 sj |
||
|
||
Why are singer-songwriters called folksingers?
|
|
|
Subject: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: musicmick Date: 13 Oct 01 - 05:21 PM Whether one sees folkmusic as a celebration of the past or as the expression of any identiftable group (Ethnic, religeous, political, geographical), we all must regard it as unique, in that it must be the vox populi (Did I spell that right?). It is not the expression of an individual, it is the soul of the group. Those of us who like folkmusic are, for the most part, interested in the culture that produced the folksong. We feel a link with the people whose music we sing. We are interested in cultures that may no longer exist. We are well informed in history and politics (We even sing about them). Some of my best friends are singer/songwriters. OK, all of my friends or s/s's. Not all s/s's are banal or egomaniacal and many are telented. Jaques Brel was a dandy s/s. He never felt the need to call himself a folksinger. Do you think that s/s's are called folksingers is so they wont have to be compared to Cole Porter or Jaques Brel? |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Art Thieme Date: 13 Oct 01 - 10:03 PM Musicmic, First, I agree with your statement completely! BUT as long as the proverbial folk scene is seen by the many looking for a music career as a springboard to success and stardom in country and pop music circles, we who hold to the older venerated views about this music and what it encompasses, must, seemingly, tolerate the presence of the myriads of way off-the-mark s/s troops in our midst. I do hope they make their marks and their $$$$$. Art Thieme
|
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Little Hawk Date: 13 Oct 01 - 10:11 PM Singer-songwriters are called "folksingers" because of Bob Dylan. Period. That's why. Blame Bob for it. Not that he was the first (by no means!) but his example cemented the notion in people's minds. - LH |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Jerry Rasmussen Date: 13 Oct 01 - 10:11 PM Sorry... a friendly disagreement. First I never came across a song written to vox populi. Most songs were written by one person. If it reflected the views and life of those around them, and they could find something in it to enjoy, then the song took on a life of its own, which may have gradually been shaped by yonders vox populi and passed into the tradition. Are Woody Guthrie's songs not folk songs, because he wrote them? If songs are written out of love and living of a tradition, they may well become folk songs. I think it all boils down to the old question... are your roots showing? |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Bill D Date: 13 Oct 01 - 10:12 PM because they need an already established, short term to hang their hat on...they'd 'call' themselves TURNIPS if thats what brought in the crowds. People who have an agenda do not want to conform to pre-established categories...they'd rather take a category that is convenient and wrap themselves in it and stretch it to fit THEM. You see Republicans & Democrats and restaurants do it every day .....you can probably think of other examples. |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Little Hawk Date: 13 Oct 01 - 10:23 PM Calling yourself a "folksinger" brings in crowds???? Huh???? Maybe it did in Boston in 1965. - LH |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Jerry Rasmussen Date: 13 Oct 01 - 11:03 PM I agree with Little Hawk. The last thing that those who have used folk music as a springboard into pop music want to be called is a folksinger. If people can't agree on what is folk music, then how can they agree on what someone is who sings it? Keep the tradition alive. Everything living grows and changes. Respect those who have given us this great music. But, when was the last folksong written? |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Deckman Date: 14 Oct 01 - 12:10 AM This is a darned GOOD thread! It asks a good question ... for which there is no, one, simple answer. To some, the only true folksongs were written by "Mr. or Mrs. Anonymous." A few years ago, in the antique business, the lawful definition of an "antique" meant it qualified as at least 100 years old ... true! I agree that with Bob Dylan came the populiar use of the term "folksinger". So, is Woody Guthrie a folksinger? Again, darned good question. He certainly was whenever he sang traditional ballads and songs. So what do we consider him when he takes a traditional melody and writes new verses to it ...The Ballad of Tom Joad ... for example. At that point, to me, he is not folksinger, but a fine singer in the tradition of folksongs. We all remember Pete Seegers famous definition ... folksongs are songs sung by folks. Maybe that's as close as we need to look. And yet, I also, have always been bothered by the loose term "folksinger." CHEERS, Bob(deckman)Nelson |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: musicmick Date: 14 Oct 01 - 12:17 AM Of course all songs are written by someone. It's not the writing that makes a song folk, it is how the community uses it. Silent Night is a composed song. WE even know who wrote it and when. It is a folk song because an identifiable group adopted it as their own. Happy Birthday is a composed song. It was, God help us, copyrighted, but it didnt become a folksong until folks sang it with a birthday cake chaser. Folksongs are unique. They are defined, not by their authors, but by their audiences. Folksongs are functional tools of communal practice. They are,as a rule, used in ritual. They may be employed to bolster a cause, to amuse and involve and educate (consider the A-B-C song that is sung to the tune of Twinkle Twinkle, Little Star). Woodie Guthrie didn't write folksongs but many of his songs became folksongs when they were sung by the very folks he was writing about. That's why This Land is Your Land is a folksong and The Great Philadelphia Lawyer is not. |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: catspaw49 Date: 14 Oct 01 - 12:32 AM Oh yeah.......I can see how this one is going to become interesting and we haven't dredged this up in awhile so I believe it may be time once again........ geeziz...did I say that?........Anyway.........I think of a flipside to it. There are a boatload of trad songs in the DT that still exist only because we (and others) have archived them, researched them, etc.......And there are some of those very songs that are never sung nowadays. No one has sung them except a handful of folkies in over 50 or 75 years. They are no longer withstanding "the test of time." Are they still folksongs because they used to be? Just a twist...... Spaw |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: musicmick Date: 14 Oct 01 - 12:36 AM I have neglected to introduce myself. I am a full time professional folksinger. I have been thus employed since the late 1950's. I write songs and I have had my work performed and recorded. I count many successful s/s's among my friends. They, for the most part agree with me. Of course, they all have respect and interest in preserving traditional music and lore. Ordinarily, I wouldn't care what the media want to call something, but I dont like kids thinking that folk music is just a style like Disco. Mike Miller |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: musicmick Date: 14 Oct 01 - 12:51 AM In my inflated opinion, a song that is never sung, not only isn't a folksong, it's not even a song. Folksongs are defined by their functions. We classify them worksongs or gospel songs or courting songs or dances or dirges or marches. We call them waltzes and polkas and hornpipes, cha-chas, tangos, the twist. When I perform a traditional song, I am aware that I am representing the culture that used it. I am not a purist. I stylize all my material, but I stay within the "language" of the tradition. Mike Miller |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Deckman Date: 14 Oct 01 - 02:48 AM "I stay within the language of the tradition." That statement says a lot. And to answer Catspaws