If you do like ballads...

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: GUEST,Some bloke
Date: 27 May 19 - 10:57 AM

Nothing to see here

Ironically, Jim's first contribution to this thread was that rare thing; agreeable.

Mind you, at that point, nobody had dared to question his self styled guru status.

---

That's enough. Try again another time, without the acrimony.
-Joe Offer-

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: GUEST,Walter Raleigh
Date: 27 May 19 - 04:09 AM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=7&v=3EoI-6lQFIE
Plot
Man has heart broken, tries to problem by pleasing woman, ending mysterious.
Cantefable

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: GUEST,Walter Raleigh
Date: 27 May 19 - 04:06 AM

At last something enjoyable

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 27 May 19 - 02:47 AM

The modern cantefable

We're going on a bear humt

:D

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: Steve Gardham
Date: 26 May 19 - 06:02 PM

Just as an aside I once recorded a version of Lord Bateman in the 60s from a lady who learnt it from her father. She sang about half of the verses but those she couldn't remember she recited in prose, so accurately that we were able to piece together the full ballad. The effect of her performance on that day was something similar to a cantefable, but even then I knew what a cantefable was (thanks to EFDSS Journals), and didn't consider for one moment that this could have been a cantefable.

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: Richard Mellish
Date: 26 May 19 - 05:18 PM

I don't think I had met the term "cante fable" anywhere before I met it in one or other thread here. But I have been understanding it as explained above: a tale which incorporates short snatches of song. How widely has it been used for specimens with different proportions, such as "The Half Hitch" which is the other way round?

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: Steve Gardham
Date: 26 May 19 - 04:50 PM

It would be far better to debate the 'cantefable' definition with what Funk and Wagnall actually define it as. Versions of 'Little Musgrave' as a cantefable? Haven't seen any of these. Perhaps Richie can enlighten us, or better still F&W must surely give references we can look at.

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: Jeri
Date: 26 May 19 - 03:40 PM

I think the fight in this thread started here. When you look at who picks fights with people, it's you.

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 26 May 19 - 01:19 PM

Orif not - report me for it
I'm getting tired of open dishonesty being used as a firm of intimidation
If it continues, I will report those responsible
How dare you people sabotage a good thread in this manner
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 26 May 19 - 10:15 AM

I don’t believe it to be the job of anybody, member or guest, to direct where a discussion should take place – the question of cante-fables was raised and challenged here, as far as I’m concerned, an ideal place to deal with it
'Cante Fable
Funk and Wagnall’s ‘Standard Dictionary of Folklore’ gives versions of ‘Little Musgrave’, ‘Maid Freed from the Gallows, ‘Our Goodman’, Rock Island Line’ and ‘Frankie and Albert’ as examples of the genre – good enough for me.   

"Apparently on the basis that one feels disagreement with their ideas"        
No-one here is suggesting difference of opinion is wrong - it is the arrogant and often insulting terms in which those differences are expressed that cause the problems
Perhaps we can leave it there eh ?
Jim

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: GUEST,Pseudonymous
Date: 26 May 19 - 08:56 AM

Gotcha Steve! Yes Mudcat is off and on. It is a great site. So much work must have gone into it!

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: Steve Gardham
Date: 26 May 19 - 07:51 AM

Mudcat contributed a lot to website.

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: Steve Gardham
Date: 26 May 19 - 07:50 AM

Richie M regular on Mudcat

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: GUEST,Pseudonymous
Date: 26 May 19 - 06:14 AM

Here is the link, it didn't work before.

http://bluegrassmessengers.com/31-the-marriage-of-sir-gawain.aspx

Hope you enjoy reading!

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: GUEST,Pseudonymous
Date: 26 May 19 - 05:43 AM

Lastly for now, as I have stuff to do, Child 31.

There is already a Mudcat thread for that particular Child number. I would suggest that that is the place for further discussion of that topic in detail? (Though discussion of the different uses of 'cantefable' might be relevant here, depending on how far you see it as linked to learning about ballads).

In addition, JHW kindly provided a link near the top of this page to a web site on Child. I've been looking at what it has to say on Child 31 and also at the actual Child 31. <> Well worth a look.

Naturally, the question of whether the 'Hitch' piece should be regarded as an example of Child 31 is one upon which 'the authorities' who have discussed folk music over the last 100 years have disagreed.

