BS: Prince Harry's bum

Subject: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: Jim McLean
Date: 24 Aug 12 - 01:20 PM

I could almost see two arseholes.

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: Ebbie
Date: 24 Aug 12 - 01:30 PM

Personally, I didn't look that closely. Other people's interests differ. :)

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: Q (Frank Staplin)
Date: 24 Aug 12 - 04:06 PM

Aren't most women more interested in what is in front?



(Ducking for cover)

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: McGrath of Harlow
Date: 24 Aug 12 - 04:26 PM

I've been trying to think of anywhere on the planet I wouldn't choose over Las Vegas. Couldn't really come up with anywhere.

What a boring young man.

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: Georgiansilver
Date: 24 Aug 12 - 04:35 PM

Actually you didn't see any arseholes... they were taking the pictures!

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: Q (Frank Staplin)
Date: 24 Aug 12 - 05:05 PM

Las Vegas is (in)famous for its varied entertainment (Cirque de Soleil and Dream among them), reasonably priced hotels, gambling and showgirls.

In reality, it is a fine city with a good university, natural history and science (three, varied), children's, railroad, atomic testing and art museums, a botanic garden, a pleasant temperature in winter, and a middle class atmosphere to much of the City. Varied foods offered at the many ethnic and North American restaurants.

Nearby lakes, Mojave Desert flora and fauna close by. Not far to Grand Canyon, Hoover Dam, Zion National Park.

An excellent place to visit in winter and spring, but hot in the summer.

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: frogprince
Date: 24 Aug 12 - 05:08 PM

So, did Prince Harry moon Las Vegas, or what in blue blazes is this about?

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: MGM·Lion
Date: 24 Aug 12 - 05:29 PM

I like Las Vegas ~~ kitsch capital of the world.

What the 3rd in line to The Throne chooses to wear within its boundaries is, however, of no interest to me whatsoever.

~M~

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: gnu
Date: 24 Aug 12 - 08:12 PM

Vegas seems like a fun place to visit.

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: Don Firth
Date: 24 Aug 12 - 09:24 PM

I knew a guy who apparently really made it big in Las Vegas. He went there in a $12,000 car and after about a week, came home in a $200,000 Greyhound bus.

Actually, if you don't get all caught up in the crapola, it's a fairly interesting place. My wife and I spent about a week there as guests of a distant relative of my wife's. The relative's husband played electric guitar in a four-piece band that was backing a girl singer in a lounge in one of the casinos. I learned that there is one helluva lot of talent in Vegas that nobody ever hears of. The girl singer was fantastic!

We didn't go to any of the big shows (some are kinda pricy). We did a bit of gambling one evening (Barbara's relative insisted that you can't come to Vegas without at least having a little flutter). I won about twenty bucks at keno, a game I know nothing about. I would have like to take a crack at the blackjack tables because you can win at that if you know what you're doing, and I'm pretty good a blackjack.

Around the casinos, the food is good and really inexpensive. What they may lose on the food, they figure they'll make up on the slot machines. And there are slot machines everywhere! Never touch 'em. They're set, or so I was told, to pay out about 30% of what they take in. But since all you have to know is how to put a coin in a slot and pull a handle, they're generally played by drooling idiots and the senile.

Fun town. Interesting stuff to see and it's not ALL kitsch.

Don Firth

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: Beer
Date: 24 Aug 12 - 09:29 PM

Right on Georgiansilver. Sure he's royalty but he's also a young man with hormones going every which way. I say good for him.
Ad.

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: Don Firth
Date: 24 Aug 12 - 09:32 PM

By the way, I notice one kind of interesting thing. With hundreds or thousands of gambling machines that you can drop coins in, hoping for a jackpot, all dinging and jingling, if you wander around a casino just listening, it sounds like millions of little elves all playing tiny hand bells. Sorta charming.

Don Firth

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: gnu
Date: 24 Aug 12 - 09:41 PM

Beer... was that a whore moaning? That is the question on every busybody's libido. The prurient arseholes!

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: Beer
Date: 24 Aug 12 - 10:19 PM

Well Gnu, I hope he got Lucky. And her as well.
ad.

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: Dave Hanson
Date: 25 Aug 12 - 04:24 AM

Good for him ? and all the while the British tax payers are paying for security men to look after him wherever he choses to go in the world except when he's ' at work ', a total wanker in my opinion, not one ounce of nous or common sense.

