Lyrics & Knowledge Personal Pages Record Shop Auction Links Radio & Media Kids Membership Help
The Mudcat Cafesj

Post to this Thread - Sort Descending - Printer Friendly - Home


BS: Reagan or Bush

Related threads:
BS: God Quits, Reagan Accepts New Post.... (39) (closed)
BS: Reagan Rapture! (85)
BS: Reagan Love Fest a Ratings Bust (13)
BS: Protocol for flying half staff (17)
BS: Ronald Reagan - Sadly Missed (188)
Obit: Ronald Reagan, actor, pres (34)
BS: Nat'l Reagan Holiday: I Worked Instead (32)
BS: Reagan Funeral Looks Kennedy-esque (41)
BS: Reagan & Recreational Grieving Syndrome (32)
Obit: Songs for Ronnie Reagan (29)
BS: Ronald Reagan death imminent (23)
BS: 'Lott, Reagan & GOP Racism' (91) (closed)
BS: More Reagan/Bush-sized Deficits (12) (closed)


Les Jones 14 Apr 02 - 04:13 AM
van lingle 14 Apr 02 - 06:09 AM
Midchuck 14 Apr 02 - 08:29 AM
kendall 14 Apr 02 - 09:06 AM
CarolC 14 Apr 02 - 12:36 PM
GUEST,Jack the Sailor 14 Apr 02 - 12:38 PM
Les Jones 14 Apr 02 - 12:40 PM
michaelr 14 Apr 02 - 02:12 PM
Lonesome EJ 14 Apr 02 - 03:52 PM
CarolC 14 Apr 02 - 04:42 PM
Lonesome EJ 14 Apr 02 - 05:19 PM
Hyperabid 14 Apr 02 - 05:35 PM
Gareth 14 Apr 02 - 06:30 PM
DougR 14 Apr 02 - 06:35 PM
Hrothgar 15 Apr 02 - 05:35 AM
GUEST,Bill Kennedy 15 Apr 02 - 10:12 AM
CarolC 15 Apr 02 - 10:34 AM
Ebbie 15 Apr 02 - 11:55 AM
GUEST,Les B. 15 Apr 02 - 12:06 PM
Ebbie 15 Apr 02 - 12:54 PM
Bobert 15 Apr 02 - 01:09 PM
kendall 15 Apr 02 - 09:44 PM
Bobert 15 Apr 02 - 09:49 PM
Stephen L. Rich 16 Apr 02 - 04:54 AM
kendall 16 Apr 02 - 05:32 AM

Share Thread
more
Lyrics & Knowledge Search [Advanced]
DT  Forum
Sort (Forum) by:relevance date
DT Lyrics:





Subject: Reagan or Bush
From: Les Jones
Date: 14 Apr 02 - 04:13 AM

Which is most scarry, Reagan as President, whilst everything was decided by the secret group that managed him, or Bush doing things by himself?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Reagan or Bush
From: van lingle
Date: 14 Apr 02 - 06:09 AM

It's a photo finish, Les.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Reagan or Bush
From: Midchuck
Date: 14 Apr 02 - 08:29 AM

How about Clinton and Kennedy being run by their dorks?

(Which is not to say that Reagan and Bush aren't scary - just to be evenhanded about it.)

Peter.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Reagan or Bush
From: kendall
Date: 14 Apr 02 - 09:06 AM

Clinton wasn't run by his "dork"


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Reagan or Bush
From: CarolC
Date: 14 Apr 02 - 12:36 PM

What makes you think Bush is doing anything by himself?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Reagan or Bush
From: GUEST,Jack the Sailor
Date: 14 Apr 02 - 12:38 PM

A1 or HP Sauce?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Reagan or Bush
From: Les Jones
Date: 14 Apr 02 - 12:40 PM

Bush seems to function without a forward strategy. Reagan's or I suppose his minders, strategy was scarry but the USSR fell apart and ceased to be a major problem.

Clinton was sexually irresponsible, which brings all his judgement into question but his heart seemed to be in the right place and he seemed to have the ability to get people talking.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Reagan or Bush
From: michaelr
Date: 14 Apr 02 - 02:12 PM

C'mon Les - it should be common knowledge that Bush's strings are controlled by a bunch of his father's cronies. I think if he was on his own he would be a terrible bumbler, but not nearly as scary as he is.

Cheers,
Michael


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Reagan or Bush
From: Lonesome EJ
Date: 14 Apr 02 - 03:52 PM

Bush and Reagan have several things in common : Belief that what benefits Big Business in America will have a ripple effect that will also benefit the majority of the population, that military strength is prime motivator for America in negotiating foreign policy, that environmental dangers are exaggerated by a powerful leftwing lobby whose principal agenda is the obstruction of progress, and that running a major deficit (while bad for business) is good for the federal government. They are also classic delegators, leaving management decision-making to their teams. The major difference is that Reagan was a sort of Conservative visionary, able to effectively articulate a vision for America. As such, he was a proactive politician, setting new schemes and designs in motion. Bush, by contrast, is much like his Father...a very reactive politician, lacking vision to articulate and project a vision. He is most comfortable when presented with a concrete challenge (9/11 and its aftermath), and fumbles when it comes to more abstract agendas such as the economy, the environment, crime, and articulating an American Foreign Policy agenda independent of the War on Terrorism.