My own thinking, and yes, I have only read a few sections and a couple of other pieces by Child, is that he would probably have wanted to consign the song copied and pasted above to the dunghill.

My view is that, if Child compared it with, say, the treatment of a somewhat similar theme by Chaucer, in the Wife of Bath's tale, he would conclude that Chaucer has a much more interesting story. And I'm guessing Child might agree.

I'm not saying that it isn't amusing, or likeable, just that it doesn't go much beyond that for me. But probably this ought to be on the thread about Child 31.

Amused to note the objection to using a dictionary: excellent source if one wanted to make a judgement about older and new fangled uses of a term as it cites examples from the past. In my view, using the term 'cantefable' to refer to any mixture of prose and verse could be seen as robbing the term of some of its specificity.

Thank you for reading.

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: GUEST,Pseudonymous
Date: 26 May 19 - 05:30 AM

On the topic of what I know something about, I will add theory of music to the list. Therefore, when I do get round to reading Bronson, I guess I shall stand a better chance of following his discussion of modes and so on than some other posters. Depends how complicated it is.

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: GUEST,Pseudonymous
Date: 26 May 19 - 05:25 AM

This is my take on it.

1 This thread originally was put up to inform us of an opportunity to learn about ballads. The heading has an ellipsis, indicating that it is not a complete sentence or thought. The OP continues that you might want to learn more about them and mentions a course, which looks very interesting. If there is a need for a thread on 'Why I like ballads', a different topic, then perhaps somebody might start one.


2 Even a cursory glance at the work on folk song that has been done over the last hundred years shows that there has been a range of ideas, some controversies and 'ballad wars' and so on.

There will therefore be honest differences of opinion, as there have been throughout one hundred years of scholarship.

3 It is, therefore, perfectly valid to hold and express an opinion different from that of another person.

4 On the other hand, it would be negative and, in my view, would add nothing to anyone's knowledge or enjoyment, to see the debate in terms of a court case, or a battle, or to claim that somebody expressing disagreement with an idea is engaging in one upmanship.

5 Requesting people to stop discussing the topic altogether, apparently on the basis that one feels disagreement with their ideas is not likely to add to anybody's understanding. On the contrary, it is likely to have the dual effect of driving people away and preventing precisely the sort of active discussion that leads to the best sort of learning.

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 26 May 19 - 04:47 AM

Steve
For someone who has joined those who have turned the term folk song on its head it's beyond me how you can offer a dictionary definition of Cante-fable
The term refers generally to a mixture of song and story, whether one or the other dominates
Alan Bruford first pointed out this ballad as being such at an EFDSS conference in Leeds where we both gave papers
We really don't need this, as Hoot says, we're here to discuss our enjoyment of the ballads
If it comes to a choice between the two opinions, personally......... !
"It is nothing like a cantefable, much more like the early nineteenth century comic pieces "
Helen Hartness Flanders got the ballad in 1930 from a 96 year old singer who described remembering it from her mother's who lived to be around the same age, singing
Her mother learned it from one of her parents - which puts it some time in the 18th century.

"Elizabeth LaPrelle "
Can't remember if you put her singing up recently Hoot - I think she was taking workshops
Very impressive
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: GUEST,Pseudonymous
Date: 25 May 19 - 06:03 PM

I thought the term 'cantefable' might lead to some discussion. It is one I had come across but not thought deeply about.

By googling I found an Oxford Refence definition from Oxford's A Dictionary of English Folklore which is specific that the term refers to a mostly prose piece interspersed with short songs.

The OED online is interesting on the term 'cantefable'. It is first found in an old French piece which calls itself a chantefable, and the cantefable spelling came later and seems to have co-existed with the earlier. The French piece was Aucassin_and_Nicolette and was a prose piece with some interspersed singing. It is often seen as a parody of various genres including our old friends the 'geste' and the 'romance'. If Wiki is right that is.

It therefore seems likely, I would suggest, that uses of the term to refer to what are basically songs/verses with a bit of prose between verses/stanzas might be much later, ie made up by a 'new crowd'.

Interestingly, the examples of used given in the OED dictionary include one from a US journal in which Leadbelly's 'talking blues' are called by that name. So the term seems to have been applied to a range of quite different 'texts' in more modern times.

