Lyrics & Knowledge Personal Pages Record Shop Auction Links Radio & Media Kids Membership Help
The Mudcat Cafesj

Post to this Thread - Sort Descending - Printer Friendly - Home


BS: New rules for the coming pandemic

Donuel 24 Jan 20 - 04:21 PM
Donuel 24 Jan 20 - 04:25 PM
Nigel Parsons 24 Jan 20 - 04:40 PM
Dave the Gnome 24 Jan 20 - 06:10 PM
Donuel 24 Jan 20 - 07:05 PM
Iains 25 Jan 20 - 02:56 AM
Mr Red 25 Jan 20 - 03:52 AM
Iains 25 Jan 20 - 04:25 AM
Nigel Parsons 25 Jan 20 - 07:54 AM
Donuel 25 Jan 20 - 08:03 AM
Donuel 25 Jan 20 - 08:21 AM
Senoufou 25 Jan 20 - 12:48 PM
michaelr 25 Jan 20 - 12:53 PM
punkfolkrocker 25 Jan 20 - 12:57 PM
Senoufou 25 Jan 20 - 01:50 PM
punkfolkrocker 25 Jan 20 - 02:47 PM
Stilly River Sage 25 Jan 20 - 02:58 PM
Senoufou 25 Jan 20 - 03:02 PM
Donuel 25 Jan 20 - 04:18 PM
punkfolkrocker 25 Jan 20 - 04:38 PM
robomatic 25 Jan 20 - 07:01 PM
WalkaboutsVerse 25 Jan 20 - 07:13 PM
robomatic 25 Jan 20 - 09:18 PM
Stilly River Sage 25 Jan 20 - 10:09 PM
Rapparee 25 Jan 20 - 10:21 PM
Rapparee 25 Jan 20 - 10:28 PM
WalkaboutsVerse 26 Jan 20 - 04:41 AM
WalkaboutsVerse 26 Jan 20 - 05:18 AM
Mossback 26 Jan 20 - 09:29 AM
robomatic 26 Jan 20 - 09:34 AM
WalkaboutsVerse 26 Jan 20 - 10:13 AM
Stilly River Sage 26 Jan 20 - 11:15 AM
WalkaboutsVerse 26 Jan 20 - 11:56 AM
Senoufou 26 Jan 20 - 01:22 PM
WalkaboutsVerse 26 Jan 20 - 01:28 PM
Senoufou 26 Jan 20 - 02:50 PM
WalkaboutsVerse 26 Jan 20 - 03:00 PM
Mr Red 26 Jan 20 - 05:36 PM
Donuel 26 Jan 20 - 06:52 PM
WalkaboutsVerse 26 Jan 20 - 07:01 PM
Donuel 27 Jan 20 - 06:01 AM
Donuel 27 Jan 20 - 07:06 AM
Nigel Parsons 27 Jan 20 - 07:15 AM
Donuel 27 Jan 20 - 08:43 AM
punkfolkrocker 27 Jan 20 - 12:58 PM
robomatic 27 Jan 20 - 07:00 PM
Donuel 27 Jan 20 - 07:08 PM
Steve Shaw 27 Jan 20 - 07:10 PM
punkfolkrocker 27 Jan 20 - 07:26 PM
punkfolkrocker 27 Jan 20 - 07:28 PM
Donuel 27 Jan 20 - 07:30 PM
Donuel 01 Feb 20 - 10:06 AM
punkfolkrocker 01 Feb 20 - 10:32 AM
Backwoodsman 01 Feb 20 - 11:31 AM
Senoufou 01 Feb 20 - 11:58 AM
punkfolkrocker 01 Feb 20 - 11:59 AM
WalkaboutsVerse 01 Feb 20 - 12:44 PM
Iains 01 Feb 20 - 12:54 PM
punkfolkrocker 01 Feb 20 - 12:59 PM
An Buachaill Caol Dubh 01 Feb 20 - 02:00 PM
punkfolkrocker 01 Feb 20 - 02:12 PM
Workingtonman 01 Feb 20 - 02:54 PM
Donuel 01 Feb 20 - 04:44 PM
Iains 01 Feb 20 - 05:40 PM
Donuel 01 Feb 20 - 08:40 PM
Iains 02 Feb 20 - 04:16 AM
Jack Campin 02 Feb 20 - 04:26 AM
Steve Shaw 02 Feb 20 - 05:09 AM
Backwoodsman 02 Feb 20 - 05:17 AM
Jack Campin 02 Feb 20 - 05:19 AM
Senoufou 02 Feb 20 - 05:45 AM
Steve Shaw 02 Feb 20 - 06:13 AM
Steve Shaw 02 Feb 20 - 06:20 AM
Iains 02 Feb 20 - 06:25 AM
Jack Campin 02 Feb 20 - 06:34 AM
Steve Shaw 02 Feb 20 - 06:41 AM
Steve Shaw 02 Feb 20 - 06:42 AM
Steve Shaw 02 Feb 20 - 06:48 AM
Steve Shaw 02 Feb 20 - 07:04 AM
Steve Shaw 02 Feb 20 - 07:05 AM
Iains 02 Feb 20 - 08:07 AM
Steve Shaw 02 Feb 20 - 08:45 AM
Donuel 02 Feb 20 - 10:54 AM
Donuel 02 Feb 20 - 10:55 AM
punkfolkrocker 02 Feb 20 - 02:32 PM
Steve Shaw 02 Feb 20 - 09:19 PM
punkfolkrocker 02 Feb 20 - 09:56 PM
Senoufou 03 Feb 20 - 04:05 AM
Iains 03 Feb 20 - 04:32 AM
Steve Shaw 03 Feb 20 - 05:49 AM
Iains 03 Feb 20 - 09:36 AM
punkfolkrocker 03 Feb 20 - 09:41 AM
Steve Shaw 03 Feb 20 - 10:02 AM
punkfolkrocker 03 Feb 20 - 10:06 AM
punkfolkrocker 03 Feb 20 - 11:19 AM
Donuel 04 Feb 20 - 05:46 AM
Senoufou 04 Feb 20 - 06:14 AM
Steve Shaw 04 Feb 20 - 08:48 AM
Senoufou 04 Feb 20 - 08:59 AM
Nigel Parsons 04 Feb 20 - 09:29 AM
Nigel Parsons 04 Feb 20 - 09:31 AM
Donuel 05 Feb 20 - 10:20 AM
Charmion 05 Feb 20 - 03:25 PM
Donuel 05 Feb 20 - 03:38 PM
Backwoodsman 06 Feb 20 - 01:54 AM
robomatic 06 Feb 20 - 02:07 AM
Steve Shaw 06 Feb 20 - 03:46 AM
Donuel 06 Feb 20 - 06:51 AM
Donuel 06 Feb 20 - 08:15 PM
leeneia 06 Feb 20 - 09:32 PM
mg 06 Feb 20 - 10:24 PM
punkfolkrocker 06 Feb 20 - 11:37 PM
Iains 07 Feb 20 - 06:18 AM
Donuel 07 Feb 20 - 06:49 AM
Iains 07 Feb 20 - 07:03 AM
Doug Chadwick 07 Feb 20 - 11:45 AM
punkfolkrocker 07 Feb 20 - 11:57 AM
punkfolkrocker 07 Feb 20 - 12:02 PM
Donuel 07 Feb 20 - 01:10 PM
Donuel 07 Feb 20 - 01:18 PM
Iains 07 Feb 20 - 01:45 PM
Donuel 07 Feb 20 - 02:27 PM
mg 07 Feb 20 - 08:58 PM
Donuel 07 Feb 20 - 09:11 PM
Donuel 07 Feb 20 - 09:12 PM
mg 09 Feb 20 - 08:08 PM
Backwoodsman 11 Feb 20 - 09:28 AM
punkfolkrocker 11 Feb 20 - 09:39 AM
Donuel 11 Feb 20 - 12:10 PM
Mr Red 12 Feb 20 - 04:53 AM
Donuel 12 Feb 20 - 06:05 AM
Iains 12 Feb 20 - 08:01 AM
Mr Red 12 Feb 20 - 09:15 AM
Backwoodsman 12 Feb 20 - 10:54 AM
punkfolkrocker 12 Feb 20 - 12:05 PM
Backwoodsman 12 Feb 20 - 12:27 PM
Iains 12 Feb 20 - 12:31 PM
Steve Shaw 12 Feb 20 - 07:17 PM
Donuel 12 Feb 20 - 10:37 PM
Manitas_at_home 13 Feb 20 - 03:09 AM
Iains 13 Feb 20 - 03:32 AM
Senoufou 13 Feb 20 - 04:25 AM
Iains 13 Feb 20 - 06:01 AM
Senoufou 13 Feb 20 - 06:15 AM
Steve Shaw 13 Feb 20 - 06:22 AM
Donuel 13 Feb 20 - 06:49 AM
Senoufou 13 Feb 20 - 07:22 AM
punkfolkrocker 13 Feb 20 - 07:32 AM
Senoufou 13 Feb 20 - 08:24 AM
Steve Shaw 13 Feb 20 - 01:05 PM
Senoufou 13 Feb 20 - 01:17 PM
Donuel 13 Feb 20 - 05:28 PM
leeneia 14 Feb 20 - 12:40 PM
Mr Red 14 Feb 20 - 04:49 PM
Donuel 14 Feb 20 - 04:53 PM
Mr Red 14 Feb 20 - 05:16 PM
Senoufou 14 Feb 20 - 05:28 PM
punkfolkrocker 14 Feb 20 - 05:54 PM
Steve Shaw 14 Feb 20 - 06:33 PM
punkfolkrocker 14 Feb 20 - 06:45 PM
Steve Shaw 14 Feb 20 - 06:53 PM
Donuel 14 Feb 20 - 09:24 PM
punkfolkrocker 14 Feb 20 - 09:45 PM
mg 15 Feb 20 - 04:46 AM
Steve Shaw 15 Feb 20 - 10:51 AM
Donuel 15 Feb 20 - 11:51 AM
punkfolkrocker 15 Feb 20 - 01:03 PM
Senoufou 15 Feb 20 - 01:23 PM
leeneia 15 Feb 20 - 02:01 PM
Senoufou 15 Feb 20 - 02:53 PM
Backwoodsman 15 Feb 20 - 03:07 PM
Donuel 15 Feb 20 - 04:04 PM
Steve Shaw 15 Feb 20 - 04:43 PM
Backwoodsman 15 Feb 20 - 05:34 PM
Donuel 15 Feb 20 - 07:43 PM
Mr Red 16 Feb 20 - 04:57 AM
leeneia 17 Feb 20 - 10:38 AM
Stilly River Sage 17 Feb 20 - 11:10 AM
Donuel 17 Feb 20 - 04:54 PM
Donuel 18 Feb 20 - 07:24 AM
Steve Shaw 18 Feb 20 - 08:04 AM
punkfolkrocker 18 Feb 20 - 08:57 AM
Iains 18 Feb 20 - 10:57 AM
Donuel 18 Feb 20 - 11:05 AM
Senoufou 18 Feb 20 - 12:09 PM
Iains 18 Feb 20 - 12:25 PM
punkfolkrocker 18 Feb 20 - 12:34 PM
Backwoodsman 18 Feb 20 - 12:50 PM
punkfolkrocker 18 Feb 20 - 01:02 PM
punkfolkrocker 18 Feb 20 - 01:05 PM
Backwoodsman 18 Feb 20 - 01:33 PM
Donuel 18 Feb 20 - 02:07 PM
Backwoodsman 18 Feb 20 - 03:15 PM
Iains 18 Feb 20 - 03:59 PM
Donuel 18 Feb 20 - 06:29 PM
Steve Shaw 18 Feb 20 - 07:35 PM
Steve Shaw 18 Feb 20 - 08:22 PM
mg 18 Feb 20 - 10:00 PM
punkfolkrocker 18 Feb 20 - 10:22 PM
Iains 19 Feb 20 - 02:35 AM
Steve Shaw 19 Feb 20 - 04:44 AM
Senoufou 19 Feb 20 - 05:18 AM
Iains 19 Feb 20 - 05:30 AM
Steve Shaw 19 Feb 20 - 05:53 AM
Donuel 19 Feb 20 - 06:48 AM
Steve Shaw 19 Feb 20 - 03:04 PM
Donuel 19 Feb 20 - 05:12 PM
Mr Red 20 Feb 20 - 02:37 AM
Senoufou 20 Feb 20 - 02:53 AM
Steve Shaw 20 Feb 20 - 04:10 AM
Iains 20 Feb 20 - 04:34 AM
Workingtonman 20 Feb 20 - 04:59 AM
Senoufou 20 Feb 20 - 05:38 AM
Donuel 20 Feb 20 - 06:08 AM
Donuel 20 Feb 20 - 07:24 AM
Mr Red 20 Feb 20 - 01:26 PM
Donuel 20 Feb 20 - 01:48 PM
punkfolkrocker 20 Feb 20 - 02:32 PM
mg 20 Feb 20 - 06:24 PM
mg 20 Feb 20 - 06:44 PM
Backwoodsman 21 Feb 20 - 02:16 AM
Iains 21 Feb 20 - 02:46 AM
Stanron 21 Feb 20 - 05:35 AM
Steve Shaw 21 Feb 20 - 08:12 AM
Donuel 21 Feb 20 - 08:53 AM
punkfolkrocker 21 Feb 20 - 09:18 AM
Iains 21 Feb 20 - 09:37 AM
punkfolkrocker 21 Feb 20 - 10:13 AM
Backwoodsman 21 Feb 20 - 10:58 AM
punkfolkrocker 21 Feb 20 - 11:20 AM
Mossback 21 Feb 20 - 11:36 AM
Iains 21 Feb 20 - 03:24 PM
Iains 21 Feb 20 - 03:38 PM
Jack Campin 22 Feb 20 - 08:31 AM
Iains 22 Feb 20 - 11:43 AM
Mr Red 22 Feb 20 - 04:55 PM
Donuel 22 Feb 20 - 05:29 PM
punkfolkrocker 22 Feb 20 - 07:55 PM
Donuel 22 Feb 20 - 09:58 PM
mg 23 Feb 20 - 01:58 AM
Backwoodsman 23 Feb 20 - 02:50 AM
mg 23 Feb 20 - 03:13 AM
Iains 23 Feb 20 - 03:43 AM
punkfolkrocker 23 Feb 20 - 03:49 AM
Backwoodsman 23 Feb 20 - 03:56 AM
mg 23 Feb 20 - 04:04 AM
Backwoodsman 23 Feb 20 - 04:08 AM
mg 23 Feb 20 - 04:34 AM
Steve Shaw 23 Feb 20 - 04:57 AM
Backwoodsman 23 Feb 20 - 05:04 AM
Iains 23 Feb 20 - 05:44 AM
Mr Red 23 Feb 20 - 06:09 AM
Steve Shaw 23 Feb 20 - 06:37 AM
Iains 23 Feb 20 - 06:44 AM
Backwoodsman 23 Feb 20 - 07:18 AM
Donuel 23 Feb 20 - 07:25 AM
Mossback 23 Feb 20 - 10:30 AM
punkfolkrocker 23 Feb 20 - 12:51 PM
Iains 23 Feb 20 - 02:16 PM
punkfolkrocker 23 Feb 20 - 02:40 PM
Steve Shaw 23 Feb 20 - 06:48 PM
Jack Campin 23 Feb 20 - 07:11 PM
Steve Shaw 23 Feb 20 - 07:29 PM
Backwoodsman 24 Feb 20 - 01:47 AM
Iains 24 Feb 20 - 04:21 AM
Donuel 24 Feb 20 - 07:05 AM
Donuel 24 Feb 20 - 10:11 AM
Donuel 24 Feb 20 - 11:49 AM
Donuel 24 Feb 20 - 06:02 PM
Steve Shaw 24 Feb 20 - 09:05 PM
Iains 25 Feb 20 - 03:20 AM
Donuel 25 Feb 20 - 06:19 AM
Nigel Parsons 25 Feb 20 - 07:56 AM
Mr Red 25 Feb 20 - 09:24 AM
punkfolkrocker 25 Feb 20 - 09:40 AM
Donuel 25 Feb 20 - 10:06 AM
Jack Campin 25 Feb 20 - 10:28 AM
Donuel 25 Feb 20 - 02:23 PM
Stilly River Sage 25 Feb 20 - 05:15 PM
Donuel 25 Feb 20 - 05:33 PM
Joe Offer 25 Feb 20 - 10:16 PM
mg 26 Feb 20 - 12:08 AM
Steve Shaw 26 Feb 20 - 04:50 AM
Doug Chadwick 26 Feb 20 - 05:16 AM
Donuel 26 Feb 20 - 05:24 AM
Iains 26 Feb 20 - 05:26 AM
Jack Campin 26 Feb 20 - 06:47 AM
punkfolkrocker 26 Feb 20 - 06:55 AM
Donuel 26 Feb 20 - 07:21 AM
Donuel 26 Feb 20 - 07:31 AM
Donuel 26 Feb 20 - 09:13 AM
Iains 26 Feb 20 - 09:42 AM
Jack Campin 26 Feb 20 - 11:39 AM
punkfolkrocker 26 Feb 20 - 12:18 PM
Iains 27 Feb 20 - 03:54 AM
Donuel 27 Feb 20 - 05:31 AM
Mr Red 27 Feb 20 - 05:50 AM
punkfolkrocker 27 Feb 20 - 06:16 AM
Iains 27 Feb 20 - 06:25 AM
punkfolkrocker 27 Feb 20 - 06:43 AM
Donuel 27 Feb 20 - 06:49 AM
Nigel Parsons 27 Feb 20 - 07:31 AM
Iains 27 Feb 20 - 09:21 AM
Steve Shaw 27 Feb 20 - 10:58 AM
Donuel 27 Feb 20 - 11:14 AM
punkfolkrocker 27 Feb 20 - 11:17 AM
Donuel 27 Feb 20 - 12:46 PM
Iains 27 Feb 20 - 12:58 PM
Steve Shaw 27 Feb 20 - 01:04 PM
Donuel 27 Feb 20 - 01:11 PM
Steve Shaw 27 Feb 20 - 01:16 PM
Donuel 27 Feb 20 - 01:20 PM
punkfolkrocker 27 Feb 20 - 01:20 PM
Donuel 27 Feb 20 - 01:41 PM
Backwoodsman 27 Feb 20 - 02:04 PM
Mossback 27 Feb 20 - 02:57 PM
Donuel 27 Feb 20 - 03:02 PM
Donuel 27 Feb 20 - 03:35 PM
Steve Shaw 27 Feb 20 - 03:59 PM
Iains 27 Feb 20 - 04:07 PM
Donuel 27 Feb 20 - 04:07 PM
Donuel 27 Feb 20 - 04:15 PM
Mrrzy 27 Feb 20 - 04:38 PM
Donuel 27 Feb 20 - 04:57 PM
Steve Shaw 27 Feb 20 - 05:07 PM
mg 27 Feb 20 - 06:08 PM
Mossback 27 Feb 20 - 06:44 PM
Donuel 27 Feb 20 - 07:58 PM
mg 27 Feb 20 - 09:21 PM
Donuel 27 Feb 20 - 09:56 PM
Donuel 27 Feb 20 - 10:45 PM
Donuel 27 Feb 20 - 11:14 PM
Helen 28 Feb 20 - 01:24 AM
mg 28 Feb 20 - 01:40 AM
Mr Red 28 Feb 20 - 03:07 AM
Iains 28 Feb 20 - 03:41 AM
Steve Shaw 28 Feb 20 - 04:51 AM
punkfolkrocker 28 Feb 20 - 09:32 AM
Jack Campin 28 Feb 20 - 09:35 AM
Mrrzy 28 Feb 20 - 10:01 AM
Doug Chadwick 28 Feb 20 - 11:15 AM
punkfolkrocker 28 Feb 20 - 11:46 AM
Donuel 28 Feb 20 - 11:48 AM
punkfolkrocker 28 Feb 20 - 12:02 PM
Donuel 28 Feb 20 - 12:06 PM
Jack Campin 28 Feb 20 - 12:08 PM
Donuel 28 Feb 20 - 12:14 PM
Senoufou 28 Feb 20 - 01:23 PM
punkfolkrocker 28 Feb 20 - 01:36 PM

