Lyrics & Knowledge Personal Pages Record Shop Auction Links Radio & Media Kids Membership Help
The Mudcat Cafesj

Post to this Thread - Printer Friendly - Home
Page: [1] [2]


BS: Obama Swiftboated

Little Hawk 21 Feb 08 - 10:32 PM
Cluin 21 Feb 08 - 10:16 PM
Amos 21 Feb 08 - 10:14 PM
Little Hawk 21 Feb 08 - 10:00 PM
Cluin 21 Feb 08 - 09:11 PM
GUEST,Guest 21 Feb 08 - 09:04 PM
Amos 21 Feb 08 - 04:42 PM
Riginslinger 21 Feb 08 - 04:13 PM
Little Hawk 21 Feb 08 - 04:10 PM
Amos 21 Feb 08 - 04:04 PM
artbrooks 21 Feb 08 - 03:16 PM
Riginslinger 21 Feb 08 - 02:52 PM
Don Firth 21 Feb 08 - 02:37 PM
Little Hawk 21 Feb 08 - 12:44 PM
Riginslinger 21 Feb 08 - 12:39 PM
Little Hawk 21 Feb 08 - 12:36 PM
Riginslinger 21 Feb 08 - 10:34 AM
Greg F. 21 Feb 08 - 10:08 AM
Riginslinger 20 Feb 08 - 04:42 PM
Little Hawk 20 Feb 08 - 02:59 PM
GUEST,geminess 20 Feb 08 - 02:38 PM
Amos 20 Feb 08 - 02:37 AM
Little Hawk 20 Feb 08 - 02:19 AM
Amos 19 Feb 08 - 11:21 PM
Big Mick 19 Feb 08 - 11:09 PM
Little Hawk 19 Feb 08 - 10:39 PM
GUEST,TIA 19 Feb 08 - 10:35 PM
GUEST,Guest 19 Feb 08 - 07:50 PM
Ebbie 19 Feb 08 - 07:40 PM
GUEST,Guest 19 Feb 08 - 07:04 PM
artbrooks 19 Feb 08 - 05:34 PM
Charley Noble 19 Feb 08 - 04:03 PM
Ebbie 19 Feb 08 - 03:30 PM
Big Mick 19 Feb 08 - 03:01 PM
Amos 19 Feb 08 - 02:42 PM
Big Mick 19 Feb 08 - 02:39 PM
Amos 19 Feb 08 - 02:34 PM
CarolC 19 Feb 08 - 02:16 PM
gnu 19 Feb 08 - 02:12 PM
Little Hawk 19 Feb 08 - 02:02 PM
freightdawg 19 Feb 08 - 01:59 PM
Little Hawk 19 Feb 08 - 11:44 AM
Barry Finn 19 Feb 08 - 11:18 AM
Amos 19 Feb 08 - 09:26 AM
Bee-dubya-ell 19 Feb 08 - 09:02 AM
CarolC 19 Feb 08 - 01:26 AM
Little Hawk 19 Feb 08 - 12:51 AM
freightdawg 18 Feb 08 - 11:18 PM
wysiwyg 18 Feb 08 - 10:57 PM
Ebbie 18 Feb 08 - 08:24 PM

Share Thread
more
Lyrics & Knowledge Search [Advanced]
DT  Forum
Sort (Forum) by:relevance date
DT Lyrics:













Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Little Hawk
Date: 21 Feb 08 - 10:32 PM

I think that Richard Nixon would kind of fit that type.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Cluin
Date: 21 Feb 08 - 10:16 PM

And some are masochistic.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Amos
Date: 21 Feb 08 - 10:14 PM

It's an honorable thing, in some cases -- some people have a sens eof duty, some have a strong hope to make things different and better. Others just want power.

A


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Little Hawk
Date: 21 Feb 08 - 10:00 PM

Or tremendously ambitious (it runs in certain families). Or filled with a quixotic desire to "change things".

Someone's got to do it and certain people are born to take on those sorts of challenges.