These are just a few scraps of information, not meant to be a definitive or comprehensive history of the word and its many usages. Happy to be corrected if wrong.

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: GUEST,Pseudonymous
Date: 25 May 19 - 05:35 PM

@Steve: thanks for this.

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: GUEST,Hootenanny
Date: 25 May 19 - 04:45 PM

If you really, really do like ballads and enjoy hearing them performed live (instead of or in addition to discussing what is and isn't a ballad) by an excellent young singer Elizabeth LaPrelle is appearing at a FOLK Club in ENGLAND on Sunday 16th June at Walthamstow, London. Her mother Sandy Newlin is also appearing with her.

I guess they are appearing at other clubs around the country but I can't find a schedule.

For those of you who are unaware of Elizabeth she resides near Rural Retreat in Virginia. I believe this is her third UK tour in the last three years or so. I may be more.

Check her out on You Tube

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: Steve Gardham
Date: 25 May 19 - 04:30 PM

Oxford Reference 2003
Cantefable: A technical term for spoken prose narratives interspersed with short songs conveying crucial information (e.g., magical utterances, riddles, threats, etc.)

The well-known ones are those folk tales that contain a short repeated rhyme of some sort: e.gs., 'Orange' 'The Golden Ball'(of which 'Maid Freed' is thought to be a survival).

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 25 May 19 - 03:55 PM

"It is nothing like a cantefable, much more like the early nineteenth century comic pieces "
Sigh......
It's exactly like a cante-fable - unless the rules have been changed by the new crowd
This gets tiresome Steve - I've been around enough authoritative people where exactly this ballad and our own 'Go For the Water' has been discussed as such
Bronson has no compunction in including it as a ballad, his only reservation is that there is no evidence of other versions in this form
I'm getting a little tired of these definitive statements based on no evidence whatever
If 'That little Shirt My Mother made For me' can be a folk song, then I'm damn sure a cante fable of this type can be regarded as what it has been widely recognised as for a long time
Please stop this one-upmanship
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: GUEST
Date: 25 May 19 - 03:40 PM

'If you do like ballads... then you must buy, beg, borrow or steal a copy of The Muckle Sangs (Classic Scots Ballads) which was first released as a Double LP on Tangent Records ?–'


Or get one of the 3 copies of the lp on ebay

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: Steve Gardham
Date: 25 May 19 - 03:07 PM

Hi Ps,
The explanations of commonplace/cliché were not aimed at you or anybody specific for that matter. I was just clarifying the differences and explaining that both words have other uses than derogatory ones, as we had misinformation on this earlier.

BTW, I have no problem whatsoever with your guest status and welcome your very sensible contributions. The nearest I get to degree is a T-cert, but I have written 5 books and numerous articles on the history of folksong. Both my sons and my wife have good degrees, but I somehow missed out. Too late now at my time of life! There are 2 solid reasons why I didn't go to uni, sheer bloody laziness and I don't like being told what to do.

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: Steve Gardham
Date: 25 May 19 - 02:54 PM

It is nothing like a cantefable, much more like the early nineteenth century comic pieces that were interpolated with bits of spoken word.

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: Steve Gardham
Date: 25 May 19 - 02:52 PM

Helen Hartness Flanders on the American ballad 'The Half-Hitch' who collected the version given above. (Roud 1887)(Laws N23).

"To call 'The H-H' a form of Child 31 is to stretch the concept of the 'secondary ballad' to its limits."
"That this comic song is the result of urban presses or music halls seems certain"
"Surely, efforts such as those by Phillips Barry in BBfM p382-385, to relate the song to Child 31 are wishful."

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 25 May 19 - 11:44 AM

Amen to that Vic
Good to see it's still around
Jim

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: Vic Smith
Date: 25 May 19 - 11:27 AM

