 sj |
||
|
||
Mudcat name
|
|
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: Wheatman Date: 26 Jun 12 - 03:34 AM When I joined Mud Cat I did not know the rules so thought you had to have a nick-name, so I made one up which related with my connection with Straw Bears. Most of my contacts in real life know who I am and my telephone number and address has been on Whittlesea Straw Bear publicity for the past 32 years or so. I don't think I have been compromised because of this but it is best to take whatever security measures you feel are necessary. gan canny Brian |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: GUEST,Psychomorris Date: 26 Jun 12 - 03:20 AM I am just mad about Morris or is it that Morris is mad about me? Or is it that Morris is mad anyway? So it was the only name for me. (Morris groupie, retired Psychiatric Nurse). |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: Tootler Date: 25 Jun 12 - 08:03 PM I use a pseudonym here. I don't make a particular secret of who I am, I just choose to use a pseudonym. I use the same one for most forums if I can and if someone else has taken it already I usually use "TootlinGeoff". It comes from my wife referring to my recorder playing as "Tootling". I recently referred to my trying out some ukuleles in a shop as as "Plinking" so maybe I have an alternative should I need one. Regardless of the fact that I use a Pseudonym, I am usually pretty careful about what I write. I have been caught out once or twice because I didn't think and check before pressing "send". Nothing serious - just a telling off on one forum - but enough to give me pause for thought. Simple rule is to check "Preview" before submitting and only finally submit after you have checked through what you have written and edited it if necessary. |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: Steve Shaw Date: 25 Jun 12 - 07:19 PM My name and address have been in my local phonebook for over 35 years. I'm not exactly inviting anyone to make a career out of tracking me down, but Jeez, it ain't hard! Grishka's bullet points are pretty sensible, but read on. But what I'm really getting at are those people who think they can say what they like with utter abandon under a pseudonym. Just take a look at any popular Youtube video and read the crap underneath. You even get it on here. And if anyone is dissing me gratuitously on a public website I reserve the moral right - yeah, moral - to publish his name and/or photo if I happen to lay my hands on them. They have forfeited their right to anonymity as far as I'm concerned. |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: JennieG Date: 25 Jun 12 - 06:46 PM There are 681 of me (first and last name) in the USA.....133 of me (first and last name) with my maiden name in the USA...... but when I google my full maiden name, first, middle and surname, there's only me. It's on a family history site, so I know it's me. I'm unique - how about that? Cheers JennieG....Jennie because it's one version of my first name, G because it's the initial of my middle name, therefore I am unlikely to forget it. |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: GUEST,Grishka Date: 25 Jun 12 - 06:26 PM Steve, there is some moral implication (though not dictation) in the original posting; it may be read to the effect that any decent person should use her or his full name, thus visibly taking full responsibility for what she or he writes. That is the usual practice in personal communication ("My name is Bond, James Bond"); I think that different rules apply in a public internet forum accessible to search engines. Haruo, unfortunately people are often assessed by irrational criteria. Imagine a bank clerk who is a Newborn Seventh Day Anabaptist and happens to mistrust all Progressive Catholics, perhaps unconsciously. I may be wrong in this special case, it just serves as an example. The general rules are in my opinion:
|
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: gnu Date: 25 Jun 12 - 04:24 PM Megan L is right. I have never made a secret of my real name or city where I live. Perhaps I should have because a woman in Europe began telephoning me (I live in Canada) and harrassing me until I told her I would call the RCMP the next time she phoned me. She no longer posts at Mudcat, that I know of. She harrased other Mudcatters as well and got caught out at it. Ya never know who is on the other end of the internut. Trolls and bullies are all warm and fuzzy until they mess with ya. Then, it's too late. |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: Haruo Date: 25 Jun 12 - 03:43 PM If you move, most search engines will think you have bifurcated like the amoeba you're descended from... I'm also not clear why anything Joe Offer has done here would be an obstacle in seeking a bank loan. |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: Steve Shaw Date: 23 Jun 12 - 12:58 PM I haven't seen anyone trying to dictate. Just a healthy variety of experiences and opinions. It's interesting to read them all. |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: Megan L Date: 23 Jun 12 - 11:10 AM I once made the mistake of using my given name on another site. A woman I had been talking to took that information and general area and tracked down my phone I was getting over 20 calls a day from her at all hours. This only stopped when my husband told her he had now