BS: Sarah Palin's at it again (Jan-Feb 2009)

Subject: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: EBarnacle
Date: 27 Jan 09 - 07:44 PM

Well, she's done it! Sarah has created a PAC to raise money for a run in 2012. It's so nice that we will have someone to laugh at for the next few grim years.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: bobad
Date: 27 Jan 09 - 07:47 PM

She just doesn't get it.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Riginslinger
Date: 27 Jan 09 - 07:48 PM

I read where she's coming out with a book, too. It won't be long and she'll be just as rich as all the other idiots who run for public office.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: GUEST,biff
Date: 27 Jan 09 - 07:52 PM

she's really there for the try it it won't work crowd

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: maple_leaf_boy
Date: 27 Jan 09 - 08:16 PM

I sure wouldn't vote for her if I could.
Willie Nelson for President. Now there's a better choice.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: SINSULL
Date: 27 Jan 09 - 08:37 PM

Do not underestimate this woman. She is very shrewd and very eager for power. Palin learned a lot over these past few months.

Trying to imagine the elegant Mrs. Obama being followed by the Alaskan shrew.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: SINSULL
Date: 27 Jan 09 - 08:38 PM

Is she running for president this time or VP or Senator? Will baby bush II be her running mate? They do have lots of guns in Alaska...

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: kendall
Date: 27 Jan 09 - 08:59 PM

Talk about delusions of adequacy!

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: artbrooks
Date: 27 Jan 09 - 09:11 PM

Well, by 2012 her overall experience won't be much different from that of the last state governor elected president...and we all know what a great job he did.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Sorcha
Date: 27 Jan 09 - 09:20 PM

Hell, the WORLD is gonna end in 2012...don't you all read the papers? LOL

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: artbrooks
Date: 27 Jan 09 - 09:32 PM

Not the world, Sorcha - only Wyoming. And who'd notice, anyway?

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Riginslinger
Date: 27 Jan 09 - 09:37 PM

Palin, that's where she intended to launch her campaign!

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: maple_leaf_boy
Date: 27 Jan 09 - 10:14 PM

It's polar shifts. The "world" that we know is going to end, and a
new one is going to begin. But, the world is not going to end-end.
The Earth's rotation is going to change, and our North and South Poles
will be in different places. This will cause climate changes to occur.
The worry is that if the polar shift occurs too quickly.
This is based on the beliefs of some South-western U.S. Native peoples,
according to a documentary that I once watched. They believe that the
world began four times, and has ended three times. Once the polar shifts
occur, then metaphorically the world has ended, and a new one has began.
A new world with a new North and South Pole. It is expected to happen
three years from now, or at least not far from it.
The world won't literally end for another 3 billion years, unless the Sun should burn out.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Alice
Date: 27 Jan 09 - 10:19 PM

2012 doomsday is a hoax.
Palin's ego, unfortunately, is real, as in really big.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Ebbie
Date: 28 Jan 09 - 12:30 AM

Somebody likes Palin. Look at this:

From Shoefly to Flying Shoe


(Shoefly is a local shoe store)

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Little Hawk
Date: 28 Jan 09 - 12:32 AM

I'm curious, Maple Leaf Boy...are you talking about a magnetic pole shift or a physical shift of the planet on its axis? The first would be a subtle event, not perceptible to ordinary human senses, but detectable with scientific equipment. The second would be a worldwide catastrophe.

And if it's a magnetic shift you are referring to, would that also be accompanied by a reversal of the Earth's direction of rotation on its axis? (in which case the sun would then rise in the west)

Just curious which particular theory you are referring to, that's all...not expressing any opinion about it one way or another.

No one has any way of knowing if the various predictions and prophecies about 2012 are "a hoax" (or just merely incorrect) or not. I won't be surprised if nothing unusual happens in 2012. I won't be totally astounded if something unusual does happen. Why? Because I have no basis of being 100% sure on either possibility, so why should I pretend (as so many do) that I do have such a basis?

I don't know. So I'll wait and see.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Alice
Date: 28 Jan 09 - 01:03 AM

Of course it can be stated that it is a hoax - NASA astrobiologist has pointed out that the 2012 "galaxy alignment" is an internet hoax.

ask an astrobiologist at NASA


"... I can't explain it because it is just an Internet hoax. There is no alignment with the center of the Galaxy in 2012 or any time."

