BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: GUEST,Raggytash
Date: 29 Jun 15 - 02:55 PM

Aha!! Congratulations Dave on reaching 150, is this a record.

I know if some was born in 33 in 78 they would be 45 and that must be a record.

Anyway, back to the deployment of Nurses.

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 29 Jun 15 - 03:08 PM

"Nothing wrong with deploying Nurses Jim"
Indeed not - my curse on those who are deporting them.
Thought you were complaint about thread drift - as I said, this one is about "deportment" not "deployment, as you desired us to get "back to"
Me - I don't mind one way or the other - I'll talk about anything - even plumbing
You wanna hear me on electrics - a real live-wire!
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 29 Jun 15 - 05:40 PM

A real live wire? Are you sure that is current, Jim? You don't want to sell yourself short! I could just go ohm to my vault...

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: GUEST,Hattie Jaques
Date: 30 Jun 15 - 03:01 AM

Not on my wards they don't!

Stiletto heels and stockings only.

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: GUEST,Hattie Jaques
Date: 30 Jun 15 - 03:04 AM

Oh, and I was talking with Jimmy Edwards earlier. He thought it excellent when using his nom de plume up the thread, asked if something reminded us of anyone.

The cap seemed a too a good a fit to keep quiet. 😆

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: GUEST,Kampervan
Date: 30 Jun 15 - 03:34 AM

Yes, but those stockings and stilettos cause so much noise, don't they. Mainly the sound of male jaws hitting the floor.

Fairly stops the patients sleeping and does their blood pressure no good at all.

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 30 Jun 15 - 03:42 AM

"I could just go ohm to my vault..."
Watt are you doing Dave - you seem to be heading for another circuit - are you trying to conFUSE things by transforming the subject?
Socket to 'em
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 30 Jun 15 - 10:05 AM

...and as for plumbing, well, I think you must be clean around the bend. Have you ever tried tap dancing or would you not sink so low?

Ah well, must solder on...

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: GUEST,pete from seven stars link
Date: 30 Jun 15 - 10:25 AM

yeh fine raggy , but a mocking jibe merited a relative response. and if no one brings the subject up, neither will I. have fun.

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 30 Jun 15 - 10:36 AM

What mocking jibe was that Pete? The one where I quite genuinely said we did not want to offend creationists or the one where you suggested, incorrectly, that I did?

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 30 Jun 15 - 10:57 AM

"Ah well, must solder on.."
Wire you doing this Dave?
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 30 Jun 15 - 11:00 AM

It's a sort of illness, Jim. I need to keep well insulated and hope it isn't terminal.

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 30 Jun 15 - 11:17 AM

Fraid you're going to have to try harder - you appear to be a bit of an armature (just winding you up!)
Try putting up more resistance
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 30 Jun 15 - 11:22 AM

I think I have been beaten. Guess I just will have to switch the subject...

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 30 Jun 15 - 12:47 PM

I'd like to help but I conduit
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: GUEST,Raggytash
Date: 30 Jun 15 - 01:45 PM

Sorry Pete, you've lost me which mocking jibe was that?

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 30 Jun 15 - 02:25 PM

Is a mocking jibe when you bring the boat around and stick your tongue out?

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 30 Jun 15 - 05:18 PM

Without wishing to get this thread deleted, does anyone know who won?

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: GUEST,Raggytash
Date: 30 Jun 15 - 07:12 PM

On the balance of probability Dave .......... I think you did.

WELL DONE!!!!!

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 01 Jul 15 - 08:13 AM

"Without wishing to get this thread deleted, does anyone know who won?"
Does it matter - it was good fun.
Perhaps we can have a rematch on the musical threads - 'Folk foods' - "The Dowie Dens of Marrow, or Folk Animals "Terrapin Hero".
Great diversion on long car journeys
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 01 Jul 15 - 08:17 AM

Thanks Jim - It was good indeed. The win I was referring to may not be the one you think though but I cannot go into further details without risking adverse reaction :-( I think Raggy knows what I am on about.

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: GUEST,Raggytash
Date: 01 Jul 15 - 08:40 AM

Spoiler due any second now!!`

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: GUEST,Cookie jar empty again
Date: 01 Jul 15 - 11:56 AM

Nurses can't have poor deportment anyway.

Apparently, the country is so crowded, you have to stand fully upright in order to fit.

It must be true. I read it in The Hertfordshire Mercury...





You were saying?

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: GUEST,Pete from seven stars link
Date: 01 Jul 15 - 03:01 PM

Ah well, since Dave the gnome insists he was utterly sincere in not making a mocking remark we shall have to let it drop. Mentioning 6000 yrs and creationists therefore seems irrelevant , but may hap he had reasons that are unbegnome to me ! .

