BS: Should we sell Alaska???

Subject: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Bobert
Date: 15 Dec 12 - 10:15 PM

Well, looks like it might bring $7T to $10T... That's some serious cash, Jack...

I donno???

I mean, Russia might just be interested... Lotta gas and oil...

We didn't give squat for it compared to what we could get today and end all this "fiscal cliff" madness...

Whaddayathink???

B~

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Beer
Date: 15 Dec 12 - 10:22 PM

China is where the money is. But then again, how about Canada. We could exchange for some really good beer, maple syrup and poutin.
Adrien

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: GUEST,olddude
Date: 15 Dec 12 - 10:23 PM

more than that in gold alone, and fish, and moose .. I will buy it ... put it on Spaws credit card for me ok :-)

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: GUEST,Chongo Chimp
Date: 15 Dec 12 - 10:23 PM

Very cool idea, Bobertz. No one up there voted for me. Not even ONE vote was cast for the APP in Alaska in 2012! I say, sell the damn place. They're specists.

And if we do sell Alaska, then I can probably talk Sarah into movin' to Chicago and joinin' my team for the 2016 election.

After all, she ain't gonna stay there if the Russians buy it, is she?

- Chongo

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Bobert
Date: 15 Dec 12 - 10:28 PM

I donno, Chongz... I mean Miss Sarah is a ball-buster kinda woman... Think she'd make for a great "mail order Russian bride"... Plus, if the deal were to go down it would clear up one problem she has with her eye-sight... I mean, she could claim to see Russia from her livin' room...

B;~)

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: gnu
Date: 15 Dec 12 - 10:34 PM

WHOA! If I bid, does Sarah come with? Makes a big difference in my bid, eh? I mean, the valuation is shite if there is no Sarah.

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Sandy Mc Lean
Date: 15 Dec 12 - 10:37 PM

Well we could add a few more acres to The Great White North but if we have to take Sarah that's a deal breaker. We already have Harper and that makes more right wing shit than we can digest!

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Crowhugger
Date: 15 Dec 12 - 10:59 PM

Bobert I'll take it, conditional on vacant possession. Cheque's in the mail.

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Bobert
Date: 15 Dec 12 - 11:08 PM

I'll broom sweep it out for ya, C-hugger...

B:~)

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: GUEST,999
Date: 15 Dec 12 - 11:10 PM

Ebbie, KT and Alaska Mike are there and they're certainly treasures worth hanging onto, so while I have no say in it, I'd say no. Unless Canada buys it, in which case they can be dual citizens. Of course, we'd have to borrow the money from the USA.

Of concern to me, however, would be Sarah Palin's place in the deal. We have more than sufficient stupidity in our government already, thank you very much.

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Bobert
Date: 15 Dec 12 - 11:15 PM

Sorry, brucie, but the Sarah goes with it...

I know, "Times are tough"...

Hey, ya'll want Alaska and expect US to finance the deal, too, then we gonna get to call the terms...

Hey, she's no worse than yer current bum...

B;~)

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Big Al Whittle
Date: 16 Dec 12 - 12:01 AM

she gets on well with the Russians, they're her neighbour + I heard her say that....it would be a nice surprise for her.

i suppose giving it back to the original inhabitants is out of the question.

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: GUEST,999
Date: 16 Dec 12 - 12:01 AM

Ya got me there, Bobster.

PS: I just found out that Alaska Mike is now Florida Mike.

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Henry Krinkle
Date: 16 Dec 12 - 12:48 AM

Why don't you ask the people of Alaska, bobette?
What makes you think you have any say in the matter?
Why don't we sell the state of North Carolina to North Korea?
And Puerto Rico.
Could we sell it to Venezuela?
It makes my blood boil.
=(:-( ))

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Henry Krinkle
Date: 16 Dec 12 - 02:00 AM

We should sell our entire coastline for 100 miles inland. It's all going to be underwater in 50 years.
=(:-( ))

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Ebbie
Date: 16 Dec 12 - 02:34 AM

Well, I swan! Turn your back for a day or two and they try to sell the very ground from under your feet. If you are going to sell Alaska, the only one to sell it to is Alaska itself. We don't need no steenkin' USAsians. Not only do we have a plenitude of resources: fish, oil, timber, fur and spectacular scenic draws for tourism, not to mention HUGE amounts of land, including ports- but we have billions of dollars stashed away. (We're no dummies) You can only wish that you were sitting as pretty.

