BS: Phantasyfile

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 07 Jun 15 - 10:58 AM

"But Keith never did"
Yes he did - the cultural implants that you claimed did exactly that
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: Teribus
Date: 07 Jun 15 - 10:52 AM

"When Terribulus insists that Israel has the right to bomb schools"

Something that Teribus has never insisted - unless of course Musktwat you can provide the post in which I "insisted" that. Now that is going to elicit another non-response from the popguns - the accusation was after all just more Musktwat Made Up Shit.

As for winding people up it would appear that you guys are the only people on this forum making complete and utter cnuts {Anag.} of yourselves.

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: akenaton
Date: 07 Jun 15 - 10:50 AM

No. Silly I sn't the right word. When Akenaton states his marriage is more legitimate than Musket's, his wish to broaden his mind isn't quite what it seems."

My stance is that I oppose the legislation to redefine the institution of marriage to accommodate a tiny sexual minority, just as I opposed the criminalisation of homosexuality forty years ago.

When you repeatedly call me a homophobe, you force me to call you a liar.....I have given multiple reasons for my stance all backed by studies and official statistics.

Rather than post abuse do what this forum was designed for and debate the points which form the foundation of my stance.

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 07 Jun 15 - 08:18 AM

Yay!
Bring out more Muskets!

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: GUEST,Musket Mk IV
Date: 07 Jun 15 - 08:02 AM

That's four to you Keith.

Sorry to you other Muskets I could not resist!!

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 07 Jun 15 - 07:45 AM

If you were hoping to wind me up by creating clones, you lose.
I just find it funny, and strange that you get such gratification from it.

Make some more!
As many as you like.

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: Musket
Date: 07 Jun 15 - 07:29 AM

Err.. Three people post, often disagree and the club rules are simple.

Make it difficult for those who trawl irrelevant posts to discredit views.

Terribulus and Keith A of Hertford are the most persistent offenders and the more a group log in winds them up, the better it is for debate.

Akenaton? If he comes here to broaden his horizons, he needs new glasses. Homophobes don't deserve respect, they are below normal people and dogs.

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: GUEST,Raggytash
Date: 07 Jun 15 - 07:27 AM

Oh everyone knows you eschew political correctness. It shines like a burning mosque or synagogue so often in the contributions from some of your "friends"

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: akenaton
Date: 07 Jun 15 - 06:45 AM

Teribus did not create the "team".....the Muskets did.

They have since attracted a coterie of people who believe the same myths as they do, never contradict anything they say and join in the abuse of all who dare to question their ideology.

Teribus, Keith, myself and various others disagree fundamentally about many subjects....we come here to broaden our horizons, not be fitted with blinkers!

We share the view, that on this forum all issues can be discussed without the hindrance of ideological shackles or political correctness.
There should be no room here for people dedicated to "taking the piss", it is lazy and cowardly.....and defeats the purpose of this section.

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: GUEST,Raggytash
Date: 07 Jun 15 - 06:31 AM

Probably the same reason I pick scabs and scratch itches.

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: Teribus
Date: 07 Jun 15 - 05:32 AM

" I think we have actually exchanged about a dozen words regarding Mudcat which were basically to say that we should ignore idiots. Full stop." - Raggytash

Now that begs the rather obvious question Raggy - Why having come to that conclusion - neither of you acted on it?

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: GUEST,Raggytash
Date: 07 Jun 15 - 04:30 AM

Just an aside Teribus, why are you determined to try and create a "team" of people on the other side of debate from yourself. I have said on previous threads I have no idea who any of the Muskets are, I don't know Greg or Steve Shaw or R Sole and I don't think I know anyone else who posts to these threads. I have clearly stated Dave the Gnome and I have met on a few occasions and have enjoyed playing music together on them. I think we have actually exchanged about a dozen words regarding Mudcat which were basically to say that we should ignore idiots. Full stop. I think there was a tacit agreement that you fell into that category.