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Little Hawk
Date: 28 Jan 09 - 01:35 AM

It depends on which particular 2012 prediction (or prophecy) you are referring to, Alice. There are many different ones. Many have to do with various ancient Amerindian traditional stories from North and South America, as well as other ancient cultural tales. Many have to do with a polar shift of some kind and/or a reversal of the Earth's direction of rotation on its axis. I don't think I have ever heard of the "galaxy alignment" story before. If someone concocted that one with deliberate intention to deceive people, then of course it's a hoax. If not, if they are sincere about it and they believe it for some reason, then it's not a hoax...they are (I would think) simply in error.

The word "hoax" means a deliberate attempt to deceive. People are often wrong in their predictions of future events, but they're not trying to deceive anyone if they actually believe what they're saying, in which case...it's not a hoax. It's just wrong, period.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Bobert
Date: 28 Jan 09 - 08:07 AM

Well, I'm all for Ms. Sarah runnin' for Prez in '12... I mean, who else could kill off the remnants of the Republican Party better than Ms. Hottie??? Plus, maybe she'd take up Hugh Hefner's offer for a little estra publicity...

(There you go, Bobert... Didn't that get you the "blast" from the Mud-womenz last time you brought it up???)

Well, yeah... Who cares... I'd buy the mag if she were in it just as a collector's item...

B~

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: SINSULL
Date: 28 Jan 09 - 08:14 AM

and of course, you buy it only for the political stories, right Bobert?

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Bobert
Date: 28 Jan 09 - 09:21 AM

Yup...

The only copy I ever bought was the one where John Lennon was interviewed...

Though I also have the "text only" of the interview of Martin Luther King...

But, yeah, I love the folks who say they only buy it for the interviews... What a joke... Half of them can't read...

B;~)

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: EBarnacle
Date: 28 Jan 09 - 11:08 AM

The idea of Palin writing her own autobiography is ludicrous. If it is true, then she will have to come across much more lucidly in print than in vive voce. Of course, she will have plenty of time, as her current job is apparently not very demanding.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: frogprince
Date: 28 Jan 09 - 11:14 AM

$2,025.00 for a pair of her shoes? Surely she could get a lot more for a pair of her used panties!
I might pay a nickle for a pair; I can always use a rag to apply wood stain with.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Nancy King
Date: 28 Jan 09 - 11:31 AM

The news story described the shoes as "red, Naughty Monkey Double-Dare pumps." Now who wouldn't want THOSE???? Wish they'd included a picture...

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Peace
Date: 28 Jan 09 - 11:44 AM

I buy it for the pitcures/pitchers/pitcheures photographs.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Ebbie
Date: 28 Jan 09 - 01:24 PM

Here ya go, Nancy.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: bobad
Date: 28 Jan 09 - 01:55 PM

Hey, my neighbour's got a pair just like that, his name is Maurice.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Riginslinger
Date: 28 Jan 09 - 02:00 PM

Nice feet!

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Stringsinger
Date: 28 Jan 09 - 02:39 PM

"I can see disaster from here".

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Don Firth
Date: 28 Jan 09 - 02:46 PM

The geological record shows that the earth's magnetic poles do shift from time to time. Different polarity of iron molecules in different strata. As Little Hawk says, it can be measured with scientific instruments (and it would throw our current compasses off until we adjust navigation to the where, geographically, the new North Pole is, and it may confuse migratory birds and monarch butterflies for awhile), but thee and me will not even notice the shift.

What kind of physical forces are there in this neighborhood of our galaxy that would cause a planet which is approximately 8,000 miles in diameter with a mass of 5.9742 × 10²⁴ kilograms to suddenly stop and begin rotating the other way, or cause it to flip over, pole to pole?

'Course, such a catastrophe might be preferable to having Sarah Palin as president. . . .

Don Firth

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: VirginiaTam
Date: 28 Jan 09 - 03:04 PM

I wanna know who all the numbnutz were that bid on that shoe auction. We can refer them to Q's lottery win thread.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Little Hawk
Date: 28 Jan 09 - 03:41 PM

The question remains, Don...what causes the Earth's manetic pole to periodically reverse itself? And that's an intriguing question.

For instance, an electric motor has polarity with a north and south pole, achieved by rotating a coil around an armature (have I got those technical terms right?). At any rate...the only way you can reverse the polarity on an electric motor is to have it rotate in the opposite direction...or you can rotate it in the opposite direction by a toggle switch which causes a source of electrical power to flow the other way.