My feelin's is hurt, they is.

(Thank you, Triple9. You are a keeper.)

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Henry Krinkle
Date: 16 Dec 12 - 03:47 AM

We can sell our coastline and buy Canada.
Use your head, bobette.
=(:-( ))

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Bobert
Date: 16 Dec 12 - 08:34 AM

Hey, Eb...

Things might be even better for ya' if China or Russia owned ya'll 'cause part of the deal would include a guaranteed annual income, plus medical care, for the current folks living in Alaska from an perspective buyer...

Yo, Krinkx...

Puerto Rico or NC won't fetch the kinda cash... Alaska is worth about $10T... That's alot of dough...

B~

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Bee-dubya-ell
Date: 16 Dec 12 - 09:14 AM

Sounds like a good idea to me. I reckon the Chinese are going to own the entire US eventually, so let's sell 'em Alaska now and use the money to have a big ol' party while we wait for the excrement to slide the rest of the way into the fan.

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Ed T
Date: 16 Dec 12 - 09:52 AM

OK, someone had to add a bit of history to this thread:

History of Baked Alaska

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Ebbie
Date: 16 Dec 12 - 06:03 PM

Not China or Russia, por favor. If not for autonomy, I vote for Canada.

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Bobert
Date: 16 Dec 12 - 06:36 PM

Sorry, Eb, but Canada can't afford it... Not sure Russia can either... The likely buyer would be China... But, hey, it wouldn't effect ya'll much... Think of it like Japan owning Toyota of America... The folks building Toyotas ain't Japanese, they are Tennesseeians...

People askin', "But what about flag?"... Fair enough... Sign Puetro Rico up as the new 50th state...

Sorry, Eb... It's business...

B;~)

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: GUEST,Blind DRunk in Blind River
Date: 16 Dec 12 - 06:37 PM

Finally! A voice of flippin' reazon, eh? It is flippin' as plane as the nose on a bull's ass that Alaska should be a part of Canada, eh? Anyone with a flippin' grane of cents knows that! Ya just look at the map, fer flip's sake! There is a, like, HUGE distanse bewteeen Alaska and...whatever flippin' other part of the USA they are closets to.

Only trubble is...askin' $10 Trillyun is a bit steep! We do not spend that kinda money here on anything axcept maybe beer, eh? I kinda dowt that their is $10 Trillyun just layin' arowned waitin' to be spent here, know what I mean? It is too much. Make a better flippin' offer, I say.

- Shane

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Ed T
Date: 16 Dec 12 - 07:00 PM

Canada already has large, sparsely populated and unused northern lands and natural resources. What value would purchasing more northern land bring to Canada?




Some history on trusting others to negotiate with your interests at heart:
Alaska boundary dispute

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Ed T
Date: 16 Dec 12 - 07:09 PM

If Canada were to aquire additional territory, I suggust (and I believe many Canadians would agree) it be South of the most of the USA, not to the north.

Canada has abundance of the whatever northern stuff Alaska has already.

Canada missed the boat a few years ago by not letting Turks and Caicos join Canada (or a related relationship that was sought by these southern Islands).

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Bee-dubya-ell
Date: 16 Dec 12 - 07:16 PM

I dunno, Shane. You Cannucks are pretty resourceful. All you'd have to do is start out by buying some third-world dump like Equatorial Guinea for a trillion or so, make a few improvements, and resell it for two trillion. Then do the same thing again with someplace like Lichtenstein. Buy it for two and sell it for four. Heck, ya'll would have the ten trillion to buy Alaska after just three or four deals.

If ya'll need any help workin' out the details, we'll be glad to send you Donald Trump to lend a hand. He's an asshole with bad hair, but he knows how to turn a real estate deal, and we Yanks would love to get rid of him.

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: GUEST,Chongo Chimp
Date: 16 Dec 12 - 07:17 PM

If they had, so many Canucks woulda moved there for the good weather that the islands would probably have sunk!

