Lyrics & Knowledge Personal Pages Record Shop Auction Links Radio & Media Kids Membership Help
The Mudcat Cafesj

Post to this Thread - Printer Friendly - Home
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]


BS: Language Pet Peeves part II

MaJoC the Filk 11 Aug 24 - 08:09 AM
Thompson 11 Aug 24 - 06:43 AM
Doug Chadwick 10 Aug 24 - 04:49 PM
Rain Dog 10 Aug 24 - 12:07 PM
leeneia 08 Aug 24 - 12:21 AM
mayomick 04 Aug 24 - 06:07 AM
Doug Chadwick 25 May 24 - 04:02 AM
MaJoC the Filk 25 May 24 - 02:46 AM
Joe_F 24 May 24 - 10:23 PM
Joe_F 24 May 24 - 10:14 PM
meself 24 May 24 - 02:26 PM
Mrrzy 04 Apr 24 - 08:30 PM
Lighter 04 Apr 24 - 02:01 PM
meself 04 Apr 24 - 11:20 AM
Mrrzy 02 Apr 24 - 04:05 PM
leeneia 01 Apr 24 - 09:09 PM
Mrrzy 01 Apr 24 - 10:59 AM
Backwoodsman 28 Mar 24 - 10:57 AM
MaJoC the Filk 28 Mar 24 - 10:42 AM
Mrrzy 28 Mar 24 - 10:37 AM
Lighter 27 Mar 24 - 07:50 AM
Doug Chadwick 27 Mar 24 - 07:24 AM
Backwoodsman 27 Mar 24 - 07:11 AM
Doug Chadwick 27 Mar 24 - 05:56 AM
Backwoodsman 27 Mar 24 - 05:36 AM
Thompson 27 Mar 24 - 04:53 AM
Mrrzy 25 Mar 24 - 03:33 PM
Lighter 22 Mar 24 - 05:33 PM
Lighter 22 Mar 24 - 05:05 PM
Manitas_at_home 22 Mar 24 - 04:30 PM
Lighter 22 Mar 24 - 03:49 PM
gillymor 22 Mar 24 - 02:38 PM
meself 22 Mar 24 - 01:27 PM
Lighter 22 Mar 24 - 08:10 AM
Donuel 22 Mar 24 - 06:30 AM
Mrrzy 21 Mar 24 - 10:44 AM
MaJoC the Filk 11 Mar 24 - 09:33 AM
Doug Chadwick 10 Mar 24 - 01:17 PM
MaJoC the Filk 10 Mar 24 - 09:49 AM
MaJoC the Filk 10 Mar 24 - 06:53 AM
Thompson 09 Mar 24 - 04:20 AM
Lighter 01 Mar 24 - 09:59 AM
Mrrzy 01 Mar 24 - 08:28 AM
Mrrzy 29 Feb 24 - 09:55 AM
meself 25 Feb 24 - 09:46 PM
Tattie Bogle 25 Feb 24 - 06:52 PM
Mrrzy 25 Feb 24 - 02:04 AM
Thompson 24 Feb 24 - 03:07 PM
Lighter 24 Feb 24 - 03:06 PM
Mrrzy 24 Feb 24 - 03:05 PM

Share Thread
more
Lyrics & Knowledge Search [Advanced]
DT  Forum Child
Sort (Forum) by:relevance date
DT Lyrics:













Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: MaJoC the Filk
Date: 11 Aug 24 - 08:09 AM

Humans are not naturally good at computing risks. There seems to be a sliding scale involved:

* Will not happen
* Cannot eliminate the possibility that this will happen
* Might happen
* Could happen
* May happen
* Is likely to happen
* Cannot eliminate the possibility that this will *not* happen
* Will happen

That's why people tend to be scared of flying, but will happily take the greater risk of driving to the airport.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Thompson
Date: 11 Aug 24 - 06:43 AM

A perfect example of the misuse of the word "may" when "might" is correct: Washington Post headline says

Heat killed a sanitation worker. Pending safety rules may have saved him.

Oh? The man died, but then he was saved?
Nope. When you read the story he died. He wasn't saved. The headline should read "Heat killed a sanitation worker. Pending safety rules might have saved him"


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Doug Chadwick
Date: 10 Aug 24 - 04:49 PM

It's not common enough for me to have heard it before. I can think of more common alternatives.

