Mudcat Pay-per-View

Subject: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: GUEST,Mr. McMahon
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 09:32 AM

Mudcat has money problems. Mudcat has feuds. Solve the Mudcat money problems with Pay-per-View wrestling matches in the tradition of the WWF.

Match 1) Joe Offer vs. Kat/Katlaughing

Match 2) Big Mick vs. CarolC

Match 3) Grudge Match: Mousethief vs. Malcolm Douglas.

Match 4) Dick Greenhaus (the anti-Dylan) vs. Little Hawk (the pro-Dylan)

Main Event) Handicap match: Catspaw47 vs. all the anonymous guests.

Suggestions for other matches are welcome.

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Amos
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 09:33 AM

Bravo, what a concept, yer goin' places, kid!!

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Jeri
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 09:37 AM

May I wrestle Big Mick? Maybe a Jello match? I don't have any current argument with him - it just sounds like fun.

In the name "Catspaw47," does the "47" reflect number of marbles? He's lost a couple.

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Amos
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 09:48 AM

I wanna wressle Jen Ellen.

A

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Bill D
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 10:05 AM

now, are we gonna have TRADITIONAL wrestling rules?...or are we gonna have those new-fangled, stupid WWF matches where they flash lights & throw chairs and have wimmen in tight spandex costumes?

I have drawn up a list of wrestling holds which fit the format of classic wrestling, and if I am confirmed as judge, there'll be no pop/rock wrestling matches here!!

so, if everyone will just read thru my....ulllk...argggg...NO!, not the jello pit!..HELLLPPPP!

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Wolfgang
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 10:05 AM

Let me sneak or grass:

The two missing marbels are now with 'GUEST,in Room 327 of the Motel Six' who once started as 'GUEST,in Room 325 of the Motel Six'.

Wolfgang

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: MMario
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 10:10 AM

hey! how come MT gets to wrestle Malcolm? Malcolm has a legitimate gripe with me (I s*ck at documentation...and he and I BOTH know it)

I think these fights are rigged!

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: bbc
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 10:17 AM

Jeri,

I'd like to double-team Big Mick w/ you. He's big enough to take us both on. Same as you--no grudge, but it sounds like a lot of fun! Jello, for sure.

Love you, Mick!

bbc

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: KingBrilliant
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 10:20 AM

Must be Mud-wresling. Can I be a granny with a brolly at the front please? 'Gworrrrn - Kill'im - look ref!! look ref!!! Shouldn't be allowed....... etc etc'

Kris

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Jim Cheydi
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 10:33 AM

Come on then! Who wants it? I'll take the lot of ya. All at once or one at a time - makes no difference to me!

Prob'ly.

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Gervase
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 10:33 AM

I'm all for wrestling - woollen singlets, goose-grease and all. C'mon Liz, gerremoff and step into the ring! Failing that, I wanna be Jackie Pallo, Mick McManus and Shirley Crabtree all rolled into one and take on all the girlies here... Nurse! The screens, quickly! This one appears to be taking a turn...

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: GUEST,Shenandoah
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 11:16 AM

I want Jeri!

I've been chasing her from Usenet to Mudcat and back again.

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: bbc
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 11:23 AM

Guest, Shenandoah,

I don't know what your agenda is, but you would do better to drop it here. Jeri is a longtime, respected, participating Mudcat member & I, for one, don't appreciate you libelling her. I know her, in person as well as online, & I have never seen her behave in the manner you state.

bbc

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Amos
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 11:35 AM

Shenandoah and Jeri!! Best three falls out of five, Crisco mandatory!

A

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Rt Revd Sir jOhn from Hull
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 11:37 AM

Clinton Hammond vs Shane MacGawon?

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Noreen
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 11:50 AM

Hey Bill, what have you got against wimmen in tight spandex costumes? :0)

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: JenEllen
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 11:54 AM

Noreen, you in it for a tag-team guacamole match? LOL

Amos, you're on buddy.

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Bill D
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 11:55 AM

Noreen, me, I'd hope!

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: mousethief
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 12:02 PM

If I don't get any wimmin in spandex in the ring (or at least ringside) during the match, I'm not going to play.

Alex

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Bill D
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 12:08 PM

funny...a search of Google groups turns up LOTS of posts by Jeri...witty, thougtful and interesting...but NONE by 'Shenandoah' Jeri has never seemed hard to find, it seems to me...why chase her?

*tsk* trolls are in breeding season, it seems...

