BS: Got Science?

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: GUEST,TIA
Date: 08 Apr 11 - 06:02 PM

I agree with McGrath...there is so much nonsensical claptrap reverberating around on this thread that there really is no longer any meaningful exchange of information. Just lots of posing.

Put it down.

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: GUEST,pete from seven stars link
Date: 08 Apr 11 - 01:57 PM

thanks gfs.loved the video.i still got the 7inch in my collection but great watching the live take.

my grasp of the NASA article was sketchy,even though i had read some of the concepts before.the expanding universe is a feature of creationist theory also,the non tec bit being that the bible speaks of God "streching out the heavens".

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
Date: 08 Apr 11 - 12:13 PM

It's simpler than you thought................

GfS

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
Date: 08 Apr 11 - 11:59 AM

No, just Nasa's version!

GfS

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: GUEST,Shimrod
Date: 08 Apr 11 - 11:02 AM

Thanks for posting the NASA article on Dark Energy/Matter, GfS. I notice that they didn't include your remarkable, spiritually powered observations on the relationship between Dark Energy/Matter and: "'spiritual' (sic), or 'meta-physical' (sic), quantum physics, intelligence(collective or otherwise), the 'life force', gravity, magnetism, telepathy, and possibly the 'initial cause'..among others!!"

Scientists! What are they like? They're probably just jealous!

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 08 Apr 11 - 10:24 AM

My monumental HTML efforts have let me down again. More unwanted italics. What these two persons do to your brain is nobody's business...

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 08 Apr 11 - 10:22 AM

oort clouds

Your monumental research efforts have let you down once again. There is but one Oort Cloud. They don't drift over in droves. "Oooo look, a bunch of Oort clouds! And what this...? Oh no! It's raining Oorts and dogs now!"

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
Date: 08 Apr 11 - 09:27 AM

This is NASA's version

GfS

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: GUEST,pete from seven stars link
Date: 08 Apr 11 - 06:01 AM

as a non involved observer of the slanging match,i think that gfs comment re ageing homosexual, was not too clever.albeit,i certainly read steves initial response as gfs describes it,but modified in subsequent posts to be PC in keeping with what he would normally profess.thats how it looks to me ,anyway.

gfs. i would certainly be happy to speak with you,as it sounds interesting but i dont know how that is facilitated.
is,nt dark matter something posited by cosmologists to account for anomalies in time/space measurement,which like oort clouds are as yet theoretical.this is a ? not a statement.

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 08 Apr 11 - 04:55 AM

The Snail made a good point

The Snail, just like you, has thus far shown itself incapable of making any good points. It snipes, whilst you flap around with unformed and incoherent notions which you appear to have extreme difficulty communicating to anyone. No, on reflection that isn't fair, because you have communicated very well that you are misogynistic and homophobic. I'm not surprised that you and it get on so well (I have to say "it" as I don't know whether Snailie-wailie's a boy, girl or neither either, as with you, though I understand that some members of the order of Mollusca it purports to belong to are actually capable of shagging themselves - hmmm, something to ponder there...). Of course, I'm always willing to be proven wrong. Now what was it you were saying?

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
Date: 08 Apr 11 - 01:00 AM

The Snail made a good point, but was not followed up on, so....to acknowledge his point, I thought I'd re-post it. It encompasses what I was saying, in the way of NOT excluding, all that you can't see....

The Snail: "You have appointed yourself as a spokesman for science so talk like a scientist. Better still, think like a scientist."

Regards,

GfS

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
Date: 07 Apr 11 - 10:33 PM

Steve and The Fool,

Stupid rants, BUT.................


.........Do you 'Got Science?'

Smilin' at ya',

GfS

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 07 Apr 11 - 08:14 PM

Gosh, italics not intended there for my bit. Which started on line three, just in case anyone still can't distinguish me from our resident idiot non-savant.

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 07 Apr 11 - 08:11 PM

Let me add, to those who considered it an 'insult' that I was 'accusing' them of homosexuality, ON THIS thread, must look at homosexuality as an INSULT...but then accuse OTHERS of being biased!!
If it is an insult, who's got the bigoted bias???????????