If you do like ballads... then you must buy, beg, borrow or steal a copy of The Muckle Sangs (Classic Scots Ballads) which was first released as a Double LP on Tangent Records ?– TNGM 119/D in 1975. Then it was re-released in January 1992 on the Greentrax label as a single CD CDTRAX9005 I have just checked and it is still available from the Greentrax website. In my opinion it is the finest commercial release of the singing of the Classic Ballads by traditional singers. The comprehensive and informative booklet notes were compiled by Hamish Henderson and Ailie Munro.
The track listings from the original vinyl releases are as follows:-
A1         Glenlogie – John Adams
A2a         The Gypsy Laddies – Jeannie Robertson
A2b         The Roving Ploughboy – John MacDonald
A3a         The False Knight Upon The Road– Bella Higgins
A3b         The False Knight Upon The Road– Duncan MacPhee
A3c         The False Knight Upon The Road– Nellie MacGregor
A4         The Bonnie Banks O' Fordie– Minnie Haman
A5         The Twa Brothers – Sheila MacGregor
B1a         Tam Lin– Betsy Johnson
B1b         Tam Lin – Willie Whyte
B2         The Knight And The Shepherd's Daughter– Lizzie Higgins
B3         The Bold Peddler– Geordie Robertson
B4         The Twa Sisters– Betsy Whyte
B5         The Jolly Beggar– Lizzie Higgins
C1a         Lord Thomas And Fair Ellen– Jessie Murray
C1b         Lord Thomas And Fair Ellen – Willie Edward
C2         Young Johnston– Betsy Whyte
C3a         Young Beicham (Lord Bateman)– Campbell MacLean
C3b         Young Beicham (Lord Bateman)– Bella Higgins
C4         The Keach In The Creel– Jimmy MacBeath
D1a         Clyde's Water – John Strachan
D1b         Clyde's Water – Willie Edward
D2         The Hugh And The Jew's Daughter– Margaret Stewart
D3         The Broom O' The Cowdenknowes– Jimmy MacBeath
D4         Jamie Telfer O' The Fair Dodhead– Willie Scott
D5a         Andrew Lammie– Jane Turriff
D5b         Andrew Lammie– Sheila MacGregor

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 25 May 19 - 08:50 AM

We visited Duncan and Linda several times at their home hoping to record tales - at the time that was what he was known for.
When he found we were also interested in songs and ballads, he insisted on singing them - fine by us.
Duncan explained that he was putting together some ballads he only partly remembered by visiting family members and Traveller friend (pretty much as Walter Pardon did when he started to put his family's repertoire together)
Personally, I can't see that this in any way makes either singer's repertoire suspect.
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: Vic Smith
Date: 25 May 19 - 08:48 AM

Vic Smith has now restored the cookie that must have disappeared (along with a lot of his weight) during his illness. The post at 25 May 19 - 08:28 AM was by the now restored - in both senses of the word - Vic Smith

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: GUEST
Date: 25 May 19 - 08:28 AM

Duncan Williamson's stunning repertoire of ballads and stories was greeted with the same scepticism.

In 1976 Williamson married the American-born musicologist/folklorist Linda Headlee, who had been working at the School of Scottish Studies. For the first four years of their marriage they lived in a tent, following which they lived in a cottage in Fife. It was largely through her that Duncan came into demand as a storyteller in Scottish schools, as well a featured performer at storytelling festivals both in the UK and abroad. She was the editor of several of his books of stories.
I have many recordings of Duncan made by myself and others dating from when I first heard him in Blairgowrie both as a singer and as storyteller in 1969. The pre- and post-Linda storytelling are very different, not better, not worse, just an entirely different approach. The later Duncan used a much smaller number of words in Travellers' cant than the earlier one. The later Duncan used much more explanation of context and language than the earlier one. None of this affected his powerful force as a storyteller but it did make him more accessible to a wider audience. Undoubtedly it helped his career as a professional storyteller from the mid-1970s. Numerous people have suggested that it was Linda's influence that brought about these changes.
The first time that I heard Duncan sing stands like a beacon in my memory. At the Blairgowrie Festivals there was usually a Sunday afternoon event - "The Archie Fisher Invitation Concert" where he was allowed to choose anyone that he had met during the weekend - festival guests, friends, interesting singers and musicians that he has met during the weekend. Duncan was one of the invitees. I don't suppose that he had ever been in a stage before and he was going to make the most of this opportunity.
He chose to sing the Waterloo-Cup song Master McGrath and he sang it to the tune of Villikins and His Dinah. The singing style was Frank Sinatra-crooner. Arms spread wide or clutching his heart, down on one knee with a sob in his voice, the full works.... There was some sniggering around me, but I couldn't join in; I was entranced.
After the marriage to Linda, lots of ballads came out that had not been heard from him before. This could have been because she encouraged him to try to engage with his earlier repertoire though it has been suggested (certainly without proof) that she may have introduced some ballads to him. I am certainly not going to express an opinion on this and in most ways I would not count it as centrally important. Duncan sang them, brought a lot of himelf into the performance and that is what matters to me. However, I hope this explains why his stunning repertoire of ballads and stories was greeted with...... scepticism.

