Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Stilly River Sage Date: 02 Oct 24 - 05:29 PM Trump can run but he can't hide his past bad behavior, Jack Smith has seen to that and Judge Chutkan concurs. Even if the Trump folks manage to get some of today's information excluded, it is out there in the world. Special counsel Jack Smith provides fullest picture yet of his 2020 election case against Trump in new filing A federal judge in Washington, DC, has released the most comprehensive narrative to date of the 2020 election conspiracy case against Donald Trump, outlining what special counsel Jack Smith describes as the former president’s “private criminal conduct.” Here is the 165-page document if anyone wants to read it. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Stilly River Sage Date: 28 Sep 24 - 06:15 PM When I navigate to the site in the cologne link above my Fakespot browser extension pops up and cautions "Potential Seller Issues" and "Limited Internet Presence." Ha. Just limited because of this new site. Anyway, it seems to be a suitable warning for the site. Trump is entangled with christian nationalist activists who have supported his causes in several venues. In particular the Supreme Court. Here is a Mother Jones article by Rob Schenck, a former member of the group. My organization, Faith and Action in the Nation’s Capital, had created an initiative we called “Operation Higher Court” that trained wealthy couples as “stealth missionaries,” befriending Thomas and his wife, Ginni; Samuel and Martha-Ann Alito; and Antonin and Maureen Scalia—lavishing them with meals at high-end restaurants and invitations to luxurious vacation properties. Alongside these amenities, our ministry offered prayers, gift Bibles, and the assurance that millions of believers thanked God for the decisions this trio of justices rendered on abortion, health care, marriage, and gun ownership. . . . When President George W. Bush nominated Roberts for chief justice, I was in a private box seat at the Senate confirmation hearing. At Alito’s confirmation, I was the guest of Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah, the three-time Senate Judiciary Committee chair. And when Donald Trump chose Neil Gorsuch after Scalia’s death, not only was I present for the hearing, but a month before, I had coordinated prayers for Gorsuch and his family in a nearby chapel. On more than one occasion, I knelt in prayer alongside Mike Pence (when he was a member of Congress from Indiana) and other lawmakers in the vanguard of the new right. Sometimes it takes a while for all of the penny to drop for folks in these organizations. This is a long read, so far I've skimmed it but will go back to read closely this evening. From Schenk, "My change of course so late in life has been painful, disorienting, and costly." It took two years to extract myself. I dismantled the organization I had spent more than two decades building, walking away from a multimillion-dollar donor base. I called countless people to explain why I was leaving the movement I’d helped lead. I reached out to others to beg their pardon for the harm I had inflicted. I repented in prayer for my errors and the damage they caused. Then, I privately dedicated the rest of my life to doing as much repair as possible. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: MaJoC the Filk Date: 28 Sep 24 - 10:20 AM > the new Trump cologne Good grief: he's selling his bottled farts. "This too was a vanity, an a striving after wind" (Ecclesiastes) .... Does one buy that with a gag order? |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Lighter Date: 27 Sep 24 - 06:00 PM And have you tried the new Trump cologne? https://gettrumpsneakers.com/products/fight-fight-fight-cologne-for-men |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Stilly River Sage Date: 27 Sep 24 - 11:36 AM Someone should tell him that his family jewels are showing . . . CNN pretty well covers it in their headline Trump hawks $100,000 watches as he leverages his candidacy for profit |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: MaJoC the Filk Date: 27 Sep 24 - 11:15 AM > Trump watches Thought 1: Do they have Mickey-Mouse hands? Thought 1a: .... or just small ones? > Trump watches Thought 2: I sincerely hope he doesn't. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Lighter Date: 27 Sep 24 - 09:21 AM How about Trump watches? Collect 'em all! https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/news/2024/09/27/donald-trump-launches-collection-branded-watches/ |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part II From: Stilly River Sage Date: 26 Sep 24 - 12:00 PM Trump is still trying to find that golden ticket, the piece of merchandise that will make him rich. Donald Trump drops more campaign merch: A silver 'Trump Coin' priced at $100 Former president Donald Trump announced the sale of a $100 limited edition silver coin that has his 'beautiful face' on it. While the "God Bless the USA Bible" is fairly accessible, Trump's "Never Surrender" high-top sneakers have become difficult to find for the shoe's retail price of $399. To purchase the shoe, buyers would have to look on eBay and other online marketplaces. One eBay user listed a pair of Trump's sneakers for a buy-now price of $9,900. The good thing about that $9,900 pair of shoes on eBay? Chances are that is sold by a collector, to a desperate Trump fan. Trump won't see another penny from that pair of shoes. The bling is presumably marketed as a separate revenue stream for the Trump family while he uses political donations to pay his legal bills. