Music & the brain
Subject: Music & the brain|
From: Desert Dancer
Date: 26 Oct 07 - 05:55 PM
Sorry for the length, but I thought it would be of interest, and soon only accessible by a few via any web link. From the science journal, Nature.
~ Becky in Tucson
Nature 449, 977-978 (25 October 2007) | doi:10.1038/449977a; Published online 24 October 2007
Harmony of the hemispheres
Our brains seem to be finely tuned to music, but of what use are our musical powers and passions?
BOOK REVIEWED-Musicophilia: Tales of Music and the Brain
by Oliver Sacks
Knopf/Picador: 2007. 400 pp. $26/£17.99
Harmony of the hemispheres
Think of a favourite piece of music — a pop song or classical piece that you've heard hundreds of times. Think about how it starts. When you can hear the tune in your head, sing, hum or whistle it (unless you're in a library, in which case you might want to try this later). According to experiments done by Daniel Levitin and Perry Cook in the early 1990s, even if you have had no musical training, your rendition of the tune will probably be very close to the original in tempo, and — perhaps more surprisingly — also quite accurate in absolute pitch.
Why should our brains be able to perform such a feat? Of what use are our musical powers and passions? And what can they tell us about how the brain works, or how — sometimes spectacularly — it doesn't?
Oliver Sacks, continuing in the tradition of The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat and An Anthropologist on Mars, addresses these questions by offering a collection of 'tales' in Musicophilia, illustrating yet more ways in which our brains can take us by surprise. In This is Your Brain on Music, Daniel Levitin presents a more systematic account of what cognitive neuroscience has to say about how we process and respond to music. Both authors make the case that music stimulates our nervous systems in unique ways, which account for its special role in our lives, and in those of our ancestors.
Sacks is the consummate storyteller, and his extensive network of patients, friends and correspondents — supplemented by a magpie-like erudition — keeps him well supplied with raw material. A man is struck by lightning and develops an irresistible desire to play the piano. A woman suffers seizures brought on by listening to Neapolitan songs. A man who cannot dress himself or remember what he did for a living still knows the baritone parts of hundreds of songs, performs successfully in public, and seems to recover his essential 'self' while he is singing.
In all, Sacks recounts the experiences of more than a hundred individuals, interlarding their stories with discussions of the likely neural underpinnings of the described behaviours. In a chapter on musical hallucinations, Sacks tells several hair-raising stories of frighteningly loud, incessant 'jukeboxes' playing in people's brains, and observes that these hallucinations are often 'release phenomena', brought on by a deficit of input to the auditory cortex as a result of hearing impairment, brain damage, the effects of drugs, or even a prolonged period in quiet surroundings. The idea — first suggested by Jerzy Konorski in 1967, and now supported by brain-imaging studies — is that hallucinations are generated by the activation of 'retro' connections from the brain to the sense organs. This process is normally inhibited by the presence of external sensory input.
This view of the brain as a dynamic system, finely balanced between inhibition and excitation, returns throughout the book. Musical or other artistic talents, facilitated by activity in the brain's right hemisphere, may suddenly emerge after damage to parts of the left hemisphere that normally suppress right-hemisphere functions, as happens in certain types of dementia. The potential for cross-inhibition between hemispheres — and the ability of regions of the right hemisphere to take over language functions — also seems to explain why music therapy helps patients who have lost the ability to speak.
Many of Sacks's stories portray the striking independence of different cognitive abilities. We know of people who are tone-deaf; others may be 'rhythm-deaf', or have 'dysharmonia' — the inability to sense the harmonies created by multiple voices or instruments. After suffering brain damage in a car accident, a musician became unable to hear a string quartet as anything but separate voices: "Four thin, sharp laser beams, beaming to four different directions." Perhaps the most distressing syndrome is 'dystimbria', in which musical tones are perceived as unpleasant noises, akin to banging pots and pans or the screeching of a car. Incredibly, Sacks experienced two episodes of temporary dystimbria, during which piano music sounded like "toneless banging with an unpleasant metallic reverberation".