Let me try to be very patient with you. And please don't respond too quickly, as, going from your posts of this evening, you appear to need to sleep something off first. Now, person (I have to call you "person", as I have no idea whether you are a boy, a girl, or neither; I was actually amazed to hear you recount something that happened to you in 1969, as you write like an eleven-year-old on speed), I actually celebrate homosexuality as just one part of the wonderful spectrum of human experience. I just happen, for my sins, to be not gay myself, and therein, unfortunately for you, lies the rub. You see, I am not insulted that you call me homosexual when I am, in fact, not. I am insulted by the fact that you feel you are able to attribute to me any quality at all of which you have no knowledge whatsoever insofar as that quality may, or may not, pertain to me, since, as far as I recall, we have never met, still less exchanged either pleasantries or unpleasantries. In other words, sweetie, stop making things up as you go along, eh? I am actually totally astounded that any remaining sense of dignity you may still be clinging to (if you are, you don't deserve to be, but hey, anyone can get deluded) permits you to think you are still OK posting to this forum. You are a laughing stock, frankly, and the tragedy is that you wouldn't notice when people are, rightly, taking the piss out of you even if it reared up and bit you on your pert little arse. Now go and have a nice lie down, huh?

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: The Fooles Troupe
Date: 07 Apr 11 - 07:16 PM

"The Toupee"

Ah! The Gutless Bullying A*hole C*nt stops masturbating to the Cosmic Music in her head and rears her Ugly Head Again!

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: The Fooles Troupe
Date: 07 Apr 11 - 07:11 PM

500!

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: GUEST,Shimrod
Date: 07 Apr 11 - 06:52 PM

" ... it beats proselytizing mutant gnome thinking!"

Tut, tut, GfS! Mutant gnomist as well as misogynistic and homophobic. Still, I suppose we should make allowances - you being a brilliant, spiritually powered COSMOLOGIST and all!!

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
Date: 07 Apr 11 - 06:17 PM

Ooops.....led with his mouth, again!

GfS

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
Date: 07 Apr 11 - 06:16 PM

The Toupee: "History Quiz:

Now which Ancient Greek Philosopher had that Original Idea?

Just the first link I pulled up.....there are more....do your own homework!

Got Science???

GfS

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: The Fooles Troupe
Date: 07 Apr 11 - 06:11 PM

""playing this type of music, activates more parts of the brain, than ANY other activity known to mankind...including sex!.......""

Ah - now I understand the AnonTroll .... stop it or you'll go blind!

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: The Fooles Troupe
Date: 07 Apr 11 - 06:04 PM

"playing this type of music, activates more parts of the brain, than ANY other activity known to mankind...including sex!......."

History Quiz:

Now which Ancient Greek Philosopher had that Original Idea?

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
Date: 07 Apr 11 - 06:03 PM

Nimrod: "I know that, at this stage - presumably pre-publication (?) - you'll not want to give too much away, but how did you do it, GfS? Don't tell me - you've got a radio telescope and a particle accelerator (both SPIRITUALLY powered, of course) in the garden shed! BRILLIANT!!!"

Thank you!..Links are available. Do your homework!..it beats proselytizing mutant gnome thinking!

GfS

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: GUEST,Shimrod
Date: 07 Apr 11 - 05:39 PM

"We know that matter, such as the 'known' universe(this dimension), is comprised of about 20%, of all matter, while 'black matter'(not commonly detectable by the commonly available tools of this dimension), comprises about the remaining 80% of the total!! Within this 80% are 'powers' or 'energies' that constitute what people attribute to 'spiritual', or 'meta-physical', quantum physics, intelligence(collective or otherwise), the 'life force', gravity, magnetism, telepathy, and possibly the 'initial cause'..among others!!
What we will find out, sooner or later, is that ALL of these are ONE, and only singular attributes of the whole."

