BS: World War who will be fighting who?

Subject: World War who will be fighting who?
From: Donuel
Date: 21 Sep 01 - 04:05 PM

So it is the: US,UK,Germany,Qatar,Kuwaite....(who else) Against the select governments and terrorists of:?

Subject: RE: World War who will be fighting who?
From: catspaw49
Date: 21 Sep 01 - 04:25 PM

No offense there Donuel, but we have about a bejillion threads on this stuff and you could put your thoughts in any number of them. The way this place works is much more conversational than the average message board, so a thread isn't needed for every idea or thought.....and this has already come up in several places.

Just a thought.....the number of threads on this is wearing thin with a lot of folks.

Spaw

Subject: RE: World War who will be fighting who?
From: Peter T.
Date: 21 Sep 01 - 04:26 PM

whom, please. yours, Peter T.

Subject: RE: World War who will be fighting who?
From: Mrrzy
Date: 21 Sep 01 - 04:33 PM

Thanks, Peter T, that's what I popped in to say... pedants, unite!

Subject: RE: World War who will be fighting who?
From: Donuel
Date: 21 Sep 01 - 04:45 PM

Thanks, as a newcomer I appreciate your suggestion to go to a bejillion other places - I think.

So the enemy states (with all the Bush definitions assumed) number between 10-20? 20-30?

The good guys are NATO plus what non alligned NATO nations?

Subject: RE: World War who will be fighting who?
From: DougR
Date: 21 Sep 01 - 04:50 PM

Donuel: I think if you will spend a bit of time on CNN or Fox News Network, you will get the answer you are seeking. There is a bunch of them, and only Afghanistan, Iran, Sudan, and Iraq of course, appear to be the only hold-outs. Both networks review the list fairly frequently.

DougR

Subject: RE: World War who will be fighting who?
From: Don Firth
Date: 21 Sep 01 - 05:05 PM

There are so many threads on the current situation that when I have an opinion to express, I'm not sure which thread to put it on so anybody will actually read it. Nor do I know anymore what other people have said.

I believe Catspaw49's idea of the AMERICAN ATTACKS**part nn thread, which has now grown to nine parts because A)people have had a lot they wanted to say, and B) each of the threads has grown so long it takes a millenium to load unless a new one (under the same name) is started. And they are all linked together, so if you want to catch up on the whole thing, you know where to go. At least you did until eleventy-dozen other threads were started.

Instead of starting new threads under new names, please, put what you have to say on the latest AMERICAN ATTACKS**part nn thread. If need be, start a new one, with links, using the same name (new consecutive part number, of course).

Thank you,

Don Firth