|
|||||||
BS: Elections: Tues. Nov. 4th |
Share Thread
|
Subject: RE: BS: Elections: Tues. Nov. 4th From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity Date: 10 Nov 14 - 01:46 AM How come THIS was deleted???? Subject: RE: BS: Elections: Tues. Nov. 4th From: GUEST,Why I didn't vote this time Date: 09 Nov 14 - 10:44 PM I reiterate................. I've been given a choice--Democrat or Republican--and I can't vote for either party. Especially when I know the following three things: 1) Most laws the government passes are illegal. The Supreme Court decided over 200 years ago in Marbury vs. Madison that any law which violates the constitution is void upon its passage. The same goes for court decisions--if they violate the constitution they are void upon their issuance. If I know that, why don't our politicians? Short answer, they do. I can't vote for people who would knowingly violate the constitution in defiance of Marbury vs. Madison. 2) September 11. Six of the ten members of the Kean Commission refused to sign their report after they "investigated" the events of 9/11. The report was a cover-up. And according to law, if you take part in a crime after its commission (like through a cover-up), then you are guilty of that crime. Therefore, the U.S. government is guilty of the 9/11 attacks. And everyone in Washington knows it. How can I vote for people who took part in the 9/11 attacks? 3) Disappearing children. 47,000 children disappeared at the U.S./Mexican border in 2013-2014. Why doesn't the government investigate that? Plenty of media attention is given to the shooting of one young man in Missouri, but the media can't look into the disappearance of 47,000? What happened to the children? Are they working in sweatshops? Sex slaves? Human sacrifices? Again, if I know about this situation, then so do the people in government. And failure to pursue the issue makes them responsible for each individual disappearance. So instead of voting this time around I'm writing this. I'm telling you, we have a criminal government. Our politicians (all of them) knowingly vote for illegal laws, cover up the crimes of September 11, and refuse to pursue possible human slave traffickers. I can't endorse any of that with a vote, and all I can think to do is publicly condemn the criminals who want me to approve of their actions. |
Subject: RE: BS: Elections: Tues. Nov. 4th From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity Date: 10 Nov 14 - 04:07 AM BTW, I am not 'GUEST,Why I didn't vote this time'.....but I thought he had a point worth lookin' at.... I voted...some shit got passed, or elected...some didn't...Oh Waaah!! As you may have suspected, I didn't particularly vote along 'party lines'....one person was running unopposed....I left her blank(she was named in too many reported 'misdeeds'...as in crooked..even in the papers a while back...nope, go find a more reputable person .... oh well..... GfS |
Subject: RE: BS: Elections: Tues. Nov. 4th From: GUEST,Cthulhu Date: 10 Nov 14 - 12:40 PM Speaking of meaningless drivel..... |
Subject: RE: BS: Elections: Tues. Nov. 4th From: Bill D Date: 10 Nov 14 - 05:57 PM "I don't see you 'revealing' other 'guests'.." Many guests post under regular names and don't try to be several persons... and some of the naughty ones no doubt hide their identities in ways that are harder to trace. That deletion was simply a long repost... the original is still up there. |
Subject: RE: BS: Elections: Tues. Nov. 4th From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity Date: 10 Nov 14 - 07:07 PM GUEST,Cthulhu: "Speaking of meaningless drivel....." Like I said, "the biases are the 'so-called liberal' tactics of smearing people, who express a good point, that is out of the ideologues reach of understanding!!...............or comprehension!!! ......or brain-lock!!! Join the perception-less! GfS |
Subject: RE: BS: Elections: Tues. Nov. 4th From: GUEST,Why I didn't vote this time Date: 10 Nov 14 - 07:50 PM My post was deleted because that's what moderators do. They delete whatever upsets the status quo. Sad state of affairs when arguing AGAINST mass murder, rampant lawlessness, and child kidnapping upsets the status quo. |