Lyrics & Knowledge Personal Pages Record Shop Auction Links Radio & Media Kids Membership Help
The Mudcat Cafemuddy

Post to this Thread - Sort Descending - Printer Friendly - Home


Tech: HTML Emojis in Mudcat Forum?

Joe Offer 14 May 18 - 03:42 PM
punkfolkrocker 14 May 18 - 03:48 PM
Joe Offer 14 May 18 - 03:49 PM
punkfolkrocker 14 May 18 - 03:49 PM
punkfolkrocker 14 May 18 - 03:49 PM
Jack Campin 14 May 18 - 03:51 PM
Kenny B 14 May 18 - 04:17 PM
DaveRo 15 May 18 - 01:21 AM
Mr Red 15 May 18 - 02:27 AM
Mr Red 15 May 18 - 02:39 AM
DaveRo 15 May 18 - 02:45 AM
DaveRo 15 May 18 - 11:25 AM
punkfolkrocker 15 May 18 - 11:41 AM
Kenny B 15 May 18 - 11:49 AM
Jeri 15 May 18 - 12:15 PM
Rapparee 15 May 18 - 12:15 PM
GUEST 15 May 18 - 05:24 PM
GUEST 15 May 18 - 05:24 PM
Mr Red 16 May 18 - 04:49 PM
GUEST,Grishka 17 May 18 - 06:18 AM
DaveRo 17 May 18 - 10:58 AM
Reinhard 17 May 18 - 12:46 PM
GUEST,Grishka 17 May 18 - 06:44 PM
DaveRo 18 May 18 - 12:10 AM
GUEST 20 May 18 - 05:19 PM
Mr Red 23 May 18 - 02:59 AM
Mr Red 23 May 18 - 03:18 AM
Share Thread
more
Lyrics & Knowledge Search [Advanced]
DT  Forum
Sort (Forum) by:relevance date
DT Lyrics:









Subject: Tech: HTML Emojis
From: Joe Offer
Date: 14 May 18 - 03:42 PM

Somebody sent me a PM, asking how to make emojis in Mudcat posts. I know it's possible and I've done it a few times, but I forget now and don't have a real computer just now to look it us. Can somebody give us some easy lessons? Then we can use the rest of this thread to practice.
Thanks.
-Joe, on vacation with a Chromebook-
😀 (Emoticon copied from Mr. Red's post below.)
😀


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Tech: HTML Emojis
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 14 May 18 - 03:48 PM

Have admin techs given up on enabling emoticon plugins in Chrome,
which stopped working after the site refurb...???


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Tech: HTML Emojis in Mudcat Forum?
From: Joe Offer
Date: 14 May 18 - 03:49 PM

Yep, guess so.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Tech: HTML Emojis in Mudcat Forum?
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 14 May 18 - 03:49 PM

Test: ??


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Tech: HTML Emojis in Mudcat Forum?
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 14 May 18 - 03:49 PM

..yeah... still not working...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Tech: HTML Emojis in Mudcat Forum?
From: Jack Campin
Date: 14 May 18 - 03:51 PM

Let's hope it never works. It would be a pointless obstacle for the blind.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Tech: HTML Emojis in Mudcat Forum?
From: Kenny B
Date: 14 May 18 - 04:17 PM

Jack are those that, that will not see? :<)


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Tech: HTML Emojis in Mudcat Forum?
From: DaveRo
Date: 15 May 18 - 01:21 AM

I thought it had been fixed. Accented characters was fixed.

Here's one from the Android keyboard.

??

Previews OK.

Maybe it depends on which emoticon you try. And also which ones your computer can display.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Tech: HTML Emojis in Mudcat Forum?
From: Mr Red
Date: 15 May 18 - 02:27 AM

let us see: the more obvious character like 1/2 etc as hash codes eg &#188;

¹         º         »         ¼         ½         ¾         ¿         À         Á         Â         Ã         Ä

Å         Æ         Ç         È         É         Ê         Ë         Ì         Í         Î         Ï         Ð         Ñ         Ò         Ó

and AE copied    Æ    as text
then emoticons using hash codes:

😀         😁         😂         😃         😄         😅         😆         😇         😈         😉         😊         😋         😌         😍

and a copy & paste

??         ??         ??         ??         ??         ??         ??         ??         ??         ??         ??         ??         ??         ??


