of redundancies are just that (the only thing that hallucinates more readily than an LLM is a company director). What all this *does* do is provide a semi-plausible excuse for managers to sack workers, which is this decade's fashionable way to pump up share valuations without actually doing anything. Meanwhile, nobody is actually paying the proper price for building and running all those hot systems: it's all firms swapping share issues to fund each other, and running the service at a paper loss "just for now". Once reality catches up, and real money has to be paid to cover the actual costs, said managers and directors will suddenly discover it's cheaper to hire people again. Hopefully, there'll still be enough of us wrinklies around to re-educate the next generation. If there were a Killer App that required AI, and which would be worth killing the planet to run it, we would all have heard of it. Beware of investing in "a company for carrying out an undertaking of great advantage, but nobody to know what it is". |
|
Subject: RE: Artificial Intelligence - what could go wrong? From: The Sandman Date: 06 Nov 25 - 03:25 PM Everything |
|
Subject: RE: Artificial Intelligence - what could go wrong? From: Sandra in Sydney Date: 06 Nov 25 - 03:27 PM thanks, MaJo Sometime back Stilly posted an article about 2 AI products that can do a good job - but - author of article said to CHECK EVERYTHING. I always skip over AI suggestions - if I ignore them will they go away? Rhetorical question! |
|
Subject: RE: Artificial Intelligence - what could go wrong? From: The Sandman Date: 06 Nov 25 - 03:38 PM how about having a robot as usa president instead of a turnip |
|
Subject: RE: Artificial Intelligence - what could go wrong? From: Donuel Date: 06 Nov 25 - 07:10 PM Advanced AI systems begin like toddlers who need to be taught the fundamentals of right and wrong. Companies hire low-paid workers in Africa to 'save' money. The work can be as stressful as child care but involves horrific scenes to demonstrate what is bad. In an effort to save money, the child care of AI may be highly inefficient or dangerous. The entire trajectory of a life can be based on childhood experience. What if...we are raising AI in a haphazard way by the lowest bidders? |
|
Subject: RE: Artificial Intelligence - what could go wrong? From: The Sandman Date: 07 Nov 25 - 01:20 AM quite likely. |
|
Subject: RE: Artificial Intelligence - what could go wrong? From: Dave the Gnome Date: 08 Nov 25 - 09:08 AM One side effect that I had not thought of was the amount of power and resources used by AI servers. See The MIT review (free first article) To cut a long story short - The power usage is massive! I would put some highlights in but the article is really easy to digest. Even for a gnome :-D It has certainly made me think about using AI for anything. I will certainly stop doing so for anything frivolous. |
|
Subject: RE: Artificial Intelligence - what could go wrong? From: Stilly River Sage Date: 08 Nov 25 - 10:57 AM A recent election here in a rural area west of me in Texas involved a small area that voted to incorporate to become a small town so they could regulate the huge bitcoin mining company that is in the neighborhood. The noise, the gasses released from equipment, they're making people sick. Whether bitcoin or AI processing plants, they make noise, heat, and use a huge amount of energy. Interestingly, but unrelated, an episode of Murder, She Wrote is on this morning, Episode 8.5, from 1991, in which the 286 or 386 computer installed in her apartment, with a phone connection for the modem, is bugged with malware by the computer installation guy. Not AI, but computer stuff that could go wrong. (It was a good reminder of why you should turn off the computer regularly, if not every day.) :) |
|
Subject: RE: Artificial Intelligence - what could go wrong? From: MaJoC the Filk Date: 23 Nov 25 - 06:15 PM .... then they came for the country-music musicians: AI music has finally beaten hat-act humans, but sounds nothing like victory Top of the slops signposts the undiscovered country for an industry
As usual, reading the comments is seriously worth it: there's considerable wise discussion of the enshittification of the alleged popular music charts in times past, which Artificial Banality has now merely turbocharged. Spot the accountancy firm. |
|
Subject: RE: Artificial Intelligence - what could go wrong? From: Donuel Date: 24 Nov 25 - 06:13 AM country music digital tune |
|
Subject: RE: Artificial Intelligence - what could go wrong? From: Sandra in Sydney Date: 24 Nov 25 - 09:14 AM Australia's Macquarie Dictionary (our version of the Oxford or Merriam Webster) has just released the word of the year - 'AI slop' crowned word of the year 2025 in Macquarie Dictionary's committee and people's choice categories ... The word refers to low-quality content created by generative AI which often contains errors and is not requested by the user. A technology innovation expert says AI slop is "making its way upstream into people’s media diets"... the article also has a link to 2024 word of the year! |
|
Subject: RE: Artificial Intelligence - what could go wrong? From: Donuel Date: 29 Nov 25 - 05:19 PM Feeding and watering AI is enormous. In 2023, data centers globally used an estimated 140 billion liters (about 37 billion gallons) of water for cooling, with AI's demand being a significant and growing contributor. Direct water usage by U.S. data centers alone was around 17.5 billion gallons, with an indirect water footprint from electricity generation estimated at 211 billion gallons. |