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: GUEST,Kenny B
Date: 25 May 19 - 07:14 AM

Pete Seeger does a very nice version of The Half Hitch - Pete Seeger

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 25 May 19 - 04:52 AM

Back to the subject
One of the constant joys of the ballads to me is the various forms the different versions take
This is a cante-fable version of the Ballad, 'The Marriage of Sir Gawain' from Maine, an area of the U.S. that has proved extremely rich in Child ballads, particularly brought in by incoming immigrants from Ireland in the latter half of the 19th century
In the early seventies we recorded a storyteller/singer who gave us a two-verse fragment of a song describing a chaotic wedding feast which. I suspect, might have been a broken-down piece of this ballad - there's not enough of it to be certain, but the area was which Seamus Delargy found so rich in traditional songs and tales when he was inspired to set up the Irish Folklore commission.
Jim Carroll

5 The Half-Hitch (Child 31)
Child gives the title of this ballad as "The Marriage of Sir Gawain", but the poetry of his sets has little in common with that of "The Half-Hitch", or "The Loathly Bride" as it is sometimes called. The themes, on the other hand, are consistent right back through a whole series of songs and stories from the Middle Ages: that a vow once given must be kept, and that a courteous knight is wed (by his vow) to a repulsive bride. The use of the cante-fable form (not mentioned in Child) adds to the local humour of our set, which comes from Maine.
(accompaniment: Peggy, on guitar)

It's of a rich merchant in Plymouth did dwell.
He had a fine daughter, most beautiful girl;
A young man of honour and riches supplied,
He courted this young girl to be his bride,
O, to be his bride.

He's courted her long till he gained her love.
At length she intended her young man to prove;
Once more he asked her, once more she denied,
She told him down plainly she would not be his bride
She would not be his bride

Of all the sad oaths that he to her did swear.
Saying, Straight home I quickly will steer;
I'll have the first woman who says she'll have me
Though she be as mean as the beggar can be,
As the beggar can be.

She's ordered her servants her love to delay.
Her rings and her jewels she quick laid away;
She put on all the old rags she could find,
She looked like the beggar before and behind,
Before and behind.

She blacked up her hands on the chimney back,
Her face likewise from corner to crack;
Then away down the road she flew like a witch.
With her petticoat hoisted all on her 'half-hitch'
All on her 'half-hitch'.

See now he comes a-riding, in haste he drew near.
He cried out, Alas! For my vow I do fear.
For she stubbed along with her shoe-heels askew.
He soon overtook her and said, Who be you?
And said. Who be you?

(spoken) I’m a woman, I guess.

This answer it struck him with fear to the heart,
He wished from his life that he soon might depart.
O heavens! cried he, But I wished I'd been buried,
And quickly he asked he, he says, Are you married?
He says, Are you married?

(spoken) No I ain't!

This answer it struck him unto a dead man.
He stumbled, he staggered, he hardly could stand.
O, how can I bear my hard burden? thought he,
So quickly he asked her, says, Will you have me?
Says, Will you have me?

(spoken) Well - yes, I guess I will if I have to.

This answer it suited as bad as the rest,
His heart it lay heavy in this young man's breast;
His courage near failed him, he durst not go home
His parents would think he was surely undone,
Surely undone.

His father said. Son you are sure for to rue,
But let's clean her up and it's maybe she'll do.
So published they were * and invited the guests,
And soon it was time for the bride to be dressed.
For the bride to be dressed.

(spoken) No, I guess I'll just get married in my old dirty clothes, I s'pose.

When the wedding was over, they sat down to eat,
With her hands she grabbed hold of the cabbage and meat.
Her fingers was burned and the tongues they did wag
As she licked them and wiped them all on her old rags,
All on her old rags.

Some laughed in their sleeves till their sides was bust in;
But fiercer than ever she at it again,
And as she sat grabbing they to her replied,
Go sit yourself down by your true lover's side,
By your true lover's side.

(spoken) No, I guess I'll just sit away in the dirty old chimney corner, I s'pose.