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Tech: HTML Emojis in Mudcat Forum?
From: Mr Red
Date: 15 May 18 - 02:39 AM

Win 7

Firefox 59.0.2 - last line doesn't show all others OK
IE 11.0.96 - similar but emoticons in B&W
Goggle Chrome 53.0.2785.116 - as IE 11
Safari 5.1.7 - no emoticons

Dunno about Tabs - Safari is the latest version for free that I have.

What do you see?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Tech: HTML Emojis in Mudcat Forum?
From: DaveRo
Date: 15 May 18 - 02:45 AM

The option in my Firefox add-on works for emojis too - though I wrote it so that I could post accented characters.

😉


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Tech: HTML Emojis in Mudcat Forum?
From: DaveRo
Date: 15 May 18 - 11:25 AM

So, answering the OP, here's one way of posting an emoticon - if you must.

Unicode is an international standard system for encoding (i.e. turning into a code) letters, non-western characters, symbols, hieroglyphs, and pictures.

Every emoticon has a Unicode number which you can look up on the internet. For example the grinning face at the top left of the table on this page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emoticons_(Unicode_block)
is 1F600 (usually written U+1F600) and the devil further along is 1F608. The next row starts 1F610

To post these you type:

&#x1F600;   😀
&#x1F608;   😈
&#x1F610;   😐

The &# prefix and the final semicolon turn it into an html code. The x specifies that it's in hexadecimal - hex 1F600 is decimal 128512 so this works too:

&#128512; 😀

This method should work with any Unicode symbol - e.g. Chinese characters.

BUT - just because you can see it, it doesn't mean everyone else can. It depends on having the appropriate font installed.

There are also lots of sites which will give you the codes - Mr Red has one.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Tech: HTML Emojis in Mudcat Forum?
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 15 May 18 - 11:41 AM

Win 8.1 / Chrome browser...

Plugin: https://www.emojiforgooglechrome.com/?ref=emojiinputhelp

Emojis will Preview but still only post as two question marks... ??

[that was supposed to be my favourite "face with stuck out tongue and winking eye"]


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Tech: HTML Emojis in Mudcat Forum?
From: Kenny B
Date: 15 May 18 - 11:49 AM

😀


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Tech: HTML Emojis in Mudcat Forum?
From: Jeri
Date: 15 May 18 - 12:15 PM

Stick an ampersand (&) in front of these, and try:
#128540; 😜
or
#x1F61C; 😜


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Tech: HTML Emojis in Mudcat Forum?
From: Rapparee
Date: 15 May 18 - 12:15 PM

:-{p


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Tech: HTML Emojis in Mudcat Forum?
From: GUEST
Date: 15 May 18 - 05:24 PM

https://getemoji.com


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Tech: HTML Emojis in Mudcat Forum?
From: GUEST
Date: 15 May 18 - 05:24 PM

https://getemoji.com


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Tech: HTML Emojis in Mudcat Forum?
From: Mr Red
Date: 16 May 18 - 04:49 PM

Mr Red has one (opens in a new tab) see the hash codes
(I use denary notation - 0-9, as opposed to hexadecimal 0-F) the code above the emoticon is the relevant one.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Tech: HTML Emojis in Mudcat Forum?
From: GUEST,Grishka
Date: 17 May 18 - 06:18 AM

Some browsers refuse to display any characters that take more than two bytes of Unicode. Thus, the following are much safer than the ones used above:
&#9785;
&#9786;
&#9787;

If your message relies on an irony emoticon, best stick to the traditional forms ;-) or ;)


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Tech: HTML Emojis in Mudcat Forum?
From: DaveRo
Date: 17 May 18 - 10:58 AM

The last of those is officially called Black Smiling Face. It's in a set called Miscellaneous Symbols
https://www.unicode.org/charts/nameslist/n_2600.html

On this Android tablet, in Grishka's post, it's red! Which illustrates a couple if problems with emoticons - they may not appear the same to other people and it's not obvious what they mean. They may not even always appear the same on a particular device. On the Unicode webpage it does appear as black. ?