- Chongo

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: gnu
Date: 16 Dec 12 - 07:28 PM

"Sorry, brucie, but the Sarah goes with it..."

SOLD! What a babe!

Yeah, I know that brains matter over looks but the dick in me just wants to... run up my Visa!

Sorry. That may be considered sexist. I, on the other hand, consider it horny. Oh, Sarah... take me to the mooze hunt. Orion will guide us.

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Sandy Mc Lean
Date: 16 Dec 12 - 08:23 PM

Ten trillion may be a high price but it should be paid to the good citizens of Alaska, not the US treasury. When Canada takes it over or re-claims what was theirs in the first place before Russia stole it the citizens will be filthy rich and we can get the money back through taxation.
Sorry gnu but Palin is still a deal breaker!

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Henry Krinkle
Date: 16 Dec 12 - 08:30 PM

Sarah really is gnu's type.
=(:-( ))

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Henry Krinkle
Date: 16 Dec 12 - 08:57 PM

She can be the Queen of Alaska
Alaskan Queen
=(:-( ))

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Bobert
Date: 16 Dec 12 - 09:04 PM

Sorry, Sandy, but the US bought it with our money and if it unloads it then there is no reason why we shouldn't get the dough...

I mean, the entire idea of sellin' if is about getting out own financial house in order... Selling it and givin' to Alaskans is dumb...

Why sell it at all if we gotta do that???

B~

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Little Hawk
Date: 16 Dec 12 - 09:10 PM

The question will be moot if Alaska pre-empts all this by seceding... ;-)

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Sandy Mc Lean
Date: 16 Dec 12 - 09:12 PM

Bobert, you bought stolen goods! Russia did not own much of what they sold to you! (think Brooklyn Bridge) Sorry you were suckered but we want back what is ours! You can keep Palin though! :-}

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Bobert
Date: 16 Dec 12 - 09:12 PM

Well, that's an interesting scenario...

B~

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Janie
Date: 16 Dec 12 - 09:58 PM

Geez! I don't have a passport, time or money to see the joint just now. Could we hold off a few years?

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Bobert
Date: 16 Dec 12 - 10:03 PM

Nah, Janie... Dump it now... Fiscal cliff is gone... We win... China wins... Ebbie wins 'cause as part of the deal she'll be guaranteed an annual income and health care...

I say, "$10T??? Let 'er rip"...

B~

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Beer
Date: 16 Dec 12 - 10:18 PM

There is no f....un loving way we will take Palin. Gnu did have a point though. I'm not up on the numbers but will this sale cover the fiscal cliff? If so we should do it. After all we own the rest of the North eh!. Oops! maybe I should not have said that. I wouldn't want to start a fight.
ad.

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Bobert
Date: 16 Dec 12 - 10:20 PM

Hey!!!

Palin will become a commie Russian... Ya' gotta love it...

B:~)

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Janie
Date: 16 Dec 12 - 10:24 PM

Rats....a pension and healthcare, or trip to Alaska, no passport required. Life is fraught with choices.

What is a girl to do???!!!!

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Beer
Date: 16 Dec 12 - 11:03 PM

Right on Bobert...
ad.

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Ebbie
Date: 17 Dec 12 - 03:35 AM

"Canada can't afford it." Bobert
Couldn't we Alaskans just kind of give ourselves to Canada? Oh, wait- I don't really like the attitude of Canadians on this question as evidenced by them here. Very disrespectful. And sharing a country with Shane? Ye gods. And you say that Canada already has everything that Alaska has? Ha. It is to laugh. No, I think we'll have to hold out for autonomy.

"When Canada takes it over or re-claims what was theirs in the first place before Russia stole it" Sandy McClain

A tad revisionist there, ain't we?

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Sandy Mc Lean
Date: 17 Dec 12 - 02:53 PM

All in fun Ebbie! In reality Russia only stole part of it, mostly the panhandle. Problem is the USA bought a pig in a poke but that's history long past! I would suggest that you declare yourselves an independant USA territory like before you joined the lower 48. That way you keep Palin and we keep Shane!