Share Thread
more
Lyrics & Knowledge Search [Advanced]
DT  Forum
Sort (Forum) by:relevance date
DT Lyrics:













Subject: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 24 Jan 20 - 04:21 PM

The spread of the human to human mutation of the Coronavirus has already put 33 million people on lockdown. Once infected there is a death rate of 1 in 3 (34 %).

Might I suggest relaxing Mudcat rules on posting to BS after the pandmic passes in 3 years.

There are currently no known antivirals or vaccines. Do not believe Trump> there are no connections to Mexican beer, in fact the disease began in snakes.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 24 Jan 20 - 04:25 PM

..there are no known cures or antivirals and vaccines to treat this strain, however its DNA genome has been sent to labs worldwide.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Nigel Parsons
Date: 24 Jan 20 - 04:40 PM

The BBC quotes 26 deaths from 830 confirmed cases. This is hardly a death rate of 1 in 3.
Please don't spread doom and despondency without some simple facts.
I accept that you may have misread the BBC pageHere which states:
How deadly is it?
Twenty-six people are known to have died from the virus - 3-4% of the known cases.
But the infection seems to take a while to kill, so more of those patients may yet die.


Note that that page says 3-4%, NOT 34%


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 24 Jan 20 - 06:10 PM

It has nothing to do with us Genomes. You can't even spell it right!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 24 Jan 20 - 07:05 PM

Nigel , without your knowing incubation time and spouting nonsense from your state news service you have drawn an ill informed conclusion.
This brand new mutated version does not obey the rules you have assumed. I thought I introduced the subject with appropriate levity.
Thats OK, I know the messenger is seldom believed.
In any disaster in the initial early stages, reported numbers are highly massaged.

You have a case in Scotland and Ireland already.

The new rules for locking down areas of China is unique and involves 20-35 million people during a holiday month. The Great Wall is closed along with all amusement parks, theatres etc.

Incubation is 5 days and will bloom starting this weekend.

Dave: Please disregard any warning containing a spelling error but please do not try to fly to WuHan province.

I suppose many Americans don't know that 8,000 have died from the common flu this season.
1 in 3 is not as bad as the Ebola death rate which has decreased this year.

Check the language from the CDC


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 25 Jan 20 - 02:56 AM

Apparently the median age for deaths is 75, so likely underlying conditions have an impact.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Mr Red
Date: 25 Jan 20 - 03:52 AM

so likely underlying conditions have an impact.

So that's OK for the demographic of Folkies then?

Apparently the impact of the lock-down at Wuhan (8 Million) and neighbouring large cites is mostly all embracing, helped by the lunar new year. Maybe panic is the wrong approach, but serious caution is warranted. The Scottish cases hadn't been confirmed as the coronovirus as of last midnight (GMT), but the suspected cases were from Wuhan. And there are reckoned to be 2000 people being traced by UK authorities in connection. Some of who may have been in transit to other destinations.

Face masks are common in Wuhan right now.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 25 Jan 20 - 04:25 AM

So that's OK for the demographic of Folkies then?
I guess you never made top of the class for comprehension

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3134957/


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Nigel Parsons
Date: 25 Jan 20 - 07:54 AM

From: Donuel
Date: 24 Jan 20 - 07:05 PM
Nigel , without your knowing incubation time and spouting nonsense from your state news service you have drawn an ill informed conclusion.
This brand new mutated version does not obey the rules you have assumed. I thought I introduced the subject with appropriate levity.
Thats OK, I know the messenger is seldom believed.
In any disaster in the initial early stages, reported numbers are highly massaged.


I'm guessing you have no facts to base your doom-mongering on, or else you would quote them.
I, at least, found a reputable website to quote. But, despite your comment, I have not formed a conclusion. You have stated that (this) Coronavirus has a death rate of 1 in 3. That is a conclusion, although you now state that there is not the information available to be able to reach such a conclusion.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 25 Jan 20 - 08:03 AM

Stiff Brit upper lip cheerio and all that. The only one I see in a panic is you Nigel.

What I see is a NOVEL situation.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 25 Jan 20 - 08:21 AM

We beat back SARS and this current response is even better, so there is plenty of room to be hopeful.
Easy now big fella.
With any viral outbreak there are several versions out there.
There are relative good ones and bad


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Senoufou
Date: 25 Jan 20 - 12:48 PM

On the BBC News this evening they announced that all Coronavirus tests on suspected carriers among UK travellers have been negative, so there are no cases so far here.
But the situation in China looks dire, poor souls.

Husband asked if it might be dangerous to order goods from China online (he likes to buy clothes and trainers etc) but I told him that the virus can't live in a parcel, as it's transmitted in the air from person to person.
(Hope I'm right!)


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: michaelr
Date: 25 Jan 20 - 12:53 PM

'Experts are seeing shocking similarities between the coronavirus that has now spread beyond China and the SARS outbreak of 2003.

Like the infectious pneumonia that has killed at least 17 people, SARS was caused by a coronavirus that originated in China. But when one of the virologists who helped identify the SARS virus visited Wuhan, where this virus originated, he didn't see nearly enough being done to fight it. People were out at markets without masks, "preparing to ring in the New Year in peace and had no sense about the epidemic," Guan Yi of the University of Hong Kong's State Key Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases told Caixin. Airports were hardly being disinfected, Guan continued, saying the local government hasn't "even been handing out quarantine guides to people who were leaving the city."

The city did disinfect the market where the virus has been traced to, but Guan criticized Wuhan for that, saying it hurts researchers' abilities to track down the virus's source. "I've never felt scared," Guan told Caixin. "This time I'm scared."'


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 25 Jan 20 - 12:57 PM

Sen - funnily enough, i was thinking most of the electrical things in our house
were made in China..

Better buy a few bottles of disinfectant to spray down the whole lot..

Can't be too careful with these sneaky foreign diseases...

They might have been lurking for years waiting for the activation signal
from their devilish Chinese communist overlord chappies...

Oh my god.. I just touched an uncleaned mouse and keyboard...!!!!!!!!!!!!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Senoufou
Date: 25 Jan 20 - 01:50 PM

Hee hee punkfolkrocker! I'd better not tell that to my husband, he'll freak out! He's bought no end of cheap Chinese tat online, as he loves clothes. He'll be going around in a hazmat suit with a sprayer!

Seriously though, it must be dreadful for the poor Chinese, rather like populations during the Great Plague, not knowing who will be struck down next. I do sincerely pity them.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 25 Jan 20 - 02:47 PM

I just read in the local news that two Bristol police stations were shut down
after a Chinese man who looked a bit unwell was arrested..

[Not joking..]

But later declared all clear...

This is how stupid xenophobic provincial panic is caused,
as no reason was given why he was arrested..
By now social media rumours must be circulating that any chinese looking person at large on the Streets of Bristol
must be reported to the police...!!!?????


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Stilly River Sage
Date: 25 Jan 20 - 02:58 PM

There are a couple of cases in the US, with thousands of people travelling here from China daily.

From the Washington Post

We’re past ‘if’ on the coronavirus. We’re on to ‘how bad will it be?’

Ronald A. Klain served as White House Ebola response coordinator from 2014 to 2015 and is an adviser to the Biden presidential campaign. Nicole Lurie served as assistant secretary for preparedness and response at the Department of Health and Human Services from 2009 to 2016.

With one confirmed case on U.S. soil, more likely already here and 8,000 visitors from China arriving every day, it is already too late to avoid multiple cases of the dangerous new coronavirus in the United States. We are past the “if” question and squarely facing the “how bad will it be” phase of the response.

Thus, President Trump failed his first test in dealing with the virus, by brashly asserting that the U.S. government has the coronavirus “completely under control.” While there is no reason to panic, we simply do not know, with China’s seventh-largest city under a lockdown, how serious it will become.

The good news is that there have been substantial improvements to global and U.S. public-health systems since the related SARS virus struck in 2003. U.S. infectious disease response systems were particularly improved after the West African Ebola epidemic of 2014. The new coronavirus’s gene was sequenced rapidly, and a test to diagnose the disease has already been developed. The World Health Organization — properly criticized for a flaccid response to the 2014 Ebola outbreak — is moving quickly: organizing a response and meeting urgently to determine if a Public Health Emergency of International Concern should be declared.
But if these are reasons to avoid the kind of fear that spread in our country during the “Ebola Autumn” of 2014, there are reasons for great concern as well. Some gaps in our disease response system were patched at that time, but serious holes remain and new ones have emerged. Policymakers need to move immediately to address four particular issues in light of the new infectious virus.

Chinese city at the center of coronavirus outbreak suspends travel

First, there needs to be leadership in the White House. President Barack Obama followed his designation of an “Ebola response coordinator” in October 2014 with a permanent office on pandemic preparedness and response in 2015. While Trump maintained this structure into 2018, John Bolton abolished it when he took over as national security adviser. With threats such as the new coronavirus requiring an “all of government” response — domestic and foreign; health and security agencies; federal, state and local authorities — someone needs to be in charge at the highest level of our government. Additionally, critical organizing structures throughout the executive branch that have been weakened in recent years — including the Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasures Enterprise — need to be reinvigorated and empowered.

Second, Congress must change the way it funds epidemic responses. Congress did move on a bipartisan basis during the 2014 Ebola outbreak to fund the Obama administration’s response plan, but even that relatively prompt action created delays in vaccine development and on-the-ground response. When it comes to making a new vaccine to stop an epidemic, developing treatments or deploying other countermeasures, funding delays mean countless people are infected or die as a result.

Last year, Congress did beef up a fund that could be tapped by the president to respond to public-health emergencies without waiting for a specific funding bill. But these funds are limited, and Congress rejected proposals for a dedicated emerging infectious disease fund that could be used to further public-private partnerships to develop diagnostics, vaccines and treatments. These shortcomings should be addressed.

Third, Congress needs to fund the full network of hospitals and treatment facilities nationwide it established after the 2014 Ebola epidemic, which enables prompt testing and isolation of patients with deadly infectious diseases. This funding is set to expire in four months, and while Congress is moving on a plan to renew the 10 most advanced such facilities, that could leave scores of American cities without the kind of testing and treatment centers that could be critical in dealing with the new coronavirus or other future threats.

Finally, policymakers in all branches and at all levels of government must let science and the best medical expertise — incomplete as it is — govern the decisions that lie ahead. The first victim of an infectious disease outbreak is often rational decision-making; fear can spread even faster than disease in an era where social media can transmit misinformation in a manner not ironically called “going viral.” Xenophobia is a particular risk; it’s unjustified when Americans returning home from a foreign trip are just as likely to carry a disease with them as immigrants or foreign tourists. Our government is filled with the best scientists, medical professionals and researchers in the world. Their expertise — not fear or politics — should guide critical decisions.

The weeks ahead will be tense and challenging. But with the right leadership, adequate funding, key investments and scientifically led decision-making, lives can be saved and the risks and damage can be reduced.


I did a long cut and paste because a lot of people hit the Post's paywall when they try to follow links.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Senoufou
Date: 25 Jan 20 - 03:02 PM

That's true. During the Ebola outbreaks abroad, people round here were a bit wary in case my husband was carrying it! (There was only one confirmed case in Ivory Coast, but of course he does travel on flights to Abidjan, and on board may be Africans from several countries)
As he's 'the only black man in the village'(apologies to Little Britain) I suppose it was natural for them to be a bit concerned.

All I do (to avoid catching flu etc) is to wash my hands thoroughly once I get home from an outing to the supermarket. One can't creep about in life being fearful of dying of some awful disease.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 25 Jan 20 - 04:18 PM

China may have been lax in prevention controls for about 30 days.(since Dec.4)
They now have hospitals full beyond capacity in the Wuhan vicinity.
The extraordinary precautions are good for everyone.

CDC is ahead of the curve, but airplanes are some of the best viral incubators we have ever invented with recycled limited air.
We should hire PFR to clean airplanes or take certain planes out of service.

A worst case scenario is no more likely than a virus mutating back out of a contagious state and becoming benign in humans. So basically the only anxiety is 'not knowing' where we are going which happens everyday anyway.

Senafou is right, but out an abundance of caution do not lick packages, do not eat packages and do not have sex with packages from Wuhan China. ;^/


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 25 Jan 20 - 04:38 PM

.. and don't watch kung fu movies until further notice..

Unless they are made in America with American actors...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: robomatic
Date: 25 Jan 20 - 07:01 PM

I just remember the panic that the Replicants tried to start during the last (Obama) administration when Ebola hit some
African countries. Existing somewhat primitive clinics were overrun and medical staff without protective clothing were getting sick and dying. The U.S. administration sent professionals with supplies fairly quickly and with the help of the international communicty, got it under control. Some sick Americans came to America and one rightist politician after another tried to either impede their getting home or getting to a safe harbor while blaming Obam for putting the nation at risk. I believe Chris Christie was among them.

Now there is a vaccine for Ebola.

As for coronavirus. If it makes Don'l happy to posit a coming disaster in his continuing voyage through the glory of his omniscience, let him play in the thread some more. Don't confuse him with facts or pollute his threaditudenosity with rationality. You are not wanted.

Meanwhile the mainland Chinese seem to be utilizing their one-party power of the state to put millions of potential victims into an isolation ward. Kind of like if Stalin had used his power for good, maybe. Or wanted to look like it.

That same power has also isolated millions of Chinese Muslims and one hope they are not going to experiment on them. Not that they will, but they could... That's what One Party power is all about.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: WalkaboutsVerse
Date: 25 Jan 20 - 07:13 PM

I've at least tried to encourage citizens of Hong Kong to accept that they are Chinese (British imperialism was evil) and fight to make all of China a better place/help get rid of the Chinese Capitalist Party.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: robomatic
Date: 25 Jan 20 - 09:18 PM

wV:

Why on earth should the HK Chinese take you seriously? I have no idea what you are trying to say. In my experience Hong Kong was a source of strong anti-Taiwanese sentiment. Now they are giving major indigestion to the dictates of people who they have not elected. Maybe they found something valuable in the English experience. How DARE they!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Stilly River Sage
Date: 25 Jan 20 - 10:09 PM

The Lunatic Fringe has been heard from, robomatic. Nothing to see there.

There were several cases of ebola in the Dallas area during that big outbreak in the last decade. An African man who travelled to the Dallas area was ill and doctor who had been in Africa came home to be treated. Two nurses treating the African man were infected (due to failure of their protective clothing). It got a bit weird here, and at one point there was a big fuss when someone wanted to put down the nurse's dog because they were afraid of germs. It was a simple matter to quarantine the dog for a couple of weeks. Lots of household possessions were burned, rugs ripped out, etc. I don't know if all of that was necessary.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Rapparee
Date: 25 Jan 20 - 10:21 PM

Oh my God! I just had dinner in an Oriental restaurant! I'm gonna die! I'm gonna die!

Come to think of it, Steve Chang hasn't been home to Cambodia in years. Maybe I'm safe.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Rapparee
Date: 25 Jan 20 - 10:28 PM

Doctor approved wear for the pandemic.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: WalkaboutsVerse
Date: 26 Jan 20 - 04:41 AM

Robo and SRS: BA Degree in Humanities (majoring in anthropology), higher certificate in management, trade certificate, etc., and travel on a shoe-string through about 40 countries, including a stop-over in Honk Kong, China, last December.