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: MaJoC the Filk Date: 23 Sep 24 - 08:45 AM > " .... Both are new to the crypto[currency] industry." The trade term for them is "marks". Every poker table has at least one sucker sitting at it: if you can't see them, go look in a mirror. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: keberoxu Date: 18 Sep 24 - 06:56 PM My mistake, it looks more like late November. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: keberoxu Date: 18 Sep 24 - 06:39 PM Today is September 18 and before the postponements, this was to be a big day for one of the criminal cases. But because of the postponement, the big day is December something. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Stilly River Sage Date: 17 Sep 24 - 12:00 PM Trump may be engaging on this next criminal enterprise: Crypto currency. This article comes from Wall Street On Parade, a newsletter run by Wall Street watchdogs Russ and Pam Martens. As Trump Launches a Crypto Firm, FBI Reports Crypto Fraud Has Exploded to $5.6 Billion; Representing Almost 50 Percent of All Financial Fraud Last Thursday, the Senate Banking Committee held a hearing on combating financial frauds against consumers. During the hearing, Senator Jon Tester of Montana held up his mobile phone and said: “Everyday, everyday, I either get an email or a phone call from somebody who’s trying to screw me out of my money.” These transactions are instant and irrevocable. Just the kind of fraud that Trump loves. The FBI report breaks down the amount of financial fraud by age group, with the finding that people over 60 years of age are the number one target for crypto fraudsters. These seniors account for $1.6 billion of the $5.6 billion lost to crypto fraud in 2023, or 29 percent of the total. That said, here's a clue to their involvement: “A copy of an early internal report, known as a white paper and obtained by CoinDesk, listed Barron [Trump] as ‘Chief DeFi Visionary,’ Eric and Donald Jr. as ‘Web3 Ambassadors,’ and Trump Sr. as ‘Chief Crypto Advocate.’ Training his youngest to start the family grift businesses early. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Stilly River Sage Date: 15 Sep 24 - 11:56 AM The federal government. They have their hands full with enough other trials right now that probably nothing new will emerge, at least for the time being. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Dave the Gnome Date: 15 Sep 24 - 10:47 AM 'scuse my ignorance but if the judge ruled that they were not in the states remit, can he be tried elsewhere for those charges? |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Stilly River Sage Date: 12 Sep 24 - 08:07 PM The judge removed three counts that involved perjury or false statements that fall under federal jurisdiction. NBC News: The original 41-count indictment accused Trump and several of his allies of a broad scheme to overturn the results of the 2020 election in Georgia, but the case has been stalled for months as an effort to disqualify the top prosecutor remains on appeal. There's still plenty to try his fat ass on. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: keberoxu Date: 12 Sep 24 - 04:22 PM The Georgia case, regarding election interference, originally had 13 charges against Donald Trump. Several have been thrown out, but there are still 8 counts remaining (ABC News). |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: keberoxu Date: 07 Sep 24 - 11:49 AM I have no links, but there have been interesting comparisons in the news of the two judges in two different cases -- the hush-money case and the election-interference case -- and how very differently they are handling their schedules. One judge is erring on the side of caution by delaying the sentencing; the other judge is dismissive of the whole election situation. Not to mention the civil case about the sexual abuse/defamation which brought Trump into court in person this week. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Stilly River Sage Date: 05 Sep 24 - 12:55 PM In Deciding When to Sentence Trump, Judge Faces ‘Impossible’ Task Justice Juan M. Merchan has tried to treat Donald J. Trump like the hundreds of other defendants whose fates he has decided. But his decision could alter American history. This is a gift article from my NY Times account so you should all be able to read the whole thing. “The judge is in an impossible situation, and one that doesn’t lend itself to easy comparisons,” said Charles Geyh, a law professor at Indiana University Bloomington who specializes in judicial conduct and ethics, adding that Justice Merchan’s decision would carry “historical implications.” Tuning out the political noise will be a tough job when it is a full cacophony. