Lyrics & Knowledge Personal Pages Record Shop Auction Links Radio & Media Kids Membership Help
The Mudcat Cafesj

Post to this Thread - Sort Descending - Printer Friendly - Home


BS: The Royal Knickers

Related threads:
BS: The Royal Wedding/baby (203)
BS: Bill and Kate to visit Canada (35)
BS: Royal Wedding Drinking Game (12)
BS: I'm Not Going To Bill & Cate's Wedding (96)
Oh, THAT wedding!!! (43)
BS: Royal Wedding Announcement (165)
BS: Queen invites murderer to wedding (80)
BS: Royal Wedding Film (23)
Folk Session on the royal wedding wkend (9)
BS: Bishop Suspended - critic of royal wedding (152)
music suggestions for the Royal Wedding (10)
queen refuses to attend wedding (69)


Fred McCormick 22 Apr 11 - 12:27 PM
GUEST,Eliza 22 Apr 11 - 12:34 PM
ChrisJBrady 22 Apr 11 - 12:35 PM
GUEST,Eliza 22 Apr 11 - 12:37 PM
gnu 22 Apr 11 - 12:42 PM
McGrath of Harlow 22 Apr 11 - 12:56 PM
Ebbie 22 Apr 11 - 01:02 PM
gnu 22 Apr 11 - 01:08 PM
GUEST,Alan Whittle 22 Apr 11 - 01:55 PM
gnu 22 Apr 11 - 02:02 PM
Lizzie Cornish 1 22 Apr 11 - 02:56 PM
GUEST,Shimrod 22 Apr 11 - 02:58 PM
Dave MacKenzie 22 Apr 11 - 03:30 PM
Lizzie Cornish 1 22 Apr 11 - 03:34 PM
gnu 22 Apr 11 - 05:01 PM
Stilly River Sage 22 Apr 11 - 06:11 PM
GUEST,Alan Whittle 22 Apr 11 - 07:26 PM
Fred McCormick 23 Apr 11 - 03:44 AM
Lizzie Cornish 1 23 Apr 11 - 03:46 AM
catspaw49 23 Apr 11 - 04:33 AM
frogprince 23 Apr 11 - 10:57 AM
GUEST,Alan Whittle 23 Apr 11 - 11:04 AM
frogprince 23 Apr 11 - 11:11 AM
Stilly River Sage 23 Apr 11 - 11:13 AM
frogprince 23 Apr 11 - 11:27 AM
frogprince 23 Apr 11 - 11:34 AM
frogprince 23 Apr 11 - 11:44 AM
gnu 23 Apr 11 - 01:43 PM
BrooklynJay 23 Apr 11 - 08:41 PM
Bee-dubya-ell 23 Apr 11 - 09:10 PM
BrooklynJay 23 Apr 11 - 11:23 PM
GUEST,Alan Whittle 24 Apr 11 - 04:27 AM
ollaimh 24 Apr 11 - 11:17 AM
Dave the Gnome 24 Apr 11 - 11:55 AM
Fred McCormick 24 Apr 11 - 01:48 PM
gnu 24 Apr 11 - 02:01 PM
The Fooles Troupe 24 Apr 11 - 10:57 PM
catspaw49 25 Apr 11 - 12:20 AM
Bainbo 25 Apr 11 - 11:56 AM
Fred McCormick 25 Apr 11 - 12:47 PM
GUEST,Eliza 25 Apr 11 - 03:13 PM
GUEST,Eliza 25 Apr 11 - 03:14 PM
gnu 25 Apr 11 - 03:24 PM
olddude 25 Apr 11 - 05:03 PM
olddude 25 Apr 11 - 05:13 PM
Lizzie Cornish 1 25 Apr 11 - 05:38 PM
Dave MacKenzie 25 Apr 11 - 05:58 PM
Don Firth 25 Apr 11 - 06:01 PM
The Fooles Troupe 25 Apr 11 - 07:11 PM
Stilly River Sage 25 Apr 11 - 10:09 PM
The Fooles Troupe 25 Apr 11 - 10:22 PM
Stilly River Sage 26 Apr 11 - 11:34 AM
GUEST,Alan Whittle 26 Apr 11 - 12:11 PM
frogprince 26 Apr 11 - 12:43 PM
MGM·Lion 26 Apr 11 - 01:13 PM
WalkaboutsVerse 26 Apr 11 - 01:14 PM
gnu 26 Apr 11 - 01:40 PM
The Fooles Troupe 27 Apr 11 - 08:52 AM
The Fooles Troupe 27 Apr 11 - 09:03 AM
gnu 27 Apr 11 - 01:35 PM
The Fooles Troupe 28 Apr 11 - 02:25 AM
CupOfTea 28 Apr 11 - 02:40 PM
gnu 28 Apr 11 - 02:50 PM
Lizzie Cornish 1 28 Apr 11 - 03:22 PM
GUEST,Alan Whittle 28 Apr 11 - 07:48 PM
MGM·Lion 29 Apr 11 - 04:33 AM
frogprince 29 Apr 11 - 12:37 PM
gnu 29 Apr 11 - 03:26 PM
gnu 29 Apr 11 - 03:26 PM
Don(Wyziwyg)T 30 Apr 11 - 11:15 AM
Dave MacKenzie 30 Apr 11 - 03:14 PM

