Lyrics & Knowledge Personal Pages Record Shop Auction Links Radio & Media Kids Membership Help
The Mudcat Cafemuddy

Post to this Thread - Printer Friendly - Home
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]


BS: Damian Green

Jim Carroll 13 Dec 17 - 01:25 PM
Iains 13 Dec 17 - 12:52 PM
Backwoodsman 13 Dec 17 - 11:51 AM
Raggytash 13 Dec 17 - 11:48 AM
Jim Carroll 13 Dec 17 - 11:45 AM
punkfolkrocker 13 Dec 17 - 10:38 AM
Iains 13 Dec 17 - 10:30 AM
punkfolkrocker 13 Dec 17 - 09:50 AM
Nigel Parsons 13 Dec 17 - 09:16 AM
Nigel Parsons 13 Dec 17 - 09:10 AM
Jim Carroll 13 Dec 17 - 08:19 AM
Keith A of Hertford 13 Dec 17 - 08:14 AM
Keith A of Hertford 13 Dec 17 - 08:09 AM
Steve Shaw 13 Dec 17 - 08:05 AM
Keith A of Hertford 13 Dec 17 - 07:24 AM
Jim Carroll 13 Dec 17 - 07:23 AM
Steve Shaw 13 Dec 17 - 06:59 AM
Dave the Gnome 13 Dec 17 - 06:52 AM
Raggytash 13 Dec 17 - 06:48 AM
Dave the Gnome 13 Dec 17 - 06:46 AM
Iains 13 Dec 17 - 06:46 AM
Keith A of Hertford 13 Dec 17 - 06:36 AM
Steve Shaw 13 Dec 17 - 06:31 AM
Raggytash 13 Dec 17 - 06:07 AM
Steve Shaw 13 Dec 17 - 05:54 AM
Jim Carroll 13 Dec 17 - 05:26 AM
Keith A of Hertford 13 Dec 17 - 04:55 AM
Jim Carroll 13 Dec 17 - 04:20 AM
Steve Shaw 13 Dec 17 - 04:13 AM
Iains 13 Dec 17 - 04:06 AM
Steve Shaw 12 Dec 17 - 04:44 PM
punkfolkrocker 12 Dec 17 - 02:40 PM
Jim Carroll 12 Dec 17 - 02:30 PM
Raggytash 12 Dec 17 - 02:14 PM
Iains 12 Dec 17 - 02:08 PM
Jim Carroll 12 Dec 17 - 01:53 PM
Keith A of Hertford 12 Dec 17 - 01:49 PM
Keith A of Hertford 12 Dec 17 - 01:47 PM
Jim Carroll 12 Dec 17 - 01:38 PM
punkfolkrocker 12 Dec 17 - 01:25 PM
Jim Carroll 12 Dec 17 - 12:56 PM
Raggytash 12 Dec 17 - 12:29 PM
Jim Carroll 12 Dec 17 - 12:15 PM
Keith A of Hertford 12 Dec 17 - 11:40 AM
bobad 12 Dec 17 - 09:17 AM
Jim Carroll 12 Dec 17 - 09:11 AM
bobad 12 Dec 17 - 08:56 AM
Keith A of Hertford 12 Dec 17 - 08:52 AM
Jim Carroll 12 Dec 17 - 08:30 AM
bobad 12 Dec 17 - 08:23 AM
Lyrics & Knowledge Search [Advanced]
DT  Forum
Sort (Forum) by:relevance date
DT Lyrics:



Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 13 Dec 17 - 01:25 PM

More whataboutism Iains
That the best you can manage?
Something we could all do had we a mind to
WHATABOUT?
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Iains
Date: 13 Dec 17 - 12:52 PM

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Westminster_sexual_scandals

As I said in my opening post, "There are bad apples in every barrel."


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 13 Dec 17 - 11:51 AM

Anyone else noticed the standard Tory tactic of 'Whataboutery'? The Praying Mantis does it every time she's challenged over the Tory governments abject failure on almost everything - she was at it again on PMQs today - and the feeble-minded, terminally-propagandised Tory shills on here do it too.