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: mousethief
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 12:11 PM

Trolls want to breed with Jeri? Is that what you're saying here, Bill? For shame!

Alex

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Naemanson
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 12:12 PM

I'm in (the jello)! I'll take on any number of opponents of the other gender. Who's in? C'mon! I double dast dare ye! Noreen? LTS? Jeri? JenEllen? bbc? KingBrilliant?Come one, come all! Singly or in gropes!

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Rick Fielding
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 12:12 PM

Luvvv it! Now this is the way to deal with silliness that always resolves itself anyway with all those behind the scenes PMs.

Hmmmmm, I'm working on my character right now. A mysterious folk-wrassler from parts unknown. Women will be sure to melt after a mere glimpse of his "Buddha like" glistening stomach. The absence of any muscular developement whatsoever will keep them positively transfixed. Opponents will quake in fear at his patented "Thumb F Chord" Submission hold! Let's see, a mask would be in order to complete the menacing picture (and disguise 55 years of wrinkles!)

All that would be left to complete the picture would be a series of Korean "Martin Knock-off guitars" to smash over my opponents heads. The REAL Martin, of course will be brought to the ring in a glass case held by my "Manager".

OK, taking applications for Manager right now. Candidate must be either six foot tall (dyed) Blonde with steroid muscles and silicone breasts....OR....Weasily little runt familiar with "foreign objects" and possesser of recognizable "trademark" (like stuffed possum)

and now I'm READY TO RUMBLE!!

Rick

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Noreen
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 12:14 PM

Hmmm.... wressling in guacamole, Jen... OK,you're on! *grin*

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Uncle_DaveO
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 12:33 PM

Bill D asked:

"...or are we gonna have those new-fangled, stupid WWF matches where they flash lights & throw chairs and have wimmen in tight spandex costumes?"

Yeah, yeah, yeah!!!!

Dave Oesterreich

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Amos
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 02:30 PM

Crisco mandatory? No antlers?

LOL.

A

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: JenEllen
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 02:36 PM

Although the folding chairs would make narry a dent in that skull of yours, your antlers might get stuck in the ropes...

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Mary in Kentucky
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 02:48 PM

Is she saying Amos is horny? hmmmmmm...need to do some background on this one.

Can I play too?

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: GUEST,in room 202 of the Motel Six
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 02:48 PM

Wolfgang,

I'm sorry to confuse you, but when you check-in to the Motel Six, you don't always get the same room.

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Hollowfox
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 02:58 PM

Rick, if you're ready to rumble, then maybe`you'd better dope-slap the sound tech again. Sounds like the bass needs major adjustment.

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Jeri
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 02:59 PM

(aside to bill d - look for the ones on "both sides the tweed")

Note to all lecherous men...er, all men: YOU DO NOT WANT TO SEE ME IN SPANDEX!!!

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Clinton Hammond
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 03:03 PM

"leaping in off the top rope, with a crushing forearm smash to the back of the neck and ooooohhh... He's dead"

-Old SNL bit, if wrestling was actually real-

;-)

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: MMario
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 03:29 PM

jeri - I stongly suspect you would look quite good in spandex. tho' I also suspect it is not to your taste.

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Naemanson
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 03:33 PM

Jeri, you wear the spandex and we'll be the judge of what we do and don't want to see. *grin*

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Benjamin
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 04:34 PM

I didn't know the WWF had rules. I mean, why would you put rules to something that's fake? Just doesn't make any sense! As for me, I'll wait to see who's in the ring before taking or making any challenges.

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Naemanson
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 07:25 PM

UNCHALLENGED I STAND, IN JELLO SO GRAND.
AND SPANDEX I WEAR TO SHOW WHAT IS THERE.
THE CHAMPION I AM FROM MY TOES TO MY TAM
AND SNEER IN THE FACES OF ALL ELSE IN THIS PLACE.

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Amos
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 08:04 PM

And he so long a fellow, and you go around it
His girth bespeaks his threat is fully founded
Spandex expands, as strength unto the strong!
Farewell, sweet rhymer! Fellow fair, so long!

A

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Big Mick
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 08:38 PM

OK, Jeri and Beebs (I can call you that......but only me and Spaw), bring your little behinds on. But there is only one rule. No fair pulling down the thong, and kicking the spud is against the rules. C'mon, youse wimmen..................I am ready for you.............what the hell is this I am tripping on?????...........Naemenson, git the hell outta my tub!!!!! Go get your own jello..............