gathered enough information from her calls to pass on to the police if she ever called again. There are lots of dangers on the internet people should be aware and take what precautions they can to keep themself safe. |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: GUEST,punkfolkrocker Date: 23 Jun 12 - 11:04 AM way I see it.. you either use your own real life identity, or you make up a name; it's entirely up to you... simple & easy as that. What might concern me more is why some folks seem so insistent on attempting to seize & monopolise the moral high ground to try to dictate the choice everyone else should make..???? |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: Geordie-Peorgie Date: 23 Jun 12 - 10:18 AM My first 'addition' to a Mudcat thread was after I'd enjoyed the site for about three months - as a 'punter'. Then one day I wanted to respond to someone's post, but in the 'geordie' vernacular. So I decided to register with a 'geordie' name (not unlike my own!) and efter that it wez aall playun sailin', man! Aah've made some serious friends - some aah've met at mudgathers & festivals, some aah've only met online - but the've aall been a source of fun and inspiration ower the years. Aah divvent get te visit the site like aah used te but when aah dee, they're aall there - and some new uns! Thanks 'catters, it's aalwez a treat! |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: Steve Shaw Date: 23 Jun 12 - 08:44 AM You have a choice. Rejoice in your real name and post under it, and avoid letting people know the specific times when you're out. There are easy enough ways of doing that: a quick re-read of your post before sending is the simplest. Everybody in the world knows that I'm out some of the time, as I'm not a recluse, though I studiously avoid giving out specific details, but no-one here has a clue what thugs I've left behind to guard the place or what massive collection of vicious dogs I harbour. Or carry on as you are now. |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: Bugsy Date: 23 Jun 12 - 02:11 AM I'm with 'Spaw. Who gives a Rat's? Cheers Bugsy |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: ChanteyLass Date: 23 Jun 12 - 01:01 AM Steve Shaw, you wanted to know about the "privacy reasons" that some of us have for using pen names. In my case, I often post info about concerts or festivals in my area. I go to some, but not all, of them. However, I know that if someone breaks into my home while I am at one (or worse at home instead of at one), the police and others will be smirking that I gave out information online that indicated I would be away at the time of the event. And just by posting this i hope that I have not made myself more vulnerable. |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: Rapparee Date: 22 Jun 12 - 07:54 PM There are, according to that website, two people with my full name and one or fewer using the diminutive. Quite honestly I don't care anymore, but I keep what I have for consistency. |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: GUEST,Grishka Date: 22 Jun 12 - 07:02 PM Joe, you volunteer not only your complete name, but many details about your life and personality. Sometimes I have the feeling that I know in advance what you think. That is of course your intention, to give Mudcat a kind of personal touch, and certainly earns you more respect than "infamy", as you well know. Nevertheless, I hope you never have to apply for a bank loan. Those who really care should not be too sure that they cannot be distinguished from their namesakes. We all give additional clues. In my own case, I do not worry too much about being recognised by Mudcatters (very few are likely to know me), but I do not want my full name mentioned. It is a probably unwritten but self-evident matter of etiquette to respect such wishes. Most Americans have their "middle initials" for easier identification. Google finds a couple of "Joe B. Offer"s etc. The site "howmanyofme.com" is definitely not reliable. Note that bank clerks and private eyes have more refined methods of searching - about LEA, I am not so sure ... |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: Steve Gardham Date: 22 Jun 12 - 06:58 PM 'applying for a job' I thought we were all retired or self-employed performers. |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: stallion Date: 22 Jun 12 - 06:54 PM "Fewer than 1" hu only one I have found on the net! Mine is from Two Black Sheep and a Stallion - I was the one drinking Hambleton Stallion that infamous night we got our name! |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: GUEST Date: 22 Jun 12 - 06:42 PM Spaw... "Why do people need to have a Mudcat name? Why would anyone give a shit? What's wrong with a given name? Generally nothing but yours pretty well sucks. Go with Sneed Hearn instead. Welcome to the 'Cat!" Pretty much sums it up. I would be more brief... they don't. |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: topical tom Date: 22 Jun 12 - 03:28 PM I like topical songs, hence my Mudcat name.Tom is not my real name but I like the alliteration. |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: Joe Offer Date: 22 Jun 12 - 11:35 AM Grishka sez: This is of course irrelevant to those whose Mudcat contributions are part of their public appearance. They had best use the name by which they want to be famous. In my case, I achieved infamy instead of fame. Oh, well... Here are the results on "Joe Offer" at http://howmanyofme.com/search/