From that visit, where as I wanted dim sum and Chinese opera, most younger folk there want French restaurants and ballet or jazz funk and hip-hop.

The "Chinese Communist Party" is now a capitalist party, allowing not just millionaires but billionaires.

If you reflect back to the protests, many were wielding American and UK flags so, as I say, F2F and through social media, "I've at least tried to encourage citizens of Hong Kong (or those who see themselves that separate way) to accept that they are Chinese (British imperialism was evil) and fight to make all of China a better place/help get rid of the Chinese Capitalist Party."


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: WalkaboutsVerse
Date: 26 Jan 20 - 05:18 AM

Pandemic or no, you should all lower your pride and follow the rules, among the travel poems, here - WalkaboutsVerse


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Mossback
Date: 26 Jan 20 - 09:29 AM

BA Degree in Humanities (majoring in anthropology), higher certificate in management, trade certificate, etc., and travel on a shoe-string through about 40 countries, including a stop-over in Honk Kong, China, last December.

I'm so impressed I could just shit. I assume you're a Very Stable Genius into the bargain?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: robomatic
Date: 26 Jan 20 - 09:34 AM

Walkabouts not saying I agree but you helped me understand. Thank you for that. More later mebbe.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: WalkaboutsVerse
Date: 26 Jan 20 - 10:13 AM

Stable enough to know I'm not currently winning, Mossback:

Since "Repatriating - Australia to England" in 1997, there has been record amounts of the opposite - economic/CAPITALIST immigration - in both countries...and, sadly, record amounts of terrorism in both countries.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Stilly River Sage
Date: 26 Jan 20 - 11:15 AM

It's the self-promotion and bad poetry that is as off-putting as the weird political views. A package deal. And the hubris of suggesting that from your position you can (or should) teach the people of Hong Kong anything that really galls. Reverse-colonization? If you can't be British you'd better go back to being Chinese?

There was a National Public Radio story from Snohomish County, Washington to do with a case of the coronavirus (no transcript yet as I post this).

"Seattle-area health providers monitoring the first confirmed U.S. cases of coronavirus say they're equipped to handle the contagious disease after last year's wave of measles."

The antivaxxers seem to have set up conditions so that healthcare providers responding to the recent measles outbreak in unvaccinated children were ready for the coronavirus as well.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: WalkaboutsVerse
Date: 26 Jan 20 - 11:56 AM

"If you can't be British you'd better go back to being Chinese?" (SRS)...pretty much what Gandhi advocated upon repatriating from South Africa to south Asia; as we type, maybe there is a HK Chinese about to repatriate and make a good difference..?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Senoufou
Date: 26 Jan 20 - 01:22 PM

I had a very dear friend when I was at Edinburgh University, called Betty Ko. She was from Hong Kong, and her family had fled from Canton.
Her father was a wealthy businessman, and after being established in Hong Kong he sent his two daughters to UK to be educated in a Catholic boarding school.
Betty was delightful, and taught me Cantonese. She explained how dangerous it had been for them all, and both she and her sister Susan (another one, I seem to collect Susans!) eventually graduated in Mathematics, Susan from London University.
I do feel they would all have been killed or incarcerated in a frightful Chinese Gulag type of place if they hadn't fled.
Sadly I lost touch with her, but I often think of the Ko family, and hope all went well for them in life.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: WalkaboutsVerse
Date: 26 Jan 20 - 01:28 PM

Maybe they safely repatriated, Senoufou - certainly a beautiful part of the world.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Senoufou
Date: 26 Jan 20 - 02:50 PM

I do hope wherever they are they are flourishing, WalkaboutsVerse. Betty's Chinese name meant 'There is a fairy in the moon'!! Isn't that lovely? (Most Hong Kong people have an English name as well as a Chinese one)


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: WalkaboutsVerse
Date: 26 Jan 20 - 03:00 PM

Agreed - and increasingly Chinese in other areas or China, too, it seems.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Mr Red
Date: 26 Jan 20 - 05:36 PM

I guess you never made top of the class for comprehension

I guess you never even made the class for clarity.
Dunning-Kruger applies.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 26 Jan 20 - 06:52 PM

You can't blame us for the cognitive bias of illusory superiority that comes from the inability of people to recognize their lack of ability.
You may as well expect a fish to know the geography of Everest.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: WalkaboutsVerse
Date: 26 Jan 20 - 07:01 PM

/Chomolungma


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 27 Jan 20 - 06:01 AM

I did not know that :^?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 27 Jan 20 - 07:06 AM

Corrections;
the incubation period is 5 to 15 days
The 3-4% mortality rate is dominant over the worst possible strain
however this is 3 times as deadly as the flu.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Nigel Parsons
Date: 27 Jan 20 - 07:15 AM

Ah, so you now accept that it is a 3-4% mortality rate, not the 1 in 3 that you originally claimed.
Better late than never.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 27 Jan 20 - 08:43 AM

For not being omnicient, your pound of flesh is in the mail.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 27 Jan 20 - 12:58 PM

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/coronavirus-outbreakchinese-live-animal-markets-recipe-disaster/

why can't they eat proper grub from supermarkets and fast food takeaways...???


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: robomatic
Date: 27 Jan 20 - 07:00 PM

I just had an interesting conversation with a fellow American who emigrated from Vietnam. He is of the opinion that the world has benefitted greatly from English cultural (colonial?) influence and currently from what is effectively pax Americana whether the U.S. is trying to do this or not is a separate issue. The fact of the U.S. being large and relatively just is what makes the world work in his opinion. This comes with a healthy credit to the Judeo-Christian religion which for him provides an ethical basis not found in the eastern religions. He would rather have American/ English unitary cultural influencee over other smaller world countries than Indian/ Chinese/ gulp Russian.

I agree with much but not all of what I'm synopsizing above. If I weighed in personally I would make this conditional on multiple levels and it would be ten times as long as it is. I did have an Indian roommate in school who made no bones about the fact that India would not be a united nation if it hadn't been for the English.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 27 Jan 20 - 07:08 PM

What makes this brand new corona virus so contagious is that it can infect others -before- symptoms appear.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 27 Jan 20 - 07:10 PM

"why can't they eat proper grub from supermarkets and fast food takeaways...???"

Reminds of Billy Connolly ridiculing trawlermen for going out in dangerous, stormy conditions by asking why they don't just go to the fish shop like everybody else...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 27 Jan 20 - 07:26 PM

see my errmmm.. intentional clever crossover in the Bertie Russell thread...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 27 Jan 20 - 07:28 PM

ahem.. this one...

Back in the late 80s - same time as when I drank frequently in Barking pubs..
I was having a few months fling with an older woman from Hong Kong,
she was a daughter of a high up affluent Hong kong family..

On the subject of Chinese eating weird stuff,
she said her old dad was reputed to impress his posh rich business chums
by providing meals of live monkey brains...

[illegal then, if I recall right..]

Never knew whether that was true, or she was just playing up to oriental stereotypes to have a laugh..

But she did know the best Chinatown restaurants to take me out to...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 27 Jan 20 - 07:30 PM

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2231453-new-coronavirus-may-be-much-more-contagious-than-initially-thought/?utm_campaign=on


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 01 Feb 20 - 10:06 AM

I strongly recommend that Americans get their doctors to prescribe up to a year in the future for common ongoing prescriptions because availability may be severely curtailed due to import disruptions as described on MSNBC.

I don't know about the UK.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 01 Feb 20 - 10:32 AM

Conspiracy theories abound...

well timed Chinese pandemic in relation to Trump's trade war...

USA black ops bat infects patient zero...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 01 Feb 20 - 11:31 AM

Did anyone else notice, in the videos of the coaches taking the British returnees from the airport to their quarantine accommodation, the incongruity of a passenger wearing a haz-mat suit sitting on the front seats, whilst the driver was wearing his usual clothing?

WT Actual F?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Senoufou
Date: 01 Feb 20 - 11:58 AM

I saw this on the BBC News. Apparently, the person in the hazmat suit in the front seat was a special healthcare professional, who was primed ready to assist if any passenger became ill in transit.
The drivers were told that, since the passengers were behind them, there was minimal risk to their catching anything. I find this extremely bizarre. Afterwards, the drivers would be quarantined at home for 10 days. (Gaily infecting their families?!) I'd have refused this job if I'd been a driver.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 01 Feb 20 - 11:59 AM

My first office job 40 years ago involved reading maps
to plot the most direct cost effective travel itineraries for coach drivers..

I was young and green, and diligently planned the most logical routes,
which I passed to managers for approval.
My work was immediately returned and I was instructed that the drivers won't comply.
In reality I need talk to them individually about the roads they want to travel on, and where they want to stop for rests.
Because all the drivers have 'personal interests and business' they need to conduct
whilst out on the road transporting holiday makers...

If things haven't changed much since then,
that quarantine coach driver might have stopped and got out at several locations,
for a smoke and banter with other drivers, go for comfort breaks in cafes and girlfriends houses,
do dodgy deals with regular customers out of the luggage compartments,
and have viral contact with loads of random mates from the airport to the emergency zone hospital...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: WalkaboutsVerse
Date: 01 Feb 20 - 12:44 PM

...there was a police escort.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 01 Feb 20 - 12:54 PM

Did anyone else notice, in the videos of the coaches taking the British returnees from the airport to their quarantine accommodation, the incongruity of a passenger wearing a haz-mat suit sitting on the front seats, whilst the driver was wearing his usual clothing?

There were similar "incongruous" photos released during the Skripal, affair.

It does make you wonder about the script we are being fed.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 01 Feb 20 - 12:59 PM

The police drivers could have got out for a smoke with the Coachie,
out of sight of press cameras..

Maybe a layby burger van with a long queue within cough and spit distance...

This is Britain after all.. we don't see any point in all that PC health and safety hygiene nonsense...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: An Buachaill Caol Dubh
Date: 01 Feb 20 - 02:00 PM

Robomatic, 27th Jan., 07-00:

Given that many of the administrators of the Raj were Scots (let alone the soldiers), interesting in these "pluralistic" days that it's still not problematic to refer solely to the English. Some are more equal than others.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 01 Feb 20 - 02:12 PM

An B - I'm English, my mrs is Welsh..

Her proud claims to be 100% celtic are dubious at best...
I know my DNA is a mash up..

Either way, a nasty virus can kill us both equally as effectively.....

Unless bugs are competing to score extra points for culling specific racial demographic victims...???


[cue.. more conspiracy theories about genetically engineered covert bio warfare viruses...]


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Workingtonman
Date: 01 Feb 20 - 02:54 PM

while we can feel very sorry for chinese folk and i'm sure they are worried. here in england we have a 'benefits' system for people on hard times that is far more dangerous and responsible for many more deaths. and they don't have to suffer ians or ian duncan shit


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 01 Feb 20 - 04:44 PM

pfr racial specific virus have been researched most heavily, believe it or not. As it turns out, specific ages are far more reliably infected than race specific engineered viral infections. But that was then, this is now. Maybe there have been 'new breakthroughs'.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 01 Feb 20 - 05:40 PM

Unresolved is probably a safer answer than yea or nay

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Ethnic_bioweapon


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 01 Feb 20 - 08:40 PM

Against treaty we did engage in bio weapon research but failed in an ethnic weapon development. We do know how kill off the young or the old and even specific middle age people.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 02 Feb 20 - 04:16 AM

It is interesting that Coronavirus is thought to have spread by bats.
The Marburg virus is transmitted to people from fruit bats and spreads among humans through human-to-human transmission. Fatality rates from outbreaks have ranged from 24% to 88%. (When I worked in Niger 40 years ago it was known as green monkey fever)
In the UK a small number of bats carry rabies caused by European Bat Lyssaviruses.
In the uk the bat is a protected species

The Lancet


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Jack Campin
Date: 02 Feb 20 - 04:26 AM

Scottish NHS advice


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 02 Feb 20 - 05:09 AM

In the UK a small number of bats carry rabies caused by European Bat Lyssaviruses.
In the uk the bat is a protected species"

Wow. Nothing like a bit of partial information or misinformation, is there? Hardly any UK bats have ever been found to carry rabies, and the type of rabies in bats is not the same thing as dog rabies. There is NO risk of contracting rabies from a UK bat unless you go out of your way to capture and handle a bat, and even if you were daft enough to do that the chances of its being an infected one are minimal. I have bats in my roof and garden and have had them in my bedroom more than once. The chances of my catching rabies are nil. No bat in this country would ever show unprovoked aggression to humans as they are extremely timid. Finally, as for "the bat" being "a protected species," there are actually 18 species of bats in the UK.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 02 Feb 20 - 05:17 AM

Unfortunate things, facts, aren’t they Steve?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Jack Campin
Date: 02 Feb 20 - 05:19 AM

I have bats in my roof and garden and have had them in my bedroom more than once. The chances of my catching rabies are nil.

Yes, but what if you have them in your belfry? Some contributors to this thread need to know.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Senoufou
Date: 02 Feb 20 - 05:45 AM

I too have had quite a few bats flying around the house in the evening, mostly pipistrelles. Once or twice one has got entangled in the net curtain after trying to get into an open window. I love the little things, and just use a tea towel to gently disentangle them and set them free. I've never considered rabies among bats - most interesting.
Now, next question. Er... do spiders carry rabies??


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 02 Feb 20 - 06:13 AM

We should look after our bats and celebrate them. A good bat population is a sign of a healthy ecosystem, and bats flitting around in the gloaming of a summer's evening whilst one is contemplating the upcoming barbecue, glass of Prosecco in hand, makes for a very pleasant scene.

I have hazy memories of Basil Fawlty threatening to put a bat up someone's nightshirt...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 02 Feb 20 - 06:20 AM

By the way, if you get a bat in the bedroom, shut the door (stay in the room), open the window and curtains and marvel at the creature's amazing ability to home in gradually on its escape route as it flies in circles round the room (it won't collide with you). Five or ten minutes should do it. If it exhausts itself it might rest on a curtain or in a dark recess for a bit. If it gets tangled in something you should wear gloves as you gently free it. It's unlucky for the bat but it gives you a rare opportunity to get up close and personal with such an engaging beastie.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 02 Feb 20 - 06:25 AM

Unfortunate things, facts, aren’t they Steve?
What:
That some British bats are a reservoir of European Bat Lyssaviruses ?
A small number of coronaviruses have been found in a few of our bat species?
A Scottish bat worker died from rabies in 2002.In the case mentioned, the contracting agency, Scottish Natural Heritage was served with two ‘improvement notices’ by the Health and Safety Executive. Vaccination is now compulsory for all those employed to work on bats in the UK, including students.It is further compulsory for all those licensed to handlebats, including volunteers, and for bat rehabilitators, with vaccine either provided gratis by the Department of Health or by the employer where one is identified. (3 injections approx.£200)
The cost ofthe same in the US is scary.
Bat lyssaviruses appear transmissible to all mammals, including humans where they all cause rabies (i.e. serious and invariably fatal disease in the absence of post-exposure treatment). In common with all other lyssaviruses there is no treatment for rabies caught from bats once clinical signs appear and so prevention of infection and immediate post-exposure treatment is vital.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Jack Campin
Date: 02 Feb 20 - 06:34 AM

Closest I've ever got to a bat was in the bathroom of a hotel in Langkawi Island, Malaysia. It settled down at the top of the door one evening and was lying dead on the floor next morning. I picked it up and biffed it out of the window. In hindsight picking up a bat in a part of the world where rabies is still endemic might not have been a great idea.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 02 Feb 20 - 06:41 AM

I've apprised you of the vanishingly small risk of infection from bats. A single exception from nearly 20 years ago merely serves to prove the rule. Those are the facts. There are 18 species of bats here, not one. Another fact. "Coronaviruses found in our bats," eh? Well here's another set of facts. Coronaviruses aren't just one thing. There is a whole family of strains of coronaviruses. The one currently in the news is just one, a novel strain which has been named novel coronavirus 2019-nCov. This strain has not been found in bats in this country. You are spreading scaremongering disinformation in your usual sub-tabloid fashion. Fortunately, an ever-decreasing number of people now look at your posts, let alone trust anything in them.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 02 Feb 20 - 06:42 AM

You were safe enough, Jack, as long as you didn't deliberately scratch yourself with its teeth or feet. Or eat it raw.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 02 Feb 20 - 06:48 AM

Ore facts. Fewer than 30 UK bats out of have ever been found with the bat rabies-like virus and they were dead specimens collected for analysis, which


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 02 Feb 20 - 07:04 AM

More facts. Fewer than 30 UK bats out of many thousands tested have ever been found with the bat rabies-like virus and they were dead specimens collected for analysis, which kind of skews any attempt to put a percentage on how many bats carry the infection. We can say that it's very low. The Scottish case referred to is the one and only case ever recorded in this country. Another fact is that you can't catch rabies through unbroken skin, so you were very safe, Jack. I love bats. Let's enjoy 'em.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 02 Feb 20 - 07:05 AM

"Ore facts?" Just goes to show that I have a cast-iron case... :-)


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 02 Feb 20 - 08:07 AM

Only our resident pedant would insist on pointing out that bats have chritian names. The rest of us are more than happy to accept that bat is a generic term covering more than 1200 species. Still it managed to waste his time on a Sunday morning, while I sit back and laugh.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 02 Feb 20 - 08:45 AM

"In the uk the bat is a protected species"

Hardly "pedantic" to point out this wild and grossly unscientific inaccuracy, along with all the other half-baked nonsense about our poor old bats. One fine day you might just learn to drop the hubris and do what the rest of us do, admit it with a little "oops" (that's all it takes) when you make a mistake.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 02 Feb 20 - 10:54 AM

Like UFO movies, people saw a movie Outbreak and saw 3 seconds of bats causing a viral transfer and 'guess' yes its bats.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 02 Feb 20 - 10:55 AM

Last I heard it was snakes or minks eaten by people.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 02 Feb 20 - 02:32 PM

In the UK these days our lives are realistically more likely to be threatened by Baseball bats..