DC


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Rain Dog
Date: 10 Aug 24 - 12:07 PM

I had not come across the term 'gagging away' before. I read it today in The Guardian, writing about the USA mens 4 x 100m relay team.

"Even without Noah Lyles, who was out of the lineup due to Covid, the US entered the race as favorites. But over the past 20 years, they’ve had a knack for gagging away Olympic opportunities. The last time they captured a medal was in 2012, but that was later stripped for a doping violation."

A quick google revealed a few uses of the term, the earliest back in 2003. It does not appear that common.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: leeneia
Date: 08 Aug 24 - 12:21 AM

I got interested in Chinese porcelain, and I was reading about cobalt, (actually cobalt compounds) which is what provides the blue paint in blue and white porcelain.

Much cobalt on the market today is mined in unregulated mines in Africa, where conditions are dreadful and thousands of children are put to work.

The language problem is that this cobalt is described as "artisanal." Talk about a weasel word!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: mayomick
Date: 04 Aug 24 - 06:07 AM

"it's all starting to kick off"


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Doug Chadwick
Date: 25 May 24 - 04:02 AM

..... I will not use "stomach" to mean belly, which (IIRC) Fowler condemned as genteelism.

The alternative is "abdomen".

DC


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: MaJoC the Filk
Date: 25 May 24 - 02:46 AM

I used to think "solar plexus" was a euphemism for the victim's, er, naughty bits.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Joe_F
Date: 24 May 24 - 10:23 PM

It is far too late to protest, but I will not use "stomach" to mean belly, which (IIRC) Fowler condemned as genteelism. When I was in high school, I had a teacher who, when he was in high school, had a teacher who said "The stomach is an internal organ. You can no more lie on your stomach than you can lie on your liver".


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Joe_F
Date: 24 May 24 - 10:14 PM

I somewhere, somehow acquired the notion that "fuzz" for the police arose as a sarcastic diminutive for "whiskers" and alluded to "Mr Whiskers," slang for Uncle Sam. Unlikelier things have turned out to be true.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: meself
Date: 24 May 24 - 02:26 PM

"Visible rocks and sandbars can be seen in the river .... "


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Mrrzy
Date: 04 Apr 24 - 08:30 PM

What about the stupidity of the American people?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Lighter
Date: 04 Apr 24 - 02:01 PM

Compare G. W. Bush's "misunderestimate."


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: meself
Date: 04 Apr 24 - 11:20 AM

Heard on local radio this morning: "It is almost impossible to understate his contribution to the world of comedy" ......


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Mrrzy
Date: 02 Apr 24 - 04:05 PM

I looked it up. A raid is "sudden" so no, it can't last weeks.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: leeneia
Date: 01 Apr 24 - 09:09 PM

"ax" (for ask) has become a part of the language for African-Americans, nothing to do with laziness.

Nah, I have heard white people from the south say ax. One of them was my own sister-in-law.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Mrrzy
Date: 01 Apr 24 - 10:59 AM

I keep reading about that hospital destroyed "after a 2-week raid" - isn't a raid a quick action? Somehow, if it lasted weeks, it wasn't a raid, to me. Attack, onslaught, not siege which lasts but you aren't in the place you are besieging, so, what? I don't think raid is the mot juste, here.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 28 Mar 24 - 10:57 AM

Heard about "Travel Reshtrictions" this morning from the BBC Radio 2 Traffic Nincompoop. WTAF?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: MaJoC the Filk
Date: 28 Mar 24 - 10:42 AM

> a book called How to be Top

There was a similar fashion for using "rules OK" in headlines (usually in the Sun iirc), which only died the death once some comedian or other pushed out "Dyslexia lures KO". They'd never get away with that death-stroke these days.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Mrrzy
Date: 28 Mar 24 - 10:37 AM

I haven't noticed Sht for St, but in Ireland I heard Chewsday, which comes after Monday, Chune, which you sing, and Jew, which forms droplets on grass in the early morning...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Lighter
Date: 27 Mar 24 - 07:50 AM

When I was in Edinburgh a dozen years ago, I heard it a lot.

Listen closely to "Dr. No," etc., and you'll hear Sean Connery saying it regularly.