Mind I've no admiration for his so called friend who took photo's and then sold him out for a quick buck.

Dave H

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: Owen Woodson
Date: 25 Aug 12 - 05:07 AM

Prince Harry 'eh? What a tosser. Now I know what people meant when they said the emperor had no clothes. Well, the third in line to the British throne at any rate.

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: GUEST,Eliza
Date: 25 Aug 12 - 05:11 AM

His bodyguards were IMO at fault. They couldn't have protected him dressed in shorts sitting in a pool. He should have known better than to invite unknown young women into his private apartment, it shows a lack of judgment. And he is not just any young man, he is the Queen's grandson and in fact represented her at the closure of the Olympics. As such it's undignified and embarrassing to have pictures of him in the nude on view around the world. He isn't in fact all that 'young'. Many men his age are fathers and have a mortgage etc. And he has a life of great privilege and wealth. This I'm afraid comes at a price.

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: GUEST
Date: 25 Aug 12 - 05:13 AM

Oh, how can some people be so depressingly predictable.

Yawwwwnnnnnnn!!!!!!

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: GUEST
Date: 25 Aug 12 - 05:14 AM

Not you, Eliza ··· that other one before you!

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: MGM·Lion
Date: 25 Aug 12 - 05:18 AM

Sorry ~ GUESTs were me. Cookie went...

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: Roger the Skiffler
Date: 25 Aug 12 - 05:34 AM

If he'd missed anotherpot would he have lost that red star?


RtS

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: Owen Woodson
Date: 25 Aug 12 - 07:01 AM

It's solved one problem at any rate. For some time now, I've been pondering the question of what we do with the royal family once the revolution has taken place. That's the socialist revolution of course.

Being a humane and charitable individual, I would be dead against shooting them or otherwise disposing of them in a cruel manner.

One or two are now so old that they should be safely confined to a care home, and I would insist that the quality of service be at least as good as that which my late mother was lucky enough to enjoy.

Of the others, one or two are barking mad and would have to be forcibly detained for their own good.

That leaves those who are at least physically able to work. Here though, we run into the problems of skills and experience, or rather the lack of them. Some of them could be employed as cleaners or waitresses or other menial but intellectually undemanding jobs. But there's at least one member whose future is assured.

Can't you just picture it? Ladies night at the local social club. The punters sat rigid in rampant anticipation, while the compere announces the next act.

"Put your hands together for the great, the one and only HARRY, THE MALE STRIPPER!"

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: Dead Horse
Date: 25 Aug 12 - 07:03 AM

If you see him as just a young lad with more money than sense - what is the problem?
If you see him as a squaddie having fun between tours - what is the problem?
The only thing I have against him is that he is GINGER!!!

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: McGrath of Harlow
Date: 25 Aug 12 - 07:40 AM

Is the right term for man of 27 "young lad"?

Surely the term "squaddie" means a private soldier, rather than a Captain?

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: McGrath of Harlow
Date: 25 Aug 12 - 11:43 AM

I see the latest tabloid label is "Dirty Harry"...

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: GUEST,CS
Date: 25 Aug 12 - 01:38 PM

Bum? Is that all they've got? Tsk, I thought celebrities these days were supposed to provide much better value for money. Where's the 'sex tape' or the 'I smoked pot' confessional?
What with all the public money they have available for generating scandal, the Royals really should get up to speed.

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: GUEST,CS
Date: 25 Aug 12 - 01:41 PM

Jeez, even big ears outdid him with Tampongate!

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: Georgiansilver
Date: 25 Aug 12 - 02:57 PM

Latest pic of Royal family!   As a Royal I personally think Harry stands out in a crowd!

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: Beer
Date: 25 Aug 12 - 03:04 PM

Hahhahahahahaa!!!!!!!
Lol, good one.

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: GUEST,Saulgoldie
Date: 25 Aug 12 - 03:19 PM

Don't give a rats ass (ass!) about his bum. But Vegas? Vegas is a fake town that shouldn't even exist but for lots a water that it took from IMPORTANT users. Wait'll the water shortage catches up with it and they have to fight over it with the folks who are growing food! That'll be one to watch, fer shur.

Saul

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: GUEST
Date: 25 Aug 12 - 03:37 PM

I can never understand people referring to him as "Prince Harry" He is known to most in the UK as young Hewitt.