I mean, look, you'd have to be crazy or stupid to be a prizefighter too, I think, but there's always someone out there who'll do it.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Cluin
Date: 21 Feb 08 - 09:11 PM

You'd have to be either crazy or incredibly stupid to want to be president.


Explains a lot, actually.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: GUEST,Guest
Date: 21 Feb 08 - 09:04 PM

"This story seems to have been circulating for about a month."

Well, now the MSM is too busy chasing the McCain and that slut story.

Sounds like the Rove/Limbaugh wing of the Republican party is hard at work.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Amos
Date: 21 Feb 08 - 04:42 PM

She'd probably get a bad case of epileptic seizures from trying, but I would enjoy watching the effort.


A


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Riginslinger
Date: 21 Feb 08 - 04:13 PM

Well, in Ann Coulter was going to hold her tongue, she'd have to hang on with both hands.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Little Hawk
Date: 21 Feb 08 - 04:10 PM

LOL!!! Geez, you gotta tell that to some of the Muslim women I know in Ontario...a feisty and independent lot, and in general they can talk the paint off a post, given half the chance.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Amos
Date: 21 Feb 08 - 04:04 PM

Well, Muslim women are also supposed to hold their tongues. Can we get both?



A


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: artbrooks
Date: 21 Feb 08 - 03:16 PM

But she'd look so much better that way!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Riginslinger
Date: 21 Feb 08 - 02:52 PM

But if you tried to put a burka on Ann Coulter, it'd get all torn up on the sharp, bony angles.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Don Firth
Date: 21 Feb 08 - 02:37 PM

Which is what Ann Coulter wanted Bush to do!

Don Firth


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Little Hawk
Date: 21 Feb 08 - 12:44 PM

I can just see the new USA Islamic order trying to get all the Americans to get down on their knees 3 times a day and pray to Mecca....stop eating pork...put burkas on the women and cover their heads with scarves....change all the churches into mosques....replace all the Bibles with fresh new copies of the Koran...

LOL!!!!!!!!!! Talk about the world's most unlikely scenario. About as unlikely as the Southern Baptists taking over Saudi Arabia in a bloodless coup and putting Billy Graham in charge.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Riginslinger
Date: 21 Feb 08 - 12:39 PM

Yeah, the caller didn't project any long range plans of any kind, just the bloodless coup...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Little Hawk
Date: 21 Feb 08 - 12:36 PM

LOL!!! And then what? God, the state of fantasy some people live in....


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Riginslinger
Date: 21 Feb 08 - 10:34 AM

Back to Obama being swiftboated, this morning a lady called in on Washington Journal to announce that Muslim operatives have taken control of the elctronic voting machines, and they are in the process of getting Obama elected. In which case, he could simply surrender, and the US would be theirs.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Greg F.
Date: 21 Feb 08 - 10:08 AM

...the alacrity with which some people uncritically bought the line.

The real problems are those people that STILL buy the line, despite the conclusive proof to the contrary. There's a disgrcefully large number of 'em.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Riginslinger
Date: 20 Feb 08 - 04:42 PM

Frankly, I don't see anything in Paul personally, or anything that he's done or said, that would encourage those kinds of folks.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Little Hawk
Date: 20 Feb 08 - 02:59 PM

What a shame that the only Republican candidate who is honest about US foreign policy should have white supremacists among his supporters. Well, I guess you can't necessarily control what all your supporters happen to believe in, can you?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: GUEST,geminess
Date: 20 Feb 08 - 02:38 PM

This story seems to have been circulating for about a month. The MSm won't touch it. There is reason to believe that Ron Paul supporters (not the Paul camp) have made an orchestrated effort to sabatoge and swiftboat Obama, basically because of his race. I have viewed hundreds of comments from "supporters" of Sinclair on the You Tube site and noticed similar postings under different names..almost verbatim. www.dearmurray.com pretty much pegs it on the ron paul aspect.

It is well known that the Ron Paul camp has ties to white supremicists, and now their (pardon the pun)..."true colors" are showing. This is a poor man's attempt at swiftboating indeed. The only question I have is who is supplying Sinclair with the $10,000 to take the lie detector test and the $100,000 if he passes it? (See article in www.whitehouse.com...not affiliated with www.whitehouse.gov.)