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Ed T
Date: 17 Dec 12 - 04:58 PM

Who takes Palin could be up to a Cdn 5C coin toss. Queen Eliz up, Canada take's her, Beaver up USA keeps her?

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: olddude
Date: 17 Dec 12 - 05:05 PM

blood boil Henry, well I once ate some blood sausage ... yuk ... ya don't want to boil blood and stuff it in pig guts .. I know some people like it but not me ...

How about some Moosehead stew ... now they got that there stuff in elaska they do ...

far as selling it outright, well I will take even with Sarah. Long as she don't talk much and just looks purddy ... I will ask Spaw fer his credit card, maybe we could use it to fix up old cars and park them in Ebbies front yard .. lots of idea's

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Ebbie
Date: 17 Dec 12 - 08:37 PM

Well, first off, you can stop dreaming about Sarah- ya don't have the money. The first thing she did with her notoriety is to buy a home out of state- no one here was surprised. As for Russia, unless they promised her a lifetime in headline news she wouldn't go for that either. A real patriot, she is.

Now: it is quite evident that the reason that you propose to sell Alaska is that no other state is worth as much. We'll keep it. Thank you very much.

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Little Hawk
Date: 17 Dec 12 - 11:18 PM

Secede, for gosh sakes! It's the obvious thing to do. Then we'll find out where Sarah Palin's true loyalties lie.

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Ebbie
Date: 18 Dec 12 - 12:34 AM

Seriously, I've met a number of old timers who disapproved of the statehood movement and to this day mourn Alaska's lost freedom and autonomy.

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: SINSULL
Date: 18 Dec 12 - 09:33 AM

I'll by it and set it free. Does that work for you, Ebbie?
SINS' bid $1000.00

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Little Hawk
Date: 18 Dec 12 - 01:50 PM

I'll beat that. I bid $1,200 for Alaska.

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: olddude
Date: 18 Dec 12 - 02:03 PM

I want Porcupine creek, there is gold in them there hills ... Me and Bruce will pan fer it .. I will go 1200.50   do I win?

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Little Hawk
Date: 18 Dec 12 - 02:04 PM

$1,300!

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Ebbie
Date: 18 Dec 12 - 02:06 PM

Keep talkin'!

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Sandy Mc Lean
Date: 18 Dec 12 - 04:59 PM

$1350

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Ed T
Date: 18 Dec 12 - 05:07 PM

$1, 350 and a wrist-watch.

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Sandy Mc Lean
Date: 18 Dec 12 - 05:37 PM

$1380 a mickey mouse wrist-watch and a Sarah Palin video.Sarah

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Ebbie
Date: 18 Dec 12 - 06:59 PM

Dan, do I hear TWO pocket watches?

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Bill D
Date: 18 Dec 12 - 07:31 PM

Sell? Totally silly! Rent!... by the week...


Oh... they are already doing that... extreme skiers and fishermen and gold prospectors and others. Don't waste yer 1300+ bucks, they'll keep yer money and deny they have it!

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: GUEST,Chongo Chimp
Date: 18 Dec 12 - 07:34 PM

$1,400.12 and some vintage signed photos of Johnny Weismuller, Maureen O'Sullivan, and best of all...Cheetah!

Beat that, suckers.

- Chongo

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Bobert
Date: 18 Dec 12 - 07:42 PM

Ahhhh, for all you big spenders... Get real... This is a reserve auction and the reserve price is $8T...

B~

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: GUEST,Chongo Chimp
Date: 18 Dec 12 - 07:56 PM

Who does this $8T get paid to?

- Chongo

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: gnu
Date: 18 Dec 12 - 08:31 PM

Oh my! I just watched Sarah on the rifle range in that video. That PHONY! She did not shoulder properly and her shooting stance was ENTIRELY wrong. I feel cheap... cheated... abused. But, I'd still like to

Now. Listen up ya history buffs. I have NO support for this so what I am going to say will be shat upon to no end...

The Yanks bought Alaska from the Russian Crown in 1867. Who owned Alaska in 1867? What was the owner's affiliation to the British Crown? Who became a country in 1967 rather than a Dominion of the British Crown? Who own's Russia, USA and the British Commonwealth today... and Alaska?