Though sometimes they can be a force for good...

The big Scots bloke across the road
sent a gang of young trouble making skinheads running out of our street
when he started swinging his at 'em...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 02 Feb 20 - 09:19 PM

Are we still talking about baseball bats? :-)


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 02 Feb 20 - 09:56 PM

well.. I was looking out our front upstairs window..

..ermm.. I thought it was a baseball bat..???

Though he is a big Scotsman... he could have been tossing his caber at 'em...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Senoufou
Date: 03 Feb 20 - 04:05 AM

I saw some photos in the paper of quite a few inventive solutions to the shortage of surgical masks in China. Some people had made one from a plastic bottle cut into shape. Even the leaves of a large cabbage(!) and one young woman had attached the peel of half an orange to her face. Bras are apparently useful. But it seems that washing the hands thoroughly after being out is an excellent idea, also avoiding touching handrails/stair rails or doorknobs, then one's face.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 03 Feb 20 - 04:32 AM

I wonder wwhy the government saw fit to update the link as recently as Oct 2019?

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/rabies-in-bats
Mr Shaw I regard you as the last person suitably qualified to apprise me of anything as by your own admission you do not differentiate between fact and whimsy. Your pontifications are best ignored


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 03 Feb 20 - 05:49 AM

Government advice fully accords with everything I've said. So here are the facts, stated simply, then you can whine away all you like, as I'm rapidly losing interest. Anything you can't agree with, tell it to the marines.

Bats can carry strains of rabies-like viruses, but this is rare.

27 UK bats, generally specimens found dead then reported, have been found to be infected out of many thousands sent in over many years.

There has been just one single case in the UK of a bat infecting a human. This was a man in Scotland in 2002 who was a licensed bat-handler and who had had prolonged contact with bats over many years.

In order to catch the disease from an infected bat (which are very rare) you have to be scratched or bitten by the bat.

Bats are very shy of humans and are extremely unlikely to show a human any aggression.

You can't catch rabies by touching a bat with unbroken skin.

No bat has been found in this country carrying the novel coronavirus strain.

There is absolutely no need to worry that you might catch rabies from any bats in your house, garden or anywhere else. It simply isn't going to happen.

There are eighteen species of bat in the UK, not one.

Enjoy life.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 03 Feb 20 - 09:36 AM

Hard to reason with stupid!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 03 Feb 20 - 09:41 AM

So how do public health officials get wild bats to wear surgical masks...???


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 03 Feb 20 - 10:02 AM

Ask Batman. He wore a mask.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 03 Feb 20 - 10:06 AM

Militant bats must have been outraged by a rich white man culturally appropriating
their appearance and mannerisms...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 03 Feb 20 - 11:19 AM

serious time again..

This has been a sad RIP Andy Gill [guitarist - Gang of 4] weekend..

one of the few 'celebrity' deaths to actually hit home emotionally for me..

A few other mudcatters were also young adults enjoying living the late 70s early 80s Leeds agitpop post punk scene..

Age 64, his death was reported as respiratory problems following an Asian tour at the end of 2019..

No further details available for now...

The obvious first reaction [well.. my mrs ] is to link this to the unfolding pandemic.

Probably coincidence.. but...???


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 04 Feb 20 - 05:46 AM

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/wuhan-coronavirus-looks-increasingly-like-a-pandemic-experts-say/ar-BBZzYIk?ocid=spartandhp
link
It was MERS that was 1 in 3 three fatal after a mutation.
A mask's porous nature compared to the size of a virus is like rice through a tennis racquet.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Senoufou
Date: 04 Feb 20 - 06:14 AM

The problem with knowing what someone died of when abroad, in tropical climates etc, is getting a proper diagnosis. My husband tells me that so many of his old mates/family members have died in Ivory Coast, and people there always say, "It was malaria". But there are so many possibilities. Diabetes is quite common, dietary deficiencies, typhoid, cholera, food poisoning, anaemia and so on, but the only symptom that they see is the high fever, and they conclude ,"C'était palu.".

We are so lucky in the West that we can be reasonably sure (laboratory tests and skilled doctors) what the illness is. Curing/preventing a virus though, well, let's hope a vaccine is soon forthcoming!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 04 Feb 20 - 08:48 AM

Unfortunately, it would take several months to develop a vaccine. After that, it has to be cleared for use on humans, and then it has to be bulked up. The timeline is probably at least one year.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Senoufou
Date: 04 Feb 20 - 08:59 AM

Oh crumbs Steve, I didn't know that. Maybe the blooming thing will mutate into something non-fatal to humans. (I believe viruses mutate rather frequently)


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Nigel Parsons
Date: 04 Feb 20 - 09:29 AM

"Rules for the coming pandemic"

In the words of Corporal Jones:
Don't Panic!

Excellent first rule.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Nigel Parsons
Date: 04 Feb 20 - 09:31 AM

Oh, 100


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 05 Feb 20 - 10:20 AM

"When the government tells you 'Do not panic', thats exactly the time to panic"
quote: John Cussak in the movie 2012


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Charmion
Date: 05 Feb 20 - 03:25 PM

The rules for the coming pandemic are the same as the rules we should have used in the last one, but didn't.

Wash your hands, with soap, and dry them thoroughly. Do it often.

Stay away from sick people. If you get sick, stay away from healthy people.

If that means you can't go shopping, too damned bad; ask someone else to do it for you and leave the groceries on the porch. Do not ask that nice person in for tea, or hug him/her.

If that means you can't go to work; sorry. I know you need your wages, but your colleagues and customers need their health even more.

Wash your hands -- again.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 05 Feb 20 - 03:38 PM

You are smart, not crazy, to avoid reflexively shaking hands in an area of known outbreak.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 06 Feb 20 - 01:54 AM

I only shake hands with people I want to shake hands with. And that’s very few indeed.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: robomatic
Date: 06 Feb 20 - 02:07 AM

"Don't Panic" is on the cover of the Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy.

In BIG FRIENDLY LETTERS.

"DON'T PANIC"


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 06 Feb 20 - 03:46 AM

I only ever used to shake hands with the wife's best friend. These days, it's shaking hands with the unemployed. Same thing.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 06 Feb 20 - 06:51 AM

I had an hour conversation with my youngest about novel coronavirus.
Bottom line was to trust the CDC even over WHO.
WHO has slightly more political and economic concerns regarding information.
My son is well versed in the subject but needed guidance navigating social media out of China.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 06 Feb 20 - 08:15 PM

Regarding this small community I warn you for the last time to find a means of getting and filling prescriptions of penicilin, antibiotics or your most basic medicines in advance of 6 weeks from now.

The reason is that many medicines such as penicilin is 95% made in China and soon they will need it for their own pnemonia cases.
I can only speculate that certain fortunate people will still have access to antibiotics. We are not all fortunate. I would reason further that anti virals, although useless and non specific, will be the first to run out.

Secondary infections are occuring and most likely you will only have spent some time for peace of mind.

Remember China has spent decades cornering the drug manufacturing market and they have unfortunately succeeded.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: leeneia
Date: 06 Feb 20 - 09:32 PM

I read in my newspaper that for most people, the novel coronavirus causes an illness similar to a bad cold. People who are compromised (you know who you are) may become very ill, but that's true of most illnesses.

I think we can relax about all this.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: mg
Date: 06 Feb 20 - 10:24 PM

good. i vaccilate between calm and panic. i have a trip planned to ireland and spain in one month..layovers in london. just got travel insurance. if epidemic is raging i will cancel trip. if not, i will go and be very careful. i am basically healthy and not prone to catching things. they say lysol works well. i am probably safer in europe than where i live..we are a port to and from china.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 06 Feb 20 - 11:37 PM

Panic and anxiety more than likely weaken the immune system...???


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 07 Feb 20 - 06:18 AM

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-death-rate/


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 07 Feb 20 - 06:49 AM

PANIC = tremble in fear, act like a coward, take unusual precautions

RELAX = ignore concerns, feel indestructable, stay on the sunny side

I'm for the middle way, however you define it.


As for bad colds, novel corona virus is only a tiny bit more powerful than the 1917 flu.

What is different is a 2020 version of modern medical care.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 07 Feb 20 - 07:03 AM

Donuel the CDC suggests 500,000,000 caught the 1918 flu virus and up to 50,000,000 died.
That makes it far more lethal that suggested statistics, so far available, for the coronavirus.
We shall see.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Doug Chadwick
Date: 07 Feb 20 - 11:45 AM

As for bad colds, novel corona virus is only a tiny bit more powerful than the 1917 flu.

What is different is a 2020 version of modern medical care.


What is different is the much higher level of international travel in 2020.

DC


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 07 Feb 20 - 11:57 AM

yeah.. in 1917 most Brits, Yanks, Aussies, Kiwis, Indians, etc, who travelled abroad
went there to get blown to smithereens..

These days most travellers come home...

A far worst potential pandemic threat...!!!

So will I still be joking about it in, say, 2 months from now...???


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 07 Feb 20 - 12:02 PM

Disclaimer: military historians please note I couldn't be arsed checking WW1 blown to smithereens casualty lists,
so 'most' might be a teeny weeny exaggeration...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 07 Feb 20 - 01:10 PM

I never expected to laugh out loud over a thread like this.
The true comments are the best punchlines.

[I would switch 'stay on the sunny side' with 'take precautions'
in the panic vs relax post.]

Predicting what may happen, for what ever reason, is secondary to the medical responses. But predict we will and infighting will begin.
It is as inevitable as a cat fight between Pollyana and Pandora, God vs. Lucifer, Voldemort vs Harry or donuel vs steve.

So I propose apologizing in advance should feathers, scales or hair get ruffled.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 07 Feb 20 - 01:18 PM

btw the CDC states the opposite of what Iains suggested.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 07 Feb 20 - 01:45 PM

Donuel: From the CDC website:
The 1918 influenza pandemic was the most severe pandemic in recent history. It was caused by an H1N1 virus with genes of avian origin. Although there is not universal consensus regarding where the virus originated, it spread worldwide during 1918-1919. In the United States, it was first identified in military personnel in spring 1918. It is estimated that about 500 million people or one-third of the world’s population became infected with this virus. The number of deaths was estimated to be at least 50 million worldwide with about 675,000 occurring in the United States.
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-resources/1918-pandemic-h1n1.html

For coronavirus
Fatality Rate (CFR)
(WHO early estimate)
2% (?)


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 07 Feb 20 - 02:27 PM

I see you've come here for a battle of the CDC's
"No I came here for an argument"
You didn't pay
"Yes I did"
No you didn't


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: mg
Date: 07 Feb 20 - 08:58 PM

I hope I am not repeating myself here. But I am seriously wondering who among the candidates can lead us through a possible epidemic. If it only affects a few thousand people in usa, there will still be shortages, panic, job loss, increased poverty etc. Who in our government can oversee this..get medicine (??), food, bedding etc. to various quarantine places. I can not see elizabeth, bernie. Biden OK if he were younger perhaps. Budd perhaps..at least he has military experience. Tulsi might impress us. Booker, gone but nice guy. How is he with logistics? Who is capable of transporting people, goods, keeping a population from panic, keeping a volatile economy going. I keep forgetting about Yang. Don't know. Bloomberg? Don't know much about him. Does anyone strike you as the person to lead us..not inspire us..but get us the goods we need. Pragmatic, cooperative, commanding. General Honore is only person who comes to mind and he is not running. Someone will emerge. Trump will only save 1% and Pence will save only the presaved.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 07 Feb 20 - 09:11 PM

I see Pete as the sharpest cookie in the bunch.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 07 Feb 20 - 09:12 PM

But Bloomberg has a track record


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: mg
Date: 09 Feb 20 - 08:08 PM

i have some concerns. i just heard something about morgues and funeral parlors in china...WHAT? if you have an epidemic you don't have the luxury of a funeral parlor. What do they think is going to happen? Do you want bodies decomposing? Do you want people assembling? No. Do what needs to be done and do it immediately and that includes people who died of something else..assume they have been exposed.

I think it is past time in us to start taking universal precautions, under the assumption that sooner or later we will have an epidemic to contend with. Quit shaking hands, especially in church. I never like that. We can bow or something. Spread yourselves out. One thing I see in China videos is they seem to crowd together even when there is space. Probably a cultural thing. I am in Scandi land so we don't tend to cuddle together much. I will research steam cleaning and ultraviolet machines. Not sure they work on viruses. There are essential oils that do work. When you give christmas presents etc...give stuff that people would like to have on hand for various eventualities. If you are near a viral epidemic, wear glasses, or goggles if you can, and protect your ears.

Public transportation is a nightmare. I want to fumigate myself after using it. Insist that new buses and trains not have cloth cushions. How can you clean them? Or people take wipes and clean them themselves with only the mildest soap and water of course. Think about pets on public transportation...

lots to think about. i don't think us will be hit much, but sooner or later we will. we also have to deal with the homeless population. no way to wash, no bathrooms etc. not good. and various epidemics are starting up there.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 11 Feb 20 - 09:28 AM

On the BBC today - it’s believed that the coronavirus came from pangolin which was sold on a Chinese market,

Such wonderful irony! The (literal) biters bit.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 11 Feb 20 - 09:39 AM

China is an amazingly strange mess of contradictions..
Technology leaders of the brighter future, hampered by stupidest superstitions of the dark past..

If nothing else good comes out of this pandemic,
the Chinese Govt must crack down heavily on endangered wild species trade...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 11 Feb 20 - 12:10 PM

mg I find your new rules valid.

I would add cruise ships to the no go list.

"the mask and GLOVE BOAT is waiting to take you away, the Glove boat.."


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Mr Red
Date: 12 Feb 20 - 04:53 AM

the BBC re-broadcast a programme that included a sophisticated smart phone survey, in the way that only the BBC manage to do. Hannah Fry, the Statistics Professor, with a few Cambridge Uni Alumni and loadsa backroom analysis with moving graphics.

It makes for stark viewing, and obviously was shown to remind people in the wake of this coronavirus instance.

CONTAGION! The BBC Four Pandemic

Enjoy...............


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 12 Feb 20 - 06:05 AM

I do not have the imagination to predict how the virus will effect the US election in November. i just know it will have an effect.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 12 Feb 20 - 08:01 AM

What is the point of wearing a mask when the infection is viral?
An NBC suit would be the only defense.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Mr Red
Date: 12 Feb 20 - 09:15 AM

Stephen Fry, on QI, who could not tell a lie:

said that the way face masks work, when they work, is to prevent people rubbing their mouths/noses & maybe eyes. After shaking hands &/or opening doors, handrails, loose food etc. It reduces the transference of whatever.

And the BBC prog did advocate the washing of hands more often during a pandemic/scare. A figure of five or more times was quoted.

Another tactic which IS done, is to inoculate key personnel, like medical workers, shop assistance etc. If vaccines have been found/made. The transmission rate, even inoculating key personnel, is probably quicker than the 4 months incubation time of novel vaccines.

Money is another vector for transmission. Indeed one old lady I recorded said her doctor (say in the 20/30s) would be payed by boiling the coins first and only he would remove them from the pan. Clever doctor or common practice in the days before the NHS?
Irene Adey talking of 11 shillings boiled born 1917, she reached 100, about 6 months after the recording.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 12 Feb 20 - 10:54 AM

Apologies for my pedantry, but this is the fourth time I’ve seen the past tense of ‘pay’ spelled ‘payed’ on t’Interweb today.

It’s ‘paid’.

Carry on....


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 12 Feb 20 - 12:05 PM

BWM - that one still confuses me.. even when spellcheck is working properly..

..and I was always top of the class in English at school..

It's not like I never payed.. errrmm.. paid attention..
no, I'm sure it's payed..
though paid now looks correct.. dunno though, it could be payed...???

oh bollocks.. it's not like I never listened to teachers explaining the spelling rules...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 12 Feb 20 - 12:27 PM

Pfr - ‘payed’ is the archaic form, the modern form is ‘paid’.
‘Payed’ is acceptable for certain nautical uses of the word.

https://www.grammarly.com/blog/paid-payed/


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 12 Feb 20 - 12:31 PM

@ Mr Red. Thank you for the clarification. It was an aspect that I had not considered. Perhaps disposable gloves would be desirable should the situation deteriorate.

For the pedants:
The past tense of pay attention to is paid attention to.
The third-person singular simple present indicative form of pay attention to is pays attention to.
The present participle of pay attention to is paying attention to.
The past participle of pay attention to is paid attention to.


I was taught all this aged 12 and forgot 90% of it by age 13. Now in the days of keyboard communication I consider myself barely literate.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 12 Feb 20 - 07:17 PM

On that at least we can all agree.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 12 Feb 20 - 10:37 PM

The healthier and more developed your immune system the more ill you will become if infected. 20 to 50 year olds are more at risk.
The irony is surprising.

The reason is that like SARs it is the over response of your own immune system that kills you.

The meek weak and feeble will inherit the Earth ;^I

I am not a runner or fitness freak. Those who are, might feel cheated.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Manitas_at_home
Date: 13 Feb 20 - 03:09 AM

OTOH, us 'fitness freaks' are more likely to be commuting by foot or bike in the fresh air than being stuck in a metal tube full of coughers and snifflers.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 13 Feb 20 - 03:32 AM

The healthier and more developed your immune system the more ill you will become if infected. 20 to 50 year olds are more at risk.
The irony is surprising.