In my experience, it isn't as, er, "pronounced" as strongly as the letters "sh" might suggest.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Doug Chadwick
Date: 27 Mar 24 - 07:24 AM

If I listen to the radio at all, which I rarely do, then it's generally Radio 4. There is far more in the 'cheery' chat in between the music, on Radio 2, to annoy me, than the way they pronounce "st"/"sht".

DC


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 27 Mar 24 - 07:11 AM

You need to listen to BBC Radio 2 Doug. They’re all doing it on there, and it’s spilling over to BBC TV Channels too.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Doug Chadwick
Date: 27 Mar 24 - 05:56 AM

pronouncing 'st' as 'sht'

Sean Connery was the first one I noticed doing
it. Other than him, I can't say that I've noticed it much.

DC


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Backwoodsman
Date: 27 Mar 24 - 05:36 AM

Talking of fashions in language (and my gripe is about pronunciation rather than actual vocabulary), am I the only one of our UK-contingent who has noticed the current fashion for pronouncing 'st' as 'sht' - so 'student' becomes 'shtudent', or 'street' becomes 'shtreet'? I've recently heard 'superstore' pronounced 'supershtore', amongst many annoying others.

It seems to be a BBC-driven phenomenon - the first offender I noticed indulging in this verbal mangling was that Richie character who presents the traffic bulletins (he also pronounces 'bus' as 'buzz' but, having worked with a guy from Dudley for a number of years, I'm used to that one). Unfortunately, 'sht' seems to have become the widely accepted pronunciation and I'm probably just a moaning old wrinkly, but it really boils my piss!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Thompson
Date: 27 Mar 24 - 04:53 AM

Has anyone brought up* the overuse of the term "key"? I can see why newspapers use it instead of "vital" in headlines (shortage-of-ink error), but I find use of it in speech to be unforgivably jarring, especially when overuse makes it a stand-in for "important", "noteworthy" or "interesting". There's so many "key" issues these days that there's no room in the door for anything else but locks.

"Key" is the 2024 equivalent of the 1960s "top" - everyone was a top scientist, a top politician, etc - until some comedian brought out a book called How to be Top, when it gradually faded away.

Words as analogies have these fashions. A few years ago "relish" was the trend, and it really annoyed me.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Mrrzy
Date: 25 Mar 24 - 03:33 PM

I shall uae the term crash blossom going forward.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Lighter
Date: 22 Mar 24 - 05:33 PM

"Trump frustrated as bond deadline nears and key bacteria identified in colon cancer cases."

There's now a name for these syntactically ambiguous sentences. They're called "crash blossoms."

Why? According to Merriam-Webster:

"While crash blossoms themselves are as old as newspapers, the term dates back to 2009, when editor Mike O'Connell saw an ambiguous headline that appeared in the newspaper Japan Today— 'Violinist Linked to JAL Crash Blossoms' —and wondered in the Testy Copy Editors forum, 'What's a crash blossom?'"


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Lighter
Date: 22 Mar 24 - 05:05 PM

Interesting to read that "aks" was "down to 1600 the regular literary form."

So according to those of a mightily prescriptive bent, "aks" should be correct, and "ask" is an illiterate variant.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Manitas_at_home
Date: 22 Mar 24 - 04:30 PM

AKS.
https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/12074/why-is-ask-sometimes-pronounced-aks


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Lighter
Date: 22 Mar 24 - 03:49 PM

Interestingly, Oxford offers no examples, ever, of "ask" being used for "ax."


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: gillymor
Date: 22 Mar 24 - 02:38 PM

In the U.S. "ax" (for ask) has become a part of the language for African-Americans, nothing to do with laziness.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: meself
Date: 22 Mar 24 - 01:27 PM

"Lazy American mouths" continue pronunciations that were in use long before English-speakers came to 'America'. What the heck is wrong with them?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Lighter
Date: 22 Mar 24 - 08:10 AM

There are three sounds in both "ask" and "ax."

So it isn't laziness. It's a reversal of the order of the sounds. This is called "metathesis."

Oxford shows similar forms in use since Old English (before 900 AD). Here's a good example from the Coverdale Bible of 1535:

"Axe and it shall be given you."

(The first published English translation of the Old and New Testaments, predecessor of King James Version.)