Share Thread
more
Lyrics & Knowledge Search [Advanced]
DT  Forum Child
Sort (Forum) by:relevance date
DT Lyrics:













Subject: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: Fred McCormick
Date: 22 Apr 11 - 12:27 PM

So this is what it's come to. After months of speculating over the wedding dress and the hat and the shoes and the bridal wreath, there was a piece on AOL news this morning, now taken down, thank God. It told us that Kate Middleton is in the habit of wearing cheap undies which she buys from a bargain clothing shop.

I'm sure we all needed to know that.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: GUEST,Eliza
Date: 22 Apr 11 - 12:34 PM

Totally mad! If her knickers aren't her own business, what IS? And anyway, what's wrong with getting things from a bargain shop? Very sensible of her, in my view.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: ChrisJBrady
Date: 22 Apr 11 - 12:35 PM

Yeah - but in the photos of her shopping recently she looks size zero. Another bulimia princess aka 'Diana' on the way?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: GUEST,Eliza
Date: 22 Apr 11 - 12:37 PM

I agree, CJB, she's painfully thin. It isn't attractive, just worrying. Do you wonder if she's got an eating disorder? Very sad if she has.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: gnu
Date: 22 Apr 11 - 12:42 PM

So that's who she is. Thought I had heard the name before. And yes, she is thin. No hips on the lass. She must use a padded saddle on the polo pitch.... or field or whatever it's called.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: McGrath of Harlow
Date: 22 Apr 11 - 12:56 PM

You're clearly very interested in all this.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: Ebbie
Date: 22 Apr 11 - 01:02 PM

Perhaps realizing that one is about to be pitched in to negotiate one's way through a life relentlessly hounded by the camera, mired in the sticky adoration of one side and the rank hostility of the other might be enough to put anyone off one's appetite?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: gnu
Date: 22 Apr 11 - 01:08 PM

I'd say so Ebbie. Tough go.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: GUEST,Alan Whittle
Date: 22 Apr 11 - 01:55 PM

When I first met you – you wore PSYCHEDELIC PANTIES


When I first met you – you wore psychedelic panties
So many pretty colours and excitement I could touch
When I first met you – you wore psychedelic panties
And I swear I worshipped you and loved you so much.

But I dreamed of being a poet, with words that would transcend life
Transport my readers from dull reality
Transcend a life with you wearing psychedelic panties.....!
They always said I was crazy, now I'm forced to agree.

I'd swap every word and song I wrote
To feel again the rapture, somehow perhaps recapture
The excitement of the moment, the feelings I could touch
Of when I first met you and you wore psychedelic panties
For back then I worshipped you, and loved you so much.

©words and music by Alan Whittle 16/04/2011 11:57


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: gnu
Date: 22 Apr 11 - 02:02 PM

Good stuff Al.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: Lizzie Cornish 1
Date: 22 Apr 11 - 02:56 PM

Lovely, Al. :0)   

Gawd, takes me back to when I had some of those, brightly coloured bikini ones, worn under bell bottom jeans..Happy days.

.....and...I had a waist!   At least..I think I did..er....