Interesting, eh? Perhaps the planet Earth works in a similar fashion. It is said to have an iron core, and the rotation of the planet around that iron core may be exactly what produces the Earth's magnetic field. If so, the direction of rotation would be what determines the polarity of the field, and the magnetic field would collapse to zero if, for instance, the planet stopped rotating...while it would simply drop in amplitude some if the planet were to slow its rotation a bit.

I have no ironclad opinion about any of this, because I don't know. I'm just speculating on what I find an interesting subject.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Nancy King
Date: 28 Jan 09 - 05:08 PM

Yeah, well, those sure are naughty, all right. Hope the winning bidder enjoys 'em...

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: McGrath of Harlow
Date: 28 Jan 09 - 06:12 PM

Does Sarah Palin count as a hoax?

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: katlaughing
Date: 28 Jan 09 - 06:18 PM

Ebbie, they wouldn't necessarily have to like her. They may have bought them as an investment in political history. I abhor her, but that didn't keep me from selling my Rog's press pass, from her only visit here, on ebay.:-)

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Little Hawk
Date: 28 Jan 09 - 07:23 PM

A hoax in what sense, McGrath?

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Don Firth
Date: 28 Jan 09 - 07:30 PM

"An inner core of solid iron is surrounded by an outer core of molten iron. They rotate at different rates, and the interaction between the regions creates what scientists call a 'hydromagnetic dynamo.'"

From this web site:    Interesting stuff.

According to this, the shift of the magnetic poles doesn't happen overnight as some folks contend, not is it cataclysmic, as the "let's all panic!!" folks love so much, it "migrates" over a period of possibly thousands of years.

Don Firth

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: frogprince
Date: 28 Jan 09 - 07:43 PM

Ahh...Don....?

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Little Hawk
Date: 28 Jan 09 - 07:51 PM

Fascinating stuff, Don! Thanks for the link.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Don Firth
Date: 28 Jan 09 - 07:59 PM

Sorry about drifting the thread, frogprince, it's just that I find the earth's inner core far more magnetic than Sarah Palin.

Vote NO on asteroid collisions, nearby supernovae, gamma ray bursters, Sarah Palin for president, and all other major cataclysms.

Don Firth

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: McGrath of Harlow
Date: 28 Jan 09 - 08:30 PM

Put together in some dirty tricks section of the Democrat Party perhaps, with a view to wrecking McCain's chances, and going on to destroy the Republicans...

In an age of Conspiracy Theories it must be worth running that one up the flagpole to see if anyone salutes it.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Little Hawk
Date: 28 Jan 09 - 11:08 PM

Most of the things that happen in the world of politics (and business) (and high finance) are accomplished by more than one person...by a group of people working together toward a common purpose, and they usually don't openly tell everyone else exactly what they're doing! That being the case, it's not a bit surprising that we have a lot of conspiracy theories, because we have a lot of conspiracies to theorize about.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Bee-dubya-ell
Date: 28 Jan 09 - 11:31 PM

If Governor Palen tries a run for President in 2012, she'll find that some of her Republican primary opponents (some of the same folks who were so fully supportive of VP candidate Palen) will be more than ready to point out the same weaknesses and lack of qualifications that Democrats were pointing out a few months ago. It's one thing to have the other party saying you're unqualified. It's quite another to have high-ranking members of your own party saying it. She hasn't had that experience yet because she hasn't participated in the national primaries. Guys like Mitt Romney or Rudy Giuliani would chew her a new anal opening without giving it a second thought.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Ebbie
Date: 28 Jan 09 - 11:36 PM

Not if God has ordained it. :)

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Richard Bridge
Date: 29 Jan 09 - 05:34 AM

A hoax? No, surely she is a con-artist or as we say in the UK a "con". Or maybe as the French say, "une conasse".

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Riginslinger
Date: 29 Jan 09 - 10:32 AM

Con-artist = Politician

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Musket
Date: 30 Jan 09 - 07:14 AM

Occasionally, here in the UK, we get a politician who has character. Whether they are very good, very bad or a downright liability, they are that rare thing, interesting. Boris Johnson, the mayor of London is a good example.

Sarah Palin may have caused some concern, and as the American leadership has more affect on the rest of the world than any other country leaders, we kept a close eye too.