That may have been true of the 1918 flu pandemic but so far as is known statistics on corona virus suggest fatalities are concentrateed among the old with pre existing conditions.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2233269-how-bad-is-the-covid-19-coronavirus-outbreak-likely-to-get/


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Senoufou
Date: 13 Feb 20 - 04:25 AM

I agree about 'metal tube with all the coughers and sniffers'.
We intended to go 'up the city' on Saturday (not that there Lunnon, just Naaaarwich) on the Park and Ride bus. But I'm not keen as people do indeed cough and sniff with no hanky, and the windows are always shut. Box of germs. I'm furious when people just sneeze loudly without even covering their mouths/noses. And cough all over everyone too.
I wonder if one can buy a Hazmat suit on Amazon? Perhaps my husband could get a fancy one with Man U or Arsenal logo printed all over it?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 13 Feb 20 - 06:01 AM

currently unavailable (I wonder why?)


https://www.amazon.com/Lakeland-Encapsulated-Expanded-Disposable-2X-Large/dp/B00CMXCJMK?ref_=fsclp_pl_dp_11


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Senoufou
Date: 13 Feb 20 - 06:15 AM

Oh Iains, what a shame, that would have been just the thing! As you say, 'wonder why it's no longer available?'


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 13 Feb 20 - 06:22 AM

Droplets are quite likely not the main problem. They settle very quickly, so you'd have to be very close to a sneeze to inhale any. So you blow your nose into a tissue which temporarily goes back in your pocket where you keep your clean tissues, banknotes, credit cards or coins. Your contaminated hands then leave virus particles on strap hangers, support bars, door handles, supermarket basket and trolley handles, then on to your own shopping bags, car keys and the car steering wheel. As a bonus you might just pick up some more from the usually disgustingly-filthy buttons on the card machine. And don't get me started on the almost invariable setup in gents' toilets in which the only way to get out is to grab, with your freshly washed hand, a door handle that pulls inwards and that has been touched by a hundred unwashed hands. We all have to touch objects contaminated by couldn't-care-less people (though they do give a shit, literally). Even you with your conscientious disposable wad of Kleenex are a culprit. The public health warnings we're getting represent a load of panic-stricken back-pedalling. They just might do a little bit of good.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 13 Feb 20 - 06:49 AM

npr suggests that Africa will be hit hard because of so few clinics.
The tongue in cheek remark about the meek inheriting the Earth is gallows humor at its worst when we consider what may happen in Africa.


There is something akin to a grim experiment aboard the Diamond Princess cruise ship being held along with over a thousand people by Japan. Some are infected and are moved off the ship as testing continues.

novel corona virus is now named Covid for short.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Senoufou
Date: 13 Feb 20 - 07:22 AM

This is why I religiously wash my hands very thoroughly the minute we get home. But you're right Steve, the arrangements in public toilets for opening doors etc are not ideal. I never ever use public loos. Husband does though.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 13 Feb 20 - 07:32 AM

Doesn't matter how cautious I am outside the house,
my wife works in a infant school
surrounded by little festering disease carriers...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Senoufou
Date: 13 Feb 20 - 08:24 AM

Ah yes, my husband is a full-time cleaner in a large secondary school. He arrives at lunchtime (pupils are present) and works until 9pm. He starts with the toilets, and what he tells me is dreadful. The pupils make an unspeakable mess, with urine, faeces and other things. Toilet paper soaked in urine then flung up to the ceiling to stick there. (Why?)
He scours himself in the shower when he gets home, and changes all his clothes, which I'm more than happy to wash on a very hot wash cycle, including his cleaner's uniform.
He can't understand why the Headmaster doesn't address this filthiness in the toilets and punish the offenders. He didn't even have a toilet at school in Africa, just a hole in the ground!
If a pandemic broke out, I should imagine schools would be a hotbed of infection.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 13 Feb 20 - 01:05 PM

The kids don't do it when there are teachers around, and you wouldn't dare grass because the perpetrators saw you in there...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Senoufou
Date: 13 Feb 20 - 01:17 PM

He knows that no adult can supervise in the toilet block during school hours. (He places a yellow triangle in front of the door while he cleans) so the pupils can do what they like in there. And as you say Steve, grasses would get beaten up.
He has a special solvent to remove graffiti and the usual genitalia drawings, which shocked him terribly at first!
It's all very unhygienic.
I wonder if all schools would close if the virus should become rife?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 13 Feb 20 - 05:28 PM

It would be better to close schools sooner than later.
If an infection rate is 1 in 200 its too late to make a meaningful difference imo. Sorry for the hardships it would cause.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: leeneia
Date: 14 Feb 20 - 12:40 PM

Keep in mind that that nastiness was probably caused by 2 or 3 boys egging each other on. That's 2 or 3 (or maybe just one) pupil out of several hundred.

What's the girls' room like? Clean, I bet. That's 50% of the school.

The adults have no excuse for this. When I was in grade school, our teachers ushered us to the restrooms at a stated time every morning and every afternoon. They would have heard the sounds of vandalizing and stopped it.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Mr Red
Date: 14 Feb 20 - 04:49 PM

one of the problems with closing schools is that the notso little horrors would be anywhere and everywhere, congregating. And it would take a monstrous effort to stop that!

Lets face it, we have a problem, just not as bad as China.






Yet.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 14 Feb 20 - 04:53 PM

If you've ever dodged a bullet it is scary but happy at the same time


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Mr Red
Date: 14 Feb 20 - 05:16 PM

antibody identified

The biotech community are moving pretty quickly, they need to.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Senoufou
Date: 14 Feb 20 - 05:28 PM

No leeneia, there are six toilet blocks in the high school, including those at the College for sixth-formers. All of them are in the same filthy state, female toilets as well as male ones. So the risk of spreading a dodgy disease is quite high. My poor husband has to clean them all!
In our village there is a lovely infant and junior school, plus a nursery, and children are ferried here from all the surrounding villages to attend.
I do think children could be vectors for a virus.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 14 Feb 20 - 05:54 PM

My mrs is always brings home colds and coughs from school for me to catch..
Last year I decided it was time to start paying for a flu jab at xmas...

Still, while we're waiting for the pandemic,
Britain has a peak outbreak of mumps...

That'll be fun...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 14 Feb 20 - 06:33 PM

Mumps? Stop worrying, mate. At our age we don't need our bollocks any more.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 14 Feb 20 - 06:45 PM

but what about our boy band/movie star handsome faces..

we can't be seen in public looking like puffy bloated hamsters...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 14 Feb 20 - 06:53 PM

The bloat dies down. It's the lack of lunch packs you should be worrying about.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 14 Feb 20 - 09:24 PM

A weak immune system is advantageous to surviving Covid 19. A strong immune system over reacts to the virus and that is what kills its victims.

Panic if you must but it is part of the normal deal for survival on the Planet. Virus were probably here first and are always a competator.

As in a collapse of life or merely a civilization in the past there is a spectrum of multiple causes happening together such as; global warming extinctions PLUS locust invasions PLUS a large impact PLUS Mumps PLUS AIDS PLUS viral infections PLUS Nuke plant abandonment PLUS etc.

This possible pandemic is a single incident and as such not a big deal to civilizationin in the long run. Survivability is 97%+


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 14 Feb 20 - 09:45 PM

"A weak immune system is advantageous to surviving"

..so you wouldn't want to be in your 90s with a strong immune system...???


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: mg
Date: 15 Feb 20 - 04:46 AM

Read up on uv light for destroying viri. Very powerful. They have big robots in hospitals now and developing for planes. Some are being offered to China. I assume China has factory availability right now and could produce them. Very old technology..I think used in wwi. Also powerful steam cleaners will do the job
Where I live in Washington State USA we are asked to practice some universal precautions.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 15 Feb 20 - 10:51 AM

"Viri." I love that and have been using it all day! Almost worthy of a thread....


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 15 Feb 20 - 11:51 AM

Strong UV light is at the entrance of operating rooms in our area.

I should have kept my 6 ft tall UV unit. (Portable tanning unit)
It was too strong for plants as well.

I would have used it for hair and hands

China export shortages begin this week


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 15 Feb 20 - 01:03 PM

What if the virus laughs at ultra violet rays
then makes the most of getting a free tanning session...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Senoufou
Date: 15 Feb 20 - 01:23 PM

Perhaps Steve one might catch viri while travelling in numerous omnibi?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: leeneia
Date: 15 Feb 20 - 02:01 PM

Re the school restrooms: I still believe that a minority of students are responsible. How many people among us want to have anything to do with feces?

This situation is a shame, and the administration should step up and do something to end it.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Senoufou
Date: 15 Feb 20 - 02:53 PM

The pupils are given small laptops to keep and take home, on which to do their homework and have contact with teachers etc. My husband has found more than one of these pushed down a toilet.
He is horrified at all this. In his home town in Adjame, Abidjan (Ivory Coast) the pupils (many with no footwear) were hard-pushed to find a pencil and an exercise book. Yet these nasty, spoiled brats shove their laptop down the loos!
The difficulty is that adults can't go into the toilet blocks when they are in use, as there are rules about privacy (rightly so). My husband is extremely careful to ban entry while he cleans, or he could be accused of voyeurism or worse.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 15 Feb 20 - 03:07 PM

I used to work part-time as a Youth-Worker at a Youth-Centre on a school campus. It was quite a regular occurrence, when checking the building was clear and secure at the end of the evening, to find one or more of the boys’ lavatories blocked by having several toilet rolls shoved down it, and a pile of human sh*t left on the top.

You have to remind yourself, under those circumstances, that it was just one kid out of the fifty or so who had come through the door that evening. But it’s still very depressing.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 15 Feb 20 - 04:04 PM

proceed immediately to the what are we eating thread


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 15 Feb 20 - 04:43 PM

I've been on several campi meself, BWM...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 15 Feb 20 - 05:34 PM

LOL! :-) :-)


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 15 Feb 20 - 07:43 PM

I do not forsee a problem with the water system so I won't have to make the pool or spa potable.
My objective is to have food for 6 months to avoid shopping weekly.
Dry goods, real frontier food. MRE's yuck. so I settled on 300 cans of soup.
Mormons are required to have a year of food.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Mr Red
Date: 16 Feb 20 - 04:57 AM

China export shortages begin this week

The pundits are predicting the pandemic will impact world economy. It was being predicted because the growth of the Chinese economy was slowing anyway, and Trump was meddling, and......, and....... But the pundits never saw this coming!

An example of why predicting the future on historical data, when it gets it wrong, will get it wrong in a bigger way.

I saw a TED.com video that reckoned the 2008 recession was made infinitely worse by Government meddling. A rule that was repealed within a year & saw recovery following.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: leeneia
Date: 17 Feb 20 - 10:38 AM

Backwoodsman, I agree.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Stilly River Sage
Date: 17 Feb 20 - 11:10 AM

Perhaps "don't transport people after they've been confined to a ship full of sick people" would be a useful rule:

Coronavirus Updates: Infected Americans Evacuated from Cruise Ship and Flown to U.S.

From the New York Times

Fourteen passengers, who were believed to be well before they were evacuated from a cruise ship in Japan on Monday, were found to be infected before boarding a charter plane to the United States.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 17 Feb 20 - 04:54 PM

1 plane landed in TX but you will be OK. Hey boss, da plane da plane


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 18 Feb 20 - 07:24 AM

The 'prompt' clinic nearby insists everyone wears a mask, but then everyone must use the same digital pen on a tether to sign in.

If you go so far as to wear a mask I would suggest gloves in public.

When do we start these special rules ?

Whenever you feel prevention has broken down and contagion is out of control.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 18 Feb 20 - 08:04 AM

Masks may filter droplets but any mask that could effectively filter viruses would suffocate you in seconds. Masks are a money-making con.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 18 Feb 20 - 08:57 AM

I read an [I hope trustworthy] article about 2 weeks ago that masks gave a false sense of security;
and that the more protective ones being sold to the public
previously required formal training and qualification
to be used used correctly and safely...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 18 Feb 20 - 10:57 AM

Masks may filter droplets but any mask that could effectively filter viruses would suffocate you in seconds
I thought that also, but FFP-3 class masks effectively protect the wearer from droplet aerosols, protein molecules, viruses, bacteria, fungi and spores, and even from highly dangerous dusts such as asbestos fibers. BUT!
Protection only works if many other protective measures are taken at the same time: Strict hygiene when putting on a mask, protective goggles, gloves and plastic apron or overall, proper disposal of possibly contaminated disposable items and regular hand washing. In addition, the surroundings must always be systematically disinfected.

IT is not really a solution unless all steps are followed and even then sh*t happens.

https://www.ecowatch.com/coronavirus-face-masks-2645078070.html?rebelltitem=3#rebelltitem3


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 18 Feb 20 - 11:05 AM

To grasp how small most viri are, fine porcelin will allow a virus to fall through like a plinko chip or a water molecule to run through a sponge. Respirators with an O2 supply are only as good as the seal against the skin which is compromised by facial fuzz.

What 'could' make Covid 19 much more infectious than the flu is that non symptomatic carriers can infect more people in their travels than flu. For example if flu would pass on to another person 1.3 times
before they are not infectious. A bad rate of infection would be 3.3

Learning from mistakes like keeping people on a cruise ship suggests that transmissability is more likely than full blown symtoms.
Ergo more cases overall. The irony is how the common cold became as virulent as right wing politics, again.

To temper speculation with current news, turn to CDC on the web.
They have the best epidmiologists in the world.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Senoufou
Date: 18 Feb 20 - 12:09 PM

I see that the Government has commandeered a hotel near Heathrow Airport (a Holiday Inn) solely for passengers arriving with symptoms/possibility of having the virus. I do hope they 'deep clean' the place after all this is over. I wouldn't stay there for all the tea in ...er...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 18 Feb 20 - 12:25 PM

From CCDC
http://weekly.chinacdc.cn/en/article/id/e53946e2-c6c4-41e9-9a9b-fea8db1a8f51


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 18 Feb 20 - 12:34 PM

My hunch is Govt is planning to commandeer the likes of Travel lodge and Premier Inn
on trading estates at the edge of every town...???


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 18 Feb 20 - 12:50 PM

Our local Travel Lodge is right in the town centre!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 18 Feb 20 - 01:02 PM

your town's buggered then...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 18 Feb 20 - 01:05 PM

I believe a new one is opening just off the M5 if you fancy a long holiday trip to Scrumpyshire...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 18 Feb 20 - 01:33 PM

I’ll be down that way next week, visiting a luthiery in the Exeter area....staying in a pub.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 18 Feb 20 - 02:07 PM

When I said CDC I meant the AMERICAN CDC.
Not the Chinese government cdc or the FUCDC or Russian news service.

I can not prove your raison d'etre is to cause dliberate harm but it is time to cut the crap.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 18 Feb 20 - 03:15 PM

You talking to me?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 18 Feb 20 - 03:59 PM

Donuel. Do you really think any government is going to be entirely honest about a suspected pandemic? It will always be a case of plan for the worst and hope for the best, and like any security issue Joe Public will be kept largely in the Dark. To put everyone infected in isolation can only work when numbers are limited. What do you do when numbers get out of control? Only Mormons and preppers can isolate themselves, the rest need feeding.
You can compare what the Chinese say about it all and other equally dubious sites such as below: Two opposite ends of the spectrum.

https://electroverse.net/coronavirus-the-official-numbers-dont-add-up/

There is controversy over the:
numbers infected
The demographic most at risk
The transmissability
the fatality rate


Who to believe?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 18 Feb 20 - 06:29 PM

Backwoodsman my good man I'm sorry I didn't write the name Iains. I look forward to all your posts. Actually Iains upsets me less than stale cheese.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 18 Feb 20 - 07:35 PM

I wish to digress, as this is supposedly a serious topic. There is no word "viri", and if you attempt to use that as the plural of "virus" you open yourself to well-deserved ridicule.

Also, you may decide to use "fora" as the plural of "forum" when referring to platforms such as this one. Technically, you are not wrong so to do, but you cast yourself as a clown if you do. We see a lot of that here.

Now back to the subject...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 18 Feb 20 - 08:22 PM

Our council has just turned down an application for a new Travelodge in Bude. A couple of years ago we got a new Premier Inn. That caused ructions...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: mg
Date: 18 Feb 20 - 10:00 PM

of course there is a word viri and it is the latin plural for men.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 18 Feb 20 - 10:22 PM

virile.. not a word heard that often at mudcat...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 19 Feb 20 - 02:35 AM

Is the corona virus virile?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 19 Feb 20 - 04:44 AM

Well now, mg, there are 7,111 languages in the world and I didn't have time to investigate every one to see if "viri" occurred in any of them. You are correct in that the Latin plural of "vir" (man) is viri, so, to that extent, you've got me there. But, you see, that isn't where we get "virus" from. In Latin, "virus" means a potent or noxious substance, such as the poisonous sap of a plant. That's where we got "virus" from, a word we usurped from the Latin and gave a different meaning to in English. We do that sort of thing quite a lot. In effect we made "virus" a word in English. We anglicised it. Now here's the rub: there is no plural variant form of the word "virus" in Latin (unlike there is for "vir," which you correctly point out), so the only resort available to us is to treat the word as a full English word and pluralise it accordingly. So "viruses" is sensible and "viri", if you insist on using it, just says something about you, but not, unfortunately, the thing you think it says about you.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Senoufou
Date: 19 Feb 20 - 05:18 AM

Excellent explanation Steve.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 19 Feb 20 - 05:30 AM

virus (n.)

late 14c., "venomous substance," from Latin virus "poison, sap of plants, slimy liquid, a potent juice," probably from PIE root *weis- "to melt away, to flow," used of foul or malodorous fluids, with specialization in some languages to "poisonous fluid" (source also of Sanskrit visam "poison," visah "poisonous;" Avestan vish- "poison;" Latin viscum "sticky substance, birdlime;" Greek ios "poison," ixos "mistletoe, birdlime;" Old Church Slavonic višnja "cherry;" Old Irish fi "poison;" Welsh gwyar "blood"). Main modern meaning "agent that causes infectious disease" first recorded 1728 (in reference to venereal disease).