Mick

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Cobble
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 08:53 PM

Anyone picks on me and I send in Mrs C OK?

Cobble.

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Jeri
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 09:14 PM

Hey, like Benjamin said - who needs rules! C'mon bbc - let's BAKE THAT POTATO!

Naemanson - spandex is funny enough, but did you have to wear the hot pink thing with the blue bunny rabbits?

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Benjamin
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 09:29 PM

That's not exactly going to get the job done you know Naemanson.

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Amos
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 09:30 PM

Jello to all, plunge, grapple at the quick!
In vain the keepoer calls 'tis Thyme -- it will not stick!
Now limn we all to cavil, bet, or, carp!
Fling out rude care, unleash the Dogs of Warp!!
No trolls shall sour this pit, nor foul these truffl'd pearls--
A song, a thong, a groin, and foot it, girls!

A

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Naemanson
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 09:35 PM

Hey, you were wearing my spandex so I had to wear yours! Besides the bunny rabbits are cute!

ANNOUNCEMENT! THIS THREAD DRIFT IS BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE MAKERS OF IMAGINWEAR, THE CLOTHING THAT MAKES YOU LOOK LIKE YOU THINK YOU LOOK.

SINSULL IS A GRANDMOTHER! HER CAT, ALICE, JUST HAD SIX CUTE LITTLE KITTENS!

NOW, BACK TO THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED PROGRAM...

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Jeri
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 09:44 PM

Naemanson, you think you look like a guy who wears blue bunnies? Uh-oh. Should have bought the velcro ears and the fluffy cotton tail, too.

SINSULL - CONGRATS, GRANNY!

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Benjamin
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 09:45 PM

Naemanson, I don't think Sinsull is Alice's mother. So I don't see how she'd the grandmother of Alice's children.

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: bbc
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 09:53 PM

Hey, Jeri, he took the challenge! Let's get him! You want the front or the back? Hmmm.... maybe left & right side? Oh, who cares...have at him! You, spaw, & Rick, honey! Love ya. : )

bbc

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: MMario
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 10:08 PM

Sinsull adopted alice, right? which makes her her mother, and Alice's children her grandchildren. perfectly logical. Are you a species snob?

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Amos
Date: 16 Jul 01 - 11:25 PM

Are you guys gonna mix it up? Or just satnd aroun' an jaw, then???

I don't go wastin' them Elizabethan couplets on no Mendelian discussions, y'know!!

A

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Naemanson
Date: 17 Jul 01 - 06:22 AM

C'mon MMario, either rassle or get out of the jello pool! If you don't I'll have to take on bbc and Jeri and they obviously would rather have you (sniff) though I don't know why!

(Bunny ears dragging the spandex wrapped form trudges with slumped shoulders out of the green jello...)

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Naemanson
Date: 17 Jul 01 - 06:25 AM

C'mon MMario, either rassle or get out of the jello pool! If you don't I'll have to take on bbc and Jeri and they obviously would rather have you (sniff) though I don't know why!

(Bunny ears dragging the spandex wrapped form trudges with slumped shoulders out of the green jello...)

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Amos
Date: 17 Jul 01 - 06:39 AM

Mick!! Watch out for your spud!! Ooooh! Nooo!! Home fries!!

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: gnu
Date: 17 Jul 01 - 08:04 AM

Well, I'm half Irish and half French, so I can tag team by myself. Tete Rouge the Irish and Flyin Frog the Frenchman will take on all comers. I can lick my weight in wildcats. I t'row my coat bot' side da road, I come to fight, me. Yeah ? you won't even get a chance to get in the pit after I get goin. Ecoutez you big dumb Anglais... WHAT did you call me ? I'm havin me some frog legs. Oh yeah, well I'm going to shove some Shamrocks right up....... *)%$%@*(%*_

The hospital report does not fair well for The Maritime Maulers. So ends their wrasslin career, but it was quite a fight.

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Naemanson
Date: 17 Jul 01 - 08:31 AM

Hey gnu, how you could tole I was French? By my spoke or by my h'accident?

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: bbc
Date: 17 Jul 01 - 09:06 AM

Ooooooh, Naemanson, come on in! See Big Mick slinking off, dripping jello? We can take you! :) If holds don't work, I'll try hugs!

bbc

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: MMario
Date: 17 Jul 01 - 09:54 AM

sorry - the hysterical laughter had me helpless for a couple hours...