question ... of course they are still folk songs. Just because those particuliar songs are not necessarily sung right now doesn't dissqualify them. One of these days, I'm going to post a song that I believe was written by my great great Grandfather. He was a union soldier, in the Americam civil war, imprisoned at Andersonville. I found this song as a forward to his diary, written in 1886. Is this a folk song? It's over one hundred years old! Does anyone sing it? No one but me! Is it valuable> Damn right. It speaks to the horror that was Andersonville prison. CHEERS, Bob |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: GUEST,Ace Date: 14 Oct 01 - 03:27 AM "...we who hold to the older venerated views about this music and what it encompasses, must, seemingly, tolerate the presence of the myriads of way off-the-mark s/s troops in our midst..." I'm sorry if I offend you, Art, but this statement encapsulates for me everything wrong with the folk scene. Music has to develop and change - much like a language - in order to be a living tradition. If you despise musicians and their music - be they s/s or musicians taking a modern slant to old traditions - because "it ain't how it were done in MY day," you are condemning folk music to a slow and dull death. |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Gary T Date: 14 Oct 01 - 04:16 AM These are intersecting sets. Some, but not all, singer/songwriters are folksingers. Some, but not all, folksingers are singer/songwriters. Anyone who automatically calls singer/songwriters folksingers, or vice versa, is exhibiting extreme intellectual laziness. The question "Why are singer/songwriters called folksingers?" is inherently fallacious if it means ALL singer/songwriters. If it means SOME singer/songwriters, the answer is simply either because they are indeed folksingers, or because whoever labeled them such doesn't care or know to make the distinction. |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Ned Ludd Date: 14 Oct 01 - 04:57 AM As an active participant(some say organiser) of a live music club(some say folk)I've seen many examples over the years of songs being mistaken for traditional. This is regarded by some writers as the ultimate accolade. Not all writers use the 'scene' as a springboard to 'better' things. I think the problem is that the word 'folk' is so general as to be meaningless. More accurate(though less convenient)words can always be found. |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Jerry Rasmussen Date: 14 Oct 01 - 09:28 AM Words and labels are necessary to define what we're talking about. To often, they end up dividing people. A few years ago, I wrote a somewhat tongue-in-cheek article about The Last Folksinger. Let's face it, folks, we're all revivalists. How many of us have skinned a woodchuck? or gone down to the cider mill to have a little nip? Been a railroad engineer recently, or seen any train wrecks? Too often when I've told people I am a folksinger (not being a stickler for terminology myself... and I do a lot of traditional folk in a traditional style) they say, "What is folk music?" They're not looking for a two hundred response thread at Mudcat. They have no idea what I am talking about. We're not doing our job, folks! Traditional folk music isn't "ours." Traditional songs can speak to the guy who commutes into New York City every day and wears $200 wing-tip shoes. A few years ago, I was playing Forked Deer (badly) of fiddle, and someone came up to me, very incensed. He was angry because I was playing it in a different key than everyone else does. I was playing it in the key that I was, because it was the only key I could play it in. He said, "Nobody plays Forked Deer in D".. or whatever key I was playing it in. I said, "they do, now." Folk music should be FUN. If we just keep taking the music out to our rapidly diminishing audience, we will become preservations. For all the obvious lacks of the Kingston Trio, they brought a lot of people to folk music because it looked like it would be fun to play. Were they folksingers? |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Allan C. Date: 14 Oct 01 - 10:27 AM Does anyone not recall when the record racks at the local chain store placed all recordings, regardless of genre, by any Black artists under the heading of "SOUL"? It was clearly an oversimplified way of categorizing music by the use of a racial characteristic, rather than by a careful examination of content. The stores today often don't even bother with having a section for "FOLK". Many times a tremendous variety of music, including bluegrass, cowboy, traditional and others,) is jumbled into "COUNTRY". It is simpler that way. These people don't care about the finer points of the differences. Hell, they don't really seem to care about any points at all. The broad category is convenient for their purposes, plain and simple. It seems to be the case as well when they actually do have a section for "FOLK". All sorts of things are lumped together that would most certainly cause a gasp from the folk purists. It is common to find Smithsonian collections in the same rack with Laura Nyro, The Weavers, and Lorenna Mckennitt. These rack labels are there for the purpose of locating music that is something other than ROCK, JAZZ, CLASSICAL or COMEDY. If the artists' musical styles were more readily identified with any of those categories, that is where you would find them. It would make no sense to have a "SINGER/SONGWRITER" label because this is also a broad definition which encompasses people who write and sing stuff that is NEW AGE, ROCK, COUNTRY, or that vaguely fits into any number of other categories. And so, we are left with having S/S artists who are sometimes lumped into FOLK, among other things. The people who decide this often know absolutely NOTHING about the finer points of musical styles. They just want to put these artists somewhere! The same holds true with the organizers and promoters of the S/S's. They have to advertise them as belonging some readily identifiable category. For them, the broader the label, the larger audience they hope to capture. Labels are always with their limitations. It wasn't very many years ago when I, with great anticpation, tuned into a brand new radio station that claimed it was only going to play "ALTERNATIVE" music. I could hardly wait for their first broadcast! It didn't take long, of course, for me to discover that they defined, "alternative" rather differently than the way I did. Bummer, man! |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Bill D Date: 14 Oct 01 - 11:32 AM gee...you've saved me a lot of typing Allan...I was just about to launch into one of my patented tirades about beibg ABLE to go into a record store and find a bin where I could EXPECT to find the older. traditional songs that I like the best. One more time...labels and categories need to mean SOMETHING in a relatively stable way. Whether the artists themselves misuse the labels, or lazy store managers lump the bins together, it still remains true that Loreena McKinnet and Bob Dylan and Kate Wolf do something a bit different from Jeannie Robertson, Almeda Riddle, The New Lost City Ramblers, and Uncle Dave Macon.....and I'd like to that difference recognized in some way that would allow ME to refer to my preferences without resorting to 2 paragraphs of disclaimers. I'd like to be able to say "I mostly like traditional folk music" and NOT have anyone assume I mean Bob Dylan (who 'may' get to be trad in 40-50 years) and The Limelighters.......does anyone have ANY idea how I might do that? |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Tedham Porterhouse Date: 14 Oct 01 - 11:51 AM Bill D, You said, "Loreena McKinnet and Bob Dylan and Kate Wolf do something a bit different from Jeannie Robertson, Almeda Riddle, The New Lost City Ramblers, and Uncle Dave Macon." I'll submit that Almeda Riddle, who mostly sang unaccompanied ancient ballads, did something VERY different from the New Lost City Ramblers who mostly recreated COMMERCIAL country music from the 1920s and '30s.