Neither man is a leader I would choose, but in terms of effectiveness in evolving, articulating, and engaging leadership as a President, Reagan was far above Bush. I think even most Conservative Mudcatters would agree with that assessment.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Reagan or Bush
From: CarolC
Date: 14 Apr 02 - 04:42 PM

...in terms of effectiveness in evolving, articulating, and engaging leadership as a President, Reagan was far above Bush

Either that, or he just looked better (and perhaps more convincing) than Bush when he acted as the mouthpiece for his handlers and their vision.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Reagan or Bush
From: Lonesome EJ
Date: 14 Apr 02 - 05:19 PM

You might be right Carol. I believe Reagan was pretty much his own man, like him or not.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Reagan or Bush
From: Hyperabid
Date: 14 Apr 02 - 05:35 PM

A political recipe

Ask them in Serve them hemlock Call it poetry Plead insanity

Kindest regards

Hyp


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Reagan or Bush
From: Gareth
Date: 14 Apr 02 - 06:30 PM

There is soething to be said for the US of A constitution restricting the office of President to two terms.

Unless, of course, it becomes hereditary.

But then at least the Bush children drink, and admit it, so maybe there's hope yet.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Reagan or Bush
From: DougR
Date: 14 Apr 02 - 06:35 PM

Right, Kendall. Clinton wasn't run by his "dork." He was run by his something else that begins with a "d." (Couldn't resist :>>))

DougR


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Reagan or Bush
From: Hrothgar
Date: 15 Apr 02 - 05:35 AM

Working backwards:

Bush, Clinton, Bush, Reagan, Clinton, Ford, Nixon, Johnson, Kennedy ........

I'd feel sorry for the Yanks if I wasn't so scared for the rest of us!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Reagan or Bush
From: GUEST,Bill Kennedy
Date: 15 Apr 02 - 10:12 AM

a few things make Bush scarier - by far - one - he is still President - we survived Reagan and his handlers, though the legacy still does harm

two - Reagan was/is a bad actor, reading what was put in front of him convinced some people that there was more there than there was - there is an interesting side note to this in one of Oliver Sacks' studies, a group of brain injured patients who develop an ability to detect insincerity, AKA 'lying', in the facial expressions of people used to laugh hysterically whenever Reagan came on the tube because they could see he was lying, and what he was saying was so completely incongruous with what he believed. BUSH, on the other hand, has beliefs and is willing to act on them.

three - Bush's beliefs - anyone who actually professes to believe in Armageddon and the Second Coming has no business directing this country and the world toward it.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Reagan or Bush
From: CarolC
Date: 15 Apr 02 - 10:34 AM

Hrothgar,

Bush, Clinton, Bush, Reagan, Clinton, Ford, Nixon, Johnson, Kennedy ........ ?

Are you sure about that?


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Reagan or Bush
From: Ebbie
Date: 15 Apr 02 - 11:55 AM

Maybe Hrothgar is, for a purpose, just not including them all?

It is dismaying to realize that those who are effective are not necessarily right for the country. On the other hand, I can't imagine anyone in the world meeting every citizens's needs. My parents, for instance, despised and feared FDR.

And certainly, from the beginning, each one of our leaders had his foes as well as adherents. Maybe the point is that the country is greater than either the bumblings or the excesses of any individual administration.

Ebbie


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Reagan or Bush
From: GUEST,Les B.
Date: 15 Apr 02 - 12:06 PM

Saw a great analysis the other day: Historians will refer to the Clinton era as "Sex between the Bushes!!"


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Reagan or Bush
From: Ebbie
Date: 15 Apr 02 - 12:54 PM

That's funny, Les!


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Reagan or Bush
From: Bobert
Date: 15 Apr 02 - 01:09 PM

Bush, by far, because the stakes are higher, and because not only has he let some very right winged folks hack away at our rights and liberties but he seems to condone violence as a means of solving differences. His administration makes Ronnie's Raygun's look like the good old days...


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Reagan or Bush
From: kendall
Date: 15 Apr 02 - 09:44 PM

Maybe we are expecting too much for an administration that is made up of, a bush a colon and a dick.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Reagan or Bush
From: Bobert
Date: 15 Apr 02 - 09:49 PM

Hmmmmmmmm? Think Kendall's on to something....


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Reagan or Bush
From: Stephen L. Rich
Date: 16 Apr 02 - 04:54 AM

Bush Lite couldn't tie his own shoes. Look one rung down the ladder to see who is runnung things.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate

Subject: RE: Reagan or Bush
From: kendall
Date: 16 Apr 02 - 05:32 AM

At least, Warren G. Harding admitted he wasn't up to the job.


Post - Top - Home - Printer Friendly - Translate


 


This Thread Is Closed.


Mudcat time: 3 March 10:28 AM EST

[ Home ]

All original material is copyright © 1998 by the Mudcat Café Music Foundation, Inc. All photos, music, images, etc. are copyright © by their rightful owners. Every effort is taken to attribute appropriate copyright to images, content, music, etc. We are not a copyright resource.