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: catspaw49
Date: 17 Jul 01 - 10:30 AM

I'm supposed to wrasslin' some Guests? Well, that don't work......I like the regular Guests and the Flaming/Trolling/Pissant Guests just get the Golden Shower award so..................

Now it looks as if there is a match possibility with Beebs and Jeri and that ain't a good option seein' as they kicked Mick's ass............Hmmm............Hollowfox lives to close and if the virtual match goes wrong, she might show up here and kick my real ass, not good either..................Or JE....Whoa! Not good at all! I've read about her exploits and all and she's pretty tough with flaming birds too...............This is tough...................Lessee...............Hey, I got it............I want to take on Amos!!! That'll work. I mean we can get in the pit and then sit around and bulshit each other to death about the meaning of the Cosmos, or it's lack thereof, until the audience and both of us pass out from sheer boredom! Physically I ain't no worse for the wear which has a lot of appeal....................Okay Amos......Step into the pit and commence bullshitting! If you're especially eloquent or completely non-understandable (preferably both) this thing could be over in a heartbeat and we could get back to the bar...............

Spaw

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Naemanson
Date: 17 Jul 01 - 11:15 AM

Naw, Spaw, I'm gettin' in the pit with Beebs and Jeri. They may have whupped up on MMario but they are now facing the Downeast Kid in full yellow oilskins and nor'easter hat. Let's get down and dirty girls!

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: catspaw49
Date: 17 Jul 01 - 11:30 AM

Hey....Go for it Naes! That pair is way too tough for me. No, I'll just sit around waiting for Amos..............

Spaw

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Big Mick
Date: 17 Jul 01 - 11:38 AM

Hey Naes...........they didn't whup MMario........they whupped me.............damned embarassing for a fella like me...........shit..........

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: bbc
Date: 17 Jul 01 - 11:47 AM

:)

Thanks for conceding so graciously, Mick. Maybe we can have a re-match (at least on the hugging part) in Portsmouth, NH on July 27th?

love you,

bbc

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: SINSULL
Date: 17 Jul 01 - 12:01 PM

Hardcore! With tables! Nana Sullivan takes on Benjamin for daring to question the pedigree of her little brood. After that, I want Rick - the Rikichi Folkie!

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Benjamin
Date: 17 Jul 01 - 01:42 PM

Who's taking me on? Dang! Stand around and open my mouth once and I'm in hard core! Where's my tag team?

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Amos
Date: 17 Jul 01 - 03:09 PM

ROTFLMAO! OKay, Spaw, over here in the shallow end!! Let's begin with the notion of Being....

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: catspaw49
Date: 17 Jul 01 - 04:44 PM

Okay then Amos..........Being, huh? Well, "being" a student of the great Dane, Soren Kierkegaard........Allow me to paraphrase him a bit on the subject:

A thing may be in and of itself or may be a thing realted to although not similar to itself or other things which have the same makeup as the thing first encountered. An old saying, which may or may not be an old saying, derived from the world of experience, or possibly from the writings of George Gobel, has it that "he who will not work shall not eat." A thing having such a trait cannot be considered to be wholly one thing, but a part of the body of like things whereas if the thing has the same properties and does not eat the thing may not exist at all and will therefore refuse to be. But, strange to say, this does not hold true in the world where it is thought applicable; for in the world of matter the law of imperfection prevails, and we see, again and again, that he also who will not work has bread to eat—indeed, although the soup is extra, and excepting for those times when the oneness of it's thingness prevents the thing from eating and hence, being that thing or any other thing.

If the physical powers of he who sleeps has a greater abundance of it than he who works, then the sleeping he is of less being than the other unless the he in question is a she, in which case, it's all over and Bob's your uncle. In the world of matter everything belongs to whosoever happens to possess it; it is thrall to the law of indifference, and he who happens to possess the Ring also has the Spirit of the Ring. and a bottle of Wisk, at his beck and call, whether now he be Noureddin or Aladdin or Clarabelle with a seltzer bottle, and he who controls the treasures of this world, controls them, howsoever he managed to do so, except for Bill Gates.

It is different in the world of spirit. There, an eternal and divine order of sacrificial vestal virgins abstains, there the rain does not fall on the just and the unjust alike, nor does the sun shine on the good and the evil alike; but there the saying does hold true that he who will not work shall not eat, and only he who was troubled shall find rest, and only he who descends into the nether world shall rescue his beloved, and only he who unsheathes his knife shall be given a pile of doody which they cannot ascribe any oneness of being to in order to possess again. There, he who will not work shall not eat, but shall be deceived, as the gods deceived Orpheus with an immaterial figure instead of his beloved Euridice, deceived him because he was lovesick and not courageous, deceived him because he had a pecker that resembled a toothpick, deceived him because he was a player on the cithara rather than a man of no being and possibly a being of similar though different characteristics than one of no being.