Of course, music speaks to our emotions as well as our intellect, and Sacks presents evidence that the emotional response has its own network in the brain. He also reminds us that music engages our motor circuits (think of foot-tapping and dancing) — a phenomenon that underlies the use of music therapy to 'unlock' patients who have been immobilized by Parkinson's disease.
Sacks's great gift — as a physician as well as a writer — is to see the whole person, rather than just the brain or the disease. He certainly avoids the danger he identifies in his preface: that, as new technologies allow us to examine the brain in ever-greater detail, "the simple art of observation may be lost ... clinical description may become perfunctory, and the richness of the human context ignored". Amidst the wealth of wonderful observations and the superabundance of humanity, another danger lurks: that the general reader who was hoping for a clear picture of what we know about the neuroscience of music may come away wanting more.
BOOK REVIEWED-This is Your Brain on Music: Understanding a Human Obsession
by Daniel Levitin
Atlantic: 2007. 320 pp. £17.99
Help is at hand, in the shape of Levitin's very different but equally enlightening book. Levitin is ideally placed to write about music and the brain, having been a professional musician, sound engineer and record producer before embarking on a career as an academic neuroscientist. He starts with the basics: the physics and neuropsychology of pitch, timbre, rhythm, loudness and harmony. He then discusses the importance of processes such as perceptual completion ('filling in'), feature extraction and feature integration, and describes where they take place in the brain. The comprehensive bibliographic notes provide easy access to the relevant technical literature.
Levitin is just as interested as Sacks in the emotional power of music, but where Sacks tells us of unfortunate individuals who have lost the ability to be moved by music, Levitin offers a mechanistic explanation for its effects. "Music communicates to us emotionally," he says, "through systematic violations of expectations." He also presents evidence for the neural circuit that mediates the emotional response, which involves the cerebellum (the brain region that 'notices' deviations from the expected timing), the mesolimbic system (known to be involved in pleasure, reward and addiction), and the release of dopamine by the nucleus accumbens. A separate circuit involving the auditory cortex looks after our intellectual response, the perception of structure and form.
Can the emotional effect of music really be summed up as the violation of expectations? When I'm listening to something as gut-wrenching as the final movement of Tchaikovsky's sixth symphony, it certainly doesn't feel that way. But Levitin makes a persuasive case that memory, anticipation and surprise are fundamental to our enjoyment of music.
Levitin writes clearly and entertainingly, and has a real flair for analogy. His dual background adds to the fun. In one chapter we find him at lunch with Francis Crick, discussing the cerebellum; in the next, he's at dinner with Joni Mitchell, figuring out why her harmonies sound like no one else's (and why the bass player Jaco Pastorius was essential to her sound).
Both Levitin and Sacks are struck by the ubiquity of music across cultures and times, and by the observation that our brains seem to be, in Sacks's words, "exquisitely tuned for music". They vigorously rebut Steven Pinker's view of music as "useless", with no adaptive value, by asserting its importance in courtship, social cohesion, cognitive development and recall, and in simply making life more bearable. What tipped the balance for me, though, was learning from Sacks that, having no accurate timepieces available, Galileo timed his experiments on the descent of objects by humming tunes to himself. What could be more useful?
1. Laura Garwin is a postgraduate trumpet student at the Royal College of Music in London. She is a former North American editor of Nature and former executive director of the Harvard Bauer Center for Genomics Research.
Subject: RE: Music & the brain|
From: McGrath of Harlow
Date: 26 Oct 07 - 06:09 PM
Thanks for that - especially for drawing my attention to Oliver Sacks' new book. Definitely one for Christmas - even though it's not published over here just yet.
Subject: RE: Music & the brain|
From: Canberra Chris
Date: 26 Oct 07 - 07:43 PM
Thanks also from me, I am fascinated by this topic too.