But just so long as she had no opportunity to actually go to Washington, the stories about her and even watching her in action was light relief and made the election something to watch.

Perhaps a novelty item, and to be frank, she was not a good advert for The USA.

But I hope she is around for the next one. Comics need people like her!

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Ron Davies
Date: 30 Jan 09 - 08:18 AM

It's nice to know, that as a poster on another forum noted, we won't need a PAC to defeat her. All we'll need is Palin herself--and Tina Fey.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Bonzo3legs
Date: 30 Jan 09 - 10:20 AM

Perhaps she should take a week with Cristina Kirshner down there in Argentina - she's running for "whore of the century" by all accounts!!

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Donuel
Date: 30 Jan 09 - 10:22 AM

The Palin LImbaugh 2012 ticket is gaining more lip service as we speak.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Ebbie
Date: 30 Jan 09 - 10:28 AM

It is interesting to see her altered appearance since she returned to Alaska. I guess your own personal makeup artist and hairdresser do make a difference.

Remember how scrubbed and polished and shiny she looked during the campaign? These days in contrast she looks positively unkempt. Current videos show it better but here is one photo: Here

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Donuel
Date: 30 Jan 09 - 10:54 AM

When she goes to visit Karl Rove in jail (for contempt of Congress) she will establish the new Republican Party as a martyr to the Democrat despots. I expect to see limbaugh lead the 'free Karl' demonstrations in DC.

Karl is trying to prove that he has a lifetime pre emptive pardon for everything and anything since Bush declared such 4 days prior to Inauguration day for both Karl and Harriet Myers.

Executive priviledge is supposed to only apply to an active President's advisors.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Donuel
Date: 30 Jan 09 - 10:57 AM

Sarah is moving to DC to rub shoulders with insiders.

I expect an act of God will call her back to AK
volcanic eruption

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Big Al Whittle
Date: 30 Jan 09 - 11:45 AM

I still find it hard to believe that the Republican party picked Reagan and Bush junior as leaders of the party - and half the people voting Republican were shaking their heads in disbelief at the time that those two were the best America could come up with.

And both those unlikely people got re-elected.

So I don't think you should underestimate her.

You have to wonder why the Republicans keep coming up with weirdoes. Nearly every other person you meet, who calls himself a Republican, seems more sensible than the people they elect as leaders.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: akenaton
Date: 30 Jan 09 - 01:45 PM

Well Al you certainly can't say that about the Dems!

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Riginslinger
Date: 31 Jan 09 - 08:56 AM

"You have to wonder why the Republicans keep coming up with weirdoes."

                  Al - I think it has to do with raising money. Just like MoveOn.org was able to orchestrate huge campaign donations for Barak Obama and left wing Democrats, Republicans now have to rely on "faith based" organizations to raise cash. That, I think, is why you see so much media attention devoted to people like Sarah Palin and Mike Huckabee.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Nick
Date: 31 Jan 09 - 09:24 AM

"You have to wonder why the Republicans keep coming up with weirdoes. Nearly every other person you meet, who calls himself a Republican, seems more sensible than the people they elect as leaders. "

I think you have the answer, Al.

You have 100 voters. Nearly every other one is more sensible - ie 49 voters. This leaves 51 voters (ie a majority) who are less sensible than the people they elect as leaders and majorities tend to win out.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Richard Bridge
Date: 31 Jan 09 - 10:27 AM

Donuel - God will call her back to AK?

Nah, too good for her.

AK will call her back to God.

AK47, that is.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: McGrath of Harlow
Date: 31 Jan 09 - 10:27 AM

Surely you need to be pretty peculiar to even want to become president. Occasionally that might be peculiar good, which is whta you've probably got now. But not too often.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Little Hawk
Date: 31 Jan 09 - 02:19 PM

You would have to be quite unusual, that's for sure.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Ebbie
Date: 31 Jan 09 - 02:43 PM

Richard Bridge, are you having a bad year? :)

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: robomatic
Date: 31 Jan 09 - 04:04 PM

The problem with Palin is that there is a perception out there that she did not do this to herself, but the media did it to her. Therefore, there is a kneejerk reaction out there that will be ready to support her against all comers, who are perceived as persecutors.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Little Hawk
Date: 31 Jan 09 - 04:56 PM

Indeed. She has acquired the image of a feisty and somehow loveable underdog. If I were her, I would work with that and see what can be done. ;-)

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: robomatic
Date: 31 Jan 09 - 06:26 PM

just as long as she stays away from those turkey pardoning power kill media events!
Sarah 'pardons' turkey but behind her...