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 19 Feb 20 - 05:53 AM

Quite.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 19 Feb 20 - 06:48 AM

To all the viri I've had before
That traveled in and out my door
I'm glad they went along
I dedicate this song

To all the viri I've had before
To all the viri I was blessed
And may I say, I've had the best
For causing me to cough, I coughed a lot, I know

To all the viri I've had before
And every time I tried to stray
The winds of change continued blowing
And they just carried me a way

To all the viri who shared my life
That now are someone else's strife
I'm not glad they came along
I dedicate this song

To all the viri I've had before
To all the viri that attacked me
That filled my nights with stomach cramps
They live within my world

I'll always be a swirl
Of all the viri I've had before
The winds of change are always blowing
And all the viri are always growing


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 19 Feb 20 - 03:04 PM

I'm sure that your terrible poetry would go down well on many campi, as long as you could get plenty of alumnuses to attend... I don't want to be one of the hippopotami in the room...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 19 Feb 20 - 05:12 PM

If the birth day for the 'virus' disease usage was 1732, then the birth day for the plural 'viri' is 2020.


For all the girls I loved before is by Willie Nelson.
It is terrible. So is coronovirus.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Mr Red
Date: 20 Feb 20 - 02:37 AM

Has anyone noticed that COVID-19 sometimes gets called:

Corvid-19

Well it is a "bird" 'flu, which is nothing to Crow about.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Senoufou
Date: 20 Feb 20 - 02:53 AM

Yes, and we should all be aware of Cornavirus. If you get that, you'll need to see a chiropodist.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 20 Feb 20 - 04:10 AM

Well I went to Galicia for my holiday and picked up A Coruña virus...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 20 Feb 20 - 04:34 AM

Perhaps if you followed the Camino Inglés route of the Camino de Santiago you might have been miraculously cured.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Workingtonman
Date: 20 Feb 20 - 04:59 AM

a word of caution about 'nasty spoiled brats' (15 feb - sorry, i've just caught up with this thread) in working with disabled people - and particularly folk with autism - the habit of blocking toilets with full rolls is quite common and a difficult behaviour to alter. if people are away from home on holiday then their confusion about the 'right' thing to do in the toilet may increase. as for electric devices? don't know but i often feel it would be no great loss if we stopped looking at screens and everyone binned the all-pervasive and addictive wee bullies.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Senoufou
Date: 20 Feb 20 - 05:38 AM

I quite understand about pupils with various disabilities such as autism (one of our neighbours has an autistic little boy) but these pupils at my husband's school have no disabilities.
And their laptops are paid for by us, the taxpayers. The modern age requires access to technology for students, and many schools here supply all their pupils with a personal laptop each.
No excuse to chuck it in the toilet!
I have to say that despite their atrocious habits in the toilets, lots of the pupils there are very very fond of my husband and greet him cheerily. He doesn't bear them any ill-will.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 20 Feb 20 - 06:08 AM

One Korean church goer is believed to have infected twelve others.
Korea now has over 100 cases.

New rule; church hugging and kissing may be hazardous to your health.

Adolescent shitstorms and spelling errors are not being investigated by the CDC. I leave that to you folks. Comedic relief is healthy and essential.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 20 Feb 20 - 07:24 AM

Early Chinese findings show pregnant women have some special immunity to developing pneumonia symptoms from Covid 19. Seventy year olds do not fair nearly as well. -npr-


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Mr Red
Date: 20 Feb 20 - 01:26 PM

FWIW coronaviruses generally are one of several family of viruses we call the common cold. Which is why symptoms of COVID-19 have been compared to colds.

rhinoviruses are another.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 20 Feb 20 - 01:48 PM

Coughing in public for any reason may become very stigmatizing.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 20 Feb 20 - 02:32 PM

Coughing and following through with a shart has always been even more stigmatizing..
Something to look forward to as I get older..
if I survive the pandemic...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: mg
Date: 20 Feb 20 - 06:24 PM

i believe some of the korean infected were us soldiers. not sure. but both korea and japan have proven really really stupid in at least some of what they have done in terms of releasing people from the quarantined ship..in japan i think with 3,000 passengers plus crew..500 diagnosed I think..2 recently died...they released to go home right away via public transportation. Are they nuts? I forget what I read about Korea...I think a woman from the cruise was not quarantined and went to chuch and spread it. An infectious disease professor has a youtube post and says the quarantine measures on ship were as good as useless and he was not afraid of ebola, sars, etc..but he was afraid of this..not sure he meant the virus itself or the precautions.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: mg
Date: 20 Feb 20 - 06:44 PM

I think you would only have to check one language, which would be Latin..could do more of course. I totally forgot about vir/viri..so long since I had Latin but I still have it somewhat as a second language as I was a nice Catholic girl.

Absolutely give up hugging and kissing people in church and most places. Shaking hands at church? I think an awful practice to start with, but at least should have happened before or after church. What I am most concerned about is transportation and I am planning a trip to Ireland and Spain in about two weeks. Someone loaned me a UV wand and I have essential oils. Not too worried about catching it as being quarantined. i probably said this already. I mean quarantined as on a plane and not getting off and no bathrooms etc. I have a specific diet to follow and I will have some food but it won't go far. Plus I will be staying in hostels with all sorts of international travelers. I think I have said many times here that we are asked where I live to follow universal precautions..we should anyway on our buses which are certainly sources of prurience in general.

Also, when I see ads on twitter etc. for flights, cruises, etc. I ask them how they are handling this..best I have found is steam cleaning and UV light plus essential oils plus lysol. I am sympathetic to people with chemical sensitivies because many disinfectants are going to be used..when steam would be harmless. We need not confine our thoughts to covid...there are others waiting to spring up and we can be prepared or we can be stupid. and i keep asking who of the democrats could possibly lead us through an epidemic, which whole cities quarantined etc...I have ancestral memories I think of epidemics..spanish flu and diptheria and others...i have worked in two departments of infectious disease in seattle..uw and childrens' hospital.

what is happening in clinics in england now is that people concerned about disease are walking into the clinics or emergency rooms and bogging down the clinics..staff have to be sent home, places have to be sanitized...it is a nightmare.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 21 Feb 20 - 02:16 AM

”what is happening in clinics in england now is that people concerned about disease are walking into the clinics or emergency rooms and bogging down the clinics..staff have to be sent home, places have to be sanitized...it is a nightmare.”

Drivel.

We have a problem with our NHS which is due to long-term underfunding by the Conservative government that has held power for the past ten years, as they prepare it for a take-over by the American private health industry.

SFA to do with Covid-19.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 21 Feb 20 - 02:46 AM

We have a problem with our NHS which is due to long-term underfunding by the Conservative government that has held power for the past ten years, as they prepare it for a take-over by the American private health industry.
Of course   the rubbish above presumes everyone is ignorant and are    not capable    of a little digging.
THE LABOUR PARTY were the first to float the idea of privatising the NHS by selling parts of it off, starting more than two decades ago and hoping "by 2008 we could have as much as 40 percent in the private sector."   Tony Blair took office in 1997, with the promise of removing “internal markets” in the NHS – the idea that Health Authorities ceased to run their hospitals, but “purchased” care from their own or other authorities hospitals. The Blair government, while leaving services free at the point of use, encouraged the outsourcing of medical services and under the Private Finance Initiative, an increasing number of hospitals were built, or rebuilt, by private companies too.

NHS hospital trusts are being crippled by the private finance initiative and will have to make another £55bn in payments by the time the last contract ends in 2050.
One of Labours cunning wheezes.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Stanron
Date: 21 Feb 20 - 05:35 AM

Gordon Brown, when he was Tony Blair's chancellor, had the 'wonderful idea' of taxing the future. He got all those new hospitals on a kind of 'hire purchase' or 'never-never' system called PFI. He didn't have to pay up front. It would all be payed for by future tax payers. That's us, now. A significant part of current NHS budget goes into paying off that debt. He got the credit and we now pay for it. Thanks Gordon.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 21 Feb 20 - 08:12 AM

Now then, you Tory apologists. A good number of us proper lefties (which Gordon and Tony were most decidedly not) were absolutely against PFIs and the academisation of schools. But be honest. By all means blame New Labour for initiating these things of which you moan, but let's face it: your lot has jumped on them with mighty enthusiasm and ballooned them out of any proportion that those initiators envisaged. You didn't have to do it, so stop whingeing about it, eh?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 21 Feb 20 - 08:53 AM

Whingeing? Who whinged? Don't you know that is a symptom of Covid 19 3/4?
QUARANTINE THEM AT ONCE

yep expect not just stupid mistakes but over reactions too


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 21 Feb 20 - 09:18 AM

New Labour...???

Oh we remember now..
that tory plot to covertly infiltrate the Labour party
in order to take it over and run it from the inside...

The fall back plan at that time when the public were sick of tory govt corruption scandals...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 21 Feb 20 - 09:37 AM

BUt it is the Labour leaders that send their entitled brats to private schools while the hoi polloi have to attend comprehensives (think abbaccus and bliar blair to name but two)

It was old labour under Tony Crosland that led the Labour campaign to replace grammar schools with comprehensive schools that did not use the Eleven-plus for the selection of pupils. ..."last thing I do, I'm going to destroy every f*cking grammar school in England."


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 21 Feb 20 - 10:13 AM

Iains - we must at least make some effort to link this to pandemics,
or you know what will happen top our posts...

I had my own experiences of far too much NHS money being wasted on private consultants under Blair,
which I found completely unacceptable...

So sensible folks should agree both Blair and the tories are responsible for the current ill condition of the NHS,
and it's inability to cope with a realistically anticipated impending pandemic...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 21 Feb 20 - 10:58 AM

But my original point in response to mg's nonsense still stands - in the UK (or 'England' as Americans erroneously refer to the UK), there is no Covid-19 panic, people are not flooding to A&E depots in our hospitals, staff are not having to be 'sent home', and A&E depts are not having to be 'sanitized', other than the routine cleaning which happens anyway.

In fact, the only person who appears to be panicking is the aforementioned mg.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 21 Feb 20 - 11:20 AM

Mob panic mentality...

What's the reality of the news reports
of Ukrainians stoning a coach transporting quarantined returners from China...???


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Mossback
Date: 21 Feb 20 - 11:36 AM

the only person who appears to be panicking is the aforementioned mg.

No, she's on top of things, BWM- she's got her magic wand, her assential oils, and she gets her information from Twatter.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 21 Feb 20 - 03:24 PM

Interesting link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-7SQGPkijs


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 21 Feb 20 - 03:38 PM

Pfr as yet it is not a pandemic. Let us hope it does not become one. It would swamp any medical care facilities and the percentage that die (estimated at 2%, would inevitably increase markedly as intensive care facilities simply do not exist for the potential numbers requiring such care. Awkward choices would have to be made that would likely penalise the very young and very old. This supposes that supply lines,medications and vital infrastructure continues to function normally. In this joined up, just in time delivery world,such an expectation is likely away with the faeries in my view. (I hope I am proved to be totally wrong, but....)


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Jack Campin
Date: 22 Feb 20 - 08:31 AM

mg:
we are asked where I live to follow universal precautions..we should anyway on our buses which are certainly sources of prurience in general.

Good grief, what do they DO on buses where mg comes from?

I just got a Facebook message from Ailie Robertson saying she'd had a gig cancelled in Italy due to coronavirus precautions. First public event I've seen to be affected.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 22 Feb 20 - 11:43 AM

Northern Italy closes schools and suspends gatherings as coronavirus cases mount

https://abcnews.go.com/International/hundreds-chinese-inmates-infected-coronavirus-outbreak-spreads-prisons/story?id=69120484


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Mr Red
Date: 22 Feb 20 - 04:55 PM

Life ain't binary.
We should panic in the UK.
Our healthcare system has been teetering on the edge for a long time.
It is the politicians, and people who justify their actions that are to blame. We can see some above.

There is one aspect of life generally, that becomes a driver of disaster in systems that can be overwhelmed, episodically.

That problem is use of the word redundancy to be perceived as excess, wasteful, unnecessary etc. Redundancy means insurance against unusual events. Capacity for natures variability.

Hospital beds apply in this context. They are there for your personal 'flu, not sitting idle. There used to be TB isolation hospitals, where are they now? We might need them!

Remember the London Ambulance Service computer system? "Tandem Computers" (clue in their name) quoted £11 million, winning quote £2 million. First few months it collapsed. Collapse & revamp - At what cost?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 22 Feb 20 - 05:29 PM

I foresee six months of confusion and initial lawless de evolution of normal civilization as people learn to deal. But who knows, ome of the exitement will be be fun for some. Good times, end times, as events grow worse, its too late to run from the latest curse.
It is good to relearn our priorities from billionaires to minorities.
Two Springs from now will bloom a new common sense that will last, sigh , a generation.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 22 Feb 20 - 07:55 PM

a bonanza for conspiracy theory nuts...

All the worst affected nations are competitors or enemies of the USA... hmmmm...??????

..meanwhile the vaccine has existed since the virus was developed,
and the select American protected elite have already been immunised... hmmmm...???????


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 22 Feb 20 - 09:58 PM

Conspiracy chickens come home to roost where ever bio weapon research has taken place. #1 is Russia, #2 is the USA.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: mg
Date: 23 Feb 20 - 01:58 AM

our buses are transports for the homeless population, and quite often make up the majority of passengers. They are absolutely filthy and quite often seem drunk, even in the morning. There is probably drug use but I don't know. They carry huge filthy duffle bags. The seats are made of fabric, which is crazy for a public transport, because they can not be cleaned. I am sure that they probably carry hepatitis, TB, flu A&B which is hitting people hard where I am. There are bad outbreaks of cholera and bubonic plague and who knows what in homeless populations in california. I am not sure what should be done, other than housing them adequately, but it is a public health disaster waiting to happen. We are vulnerable to covid19 because we are basically a port city with ships going back and forth to korea and china. there is one exposure that we know of that occured when a woman came back from travel in china. The local hospital has stepped up precautions. I have a handicapped brother who works in a homeless shelter in Seattle. I think if something hits we will be treated outside. If you tie up a hospital with infectious patients..what if you have a heart attack. what if you are having a baby ..break an arm? It is nothing to ridicule frankly. I never said people were swamping UK hospitals..but they are affecting them and at least a couple of doctors got the virus from people who just walked in (I think.) As for getting information off the internet, CDC posts on the internet. This is nothing to sneer at. The financial repercussions will last a long time, if everything goes smoothly from now. People from a factory in Italy have gotten it; soldiers in Korea have gotten it. Churches, schools, etc. shut down. I can't understand people being snarky about this.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 23 Feb 20 - 02:50 AM

“I never said that people were swamping UK hospitals”

Read your previous post again - it’s exactly what you said!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: mg
Date: 23 Feb 20 - 03:13 AM

is this what i said or is there something else..it definitely does not mention swamping.

what is happening in clinics in england now is that people concerned about disease are walking into the clinics or emergency rooms and bogging down the clinics..staff have to be sent home, places have to be sanitized...it is a nightmare.

it is a serious problem. just saw a video of a medical person in england I think..don't think i can find it again..saying this exact same thing. don't go the hospitals. call and get instructions.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 23 Feb 20 - 03:43 AM

Rumour suggests 2% of patients with the corona virus would require intensive care. The UK has around 6000 intensive care beds, of which 30% are for children. It would only require 1/2% of the population to suffer from the virus to swamp the intensive care facilities. The great flu pandemic of 1918 is thought to have infected 25% of the UK population. If not contained the implications are profound.
The critical ingrdeients for most antibiotics are now made in India and China. Most of the world's face masks are made in China and Taiwan.

http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2020-02/12/c_138777213.htm

Perhaps going forward the subject of what constitutes "strategic supplies" may need to be revisited.

As an aside:(New York Post)
"China’s only Level 4 microbiology lab that is equipped to handle deadly coronaviruses, called the National Biosafety Laboratory, is part of the Wuhan Institute of Virology."
"The Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology recently released a new directive entitled: “Instructions on strengthening biosecurity management in microbiology labs that handle advanced viruses like the novel coronavirus.”

Does 2+2=5 in this case?
https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/nih-officials-discuss-novel-coronavirus-recently-emerged-china
A lot of jumping going on around the place. The fickle finger of fate or a helping hand?
With places like the Wuhan institute of virology, Fort Detrick and Porton Down can anyone be trusted?

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/how-the-british-government-subjected-thousands-of-people-to-chemical-and-biologic


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 23 Feb 20 - 03:49 AM

I heard someone at a shop saying they think they heard someone at church saying they think
they heard a man on a bus
say he thought he read on twitter that the virus came from the moon.. I think...


What "I think" does not matter if I thought wrong...!!!

..and everyone else with any sense
can see I didn't do any proper research or preparation
before committing my thoughts to a public forum post...

misinformation is best friends with panic...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 23 Feb 20 - 03:56 AM

Semantics. How is ‘bogging down’ different to ‘swamping’?

I live in the UK, of which the ‘England’ you keep referring to is one part of four. There’s no panic. People are not ‘bogging down’ A&E departments in hospitals.