Some laughed in their sleeves till their sides they did ache,
And others with sorrow, right ready to break;
Come, give me a candle and I'll go to bed,
For I mean to go all by myself, she said.
By myself, she said.

(spoken) Husband! When you hear my old shoe go 'clong' then you may come up to me.

So upstairs she went and a-thrashing about.
His mother said, Son what's all this about?
O mother, dear mother, pray say not one word,
No comfort to me can this whole world afford,
This whole world afford.

(spoken) Husband! My old shoe done gone 'clong' a long'time ago. Ain’t you comin'?

So up he arose and he staggered along -
But they give him a candle and they bid him go on.
I'd rather to go in the darkness, he said,
For I very well know how to get to my bed,
How to get to my bed.

He launched into bed with his back to his bride,
But she rolled and she tumbled from side unto side;
She rolled till the bed-legs did holler and squeal.
He says, Dear what ails you? Why can't you lie still?
Why can't you lie still?

(spoken My shins are sore. Can't you get a candle to grease 'em by, dear?

So up he arose for to grease his wife's shins.
Behold, she lay dressed in the finest of things;
He says, Is it you, my dear jewel, at last?
She aaya, Yes it is, and our troubles are past,
Our troubles are past.

So downstairs they went and a frolic they had
And all them sad hearts waa merry and glad;
She looked like a picture, right pleasing to spy
With many full glasses, we bid them good-bye.
We bid them good-bye.

* This refers to publishing the banns, or announcing the forthcoming marriage.

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: GUEST,Pseudonymous
Date: 25 May 19 - 04:20 AM

It would help, Jim, if you could read. Now please stop in respect of the OP.

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: GUEST,HiLo
Date: 25 May 19 - 04:20 AM

wEll, I WAS enjoying this thread. then the usual happened .....in any case, I do hope that the supreme troll will be ignored and that a very interesting discussion of ballads may continue .

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 25 May 19 - 04:04 AM

If you continue behaving abusively I will ask a moderator to have your postings removed
I really don't think it is the prerogative of a non member to instruct other members who and who nort to respond to
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: GUEST,Pseudonymous
Date: 25 May 19 - 03:41 AM

Sorry, troll, singular. Currently acting all innocent as usual. The only thing is to steer clear away from any thread with him on it, which means a number of potentially interesting ones.

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 25 May 19 - 03:17 AM

"But I come close to feeding the trolls..."
Can I suggest that, for the sake of this thread and in respect to the op this stops now ?
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: GUEST,Pseudonymous
Date: 24 May 19 - 06:33 PM

As it happens, I co-wrote something that got 'collected' - and - now I come to think of it - it was a ballad.

But I come close to feeding the trolls...

Humours. Haar Haar. :)

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: GUEST,Pseudonymous
Date: 24 May 19 - 06:02 PM

@Steve

Of course not all ballads are designed to be sung, but, and in this I may be at fault, I thought this thread was about ballads as folk song.

The ideas I was contesting, and I think I have as much right as anybody else to do this, are a) that the melody or tune contributes nothing to the overall effect, meaning in a broad semiotic sense, of the performance of a ballad and b) that when you have said all there is to say about the words/text (if that is possible) you have said all there is to say about the ballad.

I'm reasonably well informed about the uses of terminology within studies of literature, having a degree for starters. Incidentally, we covered some old stuff like Beowulf and Chaucer, so I do have some background against which to evaluate the idea that ballads came before Romances. Steve, you said some people held this view; you disagreed with it and so do I.

If anybody isn't sure what romances were like, think Arthurian legends and Don Quixote (though that was a parody of the romance) and you'll be broadly on the right lines. Mixture of Christian ideas, old stories pre-dating the Norman Conquest and influences from Europe. Indeed, some romances were translated into Medieval English from European languages.

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: Steve Gardham
Date: 24 May 19 - 05:06 PM

'Commonplace' when used as an adjective can be used in a derogatory way, but when used as a noun in relation to aspects of literature there is no derogatory meaning. It is simply used to refer to anything that notedly occurs in numerous pieces of literature. Cliché similarly although it usually refers to a single word or short phrase. Again it can be used in a derogatory way but it doesn't have to be.

Could one use the word 'commonplace' to refer to certain mantras repeated on Mudcat ad nauseam?

