BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 07 Mar 18 - 12:26 PM

That was an oxy too much, Jim ;-)

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 07 Mar 18 - 12:32 PM

Tops the moron by a mile - don'cha think
Jim

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 07 Mar 18 - 12:42 PM

LYING POLICE OR LYING POLITICIAND AND LYING KEITH?
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 07 Mar 18 - 12:46 PM

SIXTEEN DEAD CHILDREN?
Your worst nightmare Keith!
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 07 Mar 18 - 12:53 PM

Dave,
There is a huge difference between addressing a person and addressing the points. Addressing a person usually begins with the persons name.

No. I always name the person then quote their point that I am addressing.

Jim,
"There have been none."Are you claimign that the links I put up to Brittan, Proctor Heath and Boothby are lies then

They are proven lies. The accuser was a deluded or deranged fantasist and is totally discredited.

Steve,
My objection was clearly stated in my post, arse.

You identified no error in my statement, and could not because it was factual.
You also resort to infantile name calling, having nothing better to say.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 07 Mar 18 - 01:23 PM

Gammon Faced Shitfluke.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 07 Mar 18 - 01:39 PM

"They are proven lies. The accuser was a deluded or deranged fantasist and is totally discredited."
No they are not Keith - they all predate Dolphin Square and are accusations of historical abuse
Apart from Dolphin Square, none of tehm have ever been challenged
Ther Heath accusations have only just resurfaced
At no time have any of those who were openly named in the Dolphin Square covered-up affair ever sought legal recompense from either the police or the papers that named them - never
That says what needs to be said
You are now blatantly lying in the face of given evidence
The more you dig into these affairs the more worms you expose
Prince Andrew?????
Certainly by association
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 07 Mar 18 - 01:56 PM

Jim,
Ther Heath accusations have only just resurfaced

A senior police officer stood outside Heath's house on all the news broadcasts appealing for any victims to come forward.
None have yet been found. It was all a hoax.

Your claim was "proven" cases of rape and paedophilia by "Prime Ministers and Government high-ups."
There has not been one.

Dave,
Gammon Faced Shitfluke.

Do you think your behaviour makes you look good to anyone?

You clearly have nothing to contribute, but why show yourself up?

There are five people putting your case, and only me putting an alternative one, and you can't even cope with that.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 07 Mar 18 - 01:58 PM

Was this the "fantasist you were talking about Keith?
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/jimmy-savile/10978492/My-father-was-a-sexual-predator-like-Jimmy-Savile-says-son-of-former-Tory-MP.html

"'My father was a sexual predator like Jimmy Savile’ says son of former Tory MP
The son of a Conservative MP has built up his own dossier on his father and a wider circle of friends
The son of a former Conservative MP has told The Telegraph he believes his father was a “prolific sexual predator” who he fears might have been linked to an alleged Westminster paedophile ring.
Anthony Atkinson suspects his father David Atkinson’s name may also have been included in a notorious dossier compiled by his fellow Conservative MP Geoffrey Dickens. The dossier, handed to the then Home Secretary Leon Brittan in the 1980s, has subsequently been lost or destroyed.
David Atkinson, according to his son, had a string of young lovers, among them a number of parliamentary assistants, with whom he conducted affairs behind the back of his wife and two children.
Justin Fashanu, the former professional footballer, who had grown up in a children’s home and subsequently committed suicide, had claimed to have had an affair with a married Conservative MP.
The MP is now thought to be Mr Atkinson. Letters from Mr Fashanu to Mr Atkinson, now in possession of his son, suggest the two men, although close, did not consummate their relationship.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 07 Mar 18 - 03:04 PM

TOP TORY SAIS DOLPHIN SQARE EVIDENCE "EXPLOSIVE"
The Evidence disappears (You've had the link Keith
MIGHT HAVE BEEN COVER-UP, MAYFLY
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 07 Mar 18 - 03:06 PM

Hairy arsed cockwomble.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 08 Mar 18 - 04:06 AM