Did you postulate the existence of 'black (sic) matter', GfS? It's commonly referred to as 'dark matter', by the way, but leaving that aside, as I understand it, at the present time, 'dark matter' has been postulated to explain certain anomalies in cosmological measurements. I thought, in my ignorance, that no-one had actually observed it directly because it's ...well ... dark ...?

But to my amazement I see that, not only have you solved the mystery, but your observations are far superior to anything that those stuffy old scientists can come up with (IDIOTS - huh!)! You not only know what this 'dark matter' is but you've been able to link it to 'meta-physical' (sic), quantum physics, intelligence(collective or otherwise), the 'life force', gravity, magnetism, telepathy, and possibly the 'initial cause' etc. AMAZING! You must be some sort of GENIUS!!! Have you PUBLISHED 'your' results yet! When the relevant journal hits the shops you'll probably be up for a NOBEL 'prize'!!!

I know that, at this stage - presumably pre-publication (?) - you'll not want to give too much away, but how did you do it, GfS? Don't tell me - you've got a radio telescope and a particle accelerator (both SPIRITUALLY powered, of course) in the garden shed! BRILLIANT!!!

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: McGrath of Harlow
Date: 07 Apr 11 - 05:26 PM

Isn't this a pretty good candidate for a thread that needs to be put down?

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
Date: 07 Apr 11 - 04:49 PM

Donuel: "I assure you that most expereinces will have aa foundation of understanding in science, and for those esperiences that don't - those are the ones that have the potential to expand our scientific understanding. The unusual and unknown is the food of discovery.

go for it."

Donuel, great insight!....which surpasses, some of the other nonsensical posts of other fad centered, closed minded wannabe 'intellectuals'. on here!!

...and yes, I did have a rather unique experience, in the late of 1969, which opened my eyes, and changed everything for me, ever since! I have found it consistent with some other people's experience, but in rather vivid, and lucid detail! It gave me a rather deeper perspective on the 'reality' that we live in, and since then science, yes science, has backed up what I saw, and experienced! I, myself, have been keenly open, to ANYTHING consistent, that sheds more light, on what this was....because it was 'earth shattering'.

You might have noticed in some of my previous posts, that I used the word, 'dimension' to try to best describe attributes of what we fully live within, and also to acknowledge, a fuller 'reality', than what is commonly looked at as 'everything that there is'.

We know that matter, such as the 'known' universe(this dimension), is comprised of about 20%, of all matter, while 'black matter'(not commonly detectable by the commonly available tools of this dimension), comprises about the remaining 80% of the total!! Within this 80% are 'powers' or 'energies' that constitute what people attribute to 'spiritual', or 'meta-physical', quantum physics, intelligence(collective or otherwise), the 'life force', gravity, magnetism, telepathy, and possibly the 'initial cause'..among others!!
What we will find out, sooner or later, is that ALL of these are ONE, and only singular attributes of the whole.

To rule out any of these factors, in the SCIENTIFIC explanation of how life came to be, or evolved on this planet, or anywhere else, is certainly short-sighted, at best!!!!

I'd love to share some of that on here with ANYONE who was not so bent on trying to be contentious, for the sake of stupidity, but rather share them with you face to face, or even a phone call...if you are/were really interested.

Little Hawk, Lizzie, Pete 'seven stars', among others,(possibly you) seemed to be a bit more open, and able to gain from each others experiences. It has been said, that music (original, creative that touches others souls and hearts), comes from this 'other' place. Scientists agree, that they DO NOT know, why certain music works this way, nor where it originates....but DO agree that playing this type of music, activates more parts of the brain, than ANY other activity known to mankind...including sex!.......Therefore, the sexual similes, that I gave, and the sheer panic of some frigid mindsets, who would be terrified of experiencing something out of their 'comfort zone' of their small minded self absorption!!!

Fair enough?

Let me add, to those who considered it an 'insult' that I was 'accusing' them of homosexuality, ON THIS thread, must look at homosexuality as an INSULT...but then accuse OTHERS of being biased!!
If it is an insult, who's got the bigoted bias???????????
Beauty, as well as ugly, is in the eye of the beholder!!!