There is a kind of learning which would presumptuously introduce into the world of spirit the same law of indifference under which the world of matter groans. And what, forsooth, does this learning really know? What is known or possibly known or assumed to be cannot under any cicumstance be more or less than the property of the being if the one being has the same properties. Therefore the Cartesium Dictum of "I think, therefore I am," can best be seen in the statement, "Someone dropped a charcoal briquet in Jane's underwear."

Well, that about sums up being and the otherwise unintelligible writings of a Danish without the cream cheese, although we may want to revisit the writings of Jay Silverheels at a later date to garner the Native American take on the idea...........

Okay........Who's asleep?

Spaw

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Bill D
Date: 17 Jul 01 - 05:41 PM

damn, 'spaw! That's clearer than Kierkegaard !! you should stayed a sleazy acdemician!

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: gnu
Date: 17 Jul 01 - 06:28 PM

OK... the Maritime Maulers are defunct, or something to that effect. Naemanson, you'd better be part French or not try that accent around SE New Brunswick. You're liable to end up a tree, mooodis !

Announcing the new tag team, The Gnus (apologies to Huey). The spokesman is gnu, soft spoken gentleman that he is. But, his partner, Wildebeest is an animal. Don't let him get control of the mic ! And the fans... oooohhhh, the fans need fans. The herd smells like the mesa's been messed. Whoop the AC on outside air, would ya ? And fill the trough with TTB... these guys'll swill anything. It's pandimonium...

Wait... they're making their entrance to the wrasslin ring... what's that theme song... well I'm wondrin' where the lions are...

We're waiting to see who the challengers are... who's going to take on these... these... gnus ??? gnus ???!!!

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: DougR
Date: 17 Jul 01 - 08:05 PM

Sounds to me like a lot of talk and no action.

DougR

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: JenEllen
Date: 17 Jul 01 - 08:15 PM

kind of like a missle defense shield? *gawd, who said that?*

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Amos
Date: 17 Jul 01 - 08:55 PM

It's clear from your presentation, Spaw, that you have relied entirely on derivative sources for your understanding, and we would be advised to try to find you some path from which to discover a genuine involvement with personal and actual beingness.

However, this path is not only difficult, it cannot be pursued with any hope for success in the presence of the sort of perseverant flatulence with which you constantly seek to confront the world as a substitute for this lack in your makeup.

I grant, and so would any honest investigator weighing only the objective facts, that it is perfectly possible that this condition genuinely reflect your inner nature, and as such would consitute a reasonable facsimile of beingness on your own part; however the same even-minded examiner would also maintain, I believe, that the persistant use of such a substitute, despite its possible versimilitude, cannot be claimed as an experience in any measure capable of valuing as highly as the genuine article.

So, then, in coclusion, I can only say that the final vector revealed by this analysis might be described on thes elines:

Put a Cork in it, Pat!!!!!!!!!!!

Love,

A

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: catspaw49
Date: 17 Jul 01 - 09:52 PM

Okay then Amos..........I can see, operating on the assumption I exist, that you have a point although I am completely unclear as to what it might be, if in fact it is. To paraphrase another philosopher for a title to this match, Bill D. suggested "Being and Nuttiness." This of course has potential as from it we can derive that being may possibly be assured through nuttiness and that, being the case, the case for being is made. It seems to be made of balsa rather than rosewood but that does allow for an incredible lightness of being (all that buildup for that sorryass punchline).

We can now move forward and explore the possibilities of being as a mandate in which man as a species is thus endowed with specific traits which make him seek out others even though they may be less well endowed than himself........you for instance. This herd instinct in recent years has marked the decline of man as a power for good in his three dimensional world and has forced his thinking and therefore his very being to embark on futile endeavors and lost causes, such as renovating downtown Cleveland or searching for great truths in the collected ramblings of Strom Thurmond. This decline of the human mind again offers proof of being, although it's tenure may be as short as case of beer on the square in Tupelo, Mississippi.