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Donuel
Date: 22 Mar 24 - 06:30 AM

Lazy American mouths say Ax instead of ask.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Mrrzy
Date: 21 Mar 24 - 10:44 AM

NBC headline
Trump frustrated as bond deadline nears and key bacteria identified in colon cancer cases: Morning Rundown

I just bet he cares deeply about bacteria


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: MaJoC the Filk
Date: 11 Mar 24 - 09:33 AM

Thanks for the disambiguation, Doug: I bow to your superior knowledge.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Doug Chadwick
Date: 10 Mar 24 - 01:17 PM

someone being "detained", then "arrested". I'll check, but be formally arrested, methinks there needs to be one or more specific charges, and the defendant must then go before the Beak. One can instead (or first) be detained, which (like being chucked in the cooler after an excessively good celebration) need not necessarily lead to a charge.

My understanding of the situation in the UK is that there are three circumstances where someone can be detained before arrest: stop and search; to prevent an imminent breach of the peace; search of property. Otherwise, at formal arrest must be made and the arrested person advised of their legal rights. They may then be detained without charge for a limited period, normally 24 hours, although exceptionally, this may be extended to 36 hours by the station Superintendent, or 72 hours under a magistrate's warrant. The decision to charge rests with the Crown Prosecution Service.


DC


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: MaJoC the Filk
Date: 10 Mar 24 - 09:49 AM

> someone was arrested "after" a drug bust

Bingo! this just seen on the the Beeb's Red Button: someone being "detained", then "arrested". I'll check, but to be formally arrested, methinks there needs to be one or more specific charges, and the defendant must then go before the Beak. One can instead (or first) be detained, which (like being chucked in the cooler after an excessively good celebration) need not necessarily lead to a charge.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: MaJoC the Filk
Date: 10 Mar 24 - 06:53 AM

Has anyone brought up* the overuse of the term "key"? I can see why newspapers use it instead of "vital" in headlines (shortage-of-ink error), but I find use of it in speech to be unforgivably jarring, especially when overuse makes it a stand-in for "important", "noteworthy" or "interesting". There's so many "key" issues these days that there's no room in the door for anything else but locks.

* I use the term most carefully. Sound effect to (dis)taste.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Thompson
Date: 09 Mar 24 - 04:20 AM

People have discarded "whoever" and are using "whomsoever", weirdly.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Lighter
Date: 01 Mar 24 - 09:59 AM

Of course surprises are to expected.

Specific surprises are not.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Mrrzy
Date: 01 Mar 24 - 08:28 AM

Heard on NPR

surprises are to b expected


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Mrrzy
Date: 29 Feb 24 - 09:55 AM

Again, someone was arrested "after" a drug bust. Like, in a completely unrelated other bust?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: meself
Date: 25 Feb 24 - 09:46 PM

No, no - you just hold them in your hand and warm them up. The term 'cooked' is being used loosely.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Tattie Bogle
Date: 25 Feb 24 - 06:52 PM

Then there are the “hand-cooked” crisps (chips to those in the US) - as if you’d plunge your hand into a vat of boiling oil?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Mrrzy
Date: 25 Feb 24 - 02:04 AM

Ok... every car on this lot was hand-selected.

What, like a flower? How do you HAND-select a CAR?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Thompson
Date: 24 Feb 24 - 03:07 PM

In Ireland, cops are the shades.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Lighter
Date: 24 Feb 24 - 03:06 PM

Hard to believe, but here are two English words that are essentially as thoroughly synonymous as "gorse" and furze."

Not very exciting though:

"inalienable"

"unalienable."

Semantically identical and orthographically nearly so - just one letter different out of eleven.

The only other difference, if it is a difference, is that the Declaration of Independence uses "unalienable," though most people (who'd be unlikely to use either one in a sentence) think it's "inalienable."

Oxford shows "inalienable" from 1647 and "unalienable" from 1611.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: BS: Language Pet Peeves part II
From: Mrrzy
Date: 24 Feb 24 - 03:05 PM

Sic'm, Fang!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate


Next Page

 


You must be a member to post in non-music threads. Join here.


You must be a member to post in non-music threads. Join here.



Mudcat time: 3 November 4:24 AM EST

[ Home ]

All original material is copyright © 2022 by the Mudcat Café Music Foundation. All photos, music, images, etc. are copyright © by their rightful owners. Every effort is taken to attribute appropriate copyright to images, content, music, etc. We are not a copyright resource.