|
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Little Hawk Date: 14 Oct 01 - 01:24 PM "Tedham Porterhouse" God, I love the sound of that. Whenever I hear it I think "This has gotta be a long-time personal friend of Bob Dylan, with a name like that...like Al Aronowitz or Jacques Levy or the late Allen Ginsberg." I picture Tedham and Bob getting together over glasses of rare Scotch whiskey, and discussing oriental philosophy and antique cars... It's just a complex of mine, that's all. Love that name! - LH |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Art Thieme Date: 14 Oct 01 - 05:57 PM Well, let it die then. What goes around, comes around. I'd much rather see what I love cease to exist rather than have live in a bastardized and mongrelized form. Art Thieme
|
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Bat Goddess Date: 14 Oct 01 - 06:04 PM A folksong probably WAS written by one person who may have been the original singer. But it was kept alive by the fact that it was a subject that "spoke" to other singers and the tune was something that other people would walk away humming. If the song didn't do either, it never lived long enough to be a "folk" song. There's plenty of singer-songwriter sh--, I mean, cr--, I mean, oh, STUFF out there that is going to die with the writer because nobody else can perform it. Bat Goddess |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Herga Kitty Date: 14 Oct 01 - 07:33 PM Sometimes people categorise your songs by how you learnt them, sometimes by whether anyone knows who wrote them or not. It's debatable whether professional singer/songwriters are really folksingers at all or just troubadors and cabaret artists. But usually it just comes down to which rack the music store staff decide to put particular albums in.... |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: musicmick Date: 14 Oct 01 - 11:32 PM OK, let's try it this way. Folksonngs are called folksongs because they are representative of a folk, that is to say a group or culture. They differ from personal expression in this regard. Often, they lack the sophistication that more formal songs posess. This simplicity is an advantage in popular usage. When someone tells me that they dont know any folksongs, I tell them that they know hundreds. We all know hundreds of folksongs. They are our heritage. Nursery rhymes are folksongs. So are hymns, patriotic songs, school songs, Girl Scout songs, play songs, family favorites, parodies, most "dirty" songs, campfire songs, etc., etc., etc. The real clue is who sings the song. If a performer sings it to an audience, it aint. If the audience sings it to themselves, it is. So whem Bing Crosby sang White Christmas it was a lovely Irving Berlin number. When we sing White Christmas around a piano, it is a folksong that was written by Mr. Berlin. (Actually, Berlin wrote another song that became folk. God Bless America, indeed). You see, we dont determine what is and what is not folk. That privilage is left to the folk. They may decide to adopt a song as their own, like Robert Burns's Auld Lang Syne or Steven Foster's Oh Susanna. They are the judges, and, by they, I mean we. Popular music tastes change and popular music must change in response. This, in no way, affects the ritual needs of a people, which are served by the songs and legends of tradition. Of course, new groups will require their own anthems, but, contrary to current thinking, newer isn't always better. Folk music will live on, in spite of its lack of commercial popularity. It will survive within its own cultures if the cultures, themselves, survive. As for those communities that no longer exist, their songs will live through historians, ethnomusicologists, cultural anthropologists and plain old folksingers like me. Mike Miller |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: 53 Date: 14 Oct 01 - 11:48 PM they are in between country, and rock. |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: musicmick Date: 14 Oct 01 - 11:53 PM Dear 53, they are between country, rock and a hard place. |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Rick Fielding Date: 15 Oct 01 - 02:38 AM Jerry, I've had that happen now and then as well (someone jumping on you for playing a tune in the "wrong" key). Perhaps my mistake was always trying to discuss it with them in a polite manner rather than accepting that only a jerk would be that agressively critical. Problem is that I DO try to stick as close to the traditions that first got me interested in this kind of music.....not always successfully. From a practical point of view, I often play old fiddle tunes on the mandolin, and if I don't have a guitar or something backing me up, I'll play it in the most 'resonant solo key'....with backup I'd probably play it in the 'original' key. For some stupid reason I too have gotten involved in far too many discussions on 'who's a folksinger, and who's not'. I've come up with my own definition which I can live with....if someone has been influenced by traditional music, then they can probably call themselves 'folksinger', if their influences are pop, rock or contemporary songwriters, then why bother labelling themselves at all? Ninety percent of those DOING the labelling probably haven't a clue what's being discussed here, nor would they even be interested. My business card has read "acoustic musician" for many years anyway.....which is certainly true. Rick |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: SeanM Date: 15 Oct 01 - 05:31 AM *Dons hipwaders* *adds snorkel* OK, now that I'm ready to wade into this one... First, as to the original question... My experience is that the s/s who choose to call themselves 'folk musicians' do so for a couple fairly recurrent reasons. The most justified (in my mind) are those that do a majority of traditional material with occasional original or more recent numbers thrown in. Yes, they're still singer/songwriter for those numbers that are theirs, but they also play VERY heavily from the body of traditional music. The opposite are those who only play original numbers. I've actually discussed this point with someone who does this and calls himself a folksinger. His view is that his songs are good enough to be 'folksongs' and thus he's a folksinger. Of course, I think he's an idiot, but that's for discussion on another thread. Most s/s folksingers seem to fall between these points, and in all honesty almost all that call themselves 'folksingers' come closer to the former than the latter. Now... as to the 'what is folk' brouhaha... I suggest that at this point, it's narrowminded to view 'folk' as a single descriptive. I rather think that folk consists of many parts, rather than just one. After all - look at 'Rock' as a descriptive label. Yes, that denotes someone following a persuasion of music that became popular first in the mid to late '50s. BUT, to actually describe the style they play in, you have to add "Acid Rock"... "Hard Rock"... "Soft Rock"... "Adult Contemporary Rock"... "Classic Rock"... etc. Each is a distinct subgenre - and if you don't believe that, then sit down some day and listen to The Who (Classic), followed by Napalm Death (Grindcore). I doubt that anyone would come out of that experience saying that all rock is the same (assuming they survived the transition.) So where does that leave 'folk'? I'd say as scattered as the elements that make it up. In my mind, there's 'regional folk', consisting of the traditional songs of a given area that are absolutely specific to that area. Songs like "Men of Harlech" and other specific tunes come to mind. There's 'historic folk', for the songs that aren't in ready circulation, but are still kept alive by the archivists and groups that specialize in it. Also, I'd say there's a distinct "folk dance music" subgenre - songs that are meant as companion tunes to go with various dances. The best part is, that like most other musical genres, NONE OF THEM ARE ABSOLUTELY EXCLUSIVE! That's part of why there is no steady and completely accepted answer to 'what is folk'. You can often tell when something isn't folk, and when something definitely is - but there's a lot out there that fits the description of 'folk' as well as other genres as well. Heck, I lost myself somewhere in there. I guess that in my twisted little mind, the discussion of "who or what is folk" has as much a chance of resolution as "Is there a god(s)?" and other topics of endless debate. All fine for a debate over a pint or seven (and you all owe me now - Pay up!), but pointless to elevate the