|
12 Nov 07 - 06:35 PM (#2192290) Subject: BS: Sattilite Innernet Question??? From: Bobert Heck, I've probably allready asked this an, if so, sorry... But... ...I need to get hooked up in ther next few weeks... I can't go into winter (with more time for the pudder) with my dial-up... It sometimes has ony 4.5 kbps which ain't enough to evn open Mudcat, let alone post anything... We don't have cable and out telephone company might not even know that high speed access even exists as it is perfectly willin' to sell folks a totally usless dial-up product... I've been looking at SkyBlue but have an open mind... Any suggestions (related to this topic)??? Thanks in advance... B~ |
|
12 Nov 07 - 06:38 PM (#2192296) Subject: RE: BS: Sattilite Innernet Question??? From: Lonesome EJ I have Qwest from my long distance provider, and it was about a 25 dollar per month upcharge. I'm very happy with it, B. |
|
12 Nov 07 - 06:40 PM (#2192298) Subject: RE: BS: Sattilite Innernet Question??? From: Amos Go for a dish satellite link. You can get the equivalent of highspeed downlink and medium speed uplink which works out fine since most of your upward traffic is short requests, not files. A |
|
12 Nov 07 - 06:44 PM (#2192300) Subject: RE: BS: Sattilite Innernet Question??? From: bobad Is wireless, as opposed to satellite, available where you are? Where I am, both are available but satellite is way more expensive. |
|
12 Nov 07 - 06:54 PM (#2192307) Subject: RE: BS: Sattilite Innernet Question??? From: Amos You need to be relatively near a link point to work a wireless connection. Sounds like ole Bobert is too far off the main roads... A |
|
12 Nov 07 - 07:41 PM (#2192341) Subject: RE: BS: Sattilite Innernet Question??? From: GUEST,.gargoyle BLACKBERRY - AT&T
Sincerely, |
|
12 Nov 07 - 07:49 PM (#2192352) Subject: RE: BS: Sattilite Innernet Question??? From: Q (Frank Staplin) My daughter (inland British Columbia) is getting satellite- the only available choice in her area for highspeed. A proposal to string cable died because too few people indicated that they would subscribe- the largest population group is city folk in summer homes- they all have broadband at home, so deep-sixed the cable proposal. Another daughter, also living in the bush*, has had satellite for a couple of years now and is quite satisfied with it (two satellite systems, one for internet and business, the other for TV). Here in the city, the broadband cable also takes care of telephone and television, so one provider for all. *bush- anywhere beyond walking distance to Starbucks. |
|
12 Nov 07 - 07:50 PM (#2192353) Subject: RE: BS: Sattilite Innernet Question??? From: michaelr There's also HughesNet. |
|
12 Nov 07 - 07:59 PM (#2192367) Subject: RE: BS: Sattilite Innernet Question??? From: Bobert Yeah, I've checked into Hughes Net... It's $10 a month more than... Quest is not avilable... Cable is not available... There are no other telephone companies in my area so it comes down to sattilite... No other option... Just which one??? Keep in mind that I live in the boonies... I mean it... B~ |
|
12 Nov 07 - 09:31 PM (#2192413) Subject: RE: BS: Sattilite Innernet Question??? From: Rapparee Where you living agin, Bobert? Front Royal or someplace like that, ain't it? |
|
12 Nov 07 - 09:52 PM (#2192421) Subject: RE: BS: Sattilite Innernet Question??? From: Rapparee Never mind, I just remembered. AT&T DSL services are available to area code 540 at $19.95 per month for the first 3 months, $39.95 per month thereafter. Iffen ya want more info, let me know. |
|
12 Nov 07 - 10:13 PM (#2192427) Subject: RE: BS: Sattilite Innernet Question??? From: Bill D Shoot....for maybe $7.5 million, you could probably get 'em to run you a special cable line. (I hear there's not many performances of the Bolshoi Ballet down there, either....living in the boonies has some benefits.) [yeah, I know...I ain't much help] |
|
13 Nov 07 - 06:25 PM (#2193077) Subject: RE: BS: Sattilite Innernet Question??? From: Bobert Thanks, Rap... I'll call AT&T and see what they say... |
|
13 Nov 07 - 10:42 PM (#2193214) Subject: RE: BS: Sattilite Innernet Question??? From: open mike i have Wild Blue...thru the local company Got Sky and i checked out a couple of others...when shopping around... Hughes Net i think is the former Directway from Direct T.V. and the other is star band. if you have a view of the southern sky you can get these. i got a good deal with Wild Blue/Got Sky and if you refer anyone you get one month free...let me know if you want me to refer you!' If you have a satelite t.v. dish you probably can get internet from a roof top satyellite too. it does get sketchy reception in heavy storms but at 100 mbps when the weather is clear! good luck and let us know what you find and decide on! |
|
14 Nov 07 - 12:53 AM (#2193247) Subject: RE: BS: Sattilite Innernet Question??? From: Padre Here in Botetourt County VA, we use Hughes Net (formerly Directway) and have had good results - rarely knocked out by weather and (when bundled with satellite TV) , not that expensive. Padre |
|
14 Nov 07 - 08:52 PM (#2193994) Subject: RE: BS: Sattilite Innernet Question??? From: Tweed Make sure your rig is modern enough to take the AT&T gizmo, Bobertz. I'm still using windows 98 and it doesn't seem to have enough something or other to handle the Bell south high speed, so I'm still stuck in the slow lane. |
|
14 Nov 07 - 09:17 PM (#2194012) Subject: RE: BS: Sattilite Innernet Question??? From: Bobert Slow lane, Tweezer??? I'd take that... Most of the time I'm stuck in the "stop lane"... 4.7 kbp's is equivalent to the energy it take for a flea to sneeze... I gonna check out AT&T but prolly go with WildBlue... Reminds me of WildBill"s Juke Joint with them big ass bottles of beer and them buzzard wings... Kinda rools off yer tongue... Wild Blue... Wild Blue... Wild Blue.... See... Oh??? Hmmmmmm??? I have XP accordin' to the book that came with the pudder... That okay??? B~ |