The number of bytes used by a unicode symbol, as encoded in UTF-8 which is what Mudcat's forum uses, is shown here:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTF-8#Description
All the ones in the new Emoticons table I linked to earlier are 4-bytes in UTF-8.

I've never thought of ;-) - wink - as expressing irony. There was a proposal for an irony punctuation mark but I've rarely seen it used:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony_punctuation

Personally I'd avoid using emoticons/emoji altogether on forums.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Tech: HTML Emojis in Mudcat Forum?
From: Reinhard
Date: 17 May 18 - 12:46 PM

If you can't express yourself with words you'd better be quiet rather than sinking to the level of teletubbies.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Tech: HTML Emojis in Mudcat Forum?
From: GUEST,Grishka
Date: 17 May 18 - 06:44 PM

DaveRo: the "face" appears red because I used a "font color=" tag to that effect. -

Certainly emoticons can be ambiguous - so can words, gestures, or facial expressions. Some of these are clear insults, all have to be used carefully. Rarely two have exactly the same meaning; there are situations in which an emoticon "says it all" ☺. -

Wikipedia about "Wink":
...
Cultural specific differences
...
The West
Winking in Western culture can be used as a way of letting someone else know that the winker or some other person is joking or lying (e.g., a parent tells their child a story about a fairy princess, and then winks at the child's older sibling, the sibling thus knows the parent is lying to the younger child).


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Tech: HTML Emojis in Mudcat Forum?
From: DaveRo
Date: 18 May 18 - 12:10 AM

GUEST,Grishka wrote: the "face" appears red because I used a "font color=" tag to that effect.
Ah! And here's me thinking Google must have applied a 'cultural sensitivity' filter to their font!

Wink: joking, yes - but not irony.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Tech: HTML Emojis in Mudcat Forum?
From: GUEST
Date: 20 May 18 - 05:19 PM

I love Google's blob emojis from Android 4.0-7.0 better than Apple emojis. Too bad they changed them to the round ones.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Tech: HTML Emojis in Mudcat Forum?
From: Mr Red
Date: 23 May 18 - 02:59 AM

There was a proposal for an irony punctuation mark but I've rarely seen it used:

and the sarcastrophe (et al) eg ^any sarcastic remark for the dimmer amongst us^


you'd better be quiet rather than sinking to the level of teletubbies. - a comment from someone who doesn't know his own species well enough.

IME the problem with the web generally and forums in particular is that: because the body language is non-existent people re-interpret what you write in the context their own sensitivities. In human communications we are still a visual species. On-line dating attests to this problem, I discovered this 30 years ago with ads in the personal columns of newspapers. The same problemo. No body language. Until emoticons. A poor substitute for body language, but short of a video link (AND smellyvision), the best we can do.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Tech: HTML Emojis in Mudcat Forum?
From: Mr Red
Date: 23 May 18 - 03:18 AM

DaveRo, I took the red face to be a colo(u)red B&W icon.
Aaaaaaand .........
anyone know if there is a simple B&W four-leaf emoticon? I collect them you know.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate
  Share Thread:
More...

Reply to Thread
Subject:  Help
From:
Preview   Automatic Linebreaks   Make a link ("blue clicky")


Mudcat time: 26 May 8:10 AM EDT

[ Home ]

All original material is copyright © 1998 by the Mudcat Café Music Foundation, Inc. All photos, music, images, etc. are copyright © by their rightful owners. Every effort is taken to attribute appropriate copyright to images, content, music, etc. We are not a copyright resource.