blood pressure. And to Art's statement: I do see the point. There ARE too many idiots goign around who figure that singing about their navel lint and why their girl kicked them off of her couch is 'folk' so long as it's acoustic. However, I wouldn't say that the general umbrella of 'folk music' is in danger of being bastardized now any more than it's ever been. Kinda hard to hurt something that won't stay still long enough to be recognized, and the chaff will eventually be blown away. What's left will be the NEXT tradition. M |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Genie Date: 15 Oct 01 - 06:06 AM What I want to know is why people who play the guitar or piano, etc. (perhaps brilliantly) and sing (perhaps wonderfully) and write some (not all or even the best) of the songs they record and sing -- why are these people usually called "singer/songwriters?" Why not "guitarist/singers" or "pianist/singer/songwriters?" In the 1930's through 50's, many singers or instrumentalists did write some of their own songs, but they were seldom called "songwriters," if they were mainly singers or instrumental musicians. I still wonder about how this strange label came to be and why it is so often applied to people for whom songwriting is one of their lesser accomplishments. Genie |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Tedham Porterhouse Date: 15 Oct 01 - 10:09 AM Rick, For what it's worth, Pete Seeger says that if you use microphones, not to mention pickups, you're no longer an "acoustic" musician. |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: GUEST,MC Fat Date: 15 Oct 01 - 10:21 AM Whats the difference between a singer/songwriter and a puppy ? After so long the puppy stops whining !! |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: GUEST,deskjet Date: 15 Oct 01 - 01:32 PM The good songs become folk songs |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Genie Date: 15 Oct 01 - 03:35 PM Good one, MC Fat! |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Tyke Date: 15 Oct 01 - 04:29 PM What do you call a singer songwriter with out a girlfriend? HOMELESS! Give them a home call them folkies! Oh I forgot about Cyril Tawney and Peter Bellamy and well you name them there are lots. Oh don't you go forgetting Cecil Sharp re writing Folk songs to clean them up a bit. |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: musicmick Date: 15 Oct 01 - 05:08 PM Nice point about Cyril Tawney and Peter Belamy who write what I call "folk" songs (note the quotation marks). To their number, we can add Ewen MacCal, John Connerly, Bruce Phillips, Stan Rogers and a host of others. Their songs are written in traditional styles and with respect for the cultures they represent. I have sung with all of them, and I cann attest to their love of traditional music. Cyril, who is a truly great songwriter, is a student of British folklore. I hope and expect that some of his songs pass into tradition as has Ewen's "Shoals of Herring" and Woodie's "This Land is Your Land". That determination will be made by the folk, not by us in discussion. I should add that folksongs can be written. When students concoct a parody lampooning their teachers ("Joy to the World, the Teacher's Dead" is a good example), when political activists adapt a song to express their positions ("Woke Up This Morning With my Mind on Freedom"), when kids make up an anti-Barney song ("I Love You, You Love Me, Barney gave me HIV") they are writing their own folksongs, but only because they are presenting a communal view. |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 15 Oct 01 - 05:29 PM "Of course all songs are written by someone."
Not strictly true. All songs get written down by someone, except the ones that don't. The people who made the songs didn't always write them down. Sometimes they couldn't.
As for records, I buy records (and that includes CDs and tapes - I call them all records) three ways. I buy them of guest at folk clubs who have impressed me. I buy them at folk festivals from specialised dealers. And I look through the mixed up boxes of vinyl in charity shops and boot fairs and jumble sales. I tend to steer clear of the kind of record shops here they have records in categories like easy listening and country and comedy and so forth.
I don't think I've sung a song in years except ones that I have heard someone else sing first. Apart from the ones I've made myself, and I'd never presume to call them folksongs. |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: GUEST,Frank Date: 15 Oct 01 - 05:58 PM Here's my theory. Record companies traditionally have operated in the "red". They needed money from ancillary publishing firms. Folk songs are not copyrightable, They are in the public domain, therefore don't bring in any money. Original songs do. They can be published and promoted. Many folksongs were copyrighted by publishers but there's only so many that can be done without problems. With songwriters, original material can be exploited easier. Hence, we have the singer-songwriter. Artists have a dual value to a record company. The record company calls the singer-songwriter a folksinger so they can sell 'em. True with all labels that have singer-songwriters on them. Frank |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Mike Regenstreif Date: 15 Oct 01 - 06:12 PM Frank, With very rare exceptions, most record companies do all they can to avoid labelling singer-songwriters as "folksingers." Commercially, the "folksinger" label does not sell records. Your theory about copyrights also doesn't hold up. Most traditional songs are recopyrighted each time they're recorded. Run a traditional song through the BMI or ASCAP data bases and you'll find that some have been "written" dozens and dozens of times. As others have pointed out, there are many songwriters whose work is deeply rooted in traditional music. Other singer-songwriters are often called "folksingers" when their performing careers are on what is known as the "folk" circuit: clubs, coffeehouses, festivals, etc.; or because they play and perform in an acoustic vein that has been identified, over the past 40+ years, as "folk." Mike Regenstreif |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: GUEST,Wave Date: 15 Oct 01 - 06:44 PM If the only folk songs are those written in ancient times then the music cannot be fully 'of the people'. None of the people I know who sing mining songs or sea shanties have ever been down a mine or had to earn a living by fishing. Most people I know who go to folk sessions are teachers, parents, computer geeks, community workers, carers, partners (and some combinations of the above!). Why should we not accept into the fold songs that express the value or otherwise of these people's lives? The folk who are writing songs about these experiences are doing so because NO-ONE ELSE IS GOING TO WRITE THE SONGS FOR THEM, NOR ARE THEY GOING TO EMERGE THROUGH THE MISTS OF TIME. And in fact, the same goes for women's songs, songs of migrants, and the experiences of young people, to name but a few 'subsets' of our society. |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: ddw Date: 15 Oct 01 - 08:37 PM MCFat —— went to hear Eric Bogle Saturday night and he passed along one his wife had told him. What's the difference between a singer/songwriter and an insurance policy. Sooner or later the insurance policy matures and starts earning money. cheers, david |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Herga Kitty Date: 15 Oct 01 - 08:49 PM Of all the cons in England the folking is the best And I've got a flat in Chelsea where I'll lay me down to rest And a-folking I will go, and a-folking I will go. Though I work in the city boys, and in the town was raised There's country airs round Regent's Park, may Cecil Sharp be praised, And a-folking I will go... Though I'm seasick on the Serpentine and it hurts my arms to row When I sing a shanty boys, you can hear the whalefish blow I'll buy me a melodeon, some whistles and some spoons, And I'll go round with morris men sight reading all the tunes We'll morris dance on every green and ale in every bar, And then drive round from site to site in a little Morris car Now where I get such tunes as this you may not understand, I've always got [hand over ear!] a Japanese transistor in me hand... Learned by osmosis from the singing of Dave Calderhead, Hammersmith Morris, a very long time ago (ie before microchips took over from transistors). Kitty |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 15 Oct 01 - 09:06 PM I like it, Kitty!