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Amos
Date: 20 Feb 08 - 02:37 AM

Gnashing of teeth and national mourning, more like.


A


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Little Hawk
Date: 20 Feb 08 - 02:19 AM

Well, but it was a perfect occasion for some grand bloviation, wasn't it?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Amos
Date: 19 Feb 08 - 11:21 PM

Well, the voting public that I talked to at the time sure didn't think those things awarded him any stature. As I recall the actual pilot was nearly crapping himself because his passenger seat was occupied by the President of the US AND a loose cannon, both at the same time. Mission Accomplished was sheer codswallop, and most people saw right throught he pretentiouness of it.

A


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Big Mick
Date: 19 Feb 08 - 11:09 PM

I agree with Guest. Dukakis let the other side define him, and the picture in the tank really did a lot to seal the deal. Aside from the fact that he looked ridiculous, it was so apparent as to be ridiculous that he was pandering for votes.

Mick


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Little Hawk
Date: 19 Feb 08 - 10:39 PM

You used to be able to get a 12-inch action figure of Bush in that flight suit. Completely posable. Able to assume any position the human body can get into.

I predict that those things will be worth a small fortune on Ebay soon. ;-)


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: GUEST,TIA
Date: 19 Feb 08 - 10:35 PM

In the flight suit, GWB *had* a major dork.

Double entendre intended.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: GUEST,Guest
Date: 19 Feb 08 - 07:50 PM

Absolutely. Bush looked very comfortable in his fly boy suit, because he had been one.

Dukakis looked like a MAJOR DORK. Also, the Bush swagger in the fly boy suit was done AFTER he was elected president, AFTER 9/11, and AFTER Baghdad fell, on his way to proclaim Mission Accomplished. Those pictures only helped his image and stature among the voting public.

Dukakis, not so much.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Ebbie
Date: 19 Feb 08 - 07:40 PM

Dukaiis in a tank was more significant than Bush in a flight suit?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: GUEST,Guest
Date: 19 Feb 08 - 07:04 PM

Couldn't agree more that Kerry deciding to go pro-gung ho and play down his anti-war history is what lost him the race--all because he did the same thing Al Gore did--ignore the Democratic party base to appeal to the corporate wing of the Democratic party, the Reagan Democrats (who supported Bush's Iraq follies) and McCain's independents (who also supported Bush's Iraq follies).

A huge miscalculation I have a sinking feeling the Democratic party is likely getting ready to repeat. And if the Dem nom can't beat the Repub this year, they don't deserve to rule the nation.

Of course, I said that in 2000 and 2004 too.

I agree about the voting for warrior presidents changing over time, but not significantly. It has been very subtle, if at all among a lot of the electorate that actually votes. For the WWII generation, it is still a huge deal. For the majority of baby boomers, it is still fairly significant, especially among those who supporetd the Iraq follies as vengeance for 9/11. And man, there were a LOT of those people who voted for Bush in 2004.

Finally, I don't know that the Dukakis loss was due to Willie Horton. I've always thought it was due to that photo that was worth a million bucks to the Republicans...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: artbrooks
Date: 19 Feb 08 - 05:34 PM

It's funny how memories change. Eight years ago, I think I would have said that Mr. Gore was slow to respond to the slanderous comments made by "Swiftboat Veterans for Truth" (many of whom never served in the Swifts, some of whom were never involved in riverine operations at all, and whose funding came from a person who never served in the military) because he really wasn't particularly emphasizing his military service and wasn't prepared to counter attacks on that topic. Oh well, memories and history evolve over time.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Charley Noble
Date: 19 Feb 08 - 04:03 PM

I don't think that the current sparring between the Clinton and Obama campaigns about possible speech plagerism will be enough to float a swiftboat, or waterboard a candidate (how's that for pulling it all together!).

Anyone taking bets on who will win in Wisconsin or Hawaii? The polling appears to be close in both races, between Clinton and Obama.

Charley Noble


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Ebbie
Date: 19 Feb 08 - 03:30 PM

Freightdog, you are keeping bad company.