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: Steve Gardham
Date: 24 May 19 - 03:26 PM

I'm quite happy for anyone to go to whatever source is available to them to get their knowledge, even Mudcat which is not as far as I know peer reviewed!

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 24 May 19 - 03:22 PM

"I think 'humour' is the best response in more ways than one."
Wonder if he finds it as humorous that someone pontificating on the ballads ahs to go to Amazon blurbs for what is common knowledge to anybody who has the slightest interest in ballads ?
Doubt if somehow
Why prolong nastiness that has run its course Steve (rhetorical question, of course)
Jim

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: Steve Gardham
Date: 24 May 19 - 03:11 PM

By the way, Ps, I think 'humour' is the best response in more ways than one.

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: Steve Gardham
Date: 24 May 19 - 03:09 PM

I think the idea that text and tune go together is wishful thinking. The statement that a ballad is not a ballad without a tune is ridiculous in the extreme. The earlier collectors had many of their versions recited. As I stated earlier, Greig's most prolific informant recited every one of her ballads. A substantial percentage of Child Ballads have no evidence whatsoever of a tune, as a simple glance through Bronson will tell you.

David is entitled to use the word 'commonplace' in any way he wishes, but the word should not be taken as derogatory just as 'cliche' has a meaning that is in no way derogatory. Also in its broadest sense 'commonplace' can refer to any grouping of words you want, a single word if you wish. The fact that some academics only want it to apply to their preferences is neither here nor there.

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 24 May 19 - 01:15 PM

For me, the thing to remember about the ballads is, whether they are of 'common origin' or not, it is 'the common people' who have kept them alive down the centuries as "good stories" - the non-literate Travellers being undoubtedly the most important
For a singer, analysing them can be an added pleasure but, apart from the historical social, folkloristic and vernacular issues, they virtually sing themselves and the more you 'do' to them, the more barriers you create to making them work
The wine analogy isn't a bad one, though only god knows why 'The Guardian' should be singled out - the pretentiousness surrounding a drink you either like or don't is a world wide affectation and a running joke.
It seems to me that some academics have created an unnecessary mystique around the ballads without understanding their basic function or the people who sang them.
When impoverished and non-literate Traveller, John Reilly, turned up with a stunning repertoire of ballads, including the centuries disappeared, 'Maid and the Palmer' there was a murner of disbelief rom academics and claims that 'he must have learned them from print'; utter nonsense - of course.
Travellers have been a major source of many of our rarest ballads
Duncan Williamson's stunning repertoire of ballads and stories was greeted with the same scepticism.
It reminded me of the story of how, after making passionate love, a titled lady asked her husband: "Do poor people do this, my love?"
The reply came, "Yes my dear"
She responded, "Well, it's too damned good for them"
Jim Carroll

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: Iains
Date: 24 May 19 - 11:59 AM

TO me there are two ways available for the analysis of a ballad.
There is a rigid scientific method based on a series of rules anyone can follow. i.e.it is objective.
Then there is a personal analysis that is subjective and may well be accepted or disputed by others. Both can offer something but the latter approach reminds me of a Guardian(newspaper) wine aficionado using a stylised language that borders on being pretentious.
I am happy to be shouted down on that interpretation. It is simply how I see it.

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: Jim Carroll
Date: 24 May 19 - 09:45 AM

As this is about the enjoyment of the singing of ballads I thought I'd put this up
Makes sense to me
Jim Carroll

Sleeve notes to five volume series, 'Blood and Roses', Traditional ballads from Scotland and North America