The message here appears to be that peadophelia, rape and sexual persecution isn't important if it is carried out by Tories
Tories have a history of their politicians being involved not just in harassment, but serious sex crimes (including possibly torture and murder) - their leadership has a history of hiding and destroying evidence (even the present Prime Minister has admitted that possibility - that's how possible it is)
And the Labour party have a "major problem£ because forty women have complained that Corbyn has "not done enough" to stop sexual harassment in Parliament -!!!!!
Theresa May has consistently supported sex pests until their behaviour has become impossible to excuse
In a way, she has opted out of taking action by suggesting teh victims go to the police
Often the harassment does not reach the level of illegality - you cannot be prosecuted for offering promotion for sex - she stood by Damien Green when he did exactly that
Such people should not hold high office (take your pick on whether that means those who persecute or thoe who defend the persecutor)
If a woman is sexually assaulted or raped the chances of bringing her attacked to justice are minuscule - that's why only a small percentage of women report sexual attacks
Sexual persecution in Parliament should be automatic grounds for dismissal - not passing the problem on to someone else.
And Keith continues to defend the countries most prominent paedofile even though the present Prime Minister has suggested that his crimes were possibly covered up and even though the evedence against him was "lost" by another Government minister, who was a known paedophile himself
Don'cha love the Tory sense of justice?
"It was all a hoax." (unlinked)
CREDIBLE
"HEATH A PAEDO"
"SEVEN CREDIBLE ALLEGED VICTIMS "
BOYS AS YOUNG AS TEN
Not according to the police enquiry last year Keith, but maybe they didn't know him as well as you do!!
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 08 Mar 18 - 04:41 AM

Hairy arsed cockwomble.

Ha ha ha. You have become irrelevant.

Jim, your red quote is of a man saying his back bench MP dad had affairs.
Big deal. No hint of anything non-consensual or concerning children.

You claimed "proven cases" of "rape and paedophilia" by "Prime Ministers and Government high-ups."
That was a lie. There have been none.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 08 Mar 18 - 04:49 AM

Jim,
Guardian Feb 2017,
"Policing was rocked by the fallout from a Scotland Yard inquiry, Operation Midland, into claims establishment figures were involved in child sexual abuse in the 1970s and 1980s.
A report in November 2016 castigated the Metropolitan police for being duped by false claims from a complainant given the name “Nick”. In that case, police chiefs were among the last to realise their inquiry, which wrongly targeted establishment figures, was an error.
Heath died in 2005, aged 89, meaning there can be no trial, making the resolution of the allegations complicated. At the end of their investigation, police are planning a report assessing whether the evidence gathered would have been sufficient to charge him."

That was over a year ago, and no such assessment has been forthcoming.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 08 Mar 18 - 04:50 AM

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/feb/20/police-chief-hits-out-mail-on-sunday-edward-heath-abuse-claims

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 08 Mar 18 - 05:14 AM

Not a tabloid claim Keith - a load of police reports
You've lost this one, I'm afraid (not)
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 08 Mar 18 - 05:14 AM

Not a tabloid claim Keith - a load of police reports
You've lost this one, I'm afraid (not)
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 08 Mar 18 - 05:17 AM

Incidentally
Yor link pre-dated three of mine - please try to keep up
Game, set and match
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 08 Mar 18 - 05:17 AM

Idiotic prick goblin

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 08 Mar 18 - 05:56 AM

Is there any truth in the rumour tat you are setting up an organsiation called P.O.P.P.L.E. (Protection of Prominent Paedofiles League")?
I hope all your good work is recognised for its contribution to society
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 08 Mar 18 - 06:26 AM

Idiotic prick goblin

Ha ha ha. At last we know who is being insulted.

Jim,
Not a tabloid claim Keith - a load of police reports

Yes, based on the testimony of a fantasist and now falsified.

Not one single proven case against any prime Minister or Government high-up as you falsely claimed Jim.
It was all bollocks.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 08 Mar 18 - 06:54 AM

Oh dear Keith - you really have blown your concern for sexual criminality wide open, haven'y you?
Don't ring us - we won't ring you
Do we need to continue to encourage this saddo lads?
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 08 Mar 18 - 06:56 AM

How many "proven cases" of your accusations against the Labour Party, by the way?

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 08 Mar 18 - 07:03 AM

I have not lied.
You have.

No "Prime Minister," Minister or other "Government High-Up" has a "proven" case of "rape" or "paedophilia" against them, as you falsely claimed, liar.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 08 Mar 18 - 07:38 AM

Pompous Rectum Waffle

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 08 Mar 18 - 08:26 AM

"I have not lied."
Yeas you have - you never stop lying
Latest example -
"Yes, based on and now falsified."
TOu have been given examples of historical abuse, you have shown that "seven reliable witnesses" have accused him
You ave been given accounts of senior policemen saying there is a case to answer
You have been given a statement by the Prime Minister that the affair was hushed up
All this and you claim the accusations are based on "the testimony of a fantasist"
That is an obscene lie to defend a probable paedofile
On top of the Heath affair you have continued to defend every other squalid in this sordid bunch of squalids
"I have not lied."
Another lie - one posting ago
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 04:33 AM

Jim, "Latest example" was true as were the others.
There are no "proven cases" as you falsely claimed.