Still, it's easier than getting involved in sensible and intelligent discussion....


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Raggytash
Date: 13 Dec 17 - 11:48 AM

Liberals eh?

Well for starters there's Paddy Pantsdown

And Norman Scott bites your pillow, or even vote Liberal or I'll shoot your dog.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 13 Dec 17 - 11:45 AM

"Of course, Jim, your view of it is quite Biblical in its approach."
If you care to read what I said Nigel, I have no interest in the minister's personal morality, nor anybody else's
I do care about sex being commodified by porn and privatised by the Tories
I hardly think quoting from a book that encourages stoning women to death for adultery a particularly apt authority on treatment of women, not to mention the casting out and blinding that occupies that particular source of wisdom.
"I don't know Keith's opinion, but I would think there must be 'degrees' in such matters."
Really!!
If one is sexual assault, what's the other?
As far as atrocities are concerned, Keith constantly defends atrocities he supports by pointing to others he doesn't
I'm sure Iains was trying to do something similar with his failed link.
It's all down to how you regard women in society and putting right what is wrong, I suppose
Doesn't seem to concern your lot overmuch where our 'betters' are concerned
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 13 Dec 17 - 10:38 AM

pestminster "404 - File or directory not found.
The resource you are looking for might have been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable."...???



lets not exclude Liberals and Greens...

All are potentially fallible...
.. it's just the tories can usually be relied on to amuse us with the most spectacularly squalid political scandals...

It's one thing they have a talent for doing better than all others...

I'll at least give 'em credit for that...!!!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Iains
Date: 13 Dec 17 - 10:30 AM

Tory sex & corruption scandals are always good for a laugh in these increasingly dispairing times...."

Not just the tories at pestminster . Lets have a really good laugh and look at labour as well.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 13 Dec 17 - 09:50 AM

"You all just become irrational about anything involving a Tory!"

Seems perfectly rational to relish tories squirming in humiliation and disgrace...

Tory sex & corruption scandals are always good for a laugh in these increasingly dispairing times....


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Nigel Parsons
Date: 13 Dec 17 - 09:16 AM

Of course, Jim, your view of it is quite Biblical in its approach.
Matthew 5: 27-28:
"You heard it was said, 'Do not commit adultery,' but I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman in order to covet her has already committed adultery with her in his heart."


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Nigel Parsons
Date: 13 Dec 17 - 09:10 AM

From: Jim Carroll - PM
Date: 13 Dec 17 - 08:19 AM
""fleetingly" touching her knee "
So?
Are there degrees of sexual harassment in your book just as there are degrees of atrocities and crimes against humanity?
I suppose there are really


I don't know Keith's opinion, but I would think there must be 'degrees' in such matters.
Whether the fleeting touch of the knee would classify as 'sexual harrassment' I don't know. But it is certainly less serious than grabbing a woman by the bust, which, in turn, is less serious than forced rape.

Do you, Jim, feel each of those three things are of the same degree? And do you think that they are all equally totally abhorrent? And should someone found guilty of any one of them receive the same sentence?
If you do feel that they are all of the same degree, then once having touched a knee, a man may as well go ahead and commit rape. You say they're all equivalent anyway.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 13 Dec 17 - 08:19 AM

""fleetingly" touching her knee "
So?
Are there degrees of sexual harassment in your book just as there are degrees of atrocities and crimes against humanity?
I suppose there are really
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 13 Dec 17 - 08:14 AM

Steve,
So who's "exonerated" Green then, Keith?

No-one has.
Peston claimed on TV that the enquiry will, but nothing official yet.

Why do you people assume his guilt, start a thread all about how guilty he is, and make up facts to compensate for the absence of any real ones?

You all just become irrational about anything involving a Tory!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 13 Dec 17 - 08:09 AM

Jim,
Knee fondling and propositioning actually

ITV,
"Writing in The Times, Kate Maltby accused the First Secretary of State of "fleetingly" touching her knee during a 2015 meeting in a London pub, and of sending her a "suggestive" text two years later. "


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 13 Dec 17 - 08:05 AM

So who's "exonerated" Green then, Keith?

