|
27 Jan 09 - 07:44 PM (#2550603) Subject: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: EBarnacle Well, she's done it! Sarah has created a PAC to raise money for a run in 2012. It's so nice that we will have someone to laugh at for the next few grim years. |
|
27 Jan 09 - 07:47 PM (#2550605) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: bobad She just doesn't get it. |
|
27 Jan 09 - 07:48 PM (#2550608) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Riginslinger I read where she's coming out with a book, too. It won't be long and she'll be just as rich as all the other idiots who run for public office. |
|
27 Jan 09 - 07:52 PM (#2550611) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: GUEST,biff she's really there for the try it it won't work crowd |
|
27 Jan 09 - 08:16 PM (#2550624) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: maple_leaf_boy I sure wouldn't vote for her if I could. Willie Nelson for President. Now there's a better choice. |
|
27 Jan 09 - 08:37 PM (#2550634) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: SINSULL Do not underestimate this woman. She is very shrewd and very eager for power. Palin learned a lot over these past few months. Trying to imagine the elegant Mrs. Obama being followed by the Alaskan shrew. |
|
27 Jan 09 - 08:38 PM (#2550635) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: SINSULL Is she running for president this time or VP or Senator? Will baby bush II be her running mate? They do have lots of guns in Alaska... |
|
27 Jan 09 - 08:59 PM (#2550649) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: kendall Talk about delusions of adequacy! |
|
27 Jan 09 - 09:11 PM (#2550656) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: artbrooks Well, by 2012 her overall experience won't be much different from that of the last state governor elected president...and we all know what a great job he did. |
|
27 Jan 09 - 09:20 PM (#2550659) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Sorcha Hell, the WORLD is gonna end in 2012...don't you all read the papers? LOL |
|
27 Jan 09 - 09:32 PM (#2550663) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: artbrooks Not the world, Sorcha - only Wyoming. And who'd notice, anyway? |
|
27 Jan 09 - 09:37 PM (#2550665) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Riginslinger Palin, that's where she intended to launch her campaign! |
|
27 Jan 09 - 10:14 PM (#2550681) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: maple_leaf_boy It's polar shifts. The "world" that we know is going to end, and a new one is going to begin. But, the world is not going to end-end. The Earth's rotation is going to change, and our North and South Poles will be in different places. This will cause climate changes to occur. The worry is that if the polar shift occurs too quickly. This is based on the beliefs of some South-western U.S. Native peoples, according to a documentary that I once watched. They believe that the world began four times, and has ended three times. Once the polar shifts occur, then metaphorically the world has ended, and a new one has began. A new world with a new North and South Pole. It is expected to happen three years from now, or at least not far from it. The world won't literally end for another 3 billion years, unless the Sun should burn out. |
|
27 Jan 09 - 10:19 PM (#2550685) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Alice 2012 doomsday is a hoax. Palin's ego, unfortunately, is real, as in really big. |
|
28 Jan 09 - 12:30 AM (#2550713) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Ebbie Somebody likes Palin. Look at this: From Shoefly to Flying Shoe (Shoefly is a local shoe store) |
|
28 Jan 09 - 12:32 AM (#2550714) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Little Hawk I'm curious, Maple Leaf Boy...are you talking about a magnetic pole shift or a physical shift of the planet on its axis? The first would be a subtle event, not perceptible to ordinary human senses, but detectable with scientific equipment. The second would be a worldwide catastrophe. And if it's a magnetic shift you are referring to, would that also be accompanied by a reversal of the Earth's direction of rotation on its axis? (in which case the sun would then rise in the west) Just curious which particular theory you are referring to, that's all...not expressing any opinion about it one way or another. No one has any way of knowing if the various predictions and prophecies about 2012 are "a hoax" (or just merely incorrect) or not. I won't be surprised if nothing unusual happens in 2012. I won't be totally astounded if something unusual does happen. Why? Because I have no basis of being 100% sure on either possibility, so why should I pretend (as so many do) that I do have such a basis? I don't know. So I'll wait and see. |
|
28 Jan 09 - 01:03 AM (#2550720) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Alice Of course it can be stated that it is a hoax - NASA astrobiologist has pointed out that the 2012 "galaxy alignment" is an internet hoax. ask an astrobiologist at NASA "... I can't explain it because it is just an Internet hoax. There is no alignment with the center of the Galaxy in 2012 or any time." |
|
28 Jan 09 - 01:35 AM (#2550733) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Little Hawk It depends on which particular 2012 prediction (or prophecy) you are referring to, Alice. There are many different ones. Many have to do with various ancient Amerindian traditional stories from North and South America, as well as other ancient cultural tales. Many have to do with a polar shift of some kind and/or a reversal of the Earth's direction of rotation on its axis. I don't think I have ever heard of the "galaxy alignment" story before. If someone concocted that one with deliberate intention to deceive people, then of course it's a hoax. If not, if they are sincere about it and they believe it for some reason, then it's not a hoax...they are (I would think) simply in error. The word "hoax" means a deliberate attempt to deceive. People are often wrong in their predictions of future events, but they're not trying to deceive anyone if they actually believe what they're saying, in which case...it's not a hoax. It's just wrong, period. |
|