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: MGM·Lion
Date: 25 Aug 12 - 05:29 PM

Oh, do you think so, Guest? I have never met anybody who calls him so. That Hewitt canard was put to bed years ago. Red hair and those features run considerably in the Spencer family ~~ just look at his uncle, the present Earl. Or look at Gainsborough's portrait of the first Earl on the wiki page about the Spencer peerage. Still, always plenty of people who delight in flinging muck, aren't there?

~M~

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 25 Aug 12 - 08:00 PM

Yes but the absence of DNA test results to the contrary speaketh volumes. I mean, why wouldn't they just put the bloody thing to rest if they could. I care not a jot, to be honest. Anyway, the fact that he was "doing it" corgi-fashion to a young woman is irrelevant. I envy him that, frankly. What is a tad more questionable is his judgement, let alone exhibitionist tendencies, in carrying out a sex act in front of someone else in the room. That someone with a camera. When you're supposed to be a bloody royal. What a twat!

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: MGM·Lion
Date: 25 Aug 12 - 11:43 PM

Wouldn't disagree with those final animadversions, Steve; what a silly fellow* indeed: but it was of course the demon rum speaking ~~ one of the things which induced me entirely to give up drinking a dozen or so years ago, along with the fact that I suddenly realised that I had never actually liked it much.

Be a bit understanding about the obvious diplomatic or ethical or whatever reasons for not proceeding with any sort of DNA test ~ the implications of even appearing to contemplate such a thing...

~M~

*Rather than the epithet you chose: & I am the one that the booby Woodson accuses of being unable to post without abuse. He really is something else, isn't he!

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: MGM·Lion
Date: 26 Aug 12 - 12:43 AM

And moreover, Steve: would you not agree that if they had been unwise enough to DNA test when the rumours first arose, and they had proved that Hewitt indeed had no place in the matter, there would have been plenty ready to mutter or shout 'cover-up'. Trouble is, once any such story gets current, (from Holocaust-denial to moon-landings being filmed in the Arizona desert to Myra Hindley having been released on the qt but an empty coffin buried for fear of public repercussions), there are always plenty of awkward people who persist in believing the perverse 'flat-earth' version!

~M~

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: GUEST
Date: 26 Aug 12 - 03:11 AM

James Hewitt bears more than a strong resemblance to young Harry.Diana admitted she was very attracted to "The Love Rat."

Unfortunately for Hewitt, the boy is his double. Hewitt even told the press that he was prepared to be hypnotized(which makes any statement less credible,the subconscious is not a reliable memory source,to answer was Harry his love child...no wonder people's tongues are wagging!

I chose to believe with Hewitt told a close friend--that he was on Diana at any given opportunity during their affair. The affair which produced young Harry Hewitt.

Diana was not a totally stupid woman and knew of the importance of presenting the Windsors with an heir and a spare before embarking on numerous other affairs.


No wonder Harry is said to have problems... he is Hewitt.

Michael, you mentioned DNA testing: Harry wanted to take the test and the Queen said no,there was no need to bow to the salacious gossip.Harry is Hewitt's son, the Windsors have had the test done, be assured of that.

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: SPB-Cooperator
Date: 26 Aug 12 - 04:14 AM

I don't give a toss if he want to flash his bits (through he might have done). But ..... the announcment from the Sun (scum) was that they published it because it was important news that the public need to know about.

Now I find that a tad patronising

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: GUEST,Eliza
Date: 26 Aug 12 - 04:23 AM

Harry is a much-loved son and grandson. Whoever his father was/is doesn't alter the fact that he's a member of the Royal Family in their eyes. As such, he must be prepared to modify his behaviour to some extent to conform to what is required by his position. IMO he lacks judgment and fails to realise that even in 'private' he cannot overstep the mark without seriously damaging the dignity of his family. One ought not to forget however that his childhood must have been extremely difficult and the tragedy of the loss of his mother when he was only twelve cannot have left him unscathed.

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: MGM·Lion
Date: 26 Aug 12 - 04:49 AM

See what I mean? GUEST reckons he 'knows' all these gossip 'facts'. Oh, they've done the test, have they? ~~ there were you, GUEST? The results have been suppressed, eh? ~ seen the secret documents have you?

Oh, go away...

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: GUEST
Date: 26 Aug 12 - 05:28 AM

The fact remains he is a love child and NOT a member of the Royal Family, what part of that do you not understand ?