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 07 Jun 15 - 04:21 AM

they only post on this forum to "take the piss" - honestly just cannot see why we bother with them

And you fall for it every time :-)

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 07 Jun 15 - 04:06 AM

If he wants to get the Musket log in, he needs two references for starters. Oh, and stop disagreeing with me on the music threads (in my other log in name) regarding origin of certain lyrics.

The Guest R Sole has not posted to any music thread.
Not under that name anyway, and how would you know about other names he uses?

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: Musket
Date: 07 Jun 15 - 03:54 AM

Quick! Man the barricades!

Gosh. The Mudcat community prefers the lies, revision and distasteful right wing claptrap of Tertibulus and Keith A Hole of Hertford. That particular pair seem to get on with the posts emanating from the keyboard of Akenaton too.

Yeah, keep convincing yourself fool.

By the way, I know I am not Scotch, wear skirts or drink turbo lager out of a paper bag but even I saw PF in the Scottish justice sense. There again, the fools think R Sole must be me whilst I think the fools must be R Soles.

If he wants to get the Musket log in, he needs two references for starters. Oh, and stop disagreeing with me on the music threads (in my other log in name) regarding origin of certain lyrics.

Still. His (or her?) genuine post I read that was pounced upon by the usual jackals did ask a good question.

What the flying fuck is this thread about? To date, it seems to be defending perversion and attacking some poor sod who came on to be helpful to what I can see. His reaction was good though.

He seems to have the usual subjects weighed up.
😆

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: Teribus
Date: 06 Jun 15 - 09:11 PM

Keith - the Gnome is not worried about some R Sole putting up links, just like the Gnome is not bothered about the lies, half truths and misrepresentations and myths put up by "his team" - they only post on this forum to "take the piss" - honestly just cannot see why we bother with them - the rest of the community of this forum told them all in no uncertain terms what they think of their efforts in a thread not so long ago - might have thought that it should have registered - probably too thick to notice.

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 06 Jun 15 - 02:27 PM

Ake said that his story was not available on line.
Guest R Sole said his story "is freely available from the PF website if anyone is interested."

I am interested Dave, so what is your criticism?

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 06 Jun 15 - 01:35 PM

Oh, FFS, why ask R Sole why he (or she) does not post a link when ake has miserably failed to do so at every opportunity. You really do show yourself up to be terminally biased at times, Keith.

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: akenaton
Date: 06 Jun 15 - 01:33 PM

I don't know what the PF website is, all I have ever had is the report in the local paper, which I have provided, condensed, but accurate.

Mr Sole, perhaps you could provide a link to the Strachur dweller aged about 69 whom you referenced earlier.
I am certain this is a pack of lies, as I would have heard of it, I know everyone almost everyone in Strachur and surrounding areas.

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 06 Jun 15 - 12:12 PM

The court report is freely available from the PF website if anyone is interested.

Why not post a link then R Sole?

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: Musket
Date: 06 Jun 15 - 11:54 AM

Keep trying Keith. I said a long time ago that you are not capable of debate.

Your trolling yet also withering attack just indicates you aren't getting any nearer to knowing what debate is.

Any chance of more info Akenaton? Or can we let balance of probability fill in the gaps?

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: GUEST,R Sole
Date: 06 Jun 15 - 11:08 AM

The court report is freely available from the PF website if anyone is interested.

Akenaton said that he never knowingly lies. Well considering what he put after I tried to help the thread, I will work on the basis that "knowingly" includes comprehending or understanding. That lets him off the hook for most of what I have read in this and other recent threads.

No wonder so many don't bother with this tripe. My hat off to Dave The Gnome, Musket, Raggytash and Greg. Although why any of you four think you can ever educate such lunatics is beyond me.

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: akenaton
Date: 06 Jun 15 - 07:52 AM

"Prosaic"?.....well I suppose we could "garnish" our factual contributions with lies, misrepresentations, obscenities, foul language and abuse, but why should we sink to your level?

It is much more satisfying to watch you thrash about as your ideologies are forensically dismembered.

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 06 Jun 15 - 07:38 AM

So anyone who complains about personal abuse is automatically guilty of it.

