|
|||||||||||
Traditional Singers and singers of Trad
|
Share Thread
![]() |
Subject: RE: Tradtional Singers and singers of Trad From: Robert B. Waltz Date: 10 Mar 25 - 02:26 PM I suspect this is a troll, but I suppose it should be answered anyway. The whole point of a song being traditional is that it was learned from tradition. If you learned it from a recording, you didn't learn it from tradition. That doesn't make the song worse. It says nothing about the quality of the performance. But the whole point of saying something is traditional is the oral transmission. The word is INFORMATIONAL. We've already lost the word "folk" to mean "acoustic singer-songwriter." Let's not mess with the word "traditional." |
Subject: RE: Tradtional Singers and singers of Trad From: r.padgett Date: 10 Mar 25 - 08:39 AM Not sure what you mean here I don't think we have at least in England, many Traditional, active singers, these may also be deemed song source singers Singers of Traditional songs abound, but they are NOT as i have said before, Traditional singers imv Who ever sings and what and how they sing can be judged by the audience Ray |
Subject: Tradtional Singers and singers of Trad From: The Sandman Date: 10 Mar 25 - 04:16 AM Why judge traditional singers differently from singers of traditional songs.In every other form of music we judge on performance not how the music was learned |
Share Thread: |