Ooops..maybe a overly quick drawn overreaction?? What they need to ask themselves, is 'WHY?'.....for the sake of 'science'.

Anyway, Donuel, maybe we can hook up. I'm sure the benefit would be mutual!

Regards,

GfS

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: Donuel
Date: 07 Apr 11 - 11:30 AM

I do not expect anyone to have experienced what I have. If you have experienced internal time dialation (psychological) you are one among many. If you have experienced an external time dialation (non psychological) then you have had a rare experience. One in which most people will not relate to it. So what. If there are some people who not only will not relate to it but are on a mission to discredit the observer who had the experience, let them. We know who they are.

Sometimes the mere timiming of an event is crucial.

If you played video games on your computer via dial up it is no big deal, but if you did it in 1969, it is a rare experience.

If you have had a rare experience, a sighting that is contrary to current physics, a satori, enlightenment or perhaps something that you should not be able to remember or understand,
I strongly recommend that you remain courageous enough to to share it here.

I assure you that most expereinces will have aa foundation of understanding in science, and for those esperiences that don't - those are the ones that have the potential to expand our scientific understanding. The unusual and unknown is the food of discovery.

go for it.

I have over the years. I have seen outlandish criticism. I'm still here along witht he events I fortold or warnedabout.

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 07 Apr 11 - 07:33 AM

Apparently relevant post number one, all of it:
Unless you've had that experience, you can bitch piss and moan, all you want, but....

Problem is, to all those who won't even ask, when others are trying to tell you, that some answers come as a life changing EXPERIENCE, is like a bunch of happily married people, trying to convince some frigid bitches, that there really are orgasms!!!...but you gotta be willing to get laid!!!!

Apparently relevant post number two, all of it:
Yes Steve, nasty little virgin bitches..horny as ever, but afraid to get laid...only thing more pathetic is rapidly aging homosexuals, watching their time run out!!
Must be hitting close to home, eh, Steve?

As for Nimrod, last time you asked me a question, like you were pretending to want a real answer, I began to lay a premise, that was easy to follow..but didn't go too far, just to see if you were really interested, or if you were going to make an ass of yourself....you chose the latter.

Sit on it.....you just missed a great one go by...

So, Guest From Shamtitty, tell me how I cherry-picked. Also, tell me where the simile is. I could offer you some advice. When your little head hits the pillow tonight, just before you start dreaming about educating frigid virgins as to how to have multiple orgasms (coo, I bet that'll be a nifty dream!), just mutter one final little word to yourself: "Facsimiles..."

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: The Fooles Troupe
Date: 07 Apr 11 - 04:59 AM

"would God and Evolution have become entwined into an EvolutionaryRevolutionaryGod....?"

Darwin would have become irrelevant and his place in Evolution History been taken over by Wallace - who was actually nearly more famous than Darwin, but whose fame has now been usurped.

Alfred Russel Wallace - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Alfred Russel Wallace, OM, FRS (8 January 1823 – 7 November 1913) was a British naturalist, explorer, geographer, anthropologist and biologist ...
http://www.google.com/search?&q=wallace

Research Alfred Russel Wallace

:-)

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: GUEST,Shimrod
Date: 07 Apr 11 - 04:58 AM

I've always assumed that you can't label yourself as an 'intellectual'. And if you want some 'help' from me (which you probably don't), I would lose that massive chip on your shoulder - no-one is claiming to be more intelligent or 'better' than you. Conversely, I'm not convinced that you are 'better' than me because you claim to be 'more spiritual' than I am!

Getting back to the previous topic, wisdom always seems to be based on the thoughts of those that came before. There may have been a time, in the distant past, when one could have completely 'original thoughts' - but it's much more difficult at this time in history. Nevertheless, it seems that gifted individuals can build upon the thoughts of others and gain new insights into the way that the world works - sometimes merely by viewing the insights of others from a novel direction or by realising that something is missing and filling in the gaps. Many great scientists have taken existing tools created by others - like theoretical mathematical techniques, for example - and found that they could be applied to solve real world problems - sometimes in completely unexpected ways. One of the greatest scientists of all time, Isaac Newton, is said to have said, "I stand on the shoulders of giants".