Note, however, that the Website says There are 5 people in the U.S. named Joseph Offer. So, maybe they're right, in a way. If you want to change your Mudcat name, that can be done. However, you now have to contact me to do it, and I keep a record of all name changes. We do not allow people to have more than one membership, but there are some that have many. Go figure. -Joe- |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: GUEST,Grishka Date: 22 Jun 12 - 08:59 AM (Suibhne, I remember the days when most Chanson performers actually smoked while singing. Ashtrays were rarely used. Then sublime, now ridiculous, for those who escaped lung cancer.) Any mentioning of a full name at Mudcat, as a nick or in the text of a message, allows anyone to find it via search engines. Most of us will claim to have nothing to hide. But assume you are applying for a job or a bank loan, would you like the clerk to know everything you wrote here, including your opinion on BS matters and details about your involvement in music? This is of course irrelevant to those whose Mudcat contributions are part of their public appearance. They had best use the name by which they want to be famous. A good nickname should give a hint about the bearer's gender and cultural background, to facilitate communication. |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: Nick Date: 22 Jun 12 - 08:57 AM I use my name as it seems easiest. I did used to very occasionally use Isaac Hornbill (or if I felt like being female - Sharon Bacilli) as both are anagrams of my name but it's too much hassle. I agree with Steve. |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: Highlandman Date: 22 Jun 12 - 08:35 AM No, Joe, you're not alone in reading Sublime Ashtray on a quick scan. I often think that unreliable eyesight has made my world a lot more interesting than it otherwise would have been. Oh the things I have seen that never were! -Glenn |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: GUEST,Suibhne Astray Date: 22 Jun 12 - 07:08 AM Well - I'll be Jack Blandifer / GUEST Blandifer come the weekend, Joe. And I'm sure you're not alone in reading it as Sublime Ashtray, bringing me back to the glory days of smoke-filled singarounds with everyone smoking apart from whoever was singing. Not so very long ago really when you think of it, but almost impossible to imagine now. I've still got an old blue-glass McEwans ashtray tucked away someplace in case of a relapse... I do miss the reek of 'Sailor' Ron Baxter's pipe though; it added a certain touch of authenticity to a session. |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: Joe Nicholson Date: 22 Jun 12 - 06:42 AM The thing is with using funny names they often give no clue as to gender you see Suibne Astray ( which being a bit of a scanner I read as Sublime Ashtray) I always thought you were a lass until today. Joe Nicholson |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: Joe_F Date: 21 Jun 12 - 05:02 PM I have never paid much attention to my nickname on various sites; if a site assigns me one as a default, I leave it that way. That explains why I am Joseph Fineman on Facebook. Joe_F is my email address; I chose it when I moved from The World to Verizon because jcf had already been used at Verizon. I am come_to_think at LiveJournal because the other possibilities had already be used, and my zine on the Gay Amateur Press Association had been so named. |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: Gurney Date: 21 Jun 12 - 04:00 PM When I came to Mudcat, it was from a site that sometimes dissolved into acrimony. Nothing to do with me, but I knew the identity of several people involved, and on that site, I just lurked. With Mudcat, I chose to use a childhood nickname, given to me long ago because I carelessly let it be known that I liked a BBC series called 'Gurney Slade.' I needn't have bothered, though. The short version of my Christian name is unisex anyway, and few remember my surname for long. Chris. |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: Phil Edwards Date: 21 Jun 12 - 03:33 PM Continuity Jones is an anagram of my birth name. Jenny Nictotious! I always wondered what happened to you. Loved the album. Seriously, that's an excellent anagram, whatever it's an anagram of. The best I could come up with was "Lewd" Pip Radish; the "Lewd" didn't laat for obvious reasons. |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: GUEST,sciencegeek Date: 21 Jun 12 - 03:09 PM well, I came somewhat late into social sites & the advice then was to use a "handle"... seemed not unlike CB use, but it took awhile to find a user name that wasn't already taken. I'm sciencegeek51 on most other sites... lol. I can remember it - dang, oldtimers!