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: GUEST,Shimrod
Date: 22 Apr 11 - 02:58 PM

May I say that it's very gratifying to know that her Royal Highness has thrifty underwear purchasing habits.

Uuuuurrrgghh! Help!! I feel a fawning attack coming on!! Her Royal Highness is so lovely and graciou ... aaaarrgghh ... and His Royal Highness is SSSUUUUCCCHHH a fine young ma .... aaarrrggghhh! Help me!! God Save Her GRACIOUS Queen, Long Live ... Hhhheeelllppp!!! Royal Wedding ... YOUR MAJESTY!!! Cuurtsy, curtsy, bow, bow, bow ... Nnnnnoooo!!! Prince Charles ... Saint Diana - People's Princess ... Princess Anne ... grovel, grovel, grovel, grovel, fawn, simper, simper ... Little help here ...? Please???


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: Dave MacKenzie
Date: 22 Apr 11 - 03:30 PM

I thought this was going to be a historical study on how, through the ages, have robbed the people that they have purported to protect.....


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: Lizzie Cornish 1
Date: 22 Apr 11 - 03:34 PM

I like William..and Kate's OK too. I hope they have a lovely day. They'd have both preferred to have had a quiet wedding..and I feel heart sorry for her with those damn paparazzi...They were all over her the other day, no wonder she's so thin...William must feel quite panic stricken that Kate may implode over it, just as his Mother did....I liked his Mum too...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: gnu
Date: 22 Apr 11 - 05:01 PM

Adverts on the telly here are for the wedding TV coverage to start at 3AM ADST. HUH?????


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: Stilly River Sage
Date: 22 Apr 11 - 06:11 PM

Some of Kate's knickers were on view in a fashion show a while back.

SRS


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: GUEST,Alan Whittle
Date: 22 Apr 11 - 07:26 PM

Perhaps we should confer a title on the royal knickers.

DM

Defender of the Minge


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: Fred McCormick
Date: 23 Apr 11 - 03:44 AM

Actually, there's a serious aspect to this. I was always under the impression that public reference to the knickers of the future queen of england was punishable under the Treason Act of 1351.

Do they still have bread and water in the Tower of London?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: Lizzie Cornish 1
Date: 23 Apr 11 - 03:46 AM

Yes, but they charge a fortune for it nowadays, Fred. ;0)


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: catspaw49
Date: 23 Apr 11 - 04:33 AM

Linda Ronstadt didn't wear underwear......Now that's a helluva' lot more interesting to me....................


Spaw


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: frogprince
Date: 23 Apr 11 - 10:57 AM

Linda Ronstadt without is an interesting thought; before Spaw chimed in, I was thinking we might be just as glad that Kate isn't known for going Paris/Britney style; that thought was...interesting, maybe...but not that appealing.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: GUEST,Alan Whittle
Date: 23 Apr 11 - 11:04 AM

I did a tv programme called Bananas in Germany years ago with Linda Ronstadt. She never mentioned not wearing not wearing any panties. its a pity - I would have been all ears.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: frogprince
Date: 23 Apr 11 - 11:11 AM

"all ears"? I would have been all somethin', but not all ears!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: Stilly River Sage
Date: 23 Apr 11 - 11:13 AM

Joining Carmen Miranda in that dicey club?

SRS


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: frogprince
Date: 23 Apr 11 - 11:27 AM

Linda R's photo from the "Hasten Down the Wind" album is a ways down the page


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: frogprince
Date: 23 Apr 11 - 11:34 AM

That's different; I tried my own link, saw it didn't work, and I thought I had gone to recheck the addy without submitting the post.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: frogprince
Date: 23 Apr 11 - 11:44 AM

Have triple checked that location, and still can't get it to link. Anyhow, on looking at that album photo again; I have to admit that I have been able to bring that image up in my mind at anytime since back when I first saw it. But in all that time, I never really looked as the lower part of the picture and raised the question of just how much really is showing through that gauze.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: gnu
Date: 23 Apr 11 - 01:43 PM

Al... you can breath through your ears? What the hell are doin in folk music?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: BrooklynJay
Date: 23 Apr 11 - 08:41 PM

Couldn't get that Linda Ronstadt link to work, but perhaps this one might: click here.