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Stilly River Sage Date: 04 Sep 24 - 06:09 PM The news is reporting again about Judge Chutkan and that she has granted Trump one request - that he doesn't need to attend the new arraignment on election interference (fraud) charges (to be filed again by Jack Smith). Judge Chutkan Grants Donald Trump's First Request Since New Indictment To paraphrase the old saying, the US courts grind slowly (with so many obstacles thrown in the way by Trump) but they grind exceedingly fine. It's going to do more than just pinch when all is said and done. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Helen Date: 02 Sep 24 - 10:43 AM Yes, but then the ultimate torture would be watching the Secret Service guys eating burger and fries while he only gets to eat prison slop. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: MaJoC the Filk Date: 02 Sep 24 - 09:33 AM > a glass-fronted cell Be careful what you wish for, Helen. In Sam Coates's podcast (The Rest Is Politics) this morning, there was a horrible screaming match between two cats: the one that Sam's the staff for, and next door's ("his nemesis," said Sam). They were apparently nose-to-nose and giving it everything, in the sure and certain knowledge that the pane of glass between them meant that neither would have to actually follow through with claws. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Helen Date: 02 Sep 24 - 06:46 AM That thought crossed my mind too, MaJoC, but even better would be a glass-fronted cell like his hero, Hannibal Lecter. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: MaJoC the Filk Date: 02 Sep 24 - 05:50 AM Are they about to finally find a use for Gitmo Bay :-) ? |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Stilly River Sage Date: 01 Sep 24 - 11:37 AM We are into uncharted territory, since no other US presidents have been put on trial, let alone come this close to being imprisoned. Many argue that Dubya should have been sent to The Hague for war crimes for Iraq; he is at least guilty of following really bad advice from the hawks in his administration. But even there, he was in the realm of "normal human being." Trump in prison - they may need to restore and reopen some abandoned facility that is run jointly by the State (he was tried and convicted in New York) and the Secret Service. There's an interesting thought exercise! (Let's continue to keep this focussed on Trump. The Bush mention was for illustration purposes only.) |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Helen Date: 31 Aug 24 - 06:17 PM And I wonder what life is like for his security guards. Are they contemplating how their possible time in jail will be, accompanying a felonious Trump. I'm also wondering whether Trump is very busy in the background, attempting to squirrel away as many of his assets as he can to try to prevent too much in financial penalties. He must be thanking his (very strange) god for those campaign donations. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Stilly River Sage Date: 31 Aug 24 - 04:05 PM More about that development from The Hill The court, in its notice, claimed the filing was “deficient,” according to the docket. It has been sent back to the attorneys because they failed to attach written permission from the court or prosecutors, per the note to his attorney Emil Bove. So it looks like they may refile after the holiday with the correct attachments and the right size PDFs. Trump is still trying to get the hush money case set aside claiming there are official "presidential acts" that were shown to the jury. The "Court's leave has not been granted" is an interesting phrase. Meanwhile, I wonder what life is like for Trump's parole officer? |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: keberoxu Date: 31 Aug 24 - 11:00 AM The Trump team request for a delay to the September 18th sentencing has been rejected, mostly on technicalities (Newsweek). Of course there is going to be an appeal and all, but I hope they get the sentencing overwith already. it's been long enough. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Helen Date: 28 Aug 24 - 04:33 PM Thanks for that explanation, Stilly. I have read a few reports and seen a couple on TV and it was a bit confusing. Trump's reliance on his literal "get out of jail free" card from the Supreme Court is hopefully on shaky ground. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Stilly River Sage Date: 28 Aug 24 - 12:04 PM Special Prosecutor Jack Smith isn't backing down after the Supreme Court gave Trump vast power to evade prosecution. The original Jan. 6 indictment that was stalled while a question went to the Supreme Court was 45 pages; the new one, that was run past a new grand jury, is 36 pages. It pares down the accusations and removes the bit from Trump tangling with the Justice Department over a lot of the Jeffrey Clark stuff. Instead of calling him President Trump it refers to him in his role as Candidate Trump to distinguish that what he was doing on Jan. 6 wasn't presidential. This document is called a superseding indictment. Trump indicted again in election subversion case brought by Jack Smith The 36-page indictment, secured Tuesday by the special counsel, is an attempt to recalibrate the case after the Supreme Court’s immunity decision. Both sides face a Friday deadline to propose next steps to U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, the Biden appointee who is overseeing the proceedings in the trial court. Chutkan has scheduled a Sept. 5 hearing to set a course for the case. Trump thinks he got a "get out of jail free" card from the Supreme Court - and it's close to that, but he has committed so many crimes that this current indictment was still possible. The new indictment seeks to rely on a distinction the Supreme Court drew between a president’s private actions (which can be the subject of criminal charges) and actions that stem from a president’s official powers (which now carry a large degree of immunity). |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Stilly River Sage Date: 19 Aug 24 - 12:59 PM The Manhattan DA is deferring to Judge Merchan if he wants to go ahead with September sentencing or postpone till after the election. At Trump's request, of course. It's time Trump faced the music, let's hope Merchan goes forward and sentences him to prison time. No one deserves it more than the Donald. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Stilly River Sage Date: 15 Aug 24 - 12:05 PM The Georgia case has several well-deserved convictions already but hit a wall with the Supreme Court decision that presidential "official acts" couldn't be used as evidence in cases. Willis didn't help herself in being involved with a coworker, though that was settled and set aside. Clearinghouse: Georgia Election Interference Case The E. Jean Carroll case appeal should be happening soon. E. Jean Carroll seeks to expedite Trump’s appeal of verdict from first defamation civil trial Lawyers for E. Jean Carroll have asked a federal appeals court to expedite Donald Trump’s appeal of the verdict in their first trial in which a jury awarded Carroll $5 million in damages after finding Trump liable for defamation and battery in May 2023. Carroll's attorneys asked for July but it looks like the hearing is on Sept. 6. In a meeting that gives just 10 minutes per side to speak I don't know if this is to arrange a bigger hearing or if this is the whole thing, in a nutshell. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Stilly River Sage Date: 09 Aug 24 - 09:39 PM Here's the Just Security Clearinghouse to keep track, if you've exceeded your freed Forbes articles this month. That Forbes article gives some interesting information; the Clearinghouse has a lot more court appointments that Trump has to keep track of. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: keberoxu Date: 09 Aug 24 - 08:17 PM IF I can make the following link work, it is a Forbes article with a timeline on the Trump legal cases. Trump's Legal Cases |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Stilly River Sage Date: 09 Aug 24 - 08:16 PM Trump is struggling - but has agreed to a debate on Sept. 10. Shortly after that his sentence will be pronounced. I'm really really really hoping the judge gives him real time to serve. It would serve him right. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Stilly River Sage Date: 06 Aug 24 - 11:31 PM One of Trump's former attorneys, Jenna Ellis, who was changed in Georgia and pled guilty, is now agreeing to cooperate in the Arizona case against fake electors. Ex-Trump attorney Jenna Ellis agrees to cooperate in Arizona 'fake elector' case The state is dropping the charges against Ellis in exchange for her cooperation. Trump wasn't charged in this case, but it is more of the body of evidence against his co-conspirators that will also work against him (as life gets worse for those folks more of them are liable to testify against Trump). |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Stilly River Sage Date: 25 Jul 24 - 04:50 PM Trump demanded that the NY hush money case (in which he was found guilty) be set aside. This after the supreme court gave him a lot of cover for future crimes he might commit should he become dictator. From Raw Story: DA Alvin Bragg responds to Trump's demand to kill verdict in hush money case Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg issued a response Thursday to Donald Trump's attempt to dismiss the ruling in the Stormy Daniels hush money case. The rest of the story is at the link. