|
17 Mar 08 - 01:06 PM (#2290662) Subject: BS: Mudcatters initiating most of threads From: Leadbelly While Amos seems to be king of posts/messages I wonder who might be the duke of most threads initiated. Interested in such kind of statistics, I think this could be much more difficult to find out. Manfred |
|
17 Mar 08 - 01:15 PM (#2290683) Subject: RE: BS: Mudcatters initiating most of threads From: SINSULL More interesting yet - who has started the most music threads? |
|
17 Mar 08 - 01:23 PM (#2290692) Subject: RE: BS: Mudcatters initiating most of threads From: Leadbelly Agreed, SINSULL. So let's try to separate this question into three categories: music, non-music and total. But this seems to be very difficult I believe. |
|
17 Mar 08 - 01:50 PM (#2290718) Subject: RE: BS: Mudcatters initiating most of threads From: Amos I don't believe anyone has the time to parse this out by hand; at least I would not see the value in it. Jeff could write an algorithm to capture the name of the author of the first thread in every post, and sort them into a list. In a lot less time than you or I could do it by hand, with close to 110,000 threads in play. A |
|
17 Mar 08 - 01:53 PM (#2290722) Subject: RE: BS: Mudcatters initiating most of threads From: gnu I think *NAME CENSURED* posted the most most nasty posts. Will there be an arse category? |
|
17 Mar 08 - 02:21 PM (#2290755) Subject: RE: BS: Mudcatters initiating most of threads From: Leadbelly Amos, everybody can use the "trace"-option to get an overview after a while how many threads were started by oneself. Perhaps there is no real value in finding out who the winner is, but on the other hand -without knowing how many threads you have initiated - you wouldn't have been the "king" of posts without Mudcatters starting more or less interesting threads. True??? |
|
17 Mar 08 - 03:02 PM (#2290789) Subject: RE: BS: Mudcatters initiating most of threads From: curmudgeon "...more or less interesting threads." There used to be a poster whose comments would shame a Vogon poet - Tom |
|
17 Mar 08 - 03:07 PM (#2290795) Subject: RE: BS: Mudcatters initiating most of threads From: Amos Leadbelly, I ain't no king of nuffin' -- just a prolix wiseguy. What I meant was, I myselfr would not undertake the laborious task of sorting out first-post on over 100,000 threads just to count 'em up. It would be interesting to know sure, but not so compellingly interesting that I would invest the time. A |
|
17 Mar 08 - 03:15 PM (#2290809) Subject: RE: BS: Mudcatters initiating most of threads From: Rapparee I sorta suspect GUEST started the most.... |
|
17 Mar 08 - 03:31 PM (#2290835) Subject: RE: BS: Mudcatters initiating most of threads From: Leadbelly Please take it easy, Amos. "King" wasn't meant ironically. Concerning this thread, I do not expext anybody to start any difficult calculations to get a result. But I thought that there might be a method - based on the programme of Mudcat Cafe - or personally made statistics to clear this question. That's all... Manfred |
|
18 Mar 08 - 09:23 AM (#2291527) Subject: RE: BS: Mudcatters initiating most of threads From: GUEST,LTS pretending to work If there is an 'arse' catagory, mine's the widest! I know because some person posted a (deleted) thread here about it. LTS |