Was it Al Gore?


"Conservative commentators have taken to repeating the mantra that Al Gore introduced Willie Horton, the inflammatory racial symbol who enlivened the 1988 presidential race, to political debate in America. On Oct. 24, William Kristol, editor and publisher of the Weekly Standard, said on ABC's This Week:

"Gore's a mean, tough political fighter. Gore is the one who introduced Willie Horton to American politics in the 1988 primary against Mike Dukakis."

************************
"Gore never mentioned that Horton was black; indeed, he never mentioned Horton by name. He merely drew attention, correctly, to the damaging fact that Dukakis had tolerated a furlough program for especially violent criminals in his state even after a horrific incident strongly suggested this was a bad policy."

*************************

"Now recall what the Republicans did with Horton's story: An "independent expenditure" group aired an ad for Bush showing a picture of Horton. A Republican fund-raising letter in Maryland showed pictures of Dukakis and Horton alongside the following text: "Is this your pro-family team for 1988?"


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Big Mick
Date: 19 Feb 08 - 03:01 PM

Disgraceful shit, from folks that pass themselves off as uber patriots. They show that they are really opportunistic whores that care little for the values they espouse so loudly. Their real agenda has nothing to do with those values, but more to do widening the gap between the richest and the rest. Shame on those who are so mentally lazy that they just fall back to their cliche'd biases and allow a man who served honorably to have his service besmirched.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Amos
Date: 19 Feb 08 - 02:42 PM

FUrthermore, it is not a function purely of what the candidate says abotu himselgf, assuming he has reasonable support. It is the underhanded launching of false tales to discredit a person, in an organized fashion. Whether he should or should not have promoted it as an item, Kerry was arguably what we call a war hero, distinguished in combat. His actual accomplishments were derogated and turned against him by people bearing false witness to nullify his public image. THAT's what Swiftboating is. And you can bet there will be more of it levied against Obama.


A


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Big Mick
Date: 19 Feb 08 - 02:39 PM

Just check back in any of the political threads. I have used it on a number of occasions, as have many. As Amos points out, it is a commonly used term in the political arena. HERE IS WHAT WIKIPEDIA says about the term.

Mick


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Amos
Date: 19 Feb 08 - 02:34 PM

Well, it's been in common parlance for a couple of decades, I think...


A


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: CarolC
Date: 19 Feb 08 - 02:16 PM

I wish I could take credit for it, gnu, but I can't. I don't remember where I first heard it, but it might have been JtS.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: gnu
Date: 19 Feb 08 - 02:12 PM

From: CarolC, 19 Feb 08 - 01:26 AM

"... chicken hawks"

That is PRICELESS!!!! Send that to Bill Maher with an invoice!

Hehehehehe... I am still laughing.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Little Hawk
Date: 19 Feb 08 - 02:02 PM

Yes, there has been that subtle shift, just as you say.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: freightdawg
Date: 19 Feb 08 - 01:59 PM

Bee-dubya-ell, I wasn't intending to suggest your interpretation and my interpretation were identical...I just thought I would give you credit for uttering the unutterable...

Little Hawk, I see a (subtle??) shift in the way candidates have been using military experience over the years. I do not think that Eisenhower, Kennedy, the first Bush, etc, were using their military experience as "war heroism." I think it was more of a, "if I have experienced the hell of war, either as a good soldier or as a command leader, then I can certainly lead in a time of peace", assuming, as it were, that leadership in a time of peace is easier than leadership in a time of war. However, if a war needed to be waged, then "I've been there."

In fact, Clinton was the first President in decades that did not serve in some form of the armed services, either active or reserve. Reference to one's military service may have been viewed as simply checking one more box on the resume qualifier.

My take on the whole Kerry debacle was that he was trying to up the ante and proclaim himself to be a hero...going above and beyond the pale of duty. When this was flatly rejected, he had no anwer. In short, Kerry Swiftboated himself.