Of course since the mobiles came in I can sing with my hand to my ear and phone home at the same time. Has anyone written any songs for singing into a mobile phone? I mean the kind of songs a self-respecting finger-in-the-ear folkie would care to sing?
|
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 15 Oct 01 - 09:09 PM And that, song is it by Dave Calderhead? If it's not and noone knows who it's by, I've got a feeling it might be one of Sydney Carter's. It's good enough to be anyway. |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: toadfrog Date: 15 Oct 01 - 09:55 PM 1. It is certainly not correct to say that "all folk songs were written by somebody." Many of them were composed by complete illiterates, and were very old by the time they got written down. 2. As an amateur folk singer, who does not do gigs, I respectfully submit that there is a problem, not only with people who compose songs and call them "folksongs," but with the whole concept of singing "folk songs" to make money or please a crowd. I submit that some of the best were essentially amateurs until "discovered" quite late in life, e.g. Mance Lipscom, Hobart Smith, Roscoe Holcomb, John Hurt, and Jesse Fuller. And it seems to me the Clancy Brothers and Tommy Makem sounded a whole lot better back in the 1950's, when they were discovered, than later when they sang concerts for thousands. Finally, once again I quote Bronson, who wrote:Bronson, Bertrand Harris, "Words and Music in "Child" Ballads," reprinted in The Ballad as Song 112, 128 (U.C. Press, 1969). So many today are becoming aware of folk-song through the medium of stage, screen, radio or phonograph that it is well to insist again and again that most of what they hear is at least as far from genuine folk-singing as the broadsides are from traditional ballads. In strict truth, there is and can be no such thing as a professional folk-singer. A singer who has his livelihood to gain through that medium can never consider the song as an end He must attract and hold the attention of many people, and inevitably he must become aware of those particular aspects of his song and of his performance that arouse the liveliest and most immediate response in the majority of his listeners. Inevitably, he will come to emphasize these elements of repertory and of style: so that, the longer he sings, and the greater his success as an entertainer, the further from genuine folk-singing will be his performance. Of all deleterious influences on folk-song, the most corrosive and deadly is the consciousness of audience appeal. This is by no means to say that genuine folk-singers do not often bring to their singing a high degree of individuality. But this personal contribution is properly involuntary, inescapable , and below the level of conscious intention. It is an attribute of the song, as in their singing the song exists. A recent collector in Alabama, Byron Arnold, has significantly registered his impressions in this regard. "These songs," he writes, "were sung quietly, naturally, never dramatically, and entirely without the mannerisms and cliches of the concert soloist. It was as if each song, as I heard it, was a creation by the singer for the satisfaction of an inner compulsion. Here is a touchstone of genuineness for our native tradition. |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: musicmick Date: 15 Oct 01 - 11:49 PM Ah Kitty, it's years since I heard the name, Dave Calderhead. He was called the Singing Toby Jug. What a sweet and gentle soul he was. I always stayed with Dave at his flat on the Potabello Road, whenever I worked in London. There are many professional folksingers by anyone's definition. Shantymen on ships were folksingers, a cantor in a synagogue is a folksinger (he even gets tenured), music therapists, campfire leaders, choir directers, labor union singers ("songs to fan the flame of discontent") My work is, primarily, as a folksinger. I do classroom programs to illustrate history through song and I can promise you that the students sing as much as I do. I led the campfires at the Philadelphia Folk Festival for thirty years and I never did a solo. I do play-parties for pre-schoolers and they do all the work.(I think that Barney qualifies as a professional folksinger even though I am older than four and a half) |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Ferrara Date: 16 Oct 01 - 07:18 AM Thanks to so many people for your well expressed ideas. I usually avoid these discussions because if I want to discuss any variation of the question "What is the REAL folk music," I have my excellent husband, Bill D, right here to give me the true and final answer.... ;-) Anyway of all the fine things said in this thread, the one I liked most and am most in sympathy with, is the one from Bronson, that toadfrog quoted. I almost never go to folk concerts. A major reason (aside from being broke all the time...), is that they usually consist of folk music "presented" by performers, rather than music sung by folks. For me the music that means the most is where the musician is totally connected to the song. Hard to describe. Well this has nothing to do with singer-songwriters ... except that often they tend to sing music that is personal, but not authentic in the above sense. I think BatGoddess had a good point: most of their music will never become folk songs because no one but the author can sing them. To offer my answer to the basic question of "why ss/s call themselves folksingers", I suspect that a lot of them started out playing folk-style music, and so still think of themselves as folksingers. |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Jerry Rasmussen Date: 16 Oct 01 - 07:48 AM All Right, All Ready! Don't be so literal. I suppose that I am a singer/songwriter, myself and I don't literally "Write" songs. I don't even know how to write songs. Perhaps I am a singer/song-thinker-upper? Maybe my musical illiteracy makes me more authentic and pure? When I do a concert, do I alternate between being a folk singer on those songs that I have learned through the RECORDED tradition (forget aural tradition for most of us, unless you considerate it the aural tradition when you learn the song from someone who learned it off a record)and then become a singer/song-thinker-upper on the songs that I've written? If you think that most song-thinker uppers who play the folk circuit are in it for the money, you are crazy. Money?, where is that? Do people who are primarily traditional folk singers who write songs too have split personalities? This whole discussions seems to center around singer/songwriters who may love folk music, but have other creative desires within them, and then are considered impure. Music is to lift the spirit. Paul McCartney is no less of a man than Clarence Ashley was... |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Jerry Rasmussen Date: 16 Oct 01 - 07:49 AM All Right, All Ready! Don't be so literal. I suppose that I am a singer/songwriter, myself and I don't literally "Write" songs. I don't even know how to write songs. Perhaps I am a singer/song-thinker-upper? Maybe my musical illiteracy makes me more authentic and pure? When I do a concert, do I alternate between being a folk singer on those songs that I have learned through the RECORDED tradition (forget aural tradition for most of us, unless you considerate it the aural tradition when you learn the song from someone who learned it off a record)and then become a singer/song-thinker-upper on the songs that I've written? If you think that most song-thinker uppers who play the folk circuit are in it for the money, you are crazy. Money?, where is that? Do people who are primarily traditional folk singers who write songs too have split personalities? This whole discussions seems to center around singer/songwriters who may love folk music, but have other creative desires within them, and then are considered impure. Music is to lift the spirit. Paul McCartney is no less of a man than Clarence Ashley was... |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Jerry Rasmussen Date: 16 Oct 01 - 07:53 AM Oops.. my computer cloned that message.. don't know how to erase one. You don't think that old-time folk singers didn't choose songs that Uncle Fred and Bert really liked, down at the General Store? |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: M.Ted Date: 16 Oct 01 - 12:35 PM Of course someone writes everything--writing is the process of conceiving, creating, and finishing--I would say that it is possible to conceive, create, and finish a song without paper ever having been involved--And these great ballad that have been transmitted, orally, perhaps,if they were not "written" exactly what were they? As to Bronson,just read this quote, "Of all deleterious influences on folk-song, the most corrosive and deadly is the consciousness of audience appeal" and remember that the word "audience" just means "people"--How could a "folk song" be a "folksong" if it did not appeal to audiences?