And Keith continues to defend the countries most prominent paedofile

No. All I have done is expose some of your lies.

All I have done on this thread is to repeat what Labour people are saying. As Labour supporters you should be applauding me.
As liberals you should join their condemnation of mysogyny and sexual harassment.

And it has been six against one.

Now the thread instigator is reduced to posting weird insults to himself, while Jim claims some kind of victory! ("game set and match"
and "You've lost this one,"

Strange people.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 05:14 AM

Thwe cases were so obviously covered up by the Establishment, even to the point that the Prime Minister has admitted the possibility that as far as the rest of the world is concerned the evidence proves these crimes beyond any reasonable doubt
Even the son of one of the accused had indicted his father as a sexual criminal
If any further confirmation were needed, the disappearance of the report puts the lid on it.
You choose to ignore everything that has been put up by claiming they are MY lies
All this has been in order tp protect the reputation of prominent paedofiles
What kind of individual does that
If "proof" were important to you, you would not have politicised this affair in order to denigrate a party against which no proof existss - only unsubstantiated (so far) accusations
Go protect your paedos - it's all you are fit for
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 05:22 AM

So, no proven cases as you claimed.
Even the son of one of the accused had indicted his father as a sexual criminal

No he did not. He said he had affairs with adults.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 05:25 AM

Thwe cases were so obviously covered up by the Establishment,

Spare us more conspiracy theories.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 05:28 AM

"And it has been six against one."

No... as may be indicative of a health condition which is cause for concern...

..it's rational sense and sanity versus one obstinate willfully perverse obsessive old man.....

If you count 6... that's only a minimum number that have even been bothered opening this thread and posting a response...!!!

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 06:01 AM

Agreed Pfr.
In the real world, I am just expressing normal mainstream views, but here the extremists dominate.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 06:07 AM

Creepy Shit Dragon

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 06:27 AM

"Spare us more conspiracy theories."
We have a conspiracy theorist for a prim minister then - and a whole loasd of them among the top echelons of the British police force
Very worrying
"No he did not. He said he had affairs with adults."
No - he linked him directly with Dolphin Square
Stop telling lies to protect paedophiles
Keep this up much longer and we'll begin to think that....!!!
I'm grateful for your persisting with this - it's enabled me to reopen the criminal activities of your beloved leaders
Will dig around for some more when I have time
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 07:10 AM

"normal mainstream views"
Muslim implants to rape children
Travellers are slaveholders
Irish children are all brainwashed
All Conservative politicians who rape children are victims of "conspiracy theories"
I knew Britain has swung to the right after Brexit but I didb't realiise it had swung quite so far
You live and learn
Mabe a conspiracy theorist for a Prime Minister and a Police force heirarchy has done more damage than I thought!!
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 07:21 AM

No - he linked him directly with Dolphin Square

Dolphin Square never happened.
Both accusers, Darren and Nick, were prosecuted.

Telegraph,
Robert Mendick, Chief Reporter
21 April 2017 • 2:27pm
A
‘fantasist’ who accused Lord Brittan of child sex abuse sparking a 12-month police investigation is now being prosecuted over false claims he was kidnapped and shot at.
The man was charged after making a series of hoax emergency phone calls to police alleging he was under attack on at least three different occasions from gun-toting gangs.
The accused, known as ‘Darren’ but whose real name cannot be disclosed for legal reasons, had previously claimed he had witnessed two murders committed by a VIP paedophile ring, prompting a police inquiry.

Lord Brittan, who was falsely accused of child sex abuse Credit: John Stillwell/PA
Darren falsely claimed Lord Brittan, the former Home Secretary, was part of the ring that abused children in a flat at Dolphin Square.
The investigation was closed in September 2015 after detectives could find no evidence to support the lurid claims.
But Darren went on to lodge a complaint with the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) that personal and sensitive details surrounding the case had been leaked to the media, including The Telegraph.
The watchdog launched an investigation into Detective Chief Inspector Paul Settle, the former head of the Metropolitan Police’s paedophile unit, which remains ongoing after more than 15 months - and despite the fact Darren has now been charged over the hoax calls.