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Don Firth
Date: 31 Jan 09 - 07:01 PM

Campaign tactic for 2012:

. . . Shooting Democrats from a low-flying plane. . . .

Don Firth

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Richard Bridge
Date: 31 Jan 09 - 07:36 PM

Why Ebbie - because I believe in destroying evil?

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Little Hawk
Date: 31 Jan 09 - 07:48 PM

Evil can't be destroyed. It's a moral concept, and you cannot destroy a moral concept. You can't destroy good, and you can't destroy evil nor can you destroy any other concept of that sort...but...you most certainly can destroy people you don't like (such as Sarah Palin), animals, the natural environment, buildings, cities, an economy, even entire nations....

Which did you have in mind for your specific crusade, Richard? Just Sarah? Or does it go farther than that?

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Bobert
Date: 31 Jan 09 - 08:04 PM

Heck, I don't care who's doin' her makeup... She's still hot as a three dollar pistol and might make me buy my 2nd Playboy in my life if she posed nude but...

...this time I wouldn't be buyin' it fir the articles...

Awww, jus' funnin' 'cause I'd at least...

...glance thru the articles...

Now as fir bein' prsident??? Nah... She ain't too smart... ight of fact, I was wonderin' if she does actually write this book if she will read it???

(Well, Boberdz... If she did it would prolly be the first book she ever read...)

That's my point... I don't think we need any more presiednts who can calim to have never actually read a book...

B~

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: robomatic
Date: 31 Jan 09 - 08:20 PM

Someone else who needs glasses. Palin is about as hot as a isickle.

awe shuks jus' funnin'

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Bobert
Date: 31 Jan 09 - 08:44 PM

Now don't be like that roboz...

No shucks gonna get ya' outta dissin' Ms. Sarah...

Now say yer sorry and promise that if she poses fir Playboy that you'll buy a copy of it... I mean, it ain't like makin' a house payment... What, couple two or three bucks...

Come on, roboz... Can she count you in fir a couple three losuy bucks, 'er what???

B~

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Little Hawk
Date: 31 Jan 09 - 09:22 PM

She's a sizzler. And a crack shot too. What more could you possibly want? ;-) Okay, she's so not as mean lookin' a femme fatale as Tura Satana was maybe, but that ain't easy, specially for a politician.

Tura and friends

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Don Firth
Date: 31 Jan 09 - 10:41 PM

You want hot?

SHE's hot!!

Don Firth

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: katlaughing
Date: 31 Jan 09 - 11:56 PM

...image of a feisty and somehow loveable underdog.

Not hardly. By the end of the campaign her own party leaders were shaking their heads and distancing themselves from her. I think she and McCain came out of right field at them and they didn't know what hit them, BUT they figured it out and only the very conservative, evangelicals of them would support her now. I don't think they'd even use her as a front because they obviously could not control her.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Riginslinger
Date: 01 Feb 09 - 12:00 AM

Of course, she can use all the publicity she can get!

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: EBarnacle
Date: 01 Feb 09 - 12:49 AM

LH, was that crack shot or crack pot?

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Little Hawk
Date: 01 Feb 09 - 03:01 AM

Chongo says he can see a place for her in his organization.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Riginslinger
Date: 01 Feb 09 - 08:52 AM

"LH, was that crack shot or crack pot?"


                     Or maybe just plain--crack!

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: akenaton
Date: 01 Feb 09 - 12:09 PM

As we say in Scotland....she's a wee cracker!

All you "liberals" should relax and forget the labels, right and left have good and bad in their philosophy and the good thing about Miss Sarah is her independence of spirit. That lady won't be ruled by no stinkin' system and she has the ability to carry people with her, to communicate her ideas and most importantly her self belief.

If we want real change, we need someone who can inspire all of the people to get out there and take government by throat, not send them to sleep with reams of dusty "Liberal" rhetoric.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Richard Bridge
Date: 01 Feb 09 - 02:42 PM

System? She had her snout in it like few others. The Princess of Pork.

Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again
From: Don Firth
Date: 01 Feb 09 - 03:13 PM

People give Palin credit for cancelling the "bridge to nowhere."

But as I understand it, she kept the Federal money.

(Perhaps Ebbie can verify if I heard this correctly.)

Don Firth