-- Folk music, whatever it is, is something that is embraced by the masses, kept alive by the masses, and, probably created, if not by the masses, at least among the masses. That means that it isn't exclusive, pure, or noble--music has always performed by musicians, and, since time began, they have had a propensity for talking a buck where they could get it, playing a dance, singing a song, making a record--and that is what has kept these folksongs around--you can reuse, recycle, cut and paste--and, strangely enough, when you leave them to rest for a while, they get put back together again-- |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Jim Krause Date: 16 Oct 01 - 02:18 PM Lately I have been calling myself a floksinger out of convenience. It is a convenient label for audiences to hang on me since they are going to immediately come to that conclusion the instant I walk on stage toting my accousitc guitar. OK, fine with me. I'd say about half of my material is public domain, and the other half is original. Does that make some one like me a folk singer? I don't know, and I don't really care, since the whole point is the song not the label. If the promoter, the listener, or the radio DJ needs to label me folk so they'll have a place to file my record in the library, then I can live with the label, whether it is technically accurate, or not. Certainly the Smithsonian, or the Library of Congress, wouldn't consider me folk. That suits me fine, too. Meanwhile, back at the ol' Bar S, I have guitar to practice and another show to get ready for. |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: GUEST,MudWeasel Date: 16 Oct 01 - 02:38 PM My rebuttal to Toadfrog, not a quote, my own words:
Of all deleterious influences on folk-song, the most corrosive and deadly are the people who think that a folk-song ahs a fixed and unchanging form. I've got more to rant about, but i think I'll let it slide for now, I'm supposedly at work here. (Nobody's ever written a Tech-Writer Chantey so far as I can tell.) -MudWeasel |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Larry124 Date: 16 Oct 01 - 02:50 PM The Old Coot Lament: Used to be, there was city music and country music. The country music was folk. The Revival added city music and "community/movement" (whatever), to folk. Nowadays just about anyone can write a song. And does. And performs it publicly. And records it. And no one else ever plays a cover version. The guys in the coffeehouse audience wish they could play that way, or maybe just get laid. The gals in the audience wish they could play that way, or maybe at least be able to say that they didn't go out and view a Bruce Willis movie. There's still a little community though. It's in forums like this one, warts and all. I'm glad. |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Ferrara Date: 16 Oct 01 - 04:25 PM To the songwriters amongst us: There are songs and songs. If you are writing/making up songs that have the style and "feel" of any form of traditional music, I don't think most people would have a quarrel with your calling yourself a folk musician. Craig Johnson, of Double Decker String Band, has written some of the finest songs around, as far as Bill and I are concerned. That's because they are memorable, authentic sounding and heartfelt, very singable (by more people than just Craig!) and evoke wonderful images of traditional activities and themes. These are what Mary Cliff calls "Music In The Tradition." There's another category of singer-songwriters, though. These are the people who make up long, rambling, relatively tuneless and complex songs about the lint in their navels; sing their diaries; or as one friend puts it, about "the People-ness of People." Peace, love, angst and brown rice are fine in their place but they often tend to lead to a sameness in the music. This type of musician is NOT writing songs "in the tradition." Songs that are too hard to comprehend and remember, or that don't have universal appeal, have seldom gotten into the tradition unless first, they were written down; and second, they were pretty spectacular. So, my point is: on the one hand, I feel that many singer/songwriters can genuinely be considered folk musicians. On the other hand, I don't think some "folk" singer-songwriters are writing music that has much in common with what we know as folk. |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 16 Oct 01 - 05:18 PM You still have people singing songs in coffee-houses in the States? Of course I suppose you maybe don't have the Public Entertainment Licence problem that'd make that illegal in coffee-houses in England. Or tea-rooms for that matter.
Just back from a trip to Italy where I learned that the Italian for Fire is "Fuoca". I think I'm going to talk about "Fuoca Music" in future instead. |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: M.Ted Date: 16 Oct 01 - 07:06 PM Ferrara, I am not at all sure about this: "That's because they are memorable, authentic sounding and heartfelt, very singable (by more people than just Craig!) and evoke wonderful images of traditional activities and themes. These are what Mary Cliff calls "Music In The Tradition." I think that none of this qualifies it as folk music, or traditional music, even if it is very good music, and very enjoyable music--In order to be really traditional, it has to be a part of the tradition, and not just sound like what is thought of as part of the tradition. As to the "folksong" deal, well, it has to be accepted by the "folk"--there is another thread, , which is "What did you sing as a kid?" and these songs are really much more folksongs than about anything else, and they are neither heartfelt or any of those "wonderful" things that you talk about--they are memorable, though--
|
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Art Thieme Date: 16 Oct 01 - 08:10 PM Ferrara, (Good to see you back here.) Great post !!! Art |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: musicmick Date: 17 Oct 01 - 03:58 AM I think that singer/songwriters should be called what they are, poets with guitars. This whole flood of s/s's is a reaction to Dylan. When he became successful, millions of equaly unattractive non-singers grabbed flattop Gibsons and started grunting, baring their souls and waiting for lightning to strike them too. Real singer/songwriters dont call themselves folksingers. Jobim, Brel, Lehrer,Matt Dennis, Carol King,Jimmy Webb are called songwriters because they write real songs, finely crafted songs. Mac Davis and Willie Nelson dont have the need or the desire to cloak their work as "folk". Wasn't Hoagie Carmichael a singer/songwriter? You bet he was. We just dont call him a s/s because his songs were commercialy successful and well written. Come to think of it, I never heard Lennon or Mc Cartney called singer/songwriters either. Do I detect a pattern? |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: SeanM Date: 17 Oct 01 - 04:35 AM Au contraire, MudWeasel!