Where I see the term "Swiftboated" as being illegitmate is its use when any bizzare accusation is brought against a politician. In the context of this thread, the ONLY way someone could say that Obama is being "Swiftboated" is if Obama made his heterosexuality and his purity in regard to drug use a leading aspect of his campaign. I don't know about the first, but he has openly admitted drug "experimentation" in his past. You cannot "Swift Boat" someone who admits a weakness, only someone who makes an exagerated claim of heroism or perfection.

Therefore, as a matter of definition, Obama cannot be "Swift Boated" on the issue of drugs, because he is not claiming to be a "drug free hero."

One other pet peeve...it was AL GORE who brought the Willie Horton issue against Dukakis. The Republicans gladly accepted the gift and used it with glee, but lets give credit where credit is due...

Freightdawg


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Little Hawk
Date: 19 Feb 08 - 11:44 AM

"the alacrity with which some people uncritically bought the line"

Well, sure. People always buy a line with alacrity as long as it is aimed at a target they already disapprove of.

If someone came up with a brand new (but as yet unproven) line of attack on George Bush or Dick Cheney, wouldn't most people here buy it with alacrity? ;-) Wouldn't they assume it was probably true?

Everybody has inside them a deep and abiding yearning to see their prejudices confirmed, and they're ever on the lookout for further confirmation. It's human nature.

The politicians and media people know this, and they play up to it constantly. They would not be able to play up to it so effectively, however, if the general electorate was better informed about realities in the outside world than is presently the case. (Only 23% of college graduates in the USA could even find Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and Iran on a world map in a recent poll!) The fact that so many people apparently believed that Iraq was a real threat to the world in 2003 demonstrates that the general electorate is not terribly well informed. The same game is being played now in regards to Iran. No one has to prove that Iran really has nuclear weapons or is really trying to get them to raise a war scare. All that has to be done is to raise vague fears that Iran might be doing so. The mere suggestion, frequently repeated, is enough.

Well, you don't arrest or kill someone on the premise that he might someday commit a crime, do you? That's the self-defence technique once marketed in National Lampoon as a joke. It was called Lapp-Goch. It worked on the premise that you kill other people FIRST, just in case they might be thinking of killing you. That is the principle the USA has been applying to nations like Iraq and Iran, and it's in total violation of international law. It is illegal to threaten to attack someone, and it's illegal to attack someone else first, both in civil law and international law...for the most obvious reasons.

Hell, I could use the same excuse to kill my neighbour and steal his house... "He was stockpiling weapons and planning to attack me! I had to stop him before he carried out his evil plan."

It's the Big Lie. You simply accuse the other guy of planning to do exactly what you yourself ARE doing...to him. That's what the USA did to Iraq in 2003. That's what the USA has been gearing up for a few years now to do to Iran....although the logistical arguments against doing it at this point are so huge that I have some hopes it won't happen.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Barry Finn
Date: 19 Feb 08 - 11:18 AM

I agree Amos & the same can be said in reverse for our present Bush. One look at his past should've sent up a red flag. I always thought that his DWI driving record (along with Cheney's) was plenty & certinly enough to make one think that if he can't drive a car properly what makes anyone think that he could drive a nation. Now about his war record.........

I believe MaCain already knows not to bring his past POW yrs to this table. Of couse someone could always raise the issue of the intell that MaCain forked over under torture while a POW. Whose above starting that engine up to get the Swiftboat's motors running?

Barry


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Amos
Date: 19 Feb 08 - 09:26 AM

IF you accept the record of those who were there, it was not Kerry's position that shot him in the foot, but those who saw fit to lie about events. The whole smear campaign was as disgusting as any political manuver ever pulled. Demonstrating courage and presence of mind under battle conditions is a perfectly legitimate citation for a candidate's qualifications -- not a complete set, by any means, but not irrelevant either. Kerry also showed remarkable courage in standing up against the war after he returned Stateside. He could have made enemies in either phase.

What really annoyed me about the Swift Boat smear campaign was the alacrity with which some people uncritically bought the line.