And that brings us neatly back to Charles Darwin, the Theory of Evolution, his daughter's tragic death, the possible effects of that death on his religious convictions and their possible effects on his theory. As I wrote in a previous post, Lizzie, the Theory of Evolution wasn't just down to Darwin (even though he now tends to take the credit) - it was independently discovered or formulated by Alfred Russel Wallace. The Theory of Evolution was 'in the scientific air' in the mid-19th century and would have emerged anyway with or without Darwin (which is not to detract from Darwin's achievements).

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: Lizzie Cornish 1
Date: 07 Apr 11 - 04:27 AM

Oh...and Shimmy, don't worry yourself too much about me, for I have bookcases FILLED with beautiful books here in my home, as do my children. :0)

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: Lizzie Cornish 1
Date: 07 Apr 11 - 04:05 AM

Now, Shimmy, WHY would I be 'anti' anyone like you?

I have great respect for those who are true teachers, who want to help others to learn purely for the love of it, but I ain't into folks who seemingly want to anhilate the thoughts of others, purely because they go against all they believe in.

By the way, what exactly IS an 'Intellectual'?   I mean, in what way does someone who writes that on their forehead differ from someone else who may have not a single degree or examination to their name, but who has profound wisdom jumping in every part of their body, alongside a huge desire to share that wisdom with others who want to listen...?

Is it that The Intellectual deems himself/herself to be far more er...intelligent?

Hmmmmmmm

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: Lizzie Cornish 1
Date: 07 Apr 11 - 03:58 AM

He was, I believe, so it says in er...'books', already questioning his belief, and when his daughter died, so his faith died with her and his thoughts on Evolution evolved ever faster.....But if she *had* lived, would his faith have continued to live alongside her, alongside his evolutionary thoughts?

Would God and Evolution have become entwined into an EvolutionaryRevolutionaryGod....?

Just another thought..that's all.

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: GUEST,Shimrod
Date: 07 Apr 11 - 03:55 AM

"...but my thoughts come from inside me, rather than from inside books which are, lets' face it, merely thoughts from inside other people."

'Merely' thoughts from inside other people? So, you're the only person capable of having original thoughts, then, are you Lizzie? What insufferable arrogance!!

Far from being original, your thoughts seem to consist of much re-hashed, cliched bunkum about 'spirituality' mixed with a lot of lazy, smug anti-intellectualism.

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: The Fooles Troupe
Date: 07 Apr 11 - 03:29 AM

Of course he would Lizzie ... he had Faith.

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: Lizzie Cornish 1
Date: 07 Apr 11 - 03:18 AM

"And, Lizzie, I'm awfully tired of your relentless anti-intellectualism - you'll be burning books next!"

Only books where every chapter is seemingly filled with the same pontificating thoughts and words, Shimmy.

YOU know I know nuzzink....

*I* know I know perhaps one helluva lot more than you do.

...but my thoughts come from inside me, rather than from inside books which are, lets' face it, merely thoughts from inside other people.

'Original Thought' shimmy, is the section in the Library where you should be looking...but I'll give you a clue, the shelves will be empty......

All you have to do is to figure out why....

;0)

And now, back to endless rounds of "Oh yes there is!" "Oh no there isn't!"


I wonder, if Darwin's daughter had *lived*, would he have fallen to his knees and thanked God, in a purely instinctive reaction?

Just a thought.......

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
Date: 07 Apr 11 - 01:45 AM

God is dead!-(Nietzsche)
Nietzsche is dead--(God)

As far as the simile, I noticed, Steve, that you cut off the first part of the quote, liking people who 'poo-poo' God, to frigid nasty virgins, as in horny and frustrated, but unwilling to try 'it' out.

So, let's stay in context,(for once) and don't cherry pick parts of phrases that you can so easily misconstrue!

It's also dishonest!

GfS

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: The Fooles Troupe
Date: 06 Apr 11 - 07:40 PM

frogprince - you being naughty again?