He has proven to be a brat on more than one occasion, his upbringing cannot be used as an excuse anymore than old Philips's public insults.
It is time to drop this thing about a troubled childhood, his father is James Hewitt, Prince Charles knows it, watch the body language between them. His mother saw more cocks than Bernard Matthews and was "removed" as she was about to marry a Muslim.

It never fails to amaze me how some people only see what what they want to.

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: MGM·Lion
Date: 26 Aug 12 - 05:41 AM

The fact remains... people only see what what they want to.
.,,.
I don't quite believe you, GUEST. I mean, the fact of your existence.

'The fact remains,' does it? & of course you would know! I expect you met a man who said...

I mean, did I ever tell you that my late brother-in-laws cousin's mother-in-law met a man in a pub who knew the assistant camera [who happened to be Myra Hindley] when Lord Lucan, who had ridden up on Shergar, filmed the moon-landing on Salisbury Plain. Aldrin couldn't make it, so the deputy commandant of that holiday camp at Treblinka stood in for him.

God, 'some people will believe anything' right back to you.

Note ~~ I am not saying that your facts are necessarily wrong; may be 101% correct for all I know ~~ or for all you know either for that matter, Mr Knowitall; or your mother-in-law or your daughter's headmaster or your cat...

And you have the gall to say sarcastically "some people only see what what they want to".   Ha!

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: MGM·Lion
Date: 26 Aug 12 - 05:46 AM

& ~ Just out of interest ~ to quote your own cliché back to you ~~

What part of "You don't know any better than anybody else" don't you understand?

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: Big Al Whittle
Date: 26 Aug 12 - 05:56 AM

Mike, you'll be telling us that Queen Victoria wasn't jack the Ripper next...

And as for 9/11 - well its obvious it was a hologram of a plane...

Tell me Mike what draws you into these 'nutter on the bus' conversations. they seem to have a great attraction for you.

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: GUEST
Date: 26 Aug 12 - 05:58 AM

Michael, you know the Royal Family are rotten to the core when it comes to jockeying outside of marriage, it has been so for centuries.

Young Hewitt is no more a Windsor than you are. James Hewitt received the same handshake as Andrew Parker Bowles, they debts and silence were bought at a price.

I understand your pride is crating a blank in your eye.

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: GUEST
Date: 26 Aug 12 - 06:01 AM

Alan, he is a royalist, that is fine, but the truth of the matter is, he will not accept the fact Diana dropped them for James Hewitt, hence the young lad Harry.

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: Big Al Whittle
Date: 26 Aug 12 - 07:00 AM

Guest - do us the courtesy of revealing your person. Even the Lone ranger took his mask off when he was on the computer.

Mike is right. You may be 101% correct. But nowt is obvious. As Wilde said the truth is rarely pure and never simple. That's why Thatcher's bloody shopping basket was such an obscene reductio ad absurdum of the English economy.

What is the corollary of all these obvious truths. .. that we all march up to Buckingham Palace with a guillotine? I think the truths would need to be a bloody sight more obvious and damning than you have outlined.

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: Owen Woodson
Date: 26 Aug 12 - 07:15 AM

Forgive me if I've got this wrong, but aren't the royal family supposed to set an example to the rest of this? Is it not a fact that their imagined inviolability, to say nothing of their outrageous wealth, is part and parcel of an alleged selfless sense of duty and a freely discharged obligation to uphold the manners and customs and morals and values of this sceptered isle of ours? And hasn't Harry just ridden a metaphorical double decker bus through such crap?

"They gloom, they glour, they look sae big,
At ilka stroke they'll fell a Whig:
They'll fright the fuds of the Pockpuds,
For mony a bare arse is coming."

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: Bee-dubya-ell
Date: 26 Aug 12 - 07:49 AM

Illegitimacy is how royal families introduce enough genetic diversity into their lineage to avoid producing highly inbred blithering idiots.


It doesn't always work.

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: Owen Woodson
Date: 26 Aug 12 - 08:22 AM

Bee-dubya-ell. I hadn't thought of that one. It probably explains why we haven't had a monarch with anything resembling a grain of intellect since about the days of Charles 11.

IE., royal bastards went out of favour around then.

Subject: RE: BS: Prince Harry's bum
From: Big Al Whittle
Date: 26 Aug 12 - 11:14 AM

'Forgive me if I've got this wrong, but aren't the royal family supposed to set an example to the rest'

you got it wrong. you are forgiven, but don't push it.

the sort of people who think the Royal family set a good example probably think Bruce Forsyth is an entertainer.