The White Collar Holler THERE is your tech shanty! M |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: GUEST,harvey andrews Date: 17 Oct 01 - 09:03 AM As a great generalisation I've always felt that the songwriters who tell stories that illuminate or explain our lives, work, community etc are in a direct line from the songs of the past that we call folk music. The songwriters who sing about their own inner angst and relationship problems aren't.
"ANON" There's no name on the stone I sleep under today
It was in the alehouse I would sing with the rest
So they learned every word and they sang every note
It was twenty years gone when our Parson came home
So I planted and ploughed'till my bones bowed and bent
There's no names on the stones we sleep under today
Harvey Andrews. Haska Music. 2000 |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: GUEST,harvey andrews Date: 17 Oct 01 - 09:16 AM I'll crack this typing lark one day! Amended lyric follows; ANON "There's no name on the stone I sleep under today There's no book that can tell of my time But you know me so well when you sing roundelay For you're singing my tune and my rhyme I am "Anon", you know me that way I had something to say about life in my day So I made a song, and somewhere the sound of it Goes round and round, to be lost and then found And that it is the way that life is That is the way it is with songs
It was in the alehouse I would sing with the rest
So they learned every word and they sang every note
It was twenty years gone when our Parson came home
So I planted and ploughed'till my bones bowed and bent
There's no names on the stones we sleep under today Harvey Andrews. Haska Music. 2000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Post - Top - Forum Home - Translate --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to Thread Subject: Help From:
|
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 17 Oct 01 - 09:48 AM Great song there from Harvey there!
I'm not sure that it is possible to draw a clear line between a song that tells a story that illuminates or explains our lives, and one that talks about the troubles in the life of the person making the song. That could imply that in order to make a song about trouble, and to do it in a way that was in the tradition, you couldn't have experienced it yourself, and that is clearly absurd.
As a rule of thumb, I think that the traditional way to respond to public troubles has been to produce new songs, but when it comes to finding ways of dealing with personal troubles the tendency has been more to rework existing songs and reassemble fragments of songs.
But when it comes to rules of thumb I'm all fingers. The crucial thing with any song is, is it a good song, and is the singer singing it in a way that does it justice. And of course there is no reason or why anybody should feel that they should only sing or listen to "folk songs". There are plenty of great songs that aren't "folk songs" For example, Harvey's song there.
|
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: LR Mole Date: 17 Oct 01 - 10:19 AM "Oh, let me tell you of the story of a co-ed named Courtney Seemed to walk down the hall alone Was she memorizin'Poe? She was not musin',no, she Wouldn't get off the cellular phone! And will they ever shut up, no, they'll never shut up... (etc.) (new folk song by the Serfston Trio) |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: M.Ted Date: 17 Oct 01 - 01:30 PM I like old music, old tradtionals, all that stuff, and, as we all do, I take from where I like, what I like--I am always curious as to where something has come from and how it got to be the way it is, and am always very interested in the characteristic elements of the musical genre-- However, I am sick to death of the "Traditional Music Police" mentality that seeks to include or exclude based on how closely someone corresponds to a label--and I am sick to death of people who try to pass themselves off as "Folkier than thou art", and I believe that they do nothing but harm to everybody who plays and listens to the music-- Case in point are the people who are critical of the "Oh, Brother Where Art Thou" soundtrack because the contemporary recordings by commercial artists are not "authentic"-- rather than appreciating, and trying to build, on what it has done to promote this kind of music, the every dwindling numbers of "traditional music" people are complaining about it-- Kids are hearing this music in unbelievable numbers--and when the listen to music, they want to play it, listen to more, learn more, write their own, and I am very excited about that prospect--What I am afraid of is that when these kids play"Man of Constant Sorrow" on their electric guitars, down at the Mall, one of the "Traditional Music Police" is going to collar them afterwards and give them Hell-- |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 17 Oct 01 - 01:55 PM They let people play guitars down at the Mall in your country M.Ted? If we could dump the Public Entertainment Licence requirementsw here in England, I'd happily put up with any number of Traditional Music Police. |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: M.Ted Date: 17 Oct 01 - 04:14 PM They have entertainment of all kinds at the Malls--if you remember "Tiffany" she became a teen pop star overnight, by playing at malls-- As to the Public Entertainment lisense business--in the states, each state regulates certain aspects of the establishements that serve alcohol, but for the most part, lisensing and regulation fall completely under the jurisdiction of local authorities. For a lurid and titillating example: In New Jersey bars, Go-Go dancers in a must wear a bra, wheraeas across the river in Pennsylvania, the breasts may be completely exposed, as long as pasties are worn to cover the nipples. However, if no alcohol is served, the state has no authority, and performers may be completely nude, if it is permitted by city, county, or town authorities. I presumably, this extends to Morris Dancing, as well. |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Bill D Date: 17 Oct 01 - 06:15 PM if you started a thread about "nouvelle cusine" or "art deco" or "classic autos" you would get many similar arguments. (or even 'antiques', though there are certain standards adopted there,) The thing is, as I keep saying, a name or category needs to MEAN something. If it can be co-opted by anyone who wants a handy rack to hang his hat on, it soon means nothing...as has happened with 'folk'. We CANNOT ever have a precise, unchanging 'definition'.....but we sure can be aware when gratuitious changes are made to a song, or when a style is changed until earlier perfomers would barely recognize it.(This does automatically not make it 'bad',just different) I still maintain that there is a need to have a way to describe those songs & music styles that developed before, or away from...or in spite of, the music 'industry'....recognizing that there will ALWAYS be gray areas. There will, though, ALWAYS be stuff that seems to 'mostly' partake of the concepts that created the idea of folk/trad in the first place. If you are not willing to have categories that mean something, just imagine a radio station that advertises it plays 'music'...and expects it's listeners to absorb Druid Madrigals, Bob Dylan, Uncle Dave Macon, Yma Sumac, Yanni and Bing Crosby as a mix! You can argue philosophy all day, but I want to FIND my favorites. Having something I DON'T like mis-labeled is a durn nuisance......
|
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Jerry Rasmussen Date: 17 Oct 01 - 08:16 PM Just curious... I have no problem finding things in the folk bin at music stores that aren't traditional. There aren't any folk bins... an elastic definition has no impact on my shopping... I buy my CDs at folk festivals, or over the Internet.. |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 17 Oct 01 - 08:24 PM Nude Morris Dancing...The mind boggles.