I'm no fan of Ivan Lewis even though he's a good local MP, etc. (he's my parents' MP as it happens). He was targeted by a Gordon Brown "hit-squad" smear in an attempt to discredit him after he'd embarrassed Brown. He's not squeaky-clean. As far as I know, proceedings are ongoing. I don't see what he has to do with this thread. Still, gnaw away. I know you will. If I tell you that he's a big noise in Labour Friends Of Israel (my dad refuses to vote for him), will that mollify you? Hilarious-laughter emojee...

Cressida Dick was in charge of the operation that led to the disgusting and brutal slaughter of Jean-Charles Menezes who was a complete innocent. The establishment looked after her and promoted her when, in my opinion and in the opinion of many other people, she should have disappeared from public view for ever at the very least. Jean-Charles' family and public opinion in Brazil have never accepted the cover-ups. Right, Keith. I've answered that question. Don't start on that unless you start another thread on it.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 13 Dec 17 - 07:24 AM

His integrity is severely in doubt whether you like it or not.

Yes it is.

Why is Cressida Dick "arguably discredited?"
Are you claiming an establishment cover up?
I think you are deluded.

Like so many other similar cases, there may be something in it, but we will never know.
A female Labour member accused Lewis of groping her.
Labour investigated and exonerated him.
She lied or a Labour cover up? I do not know but I would not start a thread celebrating his guilt and make up facts because of the absence of any real ones.
Why do you people behave like that?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 13 Dec 17 - 07:23 AM

"Losing the argument Jimmie? So bring up the racist card. What a twat!"
That's about the height of this pair's contribution - intellect to the fore as usual
My point was not about race it was about Keith's double standards between police who stick to the script and those who do not
"Ignore the troll."
Right you are - the blast from under this particular bridge is beyond a joke
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 13 Dec 17 - 06:59 AM

You accuse me of typing made up shit, etc, then you negate that in your own post! In other parts of this thread we've had Iains calling for them to be slung into jail and we've had constant accusations of their bearing a grudge (an accusation, without knowing the characters of the men, that you can't support: it's perfectly possible for mature adults to feel that they've been wronged or dissed without turning it into a grudge) and, by constantly claiming that there's no evidence for the porn, you're implying that they are lying. And the word "discredited" has been thrown around repeatedly, though you can't explain who did the discrediting, bar you and Iains. One little point that I should reiterate: the policeman's nine-year-long knowledge of the porn was not made public until four days after the allegations from the Tory party female worker came out. That sounds to me like the cop wanting to add weight to her allegations. In other words, he may have thought he was acting in the public interest. He certainly was never going to make a fortune from the Mail printing "his story." I would never claim that he wasn't out of order technically in making it public. But, to coin a cliche, we are where we are. And where we are is that Green has a lot of explaining to do, protective establishment attack-dogs notwithstanding. His integrity is severely in doubt whether you like it or not.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 13 Dec 17 - 06:52 AM

or should I say trolls


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Raggytash
Date: 13 Dec 17 - 06:48 AM

Did you detect an echo Steve, I'm sure my last post started "Like I said yesterday STEVE"


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 13 Dec 17 - 06:46 AM

Ignore the troll.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Iains
Date: 13 Dec 17 - 06:46 AM

Losing the argument Jimmie? So bring up the racist card. What a twat!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 13 Dec 17 - 06:36 AM

Rag,

Like I said yesterday Steve, Damien Green could take the matter to court and sue the police officers for defamation.


I answered that before.
The investigation is not complete, and to bring such a case requires you to prove it is false.
No-one can prove that they did not look at porn ten years ago.

Jim,
You said there was no porn on the compter and that the untrustworthy policemen lied about it

That was a lie Jim. Now you just claim,
You have implied as much since the beginning

Again, I have not.
Now Steve adds his lies,

Your cabal regard the two cops as not to be trusted, potentially lying, doing made up shit, bearing a grudge, out of order, should be prosecuted, let's throw the keys away etc, the very epitome of "discredited."


All made up shit, but I did point out the long standing feud as described by the Guardian piece I liked to, twice.