Where are you getting your information from? Here Is the latest advice issued by the UK Government.

The only ‘panic’ I’ve become aware of is here on Mudcat, in certain near-hysterical rants.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: mg
Date: 23 Feb 20 - 04:04 AM

oh ffs you are too rude for me to deal with


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 23 Feb 20 - 04:08 AM

Hmmmmm. No answer then?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: mg
Date: 23 Feb 20 - 04:34 AM

my answer is that you are abusive and i will not continue any conversation with you as that is my policy about abusive people. if there is a way to not see your messages, and i doubt that there is, i will take advantage of it. do not pm me.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 23 Feb 20 - 04:57 AM

If you get ill and have to be treated in hospital you are not "clogging up," "swamping" or "bogging down" anything. That's what hospitals are there for. A decent government in a wealthy country such as ours should ensure that contingency plans are in place in case of major outbreaks of illness, and that includes spare capacity. Instead, we have a government that lets both the health service and care sector rot while it contemplates the next hundred billion vanity project. Of course, it's far easier to blame an innocent holidaymaker or a homeless bloke on a bus...

By the way, "rumour suggests ...." is classic weasel words which entirely destroys the validity of anything that follows.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 23 Feb 20 - 05:04 AM

mg, the only ‘abusive’ posts here are from you abusing me. You made an incorrect statement, I gave you facts, and asked a question - you responded with abuse (twice now). I don’t PM people to argue with them, I’m upfront and keep it on-thread.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 23 Feb 20 - 05:44 AM

Rumour suggests is by way of acknowledging that as yet no accurate data exists.
coronavirus case
78,880
view by country
Deaths:
2,466
Recovered:
23,335
Fatality rate 3.1%
I have deliberately understated mortality in order to avoid accusations of "weasel words" by the usual.
It is a fact of life that as the number of cases increase beyond a certain level the emergency services are swamped. Nominally 350,000 victims at any one time would fill all intensive care beds.
As the number of cases increase, the quality of care becomes compromised. Creating emergency beds is easy - to have them kitted out for intensive care is not. When the lungs need help beyond simple oxygen, you will find ventilators and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation equipment are in short supply. As a result, at the height of infectious cases the mortality tate could be expected to increase markedly.
That unfortiunately is a fact.
It is still too early to be precise about how lethal this infection is. The great flu pandemic was reckoned to be a 10% mortality of the 1/3 of world population who were infected.
If attempts to confine the virus fail the aftermath will be untidy.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Mr Red
Date: 23 Feb 20 - 06:09 AM

The great flu pandemic was reckoned to be a 10% mortality

If you are referring to Spanish 'flu - times were different, medical care was different. And attitudes were.

If attempts to confine the virus fail the aftermath will be untidy eg

I was told that in 1918 - returnees to NZ were anchored off-shore as a quarantine measure, only for Prime Minster Massey to take priority and ignore quarantine. NZ thought they had it sussed! Complacency & nobless oblige! He personally caused too many unnecessary deaths.

History has a habit of repeating itself, it has to, nobody is listening!

Just think, we haven't licked HIV yet, just learned to cope, badly.

But maybe, just maybe - scares like this will result in a reduction of air travel (for a while) and help with that other Sword of Damocles hanging over the human race.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 23 Feb 20 - 06:37 AM

There's a fairly substantial threat of a flu epidemic in any winter in this country. I expect my government to have plans in place for that eventuality, just as I expect it to provide funding to mend potholes and empty the bins. What I don't expect is the blame for overflowing hospitals to be laid on the shoulders of the elderly who have nowhere to go from hospital or people seen sneezing on buses. If we have money for superduper railway lines, we have money for the NHS.

In early 2013, before the Tories had had long enough to wreck the NHS, I was initially seen by a consultant and had my back operation all within three months. A couple of years before that, my wife had a series of operations on an eye. The 18-week time limit was faithfully adhered to, or bettered, every time. I know an elderly man who desperately needs a knee replacement (he's currently almost completely immobile). He was told last week that he can have his operation in 16 months' time. Early last week I made an appointment to see my GP about my painful shoulder. I still have another five weeks to wait for that appointment.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 23 Feb 20 - 06:44 AM

Mr Red. For both rhe Spanish flu and corona virus it would seem the lungs are compromised. Yes we have antibiotics for secondary infections but the fact remains that intensive care is required when oxygenation of the blood is inadaquate. That requires resources and personnel in limited supply. Should rates of infection spiral, those most at risk will invevitably be triaged, just like any disaster when resources are inadaquate for the job in hand. A pandemic would be a repetition of the Titanic. The lifeboats are there but the numbers inadquate.

There are many contingency plans but at the end of the day resources are limited, and the UK is reckoned to be better prepared than most.
http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/78988/E93006.pdf


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 23 Feb 20 - 07:18 AM

Steve, in 2006 I needed my gall-bladder removed and a pancreatic pseudo-cyst drained by open surgery. It too three weeks from my first consultation with the specialist who diagnosed the condition, to the operation being carried out. It now takes me four weeks to get to see my doctor or my diabetic nurse-practitioner.

There’s something wrong when this situation exists yet we can afford £100,000,000,000 for a high-speed railway line that hardly any of us will ever use.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 23 Feb 20 - 07:25 AM

As Steve briefly mentioned the suspicious nature of people can be an even greater threat than the challenges of a bad cold. Hating the homeless like zombies and placing the blame on them leads to a horror of self destruction.

Never forget a King or a pauper are equal in this in vulnerability and falsely blaming others.

There is a real immune response known to actual virologists and on the other hand there is the imagined behavioral response by fearful masses.

Panic, in this case, is the fight we wage against each other.

Do not Panic.
The oods of your survival are VASTLY in your favor.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Mossback
Date: 23 Feb 20 - 10:30 AM

Where are you getting your information from?

BWM, mg explained where she gets her "facts" from a few posts back - Twatter!

Now, on to that magic wand and those assential oils......


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 23 Feb 20 - 12:51 PM

I'm curious, and it might be of wider scientific interest..

How much of a factor is smoking & vaping
in death rates and survivor rates of the new potential pandemic...???

I doubt there was any meaningful research on this factor in 1918,
when even toddlers in their cribs smoked like chimbleys.....???


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 23 Feb 20 - 02:16 PM

Pfr

https://www.journalofinfection.com/article/S0163-4453(19)30254-3/fulltext

https://www.in.gov/isdh/tpc/files/Smoking_and_Flu_7_18_11.pdf

https://academic.oup.com/eurpub/article/28/1/150/4108100


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 23 Feb 20 - 02:40 PM

I'm cooking dinner, no time to read any of that yet..

So brief summary.. is now time for a sensible decision to stop or start smoking...???


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 23 Feb 20 - 06:48 PM

Don't bother, pfr. They are all links to meta-cod-science-tiny-samples shite. The sort of stuff that poor Iains THINKS is science (see any of his "geological" posts...) but wot is more like the "science" that Guido the Shitbag might espouse...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Jack Campin
Date: 23 Feb 20 - 07:11 PM

what is happening in clinics in england now is that people concerned about disease are walking into the clinics or emergency rooms and bogging down the clinics..staff have to be sent home, places have to be sanitized...it is a nightmare.

it is a serious problem. just saw a video of a medical person in england I think..don't think i can find it again..saying this exact same thing. don't go the hospitals. call and get instructions.


Where are you getting this deranged crap? Fox or QAnon?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 23 Feb 20 - 07:29 PM

Mad as a box o' frogs, Jack.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 24 Feb 20 - 01:47 AM

For the benefit of misinformed Americans, here is the latest information from the UK government. I prefer to take information from people who actually know what’s going on, rather than trust Twitter and YouTube.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 24 Feb 20 - 04:21 AM

Don't bother, pfr. They are all links to meta-cod-science-tiny-samples shite. The sort of stuff that poor Iains THINKS is science (see any of his "geological" posts...) but wot is more like the "science" that Guido the Shitbag might espouse...

A spiffing example of trolling.

I wonder if it will be deleted. But as it is posted by the hard left no doubt this post will be deleted instead.

I am sure the respected sources linked to would be delighted to know that an opinionated exteacher delares their content cod science.
The arrogance of the idiuot knows no bounds


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 24 Feb 20 - 07:05 AM

I have maintained WHO is not to be trusted in comparison to CDC usa.
There is a point it won't matter.

Investors are making bets in favor of the virus. The futures market is betting on a 800 point decline in the DOW.

For the wrong reasons, US Border Troops are sent to northern US cities.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 24 Feb 20 - 10:11 AM

Here is a superior link to new information .

https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/how-covid-19-is-spread-67143


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 24 Feb 20 - 11:49 AM

Covid can last 2 hours on a dry surface. Disinfectants can be found in your own area for a time. Even simple hydrogen peroxide is better than nothing. I do not favor one disinfectant over another so there is no link.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 24 Feb 20 - 06:02 PM

This was going to be Manchester United's year. Like in Italy, football games will be suspended.

Fox news fake blonde employee McCaughey was promoted to chairwoman of infectious disease by Trump and is telling people on FOX not to go to hospitals because that is where there is the most transmission.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 24 Feb 20 - 09:05 PM

Not until Liverpool get twelve more points in the bag they bloody won't.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 25 Feb 20 - 03:20 AM

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/wuhan-novel-coronavirus-information-for-the-public

and here is some meta cod science for mr shaw
https://www.jstor.org/stable/3108006?seq=1


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 25 Feb 20 - 06:19 AM

They call it the infodemic. Wlll this thread become infected?
Will people blame a labor party or US candidates.

Will stupidity take over. Its up to you.

It doesn't matter to the virus.

An ounce if prevention

is worth a pound

of cure


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Nigel Parsons
Date: 25 Feb 20 - 07:56 AM

I heard on the radio yesterday:
Members of PETA (people for the ethical treatment of animals) have pointed out that 'corona virus' is an anagram of 'carnivorous'.

Make of that what you will.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Mr Red
Date: 25 Feb 20 - 09:24 AM

necrotizing fasciitis?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 25 Feb 20 - 09:40 AM

"Make of that what you will."

Herbivorous veggie animals can get all smug and sanctimonious as they like about carnivorous predators,
until they become lunch...

PETA are also edible...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 25 Feb 20 - 10:06 AM

Shocking but funny. Broiled PETA with honey and ketchup sounds good for carnivores. Vegans may have an edge.

I hope we can laugh our way through this.
He who laughs last laughs best.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Jack Campin
Date: 25 Feb 20 - 10:28 AM

How private medicine could make the epidemic very much worse:

get tested and go bankrupt


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 25 Feb 20 - 02:23 PM

Whew. (deep breath) We can relax, Covid 19 is just a hoax to hurt Trump

It is just a common cold afterall, according to Rush Limbaugh.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/feb/25/rush-limbaugh-coronavirus-trump


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Stilly River Sage
Date: 25 Feb 20 - 05:15 PM

From The Atlantic:

You’re Likely to Get the Coronavirus

"Most cases are not life-threatening, which is also what makes the virus a historic challenge to contain."

Here's the first part of the article, in case you hit the paywall:

In May 1997, a 3-year-old boy developed what at first seemed like the common cold. When his symptoms—sore throat, fever, and cough—persisted for six days, he was taken to the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Hong Kong. There his cough worsened, and he began gasping for air. Despite intensive care, the boy died.

Puzzled by his rapid deterioration, doctors sent a sample of the boy’s sputum to China’s Department of Health. But the standard testing protocol couldn’t fully identify the virus that had caused the disease. The chief virologist decided to ship some of the sample to colleagues in other countries.

At the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, the boy’s sputum sat for a month, waiting for its turn in a slow process of antibody-matching analysis. The results eventually confirmed that this was a variant of influenza, the virus that has killed more people than any in history. But this type had never before been seen in humans. It was H5N1, or “avian flu,” discovered two decades prior, but known only to infect birds.

By then, it was August. Scientists sent distress signals around the world. The Chinese government swiftly killed 1.5 million chickens (over the protests of chicken farmers). Further cases were closely monitored and isolated. By the end of the year there were 18 known cases in humans. Six people died.

This was seen as a successful global response, and the virus was not seen again for years. In part, containment was possible because the disease was so severe: Those who got it became manifestly, extremely ill. H5N1 has a fatality rate of around 60 percent—if you get it, you’re likely to die. Yet since 2003, the virus has killed only 455 people. The much “milder” flu viruses, by contrast, kill fewer than 0.1 percent of people they infect, on average, but are responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths every year.

Severe illness caused by viruses such as H5N1 also means that infected people can be identified and isolated, or that they died quickly. They do not walk around feeling just a little under the weather, seeding the virus. The new coronavirus (known technically as SARS-CoV-2) that has been spreading around the world can cause a respiratory illness that can be severe. The disease (known as COVID-19) seems to have a fatality rate of less than 2 percent—exponentially lower than most outbreaks that make global news. The virus has raised alarm not despite that low fatality rate, but because of it.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 25 Feb 20 - 05:33 PM

Oustanding. a
choo   
Gesundhiet


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Joe Offer
Date: 25 Feb 20 - 10:16 PM

I was stationed in Berlin in 1972-73, and I've always wanted to go back and spend a significant amount of time there. I'd like to do it this May, but this coronavirus makes me worry. Should I take the risk and go to Berlin, or am I better off staying away from international flights right now?
-Joe-


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: mg
Date: 26 Feb 20 - 12:08 AM

i don't know. i just cancelled my ireland and spain trip. by may we will know more. i was planning to do a lot of train travel..trains have been stopped between austria and italy and not stopping at some stations. airplanes..i would take gloves and mask and wipe stuff down with clorox wipes. i am taking them on buses now and asking driver if i can wipe down some of the handles etc. told priest at church no more shaking hands. if i went some place i would stay in that place and not travel all over as i was planning to do..plus i was going to stay in hostels with all those backpackers. be prepared on flights with your own food and water and portable toilet.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 26 Feb 20 - 04:50 AM

I'm not that bothered about catching the thing (though I'd rather not) but we're hanging back on booking holidays for the time being. It isn't always clear under what circumstances you'll get your money back if you can't go/if the trip gets cancelled, or if there are some curtailments apropos of itineraries, etc. I can well live without protracted fiscal complications and wranglings...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Doug Chadwick
Date: 26 Feb 20 - 05:16 AM

I have a trip already booked and paid for and I won't be cancelling. Death is going to get me in the end - if I am going to die of something, I would rather it not be of boredom.

DC


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 26 Feb 20 - 05:24 AM

Your plans are your own. While taking precautions I would rather get sick at home. Odds are I get better and will not get a reinfection except for a mutation of Covid.

Today NIH and CDC officially announced that people should prepare for the virus now. The government basicly says everything is fine, thinking they are protecting the stock market.

To better understand where I am coming from, my Phd wife works for Dr. Fauci. So my early and continued concern has been vicarious at best.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 26 Feb 20 - 05:26 AM

It is still too soon to predict how this will all pan out. It will either be contained or not. From decades of frequent long distance flying I can vouch for the fact that aircraft and airports are guaranteed hot spots of infection.(even if it is just the common cold).I am sure it all accelerated when smoking on aircraft was banned. No need to change the air so much so saving fuel. Plus modern aircraft recirculate 50% of the air so infection is spread everywhere.
Plenty of links available from a general search of cabin air quality for the non believers to pursue.
For me flying is a no no until the epidemiology of this particular horseman is better understood and quantified.
Studies of TB transmissability on aircraft show a very low incidence but the data quality is not the greatest.(according to the Eurosurveillance journal) THe European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control quotes
"The transmission of influenza viruses, for example, is facilitated in closed/semi-closed settings through direct person-to-person contact or from contaminated surfaces. At the beginning of the influenza A(H1N1) pandemic in 2009, air travel was the cause of the introduction of this new virus into countries not primarily affected, and aeroplanes are likely to be a major vector when the next pandemic occurs. The outbreak of SARS in 2003, and influenza A(H1N1) in 2009, illustrated how infectious diseases can suddenly appear, spread and even threaten the health, economy and social lives of citizens in countries that are not or not yet directly affected by the epidemic itself." They issue a series of guidelines for specific threats.

I find it surprising that many studies just track passengers 5 rows either side of a carrier instead of everyone. What is the difference between recirulating air and circulating people? That 5 row cut off seems inexplicable to me. There seems little point in carrying out a survey if most of the passenger manifest is ignored. It skews the derived data set and makes it totally erroneus, and potentially seriously understates the risk.
But the WHO says there is lttle risk because in most aircraft The recirculated air is usually passed through high-efficiency particulate air filters, of the type used in hospital operating theatres and intensive care units, which trap dust particles, bacteria, fungi and viruses.
Once again who to believe? My belief is the WHO is massaging the feel good factor. I do not believe a word of it. Flying poses a risk that has yet to be quantified as far as airbourne pathogens are concerned.
The containment does not seem too successful thus far.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Jack Campin
Date: 26 Feb 20 - 06:47 AM

Something I read a few years ago: the rate of spread of flu pandemics was the same in the age of jet travel as it had been in the age of sail.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 26 Feb 20 - 06:55 AM

I think I'd prefer to cough rather than shit myself to death..