Eat yer corn flakes. And learn how to shoulder a rifle unlees yer as good lookin as Sarah. I am willin to let the rifle thing pass on accounta I could teach her about shooting properly. Ooooo... baby, could I...

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: GUEST,Chongo Chimp
Date: 18 Dec 12 - 09:04 PM

You sayin' the Queen owns it all, gnu?

I get yer attitude toward Sarah. No moss grows on that gal. I offered her a choice spot in the APP campaign team back in the last go-round, and my gal friend (and campaign manager) Renata just about took my head off...so I hadda forget about it. Anyways, Sarah wanted the top spot that time (candidate for president, not just the VP), and I could not give her that. It would not have made sense to my mostly primate constituency.

Tell ya one thing: if she ever did become president, it would scare the Russians and Chinese so bad that they would probably agree to just about anything.

...or they'd shoot first, just to maintain a sense of control. Hmmm. That would not be good. Well, not to worry. It ain't gonna happen that way anyway.

- Chongo

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Ebbie
Date: 19 Dec 12 - 07:08 PM

I must apologize to Bobert and all other enthusiastic marketers. I had no idea that this idea was already being promoted. And then I find this in the Washington Post (no clicky available):

Excerpts

Selling Alaska could fetch at least $2.5 trillion and maybe twice that amount,(Where did you get the $8 trillion figure, Bobert? I like it but it does sound somewhat excessive.

He (Lt. Governor Mead Treadwell) proposed that Alaskans themselves try to buy their state. (I hadn't realized that Mead and my minds run so much in tandem.)

Russia governed Alaska, which has been part of the United States for just 145 years. Vladi¬mir Putin, who is seeking to restore Russia's power and glory, could reestablish the seat of government at the former Russian capital, Sitka, a southern seaside town that still has a Russian Orthodox church, St. Michael's. First built in the 1840s, it houses icons from that era.(One has to laugh- at least this one does- why Sitka? Sitka is a lovely little town of about 8,000 inmates, I mean, inhabitants, but its weather is worse than Juneau's, it is even farther out of the mainstream - it's on an island for god's sake - and it didn't handle government all that well way back then. As for St. Michael's, the author evidently does not realize that the current building is a reconstructed one - the original burnt some time ago - while St. Nicholas Russian Orthodox church in Juneau is the real deal. It is the oldest church (1894) in southeast Alaska.)
. "We could print our own currency to complete the sale," Treadwell said, "but unlike yours, ours still could be backed by gold as well as vital rare-earth minerals, oil and gas, timber and fish, fur-bearing critters, geothermal and hydro power, flyover rights to Asia, valuable military bases, and of course our fastest-growing export — reality TV shows." (Mead speaks truth here.)

(On the downside, what would happen when the US again and inevitably runs up against the fiscal wall?)

We'd be bumping our heads against the ceiling again in six years — assuming, plausibly, that Democrats and Republicans can't agree on a budget deal and fiscal deadlock continues.
And at that point, we wouldn't have Alaska anymore.

Our fate — Alaska's fate? — is in Washington's hands.

Found at:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/to-solve-our-debt-problems-lets-sell-alaska/2012/12/14/1c63c1d6-4352-11e2-9648-a2c323a991d6_singlePage.html?tid=obnetwork

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: dick greenhaus
Date: 20 Dec 12 - 02:07 PM

FRom a pely business standpoint, you might as well sell of the states who get more revenue from the Feds than they contribute.

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Little Hawk
Date: 20 Dec 12 - 02:53 PM

China would be the most likely purchaser, I think. They've got the money, and they need more land to hold their enormous population.

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Bobert
Date: 20 Dec 12 - 03:51 PM

Eb,

I figured the WaPo low-balled the number thinkin' it could maybe get into the bidding war... Just basic bidding 101... Heck, if the cheap-skate Post is talkin' $2.5 T then it's gotta be worth 4 or 5 times that much...

The only down side I see is that if we got our deficit down again and a Republican became president that would mean more wars... They love 'um...

But, not to worry, Eb... I'm on top of this and if we sell it I'm gonna be sure that you and KT will live like queens for the rest of your lives...