Unfortunately, the years have not been too kind to Linda. Click here for a recent photo. Sorta looks a bit like Dawn French to me...

Jay


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: Bee-dubya-ell
Date: 23 Apr 11 - 09:10 PM

Who cares about Kate's knickers? What about Her Majesty the Queen? Wonder if ol' Liz will be sportin' a frilly hot-pink thong under her Grandmother-of-the-Groom dress?

I'll give you a few moments to come to grips with that image in your own way.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: BrooklynJay
Date: 23 Apr 11 - 11:23 PM

You had me quite scared for a moment - I thought your post was going to be about Prince William's knickers...

Jay


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: GUEST,Alan Whittle
Date: 24 Apr 11 - 04:27 AM

Well actually I had wondered about William - theres never any visible pantie line when he's fannying round Scotland in a kilt.

And now you mention it - now that the scots have their own parliament - i wonder why they don't chuck the Royals out of their estates and flog them as timeshares to fund the no student fees policy - it would be a wake up call for England to do the same.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: ollaimh
Date: 24 Apr 11 - 11:17 AM

well i continue to wonder why anyone needs or wants a royal family--ok have a theme park for the tourists but lect the head of state with te same powers and the uk is a happy republic, or here in canada elect the governor general and presto republic. chuck as king--ugh ugh ugh

i'd rather have carrot top

and lindsay lohan as king and queen


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 24 Apr 11 - 11:55 AM

I'd rather see the royal knickers than the royal knockers. Best not think of either I suppose...

MP


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: Fred McCormick
Date: 24 Apr 11 - 01:48 PM

From comments above, it seems the future royal knockers would not be very much to grope about at all.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: gnu
Date: 24 Apr 11 - 02:01 PM

Fred... look at the pics. It's her hips that are small, not her


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: The Fooles Troupe
Date: 24 Apr 11 - 10:57 PM

Prince Charles to become Bigamist!

Countdown to royal fairytale

25th April 2011

THIS Friday night, a modern-day fairytale will unfold when Prince William and Kate Middleton take the plunge at Westminster Abbey.

The Chronicle will this Thursday publish the special, eight-page Royal Wedding lift-out which will trace the romance of the Prince of Wales and the high-profile fashionista.

The lift out will be the ideal way to officially kick-start the countdown to the year's most anticipated wedding.