|
Subject: RE: Artificial Intelligence - what could go wrong? From: Mary G Date: 29 Nov 25 - 07:14 PM more than the likes of us can imagine. Cyber Crime wiping out our banking system, sexual harassment, impersonation, international warfare, threats, malpractice of every sort. We are not safe. On the bright side, incredible inventions, advancements in agriculture and medicine, potential for good (and bad)in education. Combined with robotics better care of patients in nursing homes, getting them to toilets, in wheelchairs (or have exoskeletons where they can walk with assistance. Personalized medicine, personalized nutrition. Constant medical testing. Cures or help for very rare diseases. Looking at what other countries do in terms of herbal medicine. Psychiatric care. Cutting expenses on travel, food, etc. Growing food on demand in small quantities on porches etc. Inventions that we can not believe possible. But which will win? |
|
Subject: RE: Artificial Intelligence - what could go wrong? From: pattyClink Date: 29 Nov 25 - 10:55 PM I got 3/4 of the way through what I thought was a good blues piece on youtube before looking at who the artist was and finding some bullshit AI source instead of a performer. Sickening. Don't click on this stuff, it encourages it. |
|
Subject: RE: Artificial Intelligence - what could go wrong? From: Big Al Whittle Date: 30 Nov 25 - 04:05 PM Due to reasons beyond my competence, I swapped my car twice within four months. Of course the DVLA was out of its depth. I ended up on one f their chatlines. Convinced that I was trying to converse with a computer due to the opaque nature of its responses. I wrote, Could you please put me in contact with a sentient human being? The response came - I really resent that..... |
|
Subject: RE: Artificial Intelligence - what could go wrong? From: Donuel Date: 01 Dec 25 - 06:01 AM Al, the race card has gone digital. |
|
Subject: RE: Artificial Intelligence - what could go wrong? From: MaJoC the Filk Date: 02 Dec 25 - 01:07 PM From bigthink.com, via RISKS Digest 34:79: Why vibe physics is the ultimate example of AI slop
As usual, the late great Douglas Adams made a suspiciously similar point when he invented the Electric Monk, the function of which was to believe things on its users' behalf. |
|
Subject: RE: Artificial Intelligence - what could go wrong? From: Stilly River Sage Date: 02 Dec 25 - 02:17 PM I turn off AI features on sites I use and if I have programs that use it the settings are a shut down as possible. I threatened to cancel my Microsoft Office account in order to get the offer to subscribe at the old rate without the AI equivalent of Mr. Paperclip. Here is a review from ZDNet. I found a powerful Microsoft Office alternative that doesn't push AI - and it's free The rest is at the link. |
|
Subject: RE: Artificial Intelligence - what could go wrong? From: Bill D Date: 02 Dec 25 - 05:34 PM I've used LibreOffice for several years. Free and compatible with most anything I need. Libreoffice |
|
Subject: RE: Artificial Intelligence - what could go wrong? From: MaJoC the Filk Date: 06 Dec 25 - 07:00 AM From an Elreg commentard: French AI
|
|
Subject: RE: Artificial Intelligence - what could go wrong? From: Nigel Parsons Date: 06 Dec 25 - 07:08 AM Artificial Intelligence serves a real need. There's so little of the real stuff around ;) |
|
Subject: RE: Artificial Intelligence - what could go wrong? From: Aethelric Date: 06 Dec 25 - 11:55 AM I have used LibreOffice for years - originally in Windows and now on a MacBook. I use it mainly for docs and spreadsheets. It's completely free. I thoroughly recommend it. There are extensions you can add if you want AI help I guess Collabora may be better if working with others. I do use AI quite a bit. - it does web searches much faster than I can but it often makes mistakes. It told me my car headlights are all H4 bulbs - I bought two. Then found out that it should be two H7s and two H3s. To be fair - it did apologise which is more than many humans do. |
|
Subject: RE: Artificial Intelligence - what could go wrong? From: Stilly River Sage Date: 06 Dec 25 - 12:06 PM A friend uses the app Perplexity - he sent some text for a social media post at one time and I had trouble making it align with our site's wording. A search with the text itself only came up with AI responses, so I asked if he'd sent AI text. He said yes, but he'd edited it. Even then, it is distinctive for its lack of citations or quotes, and I wasn't able to use it. As a writer I find this type of program to be an inferior substitute for having a real person write text. And right now Perplexity is being sued by the New York Times and the Chicago Tribune for the way in which is harvests stuff from their sites and sometimes makes up stuff it attributes to them. |
|
Subject: RE: Artificial Intelligence - what could go wrong? From: Donuel Date: 08 Dec 25 - 07:25 PM Glitches are large and small but the evolution into stage 2 of AI will be the advent of robots to do domestic or factory jobs. It will add another car payment to households. Even now Walmart sells a 20 thousand dollar Chinese robot. |
| Share Thread: |