A


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Bee-dubya-ell
Date: 19 Feb 08 - 09:02 AM

Thanks for your thanks, freight dawg, but I think we've come to similar conclusions via totally different routes. To make myself perfectly clear, I have no use for war heroes. I was hugely disappointed that Kerry's campaign emphasized his war record and virtually ignored his anti-war activism. If he had run a true anti-war campaign and ignored his own military service, the swift-boaters would have had nothing to attack. He copped out and wound up shooting himself in the foot.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: CarolC
Date: 19 Feb 08 - 01:26 AM

Even more dangerous are the ones who imagine themselves war heroes, and who are eager to send our troops to fight and die, never having experienced the reality of war themselves (for instance, our current crop of chicken hawks).


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Little Hawk
Date: 19 Feb 08 - 12:51 AM

Interesting angle, freightdawg. Yes, Kerry and the Democratic Party shamelessly exploited the "war hero" angle, because they thought it would be a great way to undercut George Bush and get votes. The Republicans shamelessly exploited the Jane Fonda angle and the swift boaters' attacks on Kerry, because they thought it would be a good way to take votes away from him.

It was crassly manipulative behaviour on both sides, in my opinion, but absolutely typical of what they both do at election time. Party politics in presidential campaigns is truly a sickening spectacle to behold. The attempt is so often made to reach the lowest common denominator and appeal to people's worst instincts and prejudices.

What in the world does being a war hero have to do with being a good civilian leader? I want a war hero if I'm about to fight a pitched battle and I need experienced men to do the fighting. I want someone with quite different qualifications to run a government, I can assure you. A government is supposed to negotiate, find compromises, administrate, regulate, govern, pass laws, bring together different factions and find solutions to differences. A warrior is supposed to fight a battle on the field of war with an "enemy" and win it...or die trying. Those are utterly different jobs, and they have very little in common.

To run a "war hero" for high political office (as if being a war hero had anything to do with it) is just downright silly. It's a primitive appeal to people's emotions. Typical campaign tactics, in other words....although I cannot recall any Canadian politician who ran for office on the basis of being a "war hero". It seems to be a very American phenomenon.

Take John McCain for instance. Why should his war experiences have anything to do with his electability? Man, you would think it was ancient Rome or something. The Romans just loved elevating their most famous war heros to the halls of civil power. Why? Because they lived to conquer. They conquered virtually every place they could physically reach. Think about that.

Nations that persist in electing (or appointing) famous war leaders and war heros to high office are dangerous nations.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: freightdawg
Date: 18 Feb 08 - 11:18 PM

Thank you Bee-dubya-ell,

I have wanted to say the same thing for a long time, but figured I'd be a blade of grass in a hurricane.

Kerry sealed his own fate by trying to make himself out to be a war hero. Everyone seems to think that the veterans who spoke out against him were a bunch of crazed neanderthals who made up a bunch of stuff and threw it at Kerry, hoping some of it would stick. The fact is Kerry made a lot of veterans very angry by his post war antics, and when he tried to "re-invent" himself, ala Bubba Clinton, they were ready for him.

Kerry wanted to be Kennedy reincarnated, complete with an up-to-date PT 109 story. This time it didn't fly. Kerry was no Kennedy, and his "I was a war hero before I hated the war before I loved the war" rhetoric just became too nauseating for some real vets to stomach. They gave their opinion, that Kerry was unfit for leadership. I, for one, am glad they did. It let me know that (1) many men served with honor in the Swift Boats, and (2) Kerry was not one of them.

Freightdawg


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: wysiwyg
Date: 18 Feb 08 - 10:57 PM

Theem.

~S~


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Obama Swiftboated
From: Ebbie
Date: 18 Feb 08 - 08:24 PM

jThat's easy to say now, BDL. Keep in mind that they were intent on stopping Kerry's presidential bid; if these efforts had not been successful they would have tried others.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate


Next Page

 


You must be a member to post in non-music threads. Join here.


You must be a member to post in non-music threads. Join here.



Mudcat time: 8 April 10:10 PM EDT

[ Home ]

All original material is copyright © 1998 by the Mudcat Café Music Foundation, Inc. All photos, music, images, etc. are copyright © by their rightful owners. Every effort is taken to attribute appropriate copyright to images, content, music, etc. We are not a copyright resource.