Thanks Raggy, for sharing your ludicrous misapprehensions with us.

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: GUEST,Raggytash
Date: 06 Jun 15 - 06:42 AM

Odd that Professor because to me it seems just like "Personal abuse without actual contribution is back"

Might just be me ............. though I doubt it.

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: akenaton
Date: 06 Jun 15 - 05:54 AM

An observation?

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 06 Jun 15 - 05:49 AM

This is referring to the fact that Musket only does abuse, not debate.

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: GUEST,Raggytash
Date: 06 Jun 15 - 05:45 AM

"Musket is back. Personal abuse without actual contribution is back."

And this is?

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 06 Jun 15 - 04:41 AM

Musket is back.
Personal abuse without actual contribution is back.

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: Musket
Date: 06 Jun 15 - 04:25 AM

Plenty of examples of you defending Akenaton, thanks for asking.

Just click on the blue text saying Teribus and go from there. To be fair, you have to wade through lots of cut and paste waffle from right wing websites. (Google a paragraph at random and you can even find the website Terribulus is impressed by.)

I notice your umbrage at suggestions of homophobia but you seem contented to be associated with right wing militaristic and history revision fodder. It's a bit like old Adolf denying he was a vegetarian.
😴

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: Teribus
Date: 06 Jun 15 - 03:05 AM

So you can find no examples of me posting Homophobic hatred then Musktwat?

Thanks for confirming that.

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: Musket
Date: 05 Jun 15 - 06:36 PM

It gets better.

I'm rather enjoying this.

I'll give my regards to this "ginger minger" (no fucking idea either?) if Terribulus gives his regards to the late Oswald Mosley.

It isn't too difficult to be prosaic. Terribulus manages it with his style and Akenaton? Just seems to be instinctive.

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 05 Jun 15 - 05:33 PM

Claptrap? I suppose scanning documents and posting them could be deemed claptrap by someone who does not understand technology. Or basic human nature. Still, I offered to help. I can do no more if the document in question does not actually exist...

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: akenaton
Date: 05 Jun 15 - 05:28 PM

There was no court report in the paper this week.

Isn't that strange?......Or then again perhaps there just wasn't space?


I'm beginning to think you don't trust me :0).......oh ye of little faith, I never knowingly lie.

You have fallen amongst bad company methinks, they influence you too much.

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: akenaton
Date: 05 Jun 15 - 05:21 PM

Dave will have to hold his breath for a satisfyingly long time before I respond to any of the inane claptrap he has been using recently

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: GUEST,Raggytash
Date: 05 Jun 15 - 05:21 PM

Just one further point Akenaton. In your earlier posts (29th May) you indicated clearly quite that sentence was going to be past this week. Your quote:

"the Sheriff put him on the sex offenders register and will sentence him next week".

In your last post you state:

"Whenever the sentence is given, I will be able to furnish more details".

As I have said, Strange.

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: akenaton
Date: 05 Jun 15 - 05:17 PM

As a matter of fact, the editor is a good friend and worked with me for a spell before going on to further education. His father also worked as a builder with me for a large part of his working life.

They are from one of the longest established families in this area.

Unfortunately I have been unable to contact him.
I doubt if he would be willing to say anything further to the court report until sentence has been passed.

Raggytash, I provided as much information as was available, what are you getting at?

I found the case interesting, in that it seemed to bring the issue of "thought crime" into the equation.... I also said that there was the possibility of the guy may have had previously offended.....all will be revealed by the sheriff after sentence has been passed, try to be patient.

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 05 Jun 15 - 02:59 PM

Not strange at all, Raggy, just typical for ake. I strongly suspect something to do with thought police and his infamous liberal agenda. Quite right to not hold my breath.

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: GUEST,Raggytash
Date: 05 Jun 15 - 12:28 PM

Strange that you were unwilling to provide any information when you started this thread on the 29th May. Presumably you still had the paper then. Then also on the 29th you were going to speak with the Editor who you maintained was "a good friend". Furthermore as you took such an interest in the case I find it difficult to reconcile your seemingly great interest with such a complete lack of recall of information.