Many prominent people are currently accused of sexual misbehaviour, including members of all our main parties.

This one may or may not be true. We just have unsubstantiated allegations made nine years later by ex-cops with a grudge. It would not stand up in court.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 13 Dec 17 - 06:31 AM

Yep, I'm sure he has his reasons for not wanting to up the ante. Having your porn habit aired in public, even if not illegal, must be bloody embarrassing. Just look at how Iains went ballistic when I suggested that he'd implicated himself thus. Of course, if the whole thing is a pack of trumped-up lies, Green would have nothing to fear by suing, would he? As you say, very strange...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Raggytash
Date: 13 Dec 17 - 06:07 AM

Like I said yesterday Steve, Damien Green could take the matter to court and sue the police officers for defamation. I'm sure he has the resources to do so and would get the backing of the party if he needed.

All a bit strange.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 13 Dec 17 - 05:54 AM

Your cabal regard the two cops as not to be trusted, potentially lying, doing made up shit, bearing a grudge, out of order, should be prosecuted, let's throw the keys away etc, the very epitome of "discredited."

So lemme ask again, Keith. The claims of you and Iains aside, how are these ex-policemen "discredited" and who did the discrediting? Do opinionated statements emanating from Green's Tory allies or (the arguably discredited) Cressida Dick, or other members of the establishment, sufficient to have us branding them "discredited," or is that just another throwaway remark of the "vulgar and fraudulent" ilk?

Are you just a jealous baldie slaphead, Iains? Far from being blonde, I'm a fiercely-bearded dark-haired Celtic type. Grr. Mind you, I've known some very nice blonde ladies... Don't bother sending a photo.

And don't even mention gingers. Oops, wrong thread...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 13 Dec 17 - 05:26 AM

"I did not Jim."#You have implied as much since the beginning
You described the police as "discredited" on the basis of the wotrd of the accused, though one has never been described thus - you made it up.
"So why start a thread devoted to celebrating his guilt?"
Because there's no reason to belive he isn't - porn is as common as cheese and lettuce sandwiches in the parliamentary suystem and the fellr is obviously a sex predator a set up that seems to GO IN FOR THAT SORT OF THING
Still nothing on the actuations of a fellow Tory - not even worth a mention!
What will probably happen here is that Greene's 'little peccadillos' will be swept under the carpet and eventually forgotten and his victim will probably be bought off on the understanding that she never raises the matter again - every time, with these people!!
You pair are virtually Dickensian in your defence of the great and the good - one Uriah Heep , the other, Whackford Squeers
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 13 Dec 17 - 04:55 AM

You said there was no porn on the compter and that the untrustworthy policemen lied about it

I did not Jim.

We do not know if anyone is lying. There could have been porn on the computer. He might be responsible.It is just that neither is proven.

So why start a thread devoted to celebrating his guilt?
Why do you all assume it?
Why have you and Steve actually made up false facts about the case.

It is all political hysteria that we only get from you lot.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 13 Dec 17 - 04:20 AM

"You having a blond moment shaw?"
You people are CARICATURES of this rotten society Iains - one wheedling hand wringer of behalf of the great and good, the other a blustering bully who believes they can talk people down if they are unable to produce an intelligent response.
When the police were saying the right things, as with the racially motivated killings in Manchester, their word is the end; here, when a couple of policemen suggest a senior politician might have done wrong they become discredited liars." acting out of self interest and revenge.
Damien Green appears to be a serial sex pest - his victim, a fellow Tory, appears to have no interest for you pair in all this - probably a "discredited liar" too.
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 13 Dec 17 - 04:13 AM

How are these ex-policemen "discredited" and who did the discrediting?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Iains
Date: 13 Dec 17 - 04:06 AM

"How are these ex-policemen "discredited" and who did the discrediting?"

You having a blond moment shaw?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 12 Dec 17 - 04:44 PM

How are these ex-policemen "discredited" and who did the discrediting?

If I were subjected to an attempted character assassination by a worried Tory I'd wear it as a badge of honour...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 12 Dec 17 - 02:40 PM

Iains - that reads so much like a word for word tory party line defense kit counter attack....