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 06 Apr 11 - 05:53 PM

i believe ,that generally people just know,though some like yourselves believe you dont

Then you're an insufferable, pompous sod then, aren't you?

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: GUEST,Shimrod
Date: 06 Apr 11 - 05:35 PM

"i confess, i believe ,that generally people just know,though some like yourselves believe you dont."

Some people convince themselves that 'they know' all sorts of silly things - but could it be that they actually know nothing?

"you claim that i am in denial re darwinism yet i see no reason to believe it."

It's not a question of belief, is it pete? It's a question of evidence. And for the umpty-ninth time the Theory of Evolution, like all scientific theories, is INCOMPLETE. There's nothing wrong with that - live with it!

And, Lizzie, I'm awfully tired of your relentless anti-intellectualism - you'll be burning books next!

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: Dave MacKenzie
Date: 06 Apr 11 - 04:56 PM

"She said, 'There is no reason
and the truth is plain to see.'
But I wandered through my playing cards
and would not let her be
one of sixteen vestal virgins
who were leaving for the coast
and although my eyes were open
they might have just as well've been closed"

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: frogprince
Date: 06 Apr 11 - 04:49 PM

Will the virgins, be unfrozen,
by and by, Lord, by and by?...

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: frogprince
Date: 06 Apr 11 - 04:47 PM

The virgins are coming, tra-la-la-la

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: Dave MacKenzie
Date: 06 Apr 11 - 04:44 PM

'This is my way; where is yours?' thus I answered those who asked me 'the way'.
For the way - that does not exist. (Nietzsche)

as quoted in 'The Scorcese Connection' by Lesley Stern.

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: Lizzie Cornish 1
Date: 06 Apr 11 - 04:35 PM

Gawd, will you lot please stobbit!

We've all got the gist, even if we haven't got science!   Now put your bunsen burners on, warm up your hearts and souls and get ready for The Second Coming, either of God or the Now We're Not So Frigid Virgins....

and then...SMILE!


Yeesh, too much science makes chaps awful serious! ;0)

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: GUEST,pete from seven stars link
Date: 06 Apr 11 - 04:10 PM

i guess we come back to the same thing yet again.you ask for evidence for Gods existence.you deny that there is a deity to reject; and yet in a disrepectful ,insulting manner that reeks of rebellion more than asking for evidence of his existence.
i confess, i believe ,that generally people just know,though some like yourselves believe you dont.
you claim that i am in denial re darwinism yet i see no reason to believe it.you seem to think that i would ,if i read into it much more,despite a number of phds also rejecting it.
you write off such scientists for their biblical presuposition yet evolutionism involves unproven presupositions such as abiogenesis and macro change via information losing mutations
best wishes. pete

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 06 Apr 11 - 12:20 PM

I see that Guffs From Simile is slagging off "frigid virgins" in another thread now. In between bouts of severe Godliness too. There must be a name for that condition. Or at least a simile for it. "Barking" springs to mind...

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: GUEST,Shimrod
Date: 06 Apr 11 - 11:59 AM

Did your EXPERIENCES involve any 'similes', GfS? If so you might want to find out what a simile actually is, re-visit your EXPERIENCES and re-evaluate those EXPERIENCES in the light of the new information.

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 06 Apr 11 - 10:35 AM

...only thing more pathetic is rapidly aging homosexuals, watching their time run out!!
Must be hitting close to home, eh, Steve?

You wouldn't know what a simile was if it jumped up and bit you on your nasty little gonads. Your insinuation was crystal clear. Oops, sorry, I was using rather long words for you there, wasn't I?

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
Date: 06 Apr 11 - 10:08 AM

I never called anyone here a rapidly aging homosexual...it was a simile.

Idiots!

GfS

Subject: RE: BS: Got Science?
From: The Fooles Troupe
Date: 06 Apr 11 - 08:58 AM

"No wonder you don't believe in intelligence being the ability to process information!!!"

Ah - more inchoate raving from the one honored with The Order of The T.W.I.T. by so loudly proving himself lacking that attribute!