Over a decade has passed since our last ballad project. This was The Long Harvest, made for Argo Records, and it consisted of ten albums of the English and Scottish Popular Ballads in their English, Scots and North American variants. Blood and Roses is another major ballad venture. Instead of presenting well-known ballads in their numerous variants, we are concentrating on lesser known traditional ballads, and we hope to bring out another volume every year.
WHEN IS A BALLAD NOT A BALLAD? WHEN IT HAS NO TUNE. It is with this conundrum and its answer that Professor Bronson opens his introduction to The Traditional Tunes of the Child Ballads. While agreeing with the spirit of the answer, we would go a little further and say that "a ballad is not a ballad until it is sung."
We have been singing ballads for quite a long time. Of the hundred-and-forty albums we have made, more than half have contained at least one or two ballads; and as far as live concerts and clubs are concerned, we both regard the ballads as a necessary part of any program.
What is it about the ballads that we find so fascinating? Well, the stories them¬selves are first rate. They have certainly stood the test of time, and that isn't a bad recommendation. Then again — their poetry can be breathtaking. Most of the ballads that we sing contain some memorable lines: perhaps it is just a phrase, a line of incremental repetition, or it can be an entire stanza; but however brief the moment of pure poetry, it generally generates enough light and heat to radiate an entire ballad. Finally, there is the element of challenge. The mere length of most of the ballads is challenge enough. We sometimes regard them as actors regard the great classic roles of Hamlet, Lady MacBeth, Clytemnestra and King Lear.
On the face of it, the challenge is a formidable one. You are faced with an audience made up of a number of separate individuals who may or may not share anything in common (other than the more or less sophisticated attitude to life and each other, which is the result of long exposure to TV and radio, with its instant news, instant politics, instant simulated passion yelled, sobbed and moaned by a never-ending succession of pop-singers). And the ballad singer, for the next eight or ten (or ten or twelve) minutes is going to sing a tale in the form of a long narrative poem organised into twenty or thirty (or more) quatrains, tied to a melody that will be repeated every four lines. Not much room for manoeuvre! Furthermore, the poetry is of a kind that few people in the audience have had the opportunity to become familiar with. It is full of odd usages, repetitions, strange combinations of romantic love and incredible violence. To complicate matters still further, some of the texts are in braid Scots. A challenge indeed ...!
Occasionally the challenge has been taken up with results that have been less than encouraging. Experiments have adorned "Sir Patrick Spens" with spangles and a rock accompaniment; they have dragged "Barbara Allen", protesting, into the Middle Ages to the (albeit skilled) thrumming of shawms and crumhorns. But the ballads don't lend themselves to this kind of treatment. They don't make good 'production numbers'. The poetry gets in the way: too much action, too many incidents, and the quality of the language leads to a kind of rock parody. The words of the ballads have something of the feeling of stones fashioned into a smooth perfection by endless tides. Attempts to create settings, arrangements for the poetry only succeed in making it seem overdressed — like putting a silk garter on the Venus de Milo. Also, in a curious way, a ballad appears to find difficulty breathing inside an arrangement, for though the bond that fuses the ballad text and tune into a single whole is oddly flexible and appears to be constantly shifting its centre of gravity, it appears to be unable to function in the proximity of foreign musical influences.
Our own feelings for the ballads are something that we have nurtured throughout most of our joint working life as singers. Time and again we have returned to this or that ballad and discovered something new in it. Occasionally we have been led to conduct major explorations into territory that we thought we already knew. The end result has been the complete reworking of a ballad ... and a new search for the right degree of tension to match one's new understanding of the piece. Find the right amount of tension and sustaining it over thirty or forty stanzas: that's where the skill lies!
And what is tension? It is compounded of many elements. It is the right weight of vocal attack, the weight which best suits the theme and the nature of the ballad; it is the right tempo, the one in which the action of the story has time to unfold without confusing the listener; it is the right pulse, that is the right combination of breathing, articulation, sense and shape of the tune; it is complete empathy with words and music; it is the right length of pause, of silence between the verses, during which both listener and singer make the jump in thinking to a new unit of the story; and finally, it is creative judgement, the singer's knowledge of how far tune and text can be teased out and worked in each performance without destroying any part of the ballad's structure; it is the singer's ability to add colour to a word, to thicken or attenuate a line, to let a hint of harshness creep into the tone, to suggest that somewhere — not far off—there is a laugh lying in wait . . . and to be able to do all these things without upsetting the delicate balance of the ballad and, moreover, without the listener being aware that it is being done.
There comes a moment during the singing of a long ballad when everything is working. You have moved into the story crabwise, not giving too much of yourself at first. Then, suddenly, for a moment you are conscious of the people listening, and they are all breathing in time with you! And all around you there is silence, except for the voice guiding you through the ineluctable dark landscape of the ballad.
Ewan MacColl and Peggy Seeger

Subject: RE: If you do like ballads...
From: GUEST,Pseudonymous
Date: 24 May 19 - 09:43 AM

I have never "attacked" Bronson, or attempted to 'pull him to pieces'. Nor Child. I have no idea where you get this from. It strikes me as bonkers to the extent that it is funny.