Get it with your copy of The Chronicle this Thursday.

~~~~~~~
:-)


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: catspaw49
Date: 25 Apr 11 - 12:20 AM

There's a swimming pool at Westminister Abbey? Cool...........Going to be a wet wedding is it?


Spaw


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: Bainbo
Date: 25 Apr 11 - 11:56 AM

Q. What's the difference between Royal Ascot and the Royal Knickers?

A. One covers the Royal Hunt Cup ...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: Fred McCormick
Date: 25 Apr 11 - 12:47 PM

This is somewhat off topic but I've just hit a website run by a vicious far right political party. According to said frpp they won't be celebrating the weddding because Prince William is "the son of a collaborator and Grandson of a traitor".

I'm lost, I'm completely lost. I presume by collaborator, they are screaming stinking fish about Princess Diana and her relationship with a Muslim, namely Dodi Al-Fayed. But who on earth do they mean is the traitor supposed to be?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: GUEST,Eliza
Date: 25 Apr 11 - 03:13 PM

How daft! Perhaps they're referring to Prince Philip's sisters, who I believe all married Germans, some of whom were Nazis.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: GUEST,Eliza
Date: 25 Apr 11 - 03:14 PM

But then, they'd probably approve of Nazis wouldn't they?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: gnu
Date: 25 Apr 11 - 03:24 PM

A vague reference to The House of Hanover Eliza?

I wonder what kinda knickers they wore.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: olddude
Date: 25 Apr 11 - 05:03 PM

I think they are great I really do, it is a joy to see him so happy and she is a cutie for sure ... I am sure he knows exactly what unders she wears already ... Like can be a beautiful thing sometimes ...

Oh to be young again


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: olddude
Date: 25 Apr 11 - 05:13 PM

can't type that should read "life can be a beautiful thing sometimes"


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: Lizzie Cornish 1
Date: 25 Apr 11 - 05:38 PM

"Unfortunately, the years have not been too kind to Linda. Click here for a recent photo. Sorta looks a bit like Dawn French to me... "


Linda's 65 this year. I think she looks lovely. But then, I've always thought Dawn French is very beautiful. So long as she's happy, who cares?


I'm with you on William and Kate, Dan. I'm glad to see him happy. He's a nice man...and of course, he's marrying into the 'ordinary people' too, which I'd have thought would have been rejoiced over, because one day, in the not too distant future 'one of us' as opposed to 'one of them' may just be the next Queen of England.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: Dave MacKenzie
Date: 25 Apr 11 - 05:58 PM

"the next Queen of England."

Do you know something we don't?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: Don Firth
Date: 25 Apr 11 - 06:01 PM

The British Monarchy has a lot of interesting history behind it. Were it to be abolished, some British folks might be happy about it, but I think many more would feel that they have lost something of considerable national importance.

The four huge presidential faces on Mount Rushmore aren't good for much of anything other than as a spectacle, a reminder of important events in America's history, and to bring in a few tourist dollars, but I wouldn't like to see them demolished.

Does the royal family actually provide a worthwhile function anymore? I understand that they can be quite important diplomatically when the occasion arises, and they certainly perform many functions in the historical/ceremonial line. Monarchs and members of the royal family (families) have certainly provided a lot of material for historians and dramatists to work with:   Shakespeare, a number of wonderful BBC series' that have been shown in the U. S. (The Six Wives of Henry VIII, Elizabeth R.), movies like Mary, Queen of Scots, The Lion in Winter, many, many others. . . .

And God knows, they keep a lot of gossip columnists and scandal-mongers off the dole and give misanthropes something to moan, hiss, and snarl about.

Who knows? William may be a prince of a fellow in his own right, even if he hadn't been born into the Royal Family.

We have two young people here who are in love and are about to be married. To those who jeer, sneer, and make rude noises about them, I place this curse:

May a large, ugly wart with three stiff black hairs growing out of the middle of it it suddenly appear on the tips of your noses!

Don Firth


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: The Fooles Troupe
Date: 25 Apr 11 - 07:11 PM

Maybe they are referring to the abdicating King and his American wife with alleged nazi sympathies...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: Stilly River Sage
Date: 25 Apr 11 - 10:09 PM

The way I see it, they finally got smart with this most recent generation. Edward VIII abdicated because it would be an abomination if an American divorcee was the wife of the King. I don't know the particulars of Philip and Elizabeth, but it sounds like she tolerates him. Does she love him? Probably grew to.

The nonsense that Charles couldn't marry Camilla years ago and had to marry a young virgin was just too much to be borne by a lot of people. I'm sure he's glad that out of the marriage with Diana he has two wonderful sons - divorced people can regret the marriage without regretting the children. I'm sure that as his children grew, and after their mother's death, that Charles made very sure that his mother the queen knew that his sons weren't going to go through the same humiliation and time-wasting nonsense that he had to. And they're better for it. In this day and age, that kind of arranged marriage smacks of humans needing papers like show dogs. Looking back, it makes the House of Windsor look very shallow for making Charles go through with that marriage. It makes them look like they're in the 21st century now that the heir may marry for love.

SRS


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: The Fooles Troupe
Date: 25 Apr 11 - 10:22 PM

"Edward VIII abdicated because it would be an abomination if an American divorcee was the wife of the King"

That's the cover story. Now that many alive then are deceased, more facts are coming to the surface. She was highly pro-nazi (as indeed many Rich Americans were at the time - there was a strong US Nazi party till Pearl Harbour and Hitler declared War on the USA a few days after) - great personal friends with many high ranking nazis, and Edward was very amenable to them as well. Many such as Churchill were adamant that if he remained as King, Britain would become officially pro nazi too.

