BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 12:35 PM

... it's also interesting that public boarding school educated tory politicians
adapt so easily to life behind bars in prison........

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 12:44 PM

Doesn't even know the difference between a Gnome and a Goblin.

Slimy turd captain.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 01:41 PM

Jim,
So you only defend "high ups"

No. I do not defend anyone.
I was just refuting your lie about "proven cases" of "rape and paedophilia" by "Prime Ministers and government high-ups."

You defend your lie by reporting the antics of some local councillor!

No word on Tessie May the fantasist then?

Huh?

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 01:50 PM

Jim, did you mean this?
the present Prime Minister has suggested that his crimes were possibly covered up

I do not remember her suggesting any such thing.
Quote please.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 02:29 PM

Go fuck yourself Keith - you've had it twice - you know this as this is the first time yo have challenged it despite the fact that that I have asked for clarification numerous times
You always do this - ignore challenges then claim you haven't been challenged
"No. I do not defend anyone."
What!!!!!
You have had the records of these perves put up over and over again and you continue to defend them
Do not ever claim you don't tell lies - you no longer know what truth is
You really do need help
Go away - maybe there is a local paedo ring to keep you occupied = you seem to have embraced it big time
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 03:02 PM

JAy SUS
Whast a lying plonker
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 03:45 PM

Jim, you have never quoted May suggesting Heath was a paedo.

From your own quote,
"But the (police) Operation Conifer report will stop far short of alleging Heath was a paedophile and that will fuel critics who say the exercise is a ‘scandalous’ waste of public money that has besmirched Heath’s character."

Your claims about Dolphin Square were all bollocks. It never happened.
The police had to compensate all the suspects they named.

You lied about "Prime Ministers and Government high-ups."

You whole case was lies.
I did not lie.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 03:51 PM

Tossing wang bogle

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 09 Mar 18 - 08:15 PM

"Jim, you have never quoted May suggesting Heath was a paedo."
Now you are deliberately distorting what I said - is there no end to your lying to protect these monsters?
I said have put up May's statement that there was possibly a cover-up over the Dolphin Square Paedofile ring
I asked you to explain that immediately I put it up so you cannot possibly claim it slipped your notice
When a senior minister, especially one who is now Prime Minister, makes such a serious admission about her own Government you can bet she believes there has been a ******* cover-up
Want another missing file involving high-ups and paedophilia?
THERE YOU GO
One of the "missing" files involved a Government advisor you have already been linked to, PETER RIGHTON - SERIAL SEX OFFENDER
Righton'es name has also been linked to the Dolphin Square orgies - yet this particular scandal has nothing to do with that squalid rapefest - another entirely
THATCHER had already made sure none of this information got to the ears of the general public long before the files disappeared but some of the details escaped into the press
THIS IS THE MAN THATCHER PROTECTED
THIS is his own confession
GEOFFREY DICKENS SAW THE REPORT BEFORE IT "DISAPPEARED" and described it as "Explosive"
These are the obscene squalids you are defending - makes you a pervert, I reckon
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 10 Mar 18 - 03:58 AM

Jim,
I said have put up May's statement that there was possibly a cover-up over the Dolphin Square Paedofile ring

The police found nothing. Just two deluded or deranged people whose stories were shown to be fabrications.
The police had to apologise to the families of the dead and compensate everyone named still living.

Your whole case was just lies.

Dave,
Tossing wang bogle

Strange, sad man.

I am off line for a while.
A blessed relief if you found odds of only six against one too gruelling.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: DMcG
Date: 10 Mar 18 - 04:18 AM

Ok Keith - chat later.

But Tusk's statement did not contradict what I said in (a). And point (b) was more important as I said at the time (though 'significant' might have been a better word.)

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 10 Mar 18 - 04:21 AM

You know, I think he really believes that I take him seriously.

Bloated crap butler

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 10 Mar 18 - 04:21 AM

More and more information you continue to ignore Keith - plenty more to go
You are an idiot without a grain of self-respect - I am happy that you continue to humiliate yourself in this way for as long as you feel the need to protect paedofiles because they are prominent politicians
Nice of you to draw attention to yourself on the Brexit thread - the more the merrier, I say
You really have reached sewer-level on this one
Great start to the day - thanks
"Strange, sad man."
I trust you were addressing yourself when you wrote this
At least the Government attempted to cover up their pervs
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 10 Mar 18 - 04:58 AM

YOUR FRIENDS SEEM TO GET EVERYWHERE, DON'T THEY KEITH?
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 11 Mar 18 - 03:42 PM

The more you draw attention to the deceitful activities of this and previous governments, Jim, the more their sympathisers squeal. From the amount squealing that is going on I think you are hitting the mark.