DCI Paul Settle
A source said Darren had telephoned police on a number of occasions, claiming he had been kidnapped; attacked by gunmen; ambushed by an armed gang; and also shot at.
A friend of DCI Settle, an experienced detective who had warned against the 'baseless witch hunt' of VIPs such as Lord Brittan, told The Telegraph: “It is disgraceful that Paul Settle is under investigation by the IPCC when the police themselves have charged Darren with effectively being a fantasist for making hoax calls. It is utter madness.”

Harvey Proctor, a former Conservative MP whose life was destroyed after being falsely accused of being a member of the VIP paedophile gang, said: “It is utterly preposterous that Paul Settle is investigated over claims made by the man who has now been charged with being a fantasist.”
Darren had told detectives that he had been present at two possible murders – one of a 15-year-old girl at a flat in Dolphin Square used by senior politicians close to the Palace of Westminster and of a man with Down’s syndrome killed on a private estate in Suffolk with links to the Establishment.
He also alleged the man with Down’s syndrome was tortured to death on the estate when he was tied to two cars. “Both vehicles then slowly reversed and I heard a scream. I think he must have passed out because he made no more sound,” Darren told a now discredited news website Exaro in February 2015. His claims led to six people being interviewed by police under caution.

Dolphin Square
A Telegraph investigation in September 2015 showed how Darren was a deeply troubled witness, who had been jailed for two years in the 1990s for making hoax bomb calls and threats to neighbours. A judge accused him of telling “some pretty whopping lies” while Darren also falsely confessed to the murder of a prostitute in the midst of a high profile police manhunt.
Darren had a troubled youth and had been in foster care for about six months when he was abused by his foster carer. He subsequently won a claim for Government compensation as a victim of crime.

The abuse sparked a bout of heavy drinking that led to him calling police and confessing to crimes he did not commit including the murder of a prostitute in what was seen at the time as a possible 'cry for help’.
Darren’s now discredited allegations about the VIP paedophile gang helped to bolster claims by another apparent fantasist, who can be identified only as Nick, who claimed he had witnessed three other murders.
Nick is now under a separate police investigation for perverting the course of justice.
An IPCC spokesman said of the inquiry into DCI Settle as a result of allegations made by Darren: “The investigation is progressing well.”

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 07:27 AM

Standard,
A man who claimed to be the victim of a VIP paedophile ring has himself been charged with offences related to indecent images of children.
The accuser, known only as Nick, sparked the Met Police’s Operation Midland in 2015 after he told officers he had been abused for nine years.
He claimed the VIP ring raped, abused and even murdered young boys, with some of the abuse taking place in Dolphin Square, Westminster.


But the Met's £2.5 million investigation was abandoned in 2016 without a single arrest, despite police raiding the homes of prominent figures including Lord Bramall and the late ex-home secretary Lord Brittan.
After the operation was closed, the Met Police apologised to those who had been falsely accused and paid out compensation.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 08:09 AM

Snotty brained turdburlar

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 08:34 AM

"Standard,
A man who claimed to be the victim of a VIP paedophile ring "
Your latest ploy seems to have underlined the possibility he was telling the truth in the first place Keith
Nice to see you'e backing down.
It is common and confirmed knowlege that victims of Paedophelia are qyuite likely to become prdators themselves if they feel the climes against them were not tealt with fairly
Some victims of clerical abuse have been found to have become abusers themselves
Paedophilic abuse destroys lives - this is what you are defending
Again your April 17th posting has been made invalid by statements mad over eight months later
Please answer this as honestly as you can - do you believe Theresa mMay to be the conspiracy theorist you have described her to be
Are the senior policeman who now says that Heath would possibly have been charged with juvenile rape had he lived the conspiracy theorists you have claimed they are
This has really blown up in your face
You started disgustingly enough by attempting to make that harassment and rape of women a political issue
Now you are defending the filth of British humanity
You certainly will regret all this in the future - right at the top of your CV - "An apologist for Paedofiles"
Happy days certainlt are here again
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 08:42 AM

Public schools and boy buggery... seems to be something of a classic traditional combination..

Public schools and the British elite establishment & Tory party...

hmmmmmmmmm.....!!!??????

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 09:19 AM

The Tories have always liked partying as long as nobody sees what they GET UP TO
PARTING AGAIN

Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 09:34 AM

Jim, it was all made up.
The police paid compensation to all those accused.
You have made a twat of yourself again.