One little cross-species anecdote. I have a cat who had particular musical tastes. Basically she like plucked or struck strings - harp, guitar, even piano, but dislked bowed strings and wind. We had to come to an arrangement about my taste for Irish pipes.
She could handle recorded singing, but hated with a passion hearing me sing in the house. Now there is of course an obvious possible explanation for this - the quality of my singing! Could I have made a living ridding peoples' houses of rats and cockroaches too? But other Mudcatters can attest I hope that this is unlikely.
One time I had a friend in singing duets, and the cat stalked off into the next room. A bit later we decided to try the acoustics in tghat room. Instead of moving on again, the cat came and sat right in front of us and fixed us with a pained, malevolent glare. Aftger two verses and a chorus, we just could not continue singing in front of her, and went back to the other room. But being as sharp as a tack, instead of remaining mistress of the field of battle, she followed us and did it again, having discovered how to stop us.
I had to do some lateral thinking after this, and realised that singing is one activity on which I tend to focus to the exclusion of all else. The cat being a highly interactive long-term female companion, who thought she was my wife, daughter, nanny, life-coach, gate-keeper and personal secretary, maybe she was offended at being completely ignored at these times. So I decided to try singing to her, or even better, about her. Well my, my, she lapped it up like milk, and even let me do some other singing sometimes too.
Not sure if that is a story about music, cats or female company, but the working of the brain seems to come into it somewhere.
Love the name - I have danced in a few deserts myself.
Subject: RE: Music & the brain|
From: McGrath of Harlow
Date: 26 Oct 07 - 08:05 PM
I strongly suspect that our pre-human ancestors were singing apes, and that the singing was a key element in developing spoken language.
Subject: RE: Music & the brain|
Date: 26 Oct 07 - 11:31 PM
This is also a topic of interest to me. One of my degrees is in Linguistics and how we processlanguage and music fascinates me.
As some of you know, I suffer from severe chronic pain issues - so severe that at times, I am unable to sleep for more than 15 minutes for days on end. It really addles your mind. Luckily for me, one of my best pals from Graduate school was a biologist with a specific interest in the brain. He gave me some fascinating tips on how to use music and the way the brain processes it, files it away and recalls it to combat both pain and insomnia. It's not all that different from Biofeedback.
Anyway - he told me to pick a few pieces of music, preferably ones without words, that I really loved, knew by heart and could "play" from start to finish in my mind. I chose a choral piece of course but it worked and then I added a few more pieces over time that didn't have voices.
It seems that when we play a piece of music we know by heart, we are calling up a file like a computer. We can access it in a passive way by starting a recording, closing our eyes and then just letting the music play. It lowers your heart rate, your respiration, your blood pressure and sets you into a state where your brain is on a certain pattern (alphawaves I think) that makes you relaxed , almost like sleeping. If you practice, you can access the "file" without the recording and just sit there, letting it "play" in your brain from start to finish.
The benefit of doing this is that you can lower your reaction to the pain signals and eventually, begin producing endorphins to combat them. When I do this, people will assume I am alseep but I'm not, and I can hear them talking - I'm just in a state where I am so relaxed it takes me some time to come up from theat state to respond to them. It's like Meditating I suppose.
Learning to do this, call up a music "File" in your head can really help with panic, pain and relaxation. If I ever get all batty from severe insomnia, I do have to actually play the music to help me sink back into that state. I try and keep separate musical pieces for relaxtion, for pain and for helping me deal with insomnia.
The thing is, you can't just listen to any music - it needs to be music you know every well. YOu can choose a piece of new music, play it over and over and become so familiar with it that you can call it up without the recording. Trying to use new music defeats the exercise because it requires a type of attention from your brain that is active rather than passive.
Well - I've gone on about this enough. I have some Roger Eno selections I use for Pain control that really are lovely instrumentals to begin with but I've grown to truly love them for the way the help me deal with pain. I don't like to ever be without a cassette or CD of them when traveling.