But both at the same time would be most unendurable...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 26 Feb 20 - 07:21 AM

Iains with all due respect you are full of crap

There are no questions about containment. There is none.
The only question is when


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 26 Feb 20 - 07:31 AM

"The only remaining question is when"
quote yesterday Dr. Fauci

Dr. Fauci


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 26 Feb 20 - 09:13 AM

There is an internal debate that fatality rates may be as low as 1% due to under reporting and an unreliable demoninator. :^/
Stock up if you can BEFORE the supply chains are effected.
It will be like camping. ;~)

See ya


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 26 Feb 20 - 09:42 AM

From RT so it must be false news
https://www.rt.com/news/481542-milan-zombie-apocalypse-coronavirus/

but
https://www.msn.com/en-ca/video/animals/supermarket-shelves-stripped-bare-as-coronavirus-fears-grip-milan/vp-BB10kd4x

WHO director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus told a briefing for diplomats in Geneva:

    Using the word pandemic carelessly has no tangible benefit, but it does have significant risk in terms of amplifying unnecessary and unjustified fear and stigma, and paralyzing systems. It may also signal that we can no longer contain the virus, which is not true. We are in a fight that can be won if we do the right things.

He obviously views the glass as being half full. Let us hope he is right.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Jack Campin
Date: 26 Feb 20 - 11:39 AM

Virus pandemic vs Brexit:

the patriotic virus mask


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 26 Feb 20 - 12:18 PM

The British home guard will be re-mobilised to turn back inflatables
transporting illegal immigrants to our beaches,
while volunteer coast guards sink and drown them in deeper waters...

"Criminal gangs don't care a fig about spreading virus infested refugee invaders,
cramped together in small vessels like filthy smelly sardines,
breathing their deadly foreign germs all over our sovereign Island"

said one patriotic volunteer holding a cricket bat and walky talky..

"We don't want them here.. ever.."...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 03:54 AM

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/feb/26/matt-hancock-clarifies-coronavirus-travel-advice-after-criticism


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8049005/Greta-Thunbergs-latest-rally-place-CHILDREN-risk.html

Lesson number one: Crowds are a wonderful medium for spreading infection, especially when attracting people countrywide.

Looks like some real joined up thinking.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 05:31 AM

Last night President Donald Trump made his Coruna Virus Natuinal announcemnt.

He made cringe worthy claims from the briefing room which has been locked and unused for 1 year. He Dumped the entire Covid 19 task force on Pense.

Trump claimed that Corona is just a flu much less dangerous than the flu. He said the death rate of the flu is many times greater than 3 and corona is lower than flu. He also said the stock market collapse on Monday morning was due to the Democrat Debate Tuesday night.

what a performance


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Mr Red
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 05:50 AM

There are no questions about containment. There is none.

Quite, but such attempts will slow down the spread, and distribute it over a longer time frame. Which gives the services more time to react, and reduces over-whelming of medical capacity.

Then summer will arrive - and that will reduce the spread (a little).

It looks like history has taught governments something. That is progress I guess. But they have a long way to go still................


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 06:16 AM

As a reasonably environmentally conscious lefty, ie not a Mail reader,
who doesn't live too far from Bristol;
I think going ahead with the Bristol Greta demo is sheer stupidity...

.. but then I'd also say exactly the say about money spinning corporate mass events
like football, other crowd pulling sports, and arena concerts,
at this point in time...

ALL risks to children...!!!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 06:25 AM

PFR I agree with you.It is akin to poking a bear with a stick. Why do it if there is no compulsion?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 06:43 AM

Iains - this may be a bit of a fatalistically 'out there' idea..
but maybe we all do need to be exposed to the virus eventually,
over organized co-ordinated stages planned for by region and time...

similar to childhood 'measles parties'...

It's a lottery which of us will survive, but it will get the threat out the way with,
and probably build up a greater level of mass immunisation
before a vaccinate is miraculously discovered
by profiteering pharma corporations...?????????????????????????????????

I emphasise..????????????????????????????????????????????????...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 06:49 AM

Once a person becomes infected, rabies is nearly always fatal without treatment. The number of deaths in the United States ranged from 30 to 50 per year in the 1940s but has since dropped to one to three deaths per year due to not poking infected animals with a stick.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Nigel Parsons
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 07:31 AM

pfr:
Could well be right. Once everyone has been exposed we will have the chance to build up a 'herd immunity'. Unfortunately, doing this quickly may overwhelm the healthcare system for a while, and increase the percentage for whom it proves fatal.
Perhaps this has already happened (to some extent) in China. The news was last night that the rate of new cases is rising more quickly outside of China. Perhaps they are reaching saturation.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 09:21 AM

https://www.independent.ie/world-news/coronavirus/dont-answer-the-door-strict-isolation-plan-to-contain-coro
"People with suspected symptoms of the new coronavirus should self-isolate at home, communicate with their family by phone and consider putting a sign on their front door to ward off visitors."

Here we go again!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plague_cross


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 10:58 AM

There are hundreds of thousands of case of flu every year. Flu is never a mild illness and kills about two victims in every hundred. Coronavirus is a mild illness in four people out of five. It kills about one victim in a hundred (far fewer, I suspect, because it's not unlikely that tens of thousands of people have got it/had it without knowing it). By all means close schools and cancel football matches in hotspots. Otherwise, give me one rational reason for the suggested panicky overreacting we are getting, even in this thread. Nice opportunistic swipe at money-spinnng events, etc. But you can bet your life that the real reason for the draconian actions of the Chinese regime is a lot more to do with ensuring that their money-spinning capitalist economy doesn't go into free all, and watch that space if the US gets a few more cases...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 11:14 AM

Flu 0.1 % fatal - not 2 not 5.1

The Iran official who was sick AS he tried to minimize the virus on TV is at home and does not have serious symptoms.

Hey, there are worse things like car accidents and gun violence and extremeism.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 11:17 AM

"Nice opportunistic swipe at money-spinnng events"

Steve - eh...???

I was having a sarcastic swipe at Mail writers/readers,
who are taking an opportunistic ideological swipe at Greta
and the positive progressive movement she represents...

It's obvious I was pointing at their hypocrisy about mass public events..



.. though of course, personally, I wouldn't care if football closed down forever...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 12:46 PM

Japan’s government closed all schools through March in an effort to combat the outbreak. Iran canceled Friday Prayers in major cities, a cornerstone ritual of the Islamic Republic. Saudi Arabia barred pilgrims from visiting Mecca and Medina. 50 countries have infections.

ONLY RUSSIA CLAIMS NO INFECTIONS!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 12:58 PM

Coronavirus is a mild illness in four people out of five. It kills about one victim in a hundred (far fewer, I suspect, because it's not unlikely that tens of thousands of people have got it/had it without knowing it).

The World Health Organization (WHO) had mentioned 2% as a mortality rate estimate in a press conference on Wednesday, January29 and again on February 10. However, on January 29 WHO specified that this is a very early and provisional estimate that may change.

and here is some more
cod science

If you want to make sweeping statements try learning how to link. Like below
https://smw.ch/article/doi/smw.2020.20203


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 01:04 PM

Sorry, I was screwing my eyes up trying to read the tiny print on my phone in Tesco car park in Truro when I typed that (and misinterpreted your post...) Mrs Steve arrived back at the car, stinking of some perfume she'd just tried on but not bought, so I had to post without a proper review... I spent the next hour and a quarter driving back to Bude swooning as a result of the overpowering whiff...nothing with any kind of scent ever touches my body...

No piercings either, and no tattoos, though I'm thinking of getting an asp tattooed on my back with its forked tongue just lapping the top of my bum crack...Opinions?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 01:11 PM

No matter how much Steve likes to change the subject...

Thank Goodness Prisons will not become breeding grounds.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 01:16 PM

If I want to change the subject I'll change the subject. Beats talking obscurantist shite in five posts in a row any day.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 01:20 PM

Talking about your own ass crack, at your weight, it is more of an ass canyon chasm.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 01:20 PM

Steve - no problems..

on the subject of "screwed eyes"..

Today walked past Boots Opticians, and noticed a big printed sign on the door.
The gist of it was..
if you've just got back from China, or a list of other regions
I couldn't be arsed reading,

"DON'T BOOK AN APPOINTMENT WITH US"...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 01:41 PM

CHINESE restaurants are empty, Casinos and Theme parks have plunged and container imports are down 30%.
The DOW is on the longest downturn since 2018.

On the bright side buying TESLA at a 30% discount looks good. :^/


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 02:04 PM

Got to see the funny side, aint’cha?

Yes, Nigel, I realise it’s a spoof website. It’s called ‘humour’.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Mossback
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 02:57 PM

Chill, USAsians! Trumpshit sez its all under control! And science-denier Pence will PRAY the bugs away.

Problem solved.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 03:02 PM

At the outset it was said "its not just the virus, its the reaction to it".

Nothing is more spooky than the pense power of prayer on the markets.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 03:35 PM

Oil down 12%, Microsoft down 14%, 10 year bonds all time low.
Equities up 127 % (scavenges defunct business')
Hedge Funds claim tommorrow Fri will be the ultimate market reaction.
Goldman says there will be no earnings this year.

14% of recovered Covid 19 victims test postive again. (ah oh)
rna virus are notorius for mutation but this may mean something else.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 03:59 PM

Stick to cod astrophysics.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 04:07 PM

But he has you licked on metaphysics.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 04:07 PM

As usual you just don't get it.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 04:15 PM

But you are going to get it and you won't like it.
Disruption will go to disaster.
You may not change but your world has.
Adapt or die.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Mrrzy
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 04:38 PM

Where is my post about the CDC and beards?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 04:57 PM

The one about the feared beard and moustache backlash?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 05:07 PM

Anyway, yanks. Sod human lives. The Dow has tanked. Be very afraid.


What a bloody stink.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: mg
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 06:08 PM

I suggest following ret general Russel l honore' on Twitter. Smartest guy around.wish he would accept presidency. None of candidates inspire any confidence in me.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Mossback
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 06:44 PM

Anyway, yanks. Sod human lives.

When have Trumpshit and the Trumpshitistas ever shown any con concern for human life?? This is a surprise??

Mary, please get help.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 07:58 PM

Thats his version of sarcasm Mossback.
At least he gets it a little bit. He will understand alot more when his grocery store goes empty.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: mg
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 09:21 PM

I would love to get help. Thank you rude one. I would divert it to my handicapped brother who works in a homeless shelter. Or my pregnant niece who works in the most likely hospital in seattle to get it. or my brother who is in charge of maintenance at a county jail.

Do you have anything further rude to say or are you going to escalate to abuse?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 09:56 PM

My 30 day warning and the unvarnished truth is all the help I can provide in this format. Read carefully and selectively and there really is some limited help here. I really am at the close nexus of discussions at the NAID NIH and HSS but distant from the CDC.
Knowledge is power, use it and prepare. My apologies to StillySage for not believing the cavalier unprotected nature of infected citizens brought to TX and CA.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 10:45 PM

additional facts/advice
Dr. Fauci has been silenced by Trump.
N-95 masks do work
HSS whistle blower has been reassigned/punished.
Nothern CA is in fact a hot spot.
I do not know about Seattle infections.
Replacing enough Covid 19 test kits that work is an existential threat
I am still assembling extra Augmentin, so should you to share.
Dispose of one use gloves outside with care.
Complicating matters is the rapidly shrinking supply chain which is already down 33%.
The veneer of civilization will wear thin, act sooner than later.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 27 Feb 20 - 11:14 PM

*The supply chain is being measured by the number of import shipping containers excluding cargo planes.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Helen
Date: 28 Feb 20 - 01:24 AM

It says a lot more about the intellectual and psychological capabilities of a person if he can only respond with abusive comments aimed at another person rather than stating reasoned and fact based responses on the subject being discussed.

Incapable, inadequate, and unable to hold his own in a reasonable, evidential discussion.

Is trollery becoming the new pandemic?

Or is it possible to just discuss the topic of the thread?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: mg
Date: 28 Feb 20 - 01:40 AM

I think of the video of the children in Iran struggling to breathe with no oxygen equipment and I think of the snearing comments here some have made. I am not referring to silly jokes..that is OK I guess. I mean trying to ridicule and shame people for wanting to be proactive even if it all blows away and we look foolish. I am fine with looking foolish. I am not fine with abuse, especially on such a serious matter..well all abuse is serious.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Mr Red
Date: 28 Feb 20 - 03:07 AM

.. though of course, personally, I wouldn't care if football closed down forever...

I may be with you on that page, but it is a drug for the UK masses. And what would politicians have to get behind? Pop musicians? Sound familiar?

But I ask, how ya gonna buy food without traveling to crowded shops?
Home delivery? "Just leave it on the doorstep, in the rain. Ta" In the UK invest in Ocado - it didn't take long jump on that bandwagon

And without buying 60 GBP's worth it all puts up the price. Which I predicted, but not via that particular vector. Life is complex, let's face it.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Iains
Date: 28 Feb 20 - 03:41 AM

An interesting read on how the UK government will likely respond, should escalation occur and a pandemic be declared.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/213717/dh_131040.pdf

The sections below in particular spell it out very clearly.
(probably not a good time to be a pensioner or have existing medical conditions - Rationing is brutal!)
6.32 - 6.34
7.26


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 28 Feb 20 - 04:51 AM

All I ask for is football and Prosecco. Naturally, Liverpool are fulfilling my dreams and footie must continue until the few more points they need to win the league are in the bag. Prosecco is a worry as it comes from the Veneto. But, thanks to Lidl's special offer last week, I now have a bottle for every barbecue I'm likely to have this summer...

I have more cheapo baked beans stockpiled than you could shake a stick at. Bring it on, you bloody virus...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 28 Feb 20 - 09:32 AM

I'm a smart prepper..
I must stockpile strategic emergency essentials now before the massed idiots start panic buying
and there's nothing left on the shop shelves for me...

Cartoon sound FX of scampering out of front door and then car screeching out off into the distance...


hmmmm....


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Jack Campin
Date: 28 Feb 20 - 09:35 AM

Augmentin is utterly useless against viruses.

Home delivery is likely to spread the disease even faster than shopping. Firms like Amazon will not pay their workers to stay at home if they get worrying symptoms. They'll have to come in to work no matter what. Coughing all over your parcels before they ship them out. A conscientious driver (with targets to meet) will then easily manage to get them to you while the virus is still viable.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Mrrzy
Date: 28 Feb 20 - 10:01 AM

It's that the masks don't work if there is facial hair, not that they work without it necessarily...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Doug Chadwick
Date: 28 Feb 20 - 11:15 AM

It's that the masks don't work if there is facial hair, ...

No argument there, then - it's pointless in me spending my money on masks. I'm not going to lose the beard.

DC


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 28 Feb 20 - 11:46 AM

This going to bugger new anti terror rules banning face covering masks in public...???


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 28 Feb 20 - 11:48 AM

Jack is right up to a point where bacterial pnumonia sets in after viral infection and is the actual cause of death. At best it helps heal, at worst Amoxicilin buys time. Any wide spectrum AB is worth a shot when indicated.

Actual preppers must feel a sense of great accomplishment, vindication and I told you so's. I have seen many of them over do it. I think sme if them suffer from obcessive compulsive disorder.

FOX is still blaming Dems and vice versa.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 28 Feb 20 - 12:02 PM

Tee shirt slogan - "I must rush to the shops and buy up everything now, before all the stupid panic buyers beat me to it...!!!."


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 28 Feb 20 - 12:06 PM

Lol


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Jack Campin
Date: 28 Feb 20 - 12:08 PM

Nobody this patriotic could ever be a terrorist, surely?...

the Geri Halliwell approach


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Donuel
Date: 28 Feb 20 - 12:14 PM

I was in Finance in my twenties (I left for ethical reasons and the firm went bust later) and my wife is a Phd senior health economist for the Federal Government.

America will not shut down like China and Japan. Only China can. Schools will not close before Summer. When more people are outside and not in rooms, the contagion will SLOW>
Cooler heads will prevail. The confusion and uncertainty here is due to leadership. As new rules become apparent the economy will settle. Much of yeterday's reaction was from 'automated' sell off triggers. When humans are back in charge things will improve. Lots of refinancing will happen for large corporations with debt.



Long term this will last over a year but corporations are in good shape. Money has no where else to go but here. The short term will be a challenge
but if you are moderately prepared you should only be inconvienenced. Shortages will only increase demands. If you are wealthy do not not buy the dips. Wait a month.
Travel and leisure will suffer more than food. Take a 20 year postion that seems good to you for your kids but don't risk it all.
   

Now the human toll: It will be spread out as to seem less severe than it may be in reality. Even 1919 fatality rates are doubled in estimations.
Mass hysteria seems like somthing out of your hands but your own confidence makes a differnce. We all know for whom the bell tolls and the sadness of grim times.
In short this is not Armeggedon unless an irrational leader sabotages our recovery - which is not impossible but unlikely.

If anyone Says they know the bottom or that this will disappear, they are liars.


btw the firm that went bust was Bear Stearns (BS) which is funny to me.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: Senoufou
Date: 28 Feb 20 - 01:23 PM

My poor sister had a cruise booked for early May around the Med. It was to be with one of her daughters, her daughter's friend and her mother.
They'd spent hours choosing/booking trips from the ship to Barcelona and various other interesting places, including in Italy.
Now of course, flights are threatening to cancel, and even the cruise looks as if it won't happen.
She's so disappointed, but in my view the travel firms are right.
Better to stay put until all this is a thing of the past, and travel picks up again. Feel sorry for her though!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: New rules for the coming pandemic
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 28 Feb 20 - 01:36 PM

2020 has got to be the wake up call for the airlines and international tourist travel industry..

The healthy eco friendly future for us Brits
has to be rediscovering grotty seaside caravan parks and holiday camps...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate


 


You must be a member to post in non-music threads. Join here.


You must be a member to post in non-music threads. Join here.



Mudcat time: 28 February 2:09 PM EST

[ Home ]

All original material is copyright © 1998 by the Mudcat Café Music Foundation, Inc. All photos, music, images, etc. are copyright © by their rightful owners. Every effort is taken to attribute appropriate copyright to images, content, music, etc. We are not a copyright resource.