BBC,
A man who alleged he was the victim of a VIP child abuse ring faces multiple charges relating to the possession of indecent images of children.
The man, known as Nick, claimed a paedophile ring was responsible for murdering three children.
He also said he was systematically abused and tortured by senior politicians and members of the armed forces during the 1970s and 80s.
The claims triggered the abandoned Met Police investigation Operation Midland.
Those he accused included former Conservative politicians Lord Brittan and Harvey Proctor, and Field Marshal Lord Bramall.
After the Met launched Operation Midland in 2014 they held a press conference where a senior detective described Nick's allegations as "credible and true".
In 2015, the Met carried out a series of high-profile dawn raids on the homes of those Nick had accused.
All of them denied his allegations and no evidence whatsoever was found to support Nick's claims.
After the £2.5m investigation was closed, without any charges, the Met apologised for the way they had conducted the inquiry and paid compensation.
A report into Operation Midland, carried out by a retired High Court judge, said the Met had made a series of errors in the investigation and made 25 recommendations on how police should handle similar allegations in the future.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-42965637

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 09:38 AM

Telegraph,

September 2017 • 10:00pm
The only prosecution expected to arise from the £1.5 million investigation into Sir Edward Heath is of a fantasist accused of wasting police time.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 10:37 AM

Let's see shall we Keith - what else would the Conservative Telegraph say?
It still does not make one single difference to the fact that, outside of Dolphin Square, each and every one of the people named are serial paedofiles - you have clung onto the Dolphin Square cover-up and ignored their records
I ask again - are THeresa May and the police who have admitted the possibility of a cover up conspiracy theorists - please answer ?
Now will do
You carefully did not ling your quote - you missed a bit
Reports have claimed that police are treating seriously seven of the 40 or so complainants who came forward and that those would have warranted interviewing Heath under caution - had he still been alive. Heath died in 2005 and cannot defend his reputation.
Chief Constable Mike Veale
Chief Constable Mike Veale
But the Operation Conifer report will stop far short of alleging Heath was a paedophile and that will fuel critics who say the exercise is a ‘scandalous’ waste of public money that has besmirched Heath’s character.
Wiltshire Police said: “The Operation Conifer summary closure report will be published on Thursday 5 October 2017. As per our position throughout this investigation, we will not be commenting on any operational detail until such time we publish our report.

“The operational security of the investigation and the anonymity of the people who have come forward remains of paramount importance to Wiltshire Police. It is for that reason that we strongly discourage any speculation concerning any investigation detail and/or outcome.”
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/24/fantasist-facing-charges-false-ted-heath-paedophile-claims/
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 10:57 AM

Jim, you should know by now.

Any dirt about the Tory party = Unproved allegations
Any unproved allegations about the Labour party = The party are rotten

Nothing you say will ever change that. Just do as I do and take the piss.

DtG

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 11:04 AM

Let's see shall we Keith - what else would the Conservative Telegraph say?

They can not tell lies about the police or legal cases.
I also quoted BBC.

Your quote,
"But the Operation Conifer report will stop far short of alleging Heath was a paedophile and that will fuel critics who say the exercise is a ‘scandalous’ waste of public money that has besmirched Heath’s character."

So, no proven claim of rape or paedophilia against any Prime Minister or government high-ups as you falsely claimed, liar.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 11:08 AM

"Just do as I do and take the piss."
Much better to allow him to take the piss out of himself - and much more satisfying
HOW LONG BEFORE THIS IS PROVED THE WORK OF A FANTASIST? and how long before Keith begins to defend it??
Your starter for ten Keith!!!
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 11:11 AM

Dave,
Nothing you say will ever change that. Just do as I do and take the piss

Your weird nonsense just makes you irrelevant.

You can not challenge a single word that I have posted, so you are reduced to posting weird phrases, apparently against yoursel ("Goblin?".)
And it is your thread!

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 11:17 AM

Jim,
how long before Keith begins to defend it?

Why would I?
(He was a councillor. Hardly a "Goverment high-up"!

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 11:31 AM

"Why would I? (He was a councillor. Hardly a "Government high-up"!
Whatea magnificent foot-in-mouth Keith - you really couldn't make it up
So you only defend "high ups"
Didn't doubt it for one minute
"You can not challenge a single word t"
are you joking again
No word on Tessie May the fantasist then?
Didn't doubt that one either
You have hade a one-man stand in defending these perverts and everybody has challanged you
You have not a single supporter here
Mabe it' a fantasists plot
Feckin' eejit
Jim Carroll