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 12 Dec 17 - 02:30 PM

"But jimmy has elected him to sainthood"
Nope - I have said his word is as good as serial sex pest - that' all
It wasn't those who carried out the raid's job to obtain a warrant - it was the job of those who ordered the raid
Mors made up crap about the character of the accusee
You establishment arese-lickrs woul a say that, wouldn't you?
When in doubt - smear
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Raggytash
Date: 12 Dec 17 - 02:14 PM

I do not know if the police officer in question has done so, but if I were in his shoes I would damned sure I had back up evidence nicely stored away from prying eyes so that if Green was to try and sue me I could produce said evidence in court.

I wonder why Green hasn't gone down that route.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Iains
Date: 12 Dec 17 - 02:08 PM

Wonderful how the mudrats consistently confuse fact and fiction. It seems a common failing with all of them. They work up a complete fantasy on the unsubstantiated allegations of a couple of discredited coppers. The more senior one overstepped the mark by barging into an
MP's office, without even a search warrant, and took away materials.
Later he was photographed entering Downing Street clutching a confidential document. This was a convenient device enabling the removal of an embarrassment to everyone, not least the police. He was a high flier that flew too close to the sun and did a very poor Icarus impersonation. He crashed and burnt and held a grudge for the next nine years. Discredited is the least of his problems. But jimmy has elected him to sainthood. I suspect the halo would end up a ;little singed if this affair ever came to court.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 12 Dec 17 - 01:53 PM

"I have made no such accusation. "
You said there was no porn on the compter and that the untrustworthy policemen lied about it
"Groper Green"
Knee fondling and propositioning actually
Not much difference when you are one of his victims - or do you have a sliding scale of sexual assaults like you do with state atrcocities
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 12 Dec 17 - 01:49 PM

D'you thin there should be punishment for pulling your pud at the taxpayer's expense?

He denies it Jim. How do you know he is guilty?
Just prejudice Jim.
No court would convict on such flimsy evidence


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 12 Dec 17 - 01:47 PM

Your accusations of lying against the two policemen are totally unsubstantiated

I have made no such accusation. I just point out that such unsubstantiated claims from people with history would be challenged in court. You would not get a conviction on just that.

"Groper Green..."

Green is not accused of groping. That was Clive Lewis. The Labour Party enquiry presumably chose not believe the woman's uncorroborated claim.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 12 Dec 17 - 01:38 PM

"Groper Green..."
Isn't there a folk son with that name?
D'you thin there should be punishment for pulling your pud at the taxpayer's expense?
Waddya think Keith ?
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 12 Dec 17 - 01:25 PM

So a comparison was made earlier between Labour MP Clive Lewis and Tory Damien Green...

Lewis looks like a very capable and interesting chap,
but if he has a tendency to disrespect women, or at least attract complaints,
then the party needs to keep a long term close eye on his attitudes and behaviour...

Whilst Lewis may be an ex shadow minister;
he is hardly in the same league as the 2nd most powerful politician in British Parliament, Groper Green...

A position which requires much closer public scrutiny,
and a character of utmost integrity, honesty, and trustworthiness..

Green does seem lacking in all those essential areas...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 12 Dec 17 - 12:56 PM

"The fact remains Jim that looking at porn is not illegal"
No it isn't Rag, though whether it should be is debateble
This isn't about the use of porn illegally, it's about a lying minister denying its use and smearing two people have claimed to have seen it
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Raggytash
Date: 12 Dec 17 - 12:29 PM

The fact remains Jim that looking at porn is not illegal (for the most part)

What Davis should be sacked for is doing so (if the allegations prove to be true) at work and on a computer provided by his employers, that is us, the people.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 12 Dec 17 - 12:15 PM

" it has been widely reported that the ex-cops would be in breach of the rules for revealing information, and may be prosecuted for it."
Not because the information was wrong, just that they shouldn't have made it public, which was exactly my point
THe roke the rules by exposing what a leading member of the establishment was up to.
They were whistleblowers - whistlblowers always run the risk of persecution when they tell things that are uncomfortable to the powers that be
Your accusations of lying against the two policemen are totally unsubstantiated - you are the only one to have described on of them as "untrustworthy"   
Your an establishment arse-kisser Keith
What's your point here?
If you can accuse two policemen without proof, why can't we assume that a minister from a culture of porn-users has a stack of the stuff piled up on his computer = especially as he has also been accused separately by a fellow Tory of being a sexual predator?
Sounds like a dirty old man to me
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 12 Dec 17 - 11:40 AM

Jim, it has been widely reported that the ex-cops would be in breach of the rules for revealing information, and may be prosecuted for it.