Some of this is covered in, and highly relevant to the recent movie "The Kings Speech". Documented too.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: Stilly River Sage
Date: 26 Apr 11 - 11:34 AM

There was also reference to it in this week's Upstairs/Downstairs they showed in the U.S. Some were very cosy (and the Windsor family is originally German, is it not?)

SRS


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: GUEST,Alan Whittle
Date: 26 Apr 11 - 12:11 PM

'Maybe they are referring to the abdicating King and his American wife with alleged nazi sympathies....'

who cares what they refer to - they're bonkers.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: frogprince
Date: 26 Apr 11 - 12:43 PM

Why should we settle for this kind of superficial media coverage about the "royal knickers"? Why isn't someone doing some serious in-depth reporting? Shouldn't we know how much fuzz will be in those things? Will it grow free, be trimmed back, or will it be shaved off completely?
Oh, did I just exceed the bounds of good taste? Sorry, but I guess the boundary got a little blurry there.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: MGM·Lion
Date: 26 Apr 11 - 01:13 PM

Why did you choose your nickname, Frogprince, if you can't be a bit more respectful towards somebody who might well be the one to give you that essential magic kiss?

~M~


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: WalkaboutsVerse
Date: 26 Apr 11 - 01:14 PM

Blue.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: gnu
Date: 26 Apr 11 - 01:40 PM

froggy... you crack me up, yet again. Hahahahahaaa.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: The Fooles Troupe
Date: 27 Apr 11 - 08:52 AM

This is bizarre...
ABC forced to pull Chaser wedding coverage

Just two days before Prince William and Kate Middleton are due to tie the knot, ABC TV has been forced to cancel The Chaser's one-off live coverage of the event due to what it says are restrictions imposed by the royal family.

The Chaser's Royal Wedding Commentary was due to air on ABC2 from 7:00pm AEST on Friday, offering viewers a satirical take on the royal wedding.

But now the live special - promised to be "uninformed and unconstitutional" - has been reluctantly pulled due to restrictions imposed over the Easter break.

ABC TV was initially advised by the BBC, and subsequently by Associated Press Television News (APTN), there were no coverage restrictions that would prevent The Chaser's wedding commentary.

But new conditions of use issued by APTN over the Easter break state footage cannot be used "in any drama, comedy, satirical or similar entertainment program or content".

ABC TV director Kim Dalton says he is disappointed.

"The national broadcaster has acted in good faith in its negotiations around ABC2's planned coverage with both the BBC and APTN," he said.

"We're surprised and disappointed at this very late stage to be informed that any satirical or comedic treatment of the marriage of Australia's future head of state has been banned."

As late as this morning the BBC issued a new contract imposing additional restrictions on the use of its material.

"ABC TV had always planned to take the BBC's full coverage with commentary on ABC1, however, like other broadcasters, we thought Australians would appreciate an alternative take on this major event," Mr Dalton said.

"The Nine Network has Dame Edna giving her commentary and the Ten Network has the 7PM Project taking a light-hearted approach to the royal wedding.

"Our obvious choice for a light-hearted commentary is The Chaser team. Clearly, the BBC and Clarence House have decided The Chaser aren't acceptable."

The Chaser's Julian Morrow says the team accepts the ABC has been put in an "impossible position by people acting on behalf of the royal family".

"For a monarchy to be issuing decrees about how the media should cover them seems quite out of keeping with modern democratic times... but I suppose that's exactly what the monarchy is," he said.

"It's traditional for the condemned to appeal to the monarch for a stay of execution, so that's what we're going to do.

"Unfortunately it's also traditional for people who appeal for clemency to be executed."

Morrow says the move goes against free speech.

"It seems a bit crazy for the royal family to be trying to dictate the way they get represented in the media," he said.

"It seems a bit out of step with a modern democracy, but I suppose royalty is out of step with a modern democracy, so there you go."

The Chaser's Chris Taylor says it is an "honour" to be taken off air by the Queen herself.

The APTN advisory says the restrictions on the coverage of the wedding ceremony from Westminster Abbey have been agreed between Clarence House, the private office of the Prince of Wales, and the BBC.

According to the advisory, restrictions apply to the "period from the arrival of the first member of the royal family for the wedding service until the last member of the royal family leaves the main entrance of Westminster Abbey following the conclusion of the wedding service".

ABC1 will still be taking the BBC coverage of the wedding, including its commentary, and ABC News and ABC News 24's coverage will not be affected by the ban on ABC2 usage.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: The Fooles Troupe
Date: 27 Apr 11 - 09:03 AM

Chaser fans 'gutted' over axed wedding show

Users of Facebook and Twitter have vented their anger, calling the BBC "wankers" and directing obscenities towards the Queen.

"The royals: such a joke that they can't take any," Jay Dessi wrote on the ABC's Facebook page.

"How do I complain? They need to know they should come to their senses or they will turn me into a republican. I never cared before, but I care now," said Sharnell Shipard.

"They made me care enough that I just joined Prince William's Facebook page to lodge a complaint. I haven't sat through weeks of wedding crap on TV to have the only part I was looking forward to taken from me."

....

"Oh! For Kate's Sake! The Chaser's coverage of the wedding was the part that people were ACTUALLY looking forward to," @Cameron_John said.

Some fans even encouraged The Chaser to "just do it anyway".

"What are they going to do? Set the governor general on you?" @ScottCllns tweeted.
~~~~~~~~~~