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: GUEST,Rt Rev Musket
Date: 02 Jul 15 - 04:07 AM

No matter pete. I'll do some mocking if it keeps you happy.

Creationism?
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Ignoring the evidence?
😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆

Filling the heads of children with stupid medieval concepts?
😥

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: GUEST,pete from seven stars link
Date: 02 Jul 15 - 12:23 PM

like I said , mock on , in the absence of a sensible argument .....

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 02 Jul 15 - 06:06 PM

Didn't David Essex sing a song called Mock On?

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: GUEST
Date: 02 Jul 15 - 07:04 PM

It can't have been Rock On, because rocks are millions of years old. Perhaps pete has a theory about gaping gill and how it was formed then?

pete. You can't have sensible arguments with loonies. I can't argue for your silliness any more than I can argue for the Star Trek federation having affiliation status at The UN.

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: GUEST,Pete from seven stars link
Date: 03 Jul 15 - 12:05 PM

Yeh, we know they are millions of years old because of the dating methods. In fact we know that, even if they have only just formed !. We also know it because they give different dates for different methods, but being as the results are always interpreted as being millions of years old....one of them must be right....right !.

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: GUEST,Pissing meself laughing
Date: 03 Jul 15 - 01:57 PM

It takes longer than the time given in the bible that the universe existed for water to get from The Mendip Hills to Bath spa water. Despite a distance of about 20 miles.

That's possibly number 2,987,345 out of 9,999,999,999 reasons the bible and any other superstition is talking nonsense.

I have no issue in indulging you pete, but ever thought that every now and then, the grown ups want to talk seriously?

Just think, if they wrote the bible now, it would be about 13 billion years according to the word of God. If real people modified that in the future, some pillocks would still cling to the 13 billion years God told them..

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: GUEST,achmelvich
Date: 03 Jul 15 - 02:16 PM

i was at the national museum in chambers street edinburgh 5 years ago and watched a very interesting film about the universe and how it started. they said it began with the big bang 13.7 billion years ago. however, when i went back last year it was still saying the same figure - with no adjustment for the intervening 4 years. and they are supposed to be scientists! clearly we cannot trust their dating system to be accurate so it must just be guesswork - ie they don't know. this is all the proof we need for the existence of a creator god.

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 04 Jul 15 - 05:00 AM

Good point, Achmelvich.;-)

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 04 Jul 15 - 05:04 AM

...and talking about water, how come this spring water that has spent millions of years filtering through rock has a best before date? More proof of something. But I'm not sure what :-)

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: GUEST,Raggytash
Date: 04 Jul 15 - 10:13 AM

That one's easy Dave, the plastic bottles it is sold in are crap.

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: GUEST,Musketypoos
Date: 04 Jul 15 - 10:21 AM

Maybe Jesus has gone past his sell by date?

I only buy organic science from Waitrose.

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: GUEST,pete from seven stars link
Date: 04 Jul 15 - 02:58 PM

well, achmelvich, did they say how they arrived at that figure, or did you just accept it by faith.
funny thing about your missing 4 yrs. creationists have been saying 6000 yr for a few years. but maybe it's not them that are so guilty of literalism !.
probably not them either, that evade the evidence .....
neither is it usually creationists that have to resort to the fallacy of argument by mockery.

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: GUEST,Musket sans hobnob
Date: 04 Jul 15 - 04:38 PM

There is no argument pete.

I don't invoke the riffs of Clapton to explain the novels of Thomas Hardy, and nobody is making an argument against creationism because it is fantasy whilst reality is real.

Nobody gives it the benefit of a theory, just a quaint medieval fairy story. Sadly, children are suggestive, which makes you and your fellow abusers dangerous.

You really are embarrassing for real Christians, aren't you? Maintaining a tradition is sometimes nice, but it gets beyond a joke when the likes of you, ISIS, abusive priests and U.S. Politicians can't distinguish it from reality.

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 05 Jul 15 - 07:58 AM

You really are embarrassing for real Christians, aren't you?

Are you speaking for Christians now Musket?
Any basis for that opinion?

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: GUEST,Amazing
Date: 05 Jul 15 - 09:32 AM

Keith, there is a thread going laughing at your contention that opinions need facts. Yet here you are..

You have spoken for Christians many times on these threads. Christians don't this and that etc..

Yet you claim to have taught science.. Is pete's personality disorder an embarrassment to you or do believe all that creationist bollocks too? You have answered that both ways in the past. What are you this week?

Subject: RE: BS: Paying nurses with poor deportment
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 05 Jul 15 - 10:00 AM

You have not answered.
Are you speaking for Christians now Musket?
Any basis for that opinion?