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Stilly River Sage Date: 21 Jul 24 - 11:05 PM The Stormy Daniels GoFundMe account pushed up the goal and hasn't met it yet - I think pushing it up was a mistake, but perhaps the change in the landscape as far as Harris now at the top of the ticket may cause people to want to put the Stormy Daniels issues to bed. They reached the $1M goal, but then changed it to $1.25M. It's at $1,077,508 right now. Trump is now the oldest candidate ever, and after making a huge case against Biden's age, not only is Trump old, he's an indicted and convicted criminal. He chose a VP candidate with few qualifications based upon conditions that no longer exist. Trump's a rambling idiot, terribly flawed, and the discussion has come up about the GOP trying to push him out of the race. Not likely - Trump is in it for himself, not for the country or his party. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Stilly River Sage Date: 20 Jul 24 - 10:50 AM For a summing up of what happened: Judge dismisses Trump documents case over special counsel appointment from NPR. Some followup: Jack Smith's Three Options After Aileen Cannon Dismisses Case from Newsweek A number of legal experts have laid out how Smith or the Department of Justice (DOJ) could still seek to prosecute Trump over allegations that he illegally retained classified materials after he left office in January 2021, then obstructed the federal attempt to retrieve them. The rest is at the link. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Stilly River Sage Date: 15 Jul 24 - 11:34 AM The recent supreme court decision that gave Trump carte blanche gift to commit crimes as official acts, should he find his way back to the White House, had some extra stocking stuffers. Clarence Thomas answered a question that no one asked - he set up a "road map" for the Florida federal judge to dismiss the stolen documents at Mara Lago case, and she did just that this morning. The premise is that the special counsel wasn't appointed in a legal way (regardless of the fact that special counsels were set up the same way going back many presidential administrations, including Trump and the Mueller case. So, that can be appealed and it can be refiled by a different justice department prosecutor. But that trial won't happen before the election. The case in Washington, D.C., is likely to be returned to Judge Chutkan on Friday this week, and she'll have to look at the decision and decide which of his acts have immunity and which can go forward with criminal charges. Judge Chutkan's Trump Delay Offers Possibility of 'Other Movement'—Attorney The article quotes Joyce Vance, a former federal prosecutor: "This coming Friday, by my count, Judge Chutkan's jurisdiction over the Special Counsel's election interference case will resume when the judgment is returned to her from the Supreme Court," she wrote. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Stilly River Sage Date: 05 Jul 24 - 11:22 AM This morning she is up to $912,000 toward the $1M goal. Getting her out from under Trump's thumb will be a welcome move. It seems there is always new material to mine when Trump's folks get their comeuppance. Lincoln Project apparently posted a jab at Bannon in prison, one of those "don't drop the soap" references, that has prison rights activists complaining. I don't get the impression that Danbury minimum security prison (this is the "high profile" prison for rich folks) has gangs. It's the punchline when talking about prison for rich folks (does it have a golf course?) Trump can go there. I don't care. Just put him in prison. Except that's federal, and he would more likely end up at Rikers, next to his former COO. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Stilly River Sage Date: 03 Jul 24 - 04:44 PM As of this afternoon, $708,000 to help Ms. Daniels. This is in 18 hours since Maddow's interview; I hope pundits are reading something into this. It's a damned shame the bulk of the money raised has to go to Trump for those legal fees. As she said last night, it isn't fair, when he set all of this in motion. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Stilly River Sage Date: 03 Jul 24 - 11:32 AM Rachel Maddow did a long-form interview with Stormy Daniels last night. There was quite an "ick" factor, because they read through the transcripts of things that didn't go out over the air during the trial. She was not happy about the events in that hotel room. During the program, Rachel noted that Daniels has financial problems because a decision that worked against her meant she had to pay Trump's legal fees (back in ~ 2018). It was the same kind of thing as in the E. Jean trial, but worked against Daniels. At any rate, a friend of hers set up a GoFundMe account to cover her legal bills and last night when I looked in it was at $30,000. Now it is up to $624,000. I made an anonymous donation (who wants their name on a list Trump Trolls can mine?) Part of Daniels problem is from refusing to fill out information on a form that would have included