Some friends have set up their own facebook page to throw virtual tomatoes .... :-)


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: gnu
Date: 27 Apr 11 - 01:35 PM

Not very sporting of them.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: The Fooles Troupe
Date: 28 Apr 11 - 02:25 AM

There's apparently quite a rumble building over it. Yet 'Dame Edna' a guy dressed up as a lady pretending to have received a fake award of nobility is ok....


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: CupOfTea
Date: 28 Apr 11 - 02:40 PM

They can't quite be the "Royal" kinckers if she's not a royal yet, no? (Being American, i suspect this is so, not quite sure how that works...)

*I* have seen the genuine "We are NOT amused" article: Queen Victoria's used knickers.

Really.

Honest.

The Kent State University Costume Museum had them on display years ago, and me without my camera, dagnabit. I do recall it vividly, though

Joanne in Cleveland


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: gnu
Date: 28 Apr 11 - 02:50 PM

Actually, not my cup of tea.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: Lizzie Cornish 1
Date: 28 Apr 11 - 03:22 PM

Queen Vickie was sooooo teensy. They had a display of her clothes at Killerton House a few years back..including her underwear..

Hope no-one puts my knickers on display when I pop my clogs. Heck, I'd better leave orders for them to be burnt....or....burn them before I go!   I'll be the only 85 year old going commando! ;0)


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: GUEST,Alan Whittle
Date: 28 Apr 11 - 07:48 PM

If you'd like to entrust a used pair to me Lizzie, I'll make sure they don't fall into the wrong hands.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: MGM·Lion
Date: 29 Apr 11 - 04:33 AM

And whose hands would they be, then, Al?

~M~


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: frogprince
Date: 29 Apr 11 - 12:37 PM

Actually, Gnu just about said it all on the "not going" thread early this morning"

       "Sniff..."


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: gnu
Date: 29 Apr 11 - 03:26 PM

Well froggy... not quite...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: gnu
Date: 29 Apr 11 - 03:26 PM

.... COME OFF TONIGHT!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: Don(Wyziwyg)T
Date: 30 Apr 11 - 11:15 AM

""the next Queen of England."

Do you know something we don't?
""

I think she probably does, assuming that you are unaware that the title "Queen" is not automatic, and is very unlikely to be applied to Horse Face, since she is not his first wife.

Most likely is "Princess Consort", a sort of mirror image of Philip.

The other thing to remember is the extreme longevity of the females of that family. Charles is very likely to pop his clogs well ahead of the present incumbent, and for the sake of the public perception of the royals that might not be such a bad thing.

William and Catherine certainly present a much less stuffy appearance.

Don T.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: The Royal Knickers
From: Dave MacKenzie
Date: 30 Apr 11 - 03:14 PM

I'm old enough to remember (just) when Lizzie was the beautiful young queen with her dashing naval officer husband. Then Charles was the dashing young heir with his beautiful bride. What'll be the public perception of Wills and Kate in 40 years time?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate


 


You must be a member to post in non-music threads. Join here.


You must be a member to post in non-music threads. Join here.



Mudcat time: 20 April 1:21 AM EDT

[ Home ]

All original material is copyright © 2022 by the Mudcat Café Music Foundation. All photos, music, images, etc. are copyright © by their rightful owners. Every effort is taken to attribute appropriate copyright to images, content, music, etc. We are not a copyright resource.