DtG

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 11 Mar 18 - 08:08 PM

" sympathisers"
Is there more than one Dave?
Thought this was a one-mane SPP (Save the Prominent Pervs) campaign
I have to say, I've come out of this thread knowing far more about our glorious leaders than when it started - even Buck House - who'd have thought it!!
Who says Keith has no uses?
Jim Caarroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 12 Mar 18 - 09:51 AM

"I have to say, I've come out of this thread knowing far more about our glorious leaders than when it started - even Buck House - who'd have thought it!!
Who says Keith has no uses?"

Jim - that's precisely why i object to bans and exclusions of our worst adversaries...
We need hardcore antagonists like tezza to keep us motivated in staying better informed, better equipped for fighting back...

If keith is all we have left, then mudcat is poorer for it...?????

[there are maybe 2 or 3 tezza understudies, who try hard, who have so far not been banned from BS, but they are just not in his league...]

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 12 Mar 18 - 10:46 AM

I don't agree. There are times when the whole reputation of the place comes under threat. If you indulge serial bigots and bullies that's precisely what happens.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 12 Mar 18 - 10:54 AM

I agree entirely PFR - I've never suggested anybody should be banned because of extreme opinions - I welcome them, especially when they are rationally put
I draw a line at persistent abuse (we all do it sometimes but there is a limit), but even then the decision is with the moderators
Keith's problem is that there comes a point where he refuses to respond to what is being said and goes into his 'speaking clock' mode, repeating the statement over and over again as if nobody has responded - "stonewalling" in sporting terms
At that point, we need to move on if we are going to continue to share opinions and knowledge
Keith relies on this not happening - then he claims he has "won" something because - he claims - nobody can answer his points - it has always been a regular technique - and he is the only one to make these discussions a matter of win-lose
Then, and oly then will I suggest we stop responding to him - not because I disgree with him but because he then becomes an obstruction
Missing him already - aren't you!!
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Raggytash
Date: 12 Mar 18 - 12:38 PM

No, not at all, not one jot, not one iota.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 12 Mar 18 - 01:33 PM

Rhetorical question Raggy!
Jim

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 12 Mar 18 - 01:35 PM

What's the point of rhetorical questions..?

:D tG

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 12 Mar 18 - 04:03 PM

"What's the point of rhetorical questions..?"
Why do you ask!
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 12 Mar 18 - 04:21 PM

:-D

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 13 Mar 18 - 09:26 AM

Lovely piece by The Flying Rodent. One particular line is, I believe, particularly relevant here.

Repeating Yourself Isn't The Same As Winning

Enjoy.

DtG

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 20 Mar 18 - 05:40 AM

While the cat was away you all came out to play.

Dave,
The more you draw attention to the deceitful activities of this and previous governments, Jim, the more their sympathisers squeal

If you meant me Dave, you lie.
I have not sympathised with or defended anyone.

I have just repeated accusations made by party members, and pointed out Jim's whopping lie that there are proven cases of rape and paedophilia against Prime Ministers and othe government "high ups."

Was that not a whopping lie?
Anyone found a single example yet?

Meanwhile, female Labour Shadow Cabinet Minister Debbie Abrahams claims she has been the victim of a “bullying culture of the worst kind” from the party .

Meanwhile, another Labour shadow minister has been accused of “slapping” the buttocks of a female party member and making offensive sexual remarks about her. A witness told the Financial Times that those present were shocked to have seen Karl Turner, Labour’s transport spokesman, “slap” a woman’s backside as she walked through his constituency office in the summer of 2015.The witnesses have also alleged the MP for Hull East told the woman, who had had a double mastectomy, that she “shouldn’t have got rid of her real tits because they were great”.

Meanwhile, Labour has stepped up its investigations into two MPs accused of sexual harassment.
The cases of Ivan Lewis and Kelvin Hopkins have both been referred to an internal disciplinary committee.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 20 Mar 18 - 05:52 AM

I see the great whinging wazzock is back.

Ignore him and he might go away. Though I doubt it somehow.

DtG

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 20 Mar 18 - 05:53 AM

Welcome back with your pervy support of the Prominent Perves Keith -
I sincerely hope your behaviour wil be treated with the contempt you have earned for it
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 20 Mar 18 - 05:58 AM

You're sick, Keith.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 20 Mar 18 - 06:07 AM

Lads, lads, lads. Just ignore him. Let him believe he is 'winning' something. Just think of it as care in the community.

DtG

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 20 Mar 18 - 06:34 AM

Filthy liar Jim,
Welcome back with your pervy support of the Prominent Perves Keith -

It is a vicious, nasty lie to say I have supported any kind of pervert.
I never have. You are just a vile and filthy liar.