B~

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: gnu
Date: 20 Dec 12 - 03:57 PM

gnu... "Who became a country in 1967"

???!!!... ahhhh, the only reason that I report my mistake is that I am ashamed.

LH... no, I am not sayin Bee owns it. I am sayin Vicky did and she worked out a deal with Al The II. It couldn'a been fer coin on accounta even the Irvings (google KC Irving, non-Canucks)don't sell land so... nahhhh, I don't even wanna think about her bein "liberated". She waddn't a hottie like Sarah and the thought of... eeewwww!

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Ed T
Date: 20 Dec 12 - 05:36 PM

If you can trace your ancestry back to the Romanov Dynasty, you may have a good case to ownership? You may be able to launch a international case that you cannot sell what was not yours, or that which taken from others under force?

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: gnu
Date: 20 Dec 12 - 05:50 PM

Ed... "or that which taken from others under force?"

Careful, buudy... you might find yerself on a boat back home.

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Ed T
Date: 20 Dec 12 - 05:54 PM

QWe did that under the British gnu, but we came back:)

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Ed T
Date: 20 Dec 12 - 06:05 PM

My mistake, Alexander II sold Russian America to the USA in 1867. that elimates any Romanov claim.

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: gnu
Date: 20 Dec 12 - 06:06 PM

I am of Irish and French decent (typo intended), Ed. Been at THAT shit for a thousand years, my families.

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Ed T
Date: 20 Dec 12 - 06:09 PM

You share my Irish and French "decent" gnu, (also with a dab of German, that is)

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: ollaimh
Date: 20 Dec 12 - 06:19 PM

who decided that alaska was for sale?

it would come with a few hundred thousand people with way too many guns. maybe give it back to the natives and the colonists could clear out!!



canada would really like a warm addition. i used to run for member of the nova scotia legislature on the platform of making canda warmer in the winter. let the carribean islands of turks and cacos join canada, which would raise average winter tempertures. the turks and cacos applied to join canacda. we turned them down and just built them a proper airport and landing strip and a few tourist hotels so they would have an industry.

i suspect the canadian governement was afraid if we owned some carribean islands, then all the people on unemployment insurance would relocate there while collecting the dole. i know i would have if i could have!!

i haven't had time to do mudcat this week, untuill today, i have to say some of youse guys have too much time on your hands.

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: gnu
Date: 20 Dec 12 - 06:19 PM

I was born in Zweibrucken (RCAF 3Wing) so I can claim to have been born in Germany.

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Don(Wyziwyg)T
Date: 21 Dec 12 - 04:07 PM

""Should we sell Alaska???""

NO!

Keep Alaska. Sell the USA!

Your governments of the last decades have already made a start.

Don T.

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Little Hawk
Date: 21 Dec 12 - 04:12 PM

gnu - Queen Victoria was actually a lively and attractive woman in her youth. We're just used to seeing pictures of her late in life, long after the death of her husband with whom she seems to have had a very happy marriage. There was a pretty cool movie out some years back about the young Victoria.

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: gnu
Date: 21 Dec 12 - 04:13 PM

I would laugh at that, Don, if it wasn't for the fact that Canada was being bought out by the USA first under NAFTA and now we are selling it to China and Brazil and... Kinda I-ronic that the USA is pissed about us selling it to others because THEY can pay top dollar.

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Ed T
Date: 21 Dec 12 - 04:39 PM

""some of youse guys have too much time on your hands""

You know hat hahhens with idle hands? That is what I would have if I lived in Alaska, if there was plenty of wood on the fire, that is.:)

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Ed T
Date: 21 Dec 12 - 04:42 PM

hat hahhens = what happens.

(I get cold and my hands shiver at the keyboard when I think of Alaska).

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Donuel
Date: 21 Dec 12 - 08:16 PM

If you know me I have proposed selling South Carolina to Isreal.
Better for US and better for Isreal. At least their enemies would not be as cunning as Arabs.

Subject: RE: BS: Should we sell Alaska???
From: Bobert
Date: 21 Dec 12 - 08:20 PM

S.C. wouldn't bring squat... I mean, most countries would want to be paid to take if off our hands...

B~