That could be why their evidence is uncorroborated, but it remains an unsubstantiated claim of perfectly legal behaviour that Green denies.
It has been investigated and, according to Peston, like Clive Lewis he will keep his job.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: bobad
Date: 12 Dec 17 - 09:17 AM

Only a moron considers information and argument "bulltying" Bobad

Lol......it's hard for some people not to put their foot right into it. Sweet irony, don't you just love it.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 12 Dec 17 - 09:11 AM

"They would not come forward to report nothing to report, but if there WAS porn, ........"
Yesterday Sir Thomas Winsor, the chief inspector of constabulary, was critical of former officers who had breached what he believed should be lifelong pledges of confidentiality. He said: ?The special powers which citizens confer on police officers are inseparable from the obligations of special trust placed in officers to enable them to do their duty. That trust requires every officer to respect and keep confidential information which they obtain in the course of their duties and which is irrelevant to their inquiries and discloses no criminal conduct. The obligation of confidentiality, and the duty not to break trust, is an enduring one. It does not end when a police officer retires.?
"Raise your hand if you recognize anybody in the piece."
Only a moron considers information and argument "bulltying" Bobad
Raise your hand if you recognize that descriptiuon
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: bobad
Date: 12 Dec 17 - 08:56 AM

This is a nice little read, How to Deal with a Progressive Bully. Raise your hand if you recognize anybody in the piece.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 12 Dec 17 - 08:52 AM

Jim,
You lied - there was never a sign of the feud until Green invented it

No, you lie.
Here is the link I gave you earlier.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/dec/01/damian-green-decade-long-feud-met-officer-bob-quick

How come no other of the 20 policemen involved in the raid have come forward to claim that there was no porn ?

Or, that there was?

There must have been more police witnesses as Green was arrested at the time for a supposed security breach - don't you think they would have examined his computer at the time?

Yes! You make my case for me.

if there was no porn on it, they would have come forward before now

They would not come forward to report nothing to report, but if there WAS porn, ........


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 12 Dec 17 - 08:30 AM

"I said a defence in court would deem it unreliable because of the 9 year feud, and because it was not reported at the time."
You lied - there was never a sign of the feud until Green invented it and one of those policemen was in no way involved anyway
Do you honestly think you can defend a high ranking politician by accusing responsible policemen of things they have never been found guilty of, otr even involved in?
How come no other of the 20 policemen involved in the raid have come forward to claim that there was no porn ?
There must have been more police witnesses as Green was arrested at the time for a supposed security breach - don't you think they would have examined his computer at the time?
All that the police have ever said is that it was not the job of the police to comment on the contents of the computer - if there was no porn on it, they would have come forward before now
Coffe time lapse Dave - done the damage, now I'm off
Jim Carroll


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Damian Green
From: bobad
Date: 12 Dec 17 - 08:23 AM

Is this a new defintion of troll? Someone that dares to disagree with the mudrateers?

Not new, it has always been thus with them. If you know anything about those who are confined by an ideological straitjacket it's that they cannot abide opposition and deal with it by putting labels and childish names on those who dare to disagree with them - it makes them feel superior.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate
Next Page

 


You must be a member to post in non-music threads. Join here.


You must be a member to post in non-music threads. Join here.



Mudcat time: 13 December 1:56 PM EST

[ Home ]

All original material is copyright © 1998 by the Mudcat Café Music Foundation, Inc. All photos, music, images, etc. are copyright © by their rightful owners. Every effort is taken to attribute appropriate copyright to images, content, music, etc. We are not a copyright resource.