her 13-year-old daughter's name and address. Daniels herself was doxxed (a form was put up during the trial, and she pointed out to the judge that it had her address. She had to say it twice.) A sidebar resulted in the form being taken off of the screen and not entered into the record, but all of the attorneys and court officers could see that address before the form was taken down. Her home address was put online during that hearing. She wasn't paid or compensated for her time and travel during the trail (to which she was subpoenaed.) Andrew Weissman yesterday pointed out that the sentencing date pushed to September is not a bad thing - it puts it right in front of the election "when people are starting to pay attention." (Hard to imagine that anyone isn't riveted to this news now, but whatever). And if Trump wants to appeal the conviction and sentence, the deciding body for any complaints is the New York Supreme Court, not the US one. That could come later, but way after the election. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Helen Date: 02 Jul 24 - 10:50 PM Rudy Giuliani disbarred in New York as court finds he repeatedly lied about Trump's 2020 election loss "In short: "Rudy Giuliani, the former New York City mayor, federal prosecutor and legal adviser to Donald Trump, was disbarred in New York after a court found he repeatedly made false statements about Trump's 2020 election loss. "Mr Giuliani actively contributed to the fallout following the 2020 presidential election, the court said. What's next? "He is facing criminal charges in Georgia and Arizona over his role in the effort to overturn the 2020 election." |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Helen Date: 02 Jul 24 - 03:51 PM News just in: Donald Trump's sentencing delayed after US Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity "A New York judge has delayed Donald Trump's sentencing for criminal conduct until September at the earliest, after the former US president asked for a chance to argue he should have been immune from prosecution. "The former president's sentencing, for falsifying business records to disguise hush money paid to porn star Stormy Daniels, had been set for July 11. "But it faces potential complications after the US Supreme Court ruled on Monday, local time, that ex-presidents have some immunity from criminal prosecution in some circumstances. "The postponement delays the sentencing until at least September 18, well after this month's Republican National Convention, where Mr Trump is set formally to accept the party’s nomination for president in this year's race." |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Backwoodsman Date: 02 Jul 24 - 10:43 AM The Supreme Court should be apolitical, not a tool of the political parties. And this latest piece of BS is proof absolute. Judges should not be appointed by Presidents, nor on the basis of their political leanings. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Stilly River Sage Date: 02 Jul 24 - 09:25 AM The way it was written, the Supreme Court would have to decide in the end, in any given case, what is "official" versus "unofficial." They could give no examples of these things during the reading of the decision. So something they let Donald get away with they wouldn't let Biden get away with. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Backwoodsman Date: 02 Jul 24 - 08:08 AM Well I’m glad it’s not just me who’s jaw-dropped, Dave. I just don’t ‘get it’ how the judges can make this stuff up on the hoof - isn’t Congress the legislature of the US? Shouldn’t a change in the law require an Act of Congress? |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: MaJoC the Filk Date: 02 Jul 24 - 08:04 AM Points of order: * Is the ruling in question retroactive? * There's been much discussion on the wireless this morning. It's been suggested that said ruling seems to be so tightly fitted to Don the Con's circumstances that it couldn't be used in other cases. Adjudication, please. |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Dave the Gnome Date: 02 Jul 24 - 07:29 AM Have I got this right - The supreme court have ruled that the president of the USA is immune from proscecution for "official acts"? Heaven help us all and protect ups from the American "justice" system... |
Subject: RE: Trump CONVICTED - NO new Trump threads part III From: Stilly River Sage Date: 01 Jul 24 - 10:45 PM I've heard about it. Perhaps it is time to look it up. Trump's lawyers announced today they are going to ask the judge in his payments to Stormy Daniels trial to set aside the verdict, based upon the Supreme Court ruling today. But what he did was totally a private act, a non-official act, and the State of New York found him guilty. The lawyers didn't turn in their recommendations for his punishment that were due today (the prosecutors, the parole department, and the defense all get to give an opinion to the judge). So who knows what will happen next week. Stay tuned. |
Share Thread: |