As I said, strange.

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: akenaton
Date: 05 Jun 15 - 11:51 AM

I have no further details, and the paper of two weeks ago has been binned. Whenever the sentence is given, I will be able to furnish more details.

In the meantime, perhaps you could badger Mr Sole who seems to have some information which I don't posses, like the guys address and age.

The only problem, is that Mr Sole does not appear to have the slightest idea what the case he refers to is about.

How do you manage to live with yourselves, continually having your idiocies exposed must surely have some effect on even the zombies who constitute and support "Team Musket"

This expose will not cease until you learn how to behave in debate.....make it easy on yourselves.....spend some time reading and absorbing a little material from outside the "Twilight Zone"

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: Raggytash
Date: 05 Jun 15 - 08:52 AM

I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you Dave. I wonder about his reticence to provide information though.

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 05 Jun 15 - 08:07 AM

Tell you what, ake. Scan the article from the local paper and upload it somewhere. Or if that is something you cannot do, send me the paper by post and I will scan it and post the location here. Happy to send you my address via PM. Just ask.

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: Raggytash
Date: 05 Jun 15 - 08:06 AM

Teribus,

I refer to you the latter part of Akenaton statement:

"if there is no link available some detail of the case he is referring to would be useful"

This is exactly what I, and others, have been asking for from Akenaton. He has provided such little detail that any meaningful debate is impossible.

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: Teribus
Date: 05 Jun 15 - 07:47 AM

Ehmm no Raggytash, Akenaton stated very early on that the details he had were from Court Records and that apart from the man's name he had provided all the information contained in that report - even after having stated this, those posting to this thread continued to witter on demanding links to non-existent newspaper articles and castigating Akenaton for not producing them - It can hardly be his fault that those people obviously cannot read or comprehend the English language.

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: Raggytash
Date: 05 Jun 15 - 06:37 AM

From Akenaton

"If Mr Sole is genuine, I invite him to supply a link to the cases he is talking about, if there is no link available some detail of the case he is referring to would be useful"

This is from a man who has repeatedly refused to provide details to even start a meaningful debate. Pot, Kettle, Black spring to mind.

A previous post I put on has duly been deleted, possibly at Akenaton's request.

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: GUEST
Date: 04 Jun 15 - 07:40 PM

Few have fallen out with Max as much as I did over some concerns yet when I closed Folkinfo, he genuinely offered to do anything he could to help. I'm not sure I've always agreed with Joe either on everything (and I was a mod here way back) but I would actually like to meet him one day.

I am shall I say these days unsure of where the bottom section goes but largely I hope stay out of rows.

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: Musket
Date: 04 Jun 15 - 07:08 PM

Moderators leave accusations that Musket is posting as someone else but remove Musket's rebuttal.

Nice.

If the duty moderator would kindly say why they are yet again protecting two rather nasty people who post homophobic hatred but delete anything by a gay man slighted by them, regardless of the subject?

Mudcat eh? Still proud of your association with Max's sick venture Joe?

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
Date: 04 Jun 15 - 02:54 PM

No Mr. Sole???
Then maybe it isn't 'genetic'....
What??...No gene???
This sounds all too familiar.....let's make up a study that says that both exist!
We have a precedent...

GfS

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 04 Jun 15 - 10:56 AM

I smell an R Sole.

Subject: RE: BS: Phantasyfile
From: akenaton
Date: 04 Jun 15 - 10:15 AM

I tried very hard to find a link to the article, there was none available.

If Mr Sole is genuine, I invite him to supply a link to the cases he is talking about, if there is no link available some detail of the case he is referring to would be useful.......he mentions Strachur, a village not far from where I live, he mentions !944, a year not far from my birth date.

I read the local paper every week and have never seen an article containing this information.....until he give more information on the actual case as I have done, I will consider him a troll....he has posted as a troll on other threads using vocabulary and phrasing not unlike "team musket".    I smell a rat!