- and it does fit me... though my interests are so diverse - I really do find scientific method to be the "obvious" way to look at things in life. I try to be courteous when I'm online, even when spiteful nonsense is directed my way by individuals whom I neither know nor probably care to know. My identity is known to other mudcatters that I have either met in person or had other contact with. My given name doesn't really give any real personal information about me and irrelevant - unless you're a long lost, wealthy relative. LOL Chris Setari |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: Haruo Date: 21 Jun 12 - 01:29 PM I use "Haruo" (Used to be Liland) even though my official (certified) name is "Leland Bryant Ross"; I prefer Haruo (which was my name in the Japanese public schools when I was a kid) in a lot of contexts (especially in Esperanto, which a lot of my life is lived in and where it is useful to have a name that ends in-o) and use it here, and at BaptistLife.com where I am a moderator, besides using it most of the time in Esperanto contexts (with the odd and now regretted exception of Facebook, where I unaccountably listed myself as Leland Bryant Ross even though more than half of my FB'ing is in Esperanto). |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: frogprince Date: 21 Jun 12 - 10:39 AM The "Cat" was the first place I ever "said anything" online apart from online shopping. My profound reason for using a moniker was that I saw that a big share of the people did, so I did. My wife has an outrageous number of collectible wooden, ceramic, plastic, glass, plaster, metal, stuffed cloth, and photographed frogs, and kisses from her make me feel a lot more like a prince than I usta feel. Dean Elkins. (www.frayedtrain.com) |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: Ross Campbell Date: 21 Jun 12 - 10:33 AM I spotted the potential Sweeney/Suibhne Astray conflict a while back - obviously more Seamus Heaney fans out there. Fair enough, continue in the great tradition of Flann O'Brien/Brian O'Nolan/Myles na gCopaleen if you must! Ross |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: EBarnacle Date: 21 Jun 12 - 09:40 AM Why hasn't Chongo weighed in on this? |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: Don(Wyziwyg)T Date: 21 Jun 12 - 08:34 AM When I joined I chose the name which was given to me by a folk club reviewer who liked my comic songs (at least, I think he liked them), and dubbed me Wysiwyg (What you see....etc), but it was pointed out that this moniker very closely approximated Susan's. So I changed it to Don(Wyziwyg)T, Don being my real given name and T the initial of my real surname. Not much cowardice there really, and even real names identify nobody to any other than those who already know the person. As for guests,....well.. As Spaw said, "Who gives a shit?" Don T. |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: GUEST,Suibhne Astray Date: 21 Jun 12 - 08:24 AM I made a point of never insulting or belittling anyone as a person I'd never do that, at least not without severe provocation (I can think of one occasion when I flew off it in your direction when I was being personally attacked from elsewhere, but we were quick to make ammends). I'm amazed how much personal abuse I get here though for simply trying to talk about stuff that matters, but none of what I say is in any way personal. Not naming names, but it really is very odd that they's sooner abuse me than talk rationally. That said, the most upset I ever caused here was for DEFENDING another Esteemed 'Catter's right to call me a **** without their post being 'moderated'. I might have retaliated a teensy bit, but, hell, I'm only human, you know? * NOOOOOOOOOOOOO! Despite Ross's above protests, I'm counting down the days to when I become Jack Blandifer (or rather GUEST Blandifer seeing as this bloody heap of crap never keeps me signed in). I hear what you're saying though, Ross - but there's now a Preston band called Sweeney Astray and I'm keen to avoid any confusion... |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: Richard Bridge Date: 21 Jun 12 - 07:48 AM *of* |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: Richard Bridge Date: 21 Jun 12 - 07:46 AM It is the online culture if anonymity that leads to irresponsibility. However, on BIG issues (think whistleblowers about government misconduct) anonymity can be valuable - but alas given government resources that is the last example in which real anonymity prevails for long. I favour real names and the late Dave Bryant did too. |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: Rain Dog Date: 21 Jun 12 - 07:17 AM Well I guess it is a case of singing horses for courses. I would like to point out that any name used means much the same to me unless the poster goes on to reveal more information about themselves.Be it GUEST,Howard Jones, Ron Cheevers or Rapparee, I don't know who they are unless I want to go back trawling through their old posts |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: Phil Edwards Date: 21 Jun 12 - 07:07 AM One chap faced me quite agressively on a Mudcat issue at the bar once Dear Lord. That does suggest a lack of appreciation of what's what, and in particular of what matters. When I was more heavily involved in online communities I made a point of never insulting or belittling anyone as a person - several times I told someone they were being an idiot or worse, but never (as far as I could manage) that they were an idiot. Online it's all a performance to some extent - we all get into habitual ways of writing, & sometimes the habits we get into are idiotic habits. |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: IanC Date: 21 Jun 12 - 06:53 AM I was just Ian before we had to register our names or post as GUEST. Then I discovered someone else was. Ian Chandler |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: JHW Date: 21 Jun 12 - 06:08 