If you are not, find a quote, liar.

Dave,

You know, I think he really believes that I take him seriously.

You do Dave.
You must because I have said nothing that has not been said by your fellow party members.
Your own political comrades Dave.
Do you not take them seriously?

What about Jim's whopping lies.
Do you take him seriously Dave?
You have not uttered a word of criticism, but you must know his claim of proven cases was a whopping lie, as are his false accusations against me.

Steve,
You're sick, Keith.

Just vacuous abuse Steve.
You have not, and can not, challenge anything I have said.
Can you Steve?

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 20 Mar 18 - 06:40 AM

Go and find yourself a nice rest home.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 20 Mar 18 - 06:47 AM

Leave him lads - this is no longer abour sexual impropriety - just about "Tories good- Labour bad"
Any moron who picks woman who MP who suddenly discovers she has been "bullied" in the past after she has been suspended for her own behaviour cannot be the brightest starfish in the sand-bucket
Let him live with his resentment that he was never invited to the Dolphin Square rape-ups
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 20 Mar 18 - 07:06 AM

Not sure what to do for the best as I am no psychiatrist. Reasoning is impossible. The direct approach does not work. Abuse is water of a ducks back as I guess he must have become accustomed to it if he acts like he does here in real life. The inbred llama sucker has a real problem.

DtG

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 20 Mar 18 - 08:25 AM

Three more posts, and not one offers a counter argument because none of you have one.

I post hard facts, you lot just trivial abuse.

Lads, lads, lads. Just ignore him.

Yes. Scuttle back into hiding little mice.
The cat is back.

What a pathetic lot you are.
Oh dear oh dear.
Ha ha ha.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 20 Mar 18 - 08:28 AM

Goat blowing dipshit

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 20 Mar 18 - 08:39 AM

Another vacuous, random post, and not one offers a counter argument because none of you have one.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 20 Mar 18 - 08:46 AM

There is no counter argument to errant nonsense.

Bollock brained snotgobbler

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 20 Mar 18 - 08:50 AM

THIS IS THE EGO YOU ARE FEEDING DAVE
Time for us to roll and go
It's time for us to leave him
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 20 Mar 18 - 09:26 AM

Dave,
There is no counter argument to errant nonsense.

I suppose not, but I have just repeated accusations from within Labour by your fellow Party members.
How is that "errant nonsense?"

Obviously it is not. You just have no reply to it.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 20 Mar 18 - 09:29 AM

Repeating as yet unproven accusations is errant nonsense.

Blinkered turdbending monkeywaker

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 20 Mar 18 - 09:29 AM

Jim, your link is to James Cagney in White Heat - Top of the World.

Is that the ego Dave is feeding?
Is that how you see me?
I am flattered.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 20 Mar 18 - 09:33 AM

I think it is more like this.

You lose!

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 20 Mar 18 - 09:35 AM

Dave,
Repeating as yet unproven accusations is errant nonsense.

Of course it is not!
If Labour members are making false accusations of sexual misconduct against each other, that is itself an issue.

The accusations are a hard fact.
That is a serious issue for the Party whether they are true or not.

Other parties do not seem to have it to anything like the same extent.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 20 Mar 18 - 09:38 AM

"Jim, your link is to James Cagney in White Heat - Top of the World.

Is that the ego Dave is feeding?
Is that how you see me?
I am flattered."

you sure about that flattery...???

Considering multiple 'rumours' of Cagney serial seducing young male acting hopefuls...?????

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 20 Mar 18 - 09:39 AM

Repeating as yet unproven accusations is errant nonsense.

Of course it is not!<.i>

Oh yes it is!

He's behind you!

Blithering crusty bellend.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 20 Mar 18 - 09:42 AM

Dave,
You lose!

Who has lost Dave?
Certainly not me. No-one has found a single fault in anything I have posted, and you are all incapable of challenging any of my actual posts!

Repeating as yet unproven accusations is errant nonsense.

Of course it is not!
If Labour members are making false accusations of sexual misconduct against each other, that is itself an issue.

The accusations are a hard fact.
That is a serious issue for the Party whether they are true or not.

Other parties do not seem to have it to anything like the same extent.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 20 Mar 18 - 09:47 AM

Who has lost Dave?

Gollum won his precious so I guess everyone else lost...

Dribbling ulcerous fuckwit

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Keith A of Hertford
Date: 20 Mar 18 - 10:02 AM

A goblin crashes and burns.
An appropriate analogy indeed Dave.

Subject: RE: BS: Sexual impropriety at Westminster
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 20 Mar 18 - 10:06 AM

You wouldn't know an appropriate analogy if it painted itself blue and sang the appropriate analogy anthem while biting your balls.

Simpering odorous slugfucker