Though actually they did have that at a Late Night Extra at a Folk Festival a few years ago. Well, nearly naked. There were a few balloons about. Not a pretty sight. Definitely not in The Tradition. |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: curmudgeon Date: 17 Oct 01 - 09:34 PM i had hoped to get into this thread sooner. Having just waded through the whole thing, I should rather offer some random thoughts rather than resopnd to any previous posts.. . i entered the world of folksong performance during the Great Folk scare of the '60s. There were a lot of fine folksingers out there singing traditional songs. once in a while, they'd sing a "new" song that took their fancy. Some of these caught on, some didn't.. . Some of them wrote their own songs as well,. both good and bad. sometimes the good ones were forgoten but the bad lived on, for a while.. . As being a folksinger came to be seen as a viable career (big bucks and babes) more youngsters took a stab at it.. . When I was cook, stickman,manager, auditioner at at coffee house in those times, I often asked the youngsters what kind of songs they did and was met with such responses as "I do Joanie's songs," or "We do Peter Paul and mary." I knew then that the age of folksong popularity was coming to an end.. . "Never ascribe to malice that which can be more easily explained by stupidity.". . This, in my opinion sums up the distinction between singer/songwriters and folksingers. It is, to a large extent the fault of the promoters, record producers and radio "personalities.".,none of whom have the slightest clue as to what constitutes folk music. . We have here a weekly "Folk Show" the host of which wouldn't recognise a traditional song if it bit her on the *. We also have another "Folk Show" which presents a wonderful panoply of tradtional songs intermingled with a few conteporary offerings. This is what its all about.. . Essentially, iy all has to mixed together. That which is taken up by the traditional purveyors of folk song and/or the "people," will be the folksongs of the future. Sadly though, there;s an awful lot of crap that will make it through. (I still cannot abide the singing of what must be the most universal "folksong," Happy Birthday). . I fear that I'm beginning to ramble. i might just come back when I've had more sleep.. . Curmudgeonly yours -- Tom |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Jerry Rasmussen Date: 17 Oct 01 - 10:43 PM Just a comment... I ran a folk concert series booking people who sang traditional folk music for 27 years. After I stopped, a "big time" entrepreneur started offering a folk concert series in my town. I was invited to a meeting of folk presenters, and we were asked to introduce ourselves and give a little of our background. I said that I had run a folk concert series for 27 years, presenting traditional folk music, and that I'd be happy to do whatever I could to help any other series. The guy who runs the "folk" concert series turned to me in response and said, "I hate traditional folk music." I am reminded of a comment made by Peter LaFarge one night at the now defunct Gaslight Cafe in Greenwich Village. He said, start writing songs. Nobody is going to be interested in anyone who doesn't write songs anymore. Prophetic. |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: toadfrog Date: 17 Oct 01 - 11:56 PM As a prize example of what folk music can be I suggest anyone who hasn't hear it listen to Roscoe Holcomb's "Little Bessie," which was on the film and record, The High Lonesome Sound (Folkways FA 2368, 1965) and probably on a Smithsonian CD today. John Cohen writes in the liner notes: "During the singing Roscoe becamd very involved with the song, so much so that his mood changed, and he didn't feel like singing at all for several days afterward." Not exactly a trouper. Could never have made it on the stage that way. Couldn't have competed with Bob Dylan. But being "involved with the song" is one of the things that makes folk music worth while. |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Art Thieme Date: 20 Oct 01 - 09:48 PM Tom (Curmudgeon), Good post. True points there. Having been there myself I think, shows me the truth of it. I guess I'm here too much though-----I see a post by a naive but nice person and I just cannot help myself; I leap in a thread and come on too strong (probably) for my own good or the good of the points I want to make. Just want to grab 'em and say, "Please, look to the real thing. There is so very much that is there. As a folksinger, you have the luxury of being a time traveler. Any truck driver can go from here to there---but we can go any place and any time." Art Thieme |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: 53 Date: 20 Oct 01 - 10:01 PM pete seeger is dead and gone, and there's nothing wrong with using mics, and pickups. |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Little Hawk Date: 20 Oct 01 - 11:03 PM musicmic - A number of the songwriters you regard as "real songwriters" seem to have greatly admired Dylan's work (John Lennon and George Harrison sure did) and some (or most) of them have covered his songs from time to time, so where does that leave your point? Then there are those hosts of "equally unattractive non-singers grunting and baring their souls"...like Jackson Browne? Oh yeah, for sure, he can't sing! :-) A classic example of both singer-songwriter and Dylan devotee, baring his soul, but definitely not grunting. But are they "folksingers"? Does it matter? Not that there weren't loads of lousy Dylan-wannabe's in the wings...there certainly were...but that is no reflection on the quality of what Dylan himself has accomplished. - LH |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: Jerry Rasmussen Date: 23 Oct 01 - 09:34 AM Some of my favorite Folksinger/songwriters... Woody Guthrie, Pete Seeger, Leadbelly, Dave Van Ronk, and yes, my dear, dear friend, Art Thieme. Why aren't they called Folksinger/songwriters? |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: GUEST,swoopy Date: 23 Oct 01 - 10:29 AM Not all s/s are ever going to be labelled folksingers e.g Randy newman, Noel coward,or Mick Jagger The ones that get labelled do so because their songs SOUND LIKE FOLKSONGS. This is particularly likely if you use a guitar. Also if you use the same old chords, song stucture, or singing styles. So if it really matters to you (why should it?)either pillage alternative musical traditions or invent your own personal genre go for it (ps reminds me of the early Dylan lyric "You sound like a hillbilly We only want folk singers here") |
|
Subject: RE: Why are singer/ songwrites called folksi From: M.Ted Date: 23 Oct 01 - 03:51 PM I would have thrown my chair at the bastard that said"I hate traditional music", but only after giving him a piece of my mind. Not that it would have made much difference. Just curious, does the :Big Time" promoter still do "folk" concerts in your town, or has he moved on to bigger and better things? |
| Share Thread: |