AM I reckoned my initials were easy for other posters to write without the need to copy and paste; and those who know me will recognise them anyway. John Hepple Wilson |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: Dave MacKenzie Date: 21 Jun 12 - 05:11 AM I use my birth name for the same reasons as Phil Cooper, but also because there are so many of us that it's confusing enough as it is. Guess who one of my favourite film directors is! Many decades ago, my first wife complained that she (and my mother) called me David while the rest of the world called me Dave (apart from a few who still called me David R), and did that mean I was a different person at home from in the world at large. I'm more concerned with the spelling of my surname. |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: GUEST,Suibhne Astray Date: 21 Jun 12 - 04:41 AM for all I know the elbows-out Suibhne is actually more authentic than civilised Sean. On Mudcat it's blether & ideas - just words, opinions, passions & perspectives born from our various personal concerns & agendas. Naturally one approaches such things with a degree of academic detachment. Maybe I should sign my posts with a nice smiley emoticon? In real life such things tend not to matter in the grand scheme of things, especially in a wider social setting of a singaround or session, where my inclination is to simply have a ball. One chap faced me quite agressively on a Mudcat issue at the bar once - I told him to cool his heels: online, fine - but not in our cups. I believe in Folk 'n' Fun : which is to say Folk is Folk - and Fun is Fun; it's as serious as your life in terms of political & cultural legacy, and for many I know it can't be serious enough! Ye canna win! |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: GUEST,Howard Jones Date: 21 Jun 12 - 02:39 AM I post under my real name because I couldn't be bothered to think up a net name. I couldn't see the point, other than to conform with what appeared to me to be a rather geeky custom. There are plenty of people who know me, admittedly in a very small subset of the English folk world. I also have a responsible professional job. I don't believe I have posted anything on Mudcat or elsewhere that I would not be prepared to say in real life. I haven't been intentionally offensive to anyone (although I have engaged in some robust debates), and if I have been unintentionally offensive then I would be prepared to apologise. I don't see the need to hide my identity to protect either my musical reputation (such as it is) or my professional one. Furthermore it seemed to me that using an oline name would not just be to disguise my real personality but to take on a different one - as is possibly demonstrated by Sean/Suibhne. Choosing a name might therefore influence, perhaps unconsciously, the online persona I took on, and should not be done lightly if I were to be able to post with integrity. I decided that an online name was not something to be adopted casually. Perhaps that's taking it all a bit too seriously, but I decided I didn't want to devote time and effort to thinking about it when I already have a name I am comfortable being known by. To quote TS Eliot, "The naming of 'Cats is a difficult matter, it isn't just one of your holiday games." |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: Rapparee Date: 20 Jun 12 - 10:06 PM I'm retired from being a public librarian. Being in a very real sense a public person with a common first name I didn't mind using an alias. I started as "Rapaire" but not everyone knows variants of Irish, so now I'm "Rapparee." If you don't know what a rapparee was I suggest you go look it up -- I'm a retired librarian. |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: Janie Date: 20 Jun 12 - 09:41 PM Steve, not everyone who posts on Mudcat are musicians, much less professional musicians. I am a psychotherapist. |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: catspaw49 Date: 20 Jun 12 - 09:07 PM Spaw is obviously short for catspaw.....I used the pseudonym because back then they were pretty common. Hide anything? No....on this site you can find a complete medical history of me for the past 14 years as well as my name (Pat Patterson) and all the other boilerplate info. Spaw has become so commonly used that when I talk to other 'Catters, although they know my name, they call me Spaw and indeed it is Spaw that I've become. Although Pat might tell you something in his long winded way, Spaw would more often cut to the chase as he's grown weary of typing anymore. So to answer in the best traditions of Spaw............. Why do people need to have a Mudcat name? Why would anyone give a shit? What's wrong with a given name? Generally nothing but yours pretty well sucks. Go with Sneed Hearn instead. Welcome to the 'Cat! Spaw |
|
Subject: RE: Mudcat name From: Ross Campbell Date: 20 Jun 12 - 08:24 PM "That reminds me, it's been too long since I changed my Mudcat name... " (Suibhne Astray) NOOOOOOOOOOOOO! (Unless Joe Offer agrees to set up a cross-index of all name-changers - or updates all previous references with the new moniker - some threads get very difficult to follow because ALL posts from the individual concerned get changed to the new name, while replies still address the old name - which cannot then be found in the PM search.) Forgive me - it's an age thing! Ross |
| Share Thread: |