In these ventures, the nuttiness is obvious and being as a concept takes on a reality that we can then say is real. What part of it that is real is open to interpretations of reality which sadly relies on truth as a real and the real truth is that perception of truth and reality is more subjective than the description of a toad fart and likewise depends upon the proximity to the reality and the angle of view to the truth......or the distance of your nose from the toad fart. Our first problem in exploring this line of thought is to analyze the logic and to do that we have to agree on the angle of view, the mutual proximity to the reality, and whether or not toads do indeed fart.

I will concede for purposes of this argument that our mutual beings are within the spectrum of reality and truth mentioned above, whatever it was, and I now leave it to you to call up a deductive proof source regarding toad farts, ie, "I fart, therefore I hop."

Spaw

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: DougR
Date: 17 Jul 01 - 10:14 PM

Ok, JenEllen, now you done it! Wanna wrestle?

DougR

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: JenEllen
Date: 17 Jul 01 - 11:10 PM

Um, Dugger, you really wanna wrassle the woman who wrote the book on 'Restraint of Domestic Animals' (at least one of them anyways...) your ticker couldn't take it! LOL
~peacenikJ

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Amos
Date: 18 Jul 01 - 12:12 AM

By God, it's Murray Fowler from Iowa U, in DRAG!! Dang, Murray, how's the llama trade???

Sir Spaw, your complexity is deeper than your very bowel tonight; mayhap you are using a spoare, a sort of semiotic colon? No other explanation for the sheer force, sustainment, and rank fetidness of your endless exhalation. Thus, to spare the house, and prevent acid corrosion of the very jello pit around which we are gathered, I yield me to your coated tongue! Give o'er, I can no more! Enough!

I appreciate your remarks about seeking me out, but your premises are inverted, sir. But since I am, as I speak, soaking up decent brown stuff and practicing the Minstrel's stroke at the Tavern, I will not contest it further!! Go, get hence -- get thee to the Neil Young Center!! For thou are Terminally Screwed among all mankind!!

(Jeeze what a mouth!! Lose a penny a sale andmake it up in volume!!)

A

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: DougR
Date: 18 Jul 01 - 01:10 AM

That's okay, JenEllen, I'm used to rejection. If you don't believe it, check out the SDI thread (which I know you already have)! **BG**

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: ddw
Date: 18 Jul 01 - 01:22 AM

I think Clinton Hammond should be paired against Peg — talk about a grudge match! She'd whup him on adrenalin alone, if her past posts to him are anything to judge by....

david

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Naemanson
Date: 18 Jul 01 - 08:29 AM

Hey gnu, h'I tink you tink h'I h'am a Franchman, me. But you don know what I yam and I don know what you are, you.

[several of my formative years were spent in Northern Aroostook County, Maine, in the town of Van Buren. This is located in an area generally known as "The Valley", a euphemism for The Saint John River Valley. The majority of the population is French Catholic.

When I arrived it was 1963, I was in the fifth grade and they assigned me to an English class and a French class. My parents thought I would be learning my own language in the English class and a second language in the French class.

Unfortunately the French class was intended to teach the kids how to speak their native tongue correctly. The teacher arrived on the first day of class and spoke for ten minute in a completely incomprehensible language before I got the nerve up to raise my hand and ask her to speak English.

English class was intended to teach the kids a second language!]

Subject: CAGE MATCH ANNOUNCED
From: GUEST,Mr. McMahon
Date: 27 Jul 01 - 11:03 AM

I'm pleased to announce a new match has been added to the Mudcat Pay-per-View. This feud is so intense that it will be fought insude a fifteen foot steel cage.

Ladies, Gentlemen, Mudcats of all ages:

BRENDY vs. WYSIWYG

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: GUEST
Date: 27 Jul 01 - 02:51 PM

Don't get down on Brendy. WYSIWYG is spamming him with e-mails.

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Lonesome EJ
Date: 27 Jul 01 - 07:07 PM

Can't quite get into the wrassling aspect, how about a telethon? With Joe (Tiny Joe) Offer as the poster child? Who for the MC? I am already reaching for the phone to pledge.

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: Amos
Date: 27 Jul 01 - 07:35 PM

I'd like to see Joe Offer do a ventriloquist act with Caitirn or Firecat on his knee. Oughta get a rise out of the audience.

If not the performers....

A

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: katlaughing
Date: 27 Jul 01 - 07:42 PM

Jaysus, Amos, that's a bit over the top!

Subject: RE: Mudcat Pay-per-View
From: catspaw49
Date: 27 Jul 01 - 08:16 PM

Or up from the bottom as it were.....uh, so to speak.........

Spaw