28 Jan 09 - 08:07 AM (#2550883) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Bobert Well, I'm all for Ms. Sarah runnin' for Prez in '12... I mean, who else could kill off the remnants of the Republican Party better than Ms. Hottie??? Plus, maybe she'd take up Hugh Hefner's offer for a little estra publicity... (There you go, Bobert... Didn't that get you the "blast" from the Mud-womenz last time you brought it up???) Well, yeah... Who cares... I'd buy the mag if she were in it just as a collector's item... B~ |
|
28 Jan 09 - 08:14 AM (#2550884) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: SINSULL and of course, you buy it only for the political stories, right Bobert? |
|
28 Jan 09 - 09:21 AM (#2550948) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Bobert Yup... The only copy I ever bought was the one where John Lennon was interviewed... Though I also have the "text only" of the interview of Martin Luther King... But, yeah, I love the folks who say they only buy it for the interviews... What a joke... Half of them can't read... B;~) |
|
28 Jan 09 - 11:08 AM (#2551026) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: EBarnacle The idea of Palin writing her own autobiography is ludicrous. If it is true, then she will have to come across much more lucidly in print than in vive voce. Of course, she will have plenty of time, as her current job is apparently not very demanding. |
|
28 Jan 09 - 11:14 AM (#2551037) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: frogprince $2,025.00 for a pair of her shoes? Surely she could get a lot more for a pair of her used panties! I might pay a nickle for a pair; I can always use a rag to apply wood stain with. |
|
28 Jan 09 - 11:31 AM (#2551055) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Nancy King The news story described the shoes as "red, Naughty Monkey Double-Dare pumps." Now who wouldn't want THOSE???? Wish they'd included a picture... |
|
28 Jan 09 - 11:44 AM (#2551075) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Peace I buy it for the pitcures/pitchers/pitcheures photographs. |
|
28 Jan 09 - 01:24 PM (#2551179) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Ebbie Here ya go, Nancy. |
|
28 Jan 09 - 01:55 PM (#2551202) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: bobad Hey, my neighbour's got a pair just like that, his name is Maurice. |
|
28 Jan 09 - 02:00 PM (#2551204) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Riginslinger Nice feet! |
|
28 Jan 09 - 02:39 PM (#2551237) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Stringsinger "I can see disaster from here". |
|
28 Jan 09 - 02:46 PM (#2551244) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Don Firth The geological record shows that the earth's magnetic poles do shift from time to time. Different polarity of iron molecules in different strata. As Little Hawk says, it can be measured with scientific instruments (and it would throw our current compasses off until we adjust navigation to the where, geographically, the new North Pole is, and it may confuse migratory birds and monarch butterflies for awhile), but thee and me will not even notice the shift. What kind of physical forces are there in this neighborhood of our galaxy that would cause a planet which is approximately 8,000 miles in diameter with a mass of 5.9742 × 1024 kilograms to suddenly stop and begin rotating the other way, or cause it to flip over, pole to pole? 'Course, such a catastrophe might be preferable to having Sarah Palin as president. . . . Don Firth |
|
28 Jan 09 - 03:04 PM (#2551259) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: VirginiaTam I wanna know who all the numbnutz were that bid on that shoe auction. We can refer them to Q's lottery win thread. |
|
28 Jan 09 - 03:41 PM (#2551293) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Little Hawk The question remains, Don...what causes the Earth's manetic pole to periodically reverse itself? And that's an intriguing question. For instance, an electric motor has polarity with a north and south pole, achieved by rotating a coil around an armature (have I got those technical terms right?). At any rate...the only way you can reverse the polarity on an electric motor is to have it rotate in the opposite direction...or you can rotate it in the opposite direction by a toggle switch which causes a source of electrical power to flow the other way. Interesting, eh? Perhaps the planet Earth works in a similar fashion. It is said to have an iron core, and the rotation of the planet around that iron core may be exactly what produces the Earth's magnetic field. If so, the direction of rotation would be what determines the polarity of the field, and the magnetic field would collapse to zero if, for instance, the planet stopped rotating...while it would simply drop in amplitude some if the planet were to slow its rotation a bit. I have no ironclad opinion about any of this, because I don't know. I'm just speculating on what I find an interesting subject. |
|
28 Jan 09 - 05:08 PM (#2551377) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Nancy King Yeah, well, those sure are naughty, all right. Hope the winning bidder enjoys 'em... |
|
28 Jan 09 - 06:12 PM (#2551422) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: McGrath of Harlow Does Sarah Palin count as a hoax? |
|
28 Jan 09 - 06:18 PM (#2551429) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: katlaughing Ebbie, they wouldn't necessarily have to like her. They may have bought them as an investment in political history. I abhor her, but that didn't keep me from selling my Rog's press pass, from her only visit here, on ebay.:-) |
|
28 Jan 09 - 07:23 PM (#2551497) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Little Hawk A hoax in what sense, McGrath? |
|
28 Jan 09 - 07:30 PM (#2551505) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Don Firth "An inner core of solid iron is surrounded by an outer core of molten iron. They rotate at different rates, and the interaction between the regions creates what scientists call a 'hydromagnetic dynamo.'" From this web site: Interesting stuff. According to this, the shift of the magnetic poles doesn't happen overnight as some folks contend, not is it cataclysmic, as the "let's all panic!!" folks love so much, it "migrates" over a period of possibly thousands of years. Don Firth |
|
28 Jan 09 - 07:43 PM (#2551512) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: frogprince Ahh...Don....? |
|
28 Jan 09 - 07:51 PM (#2551519) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Little Hawk Fascinating stuff, Don! Thanks for the link. |
|
28 Jan 09 - 07:59 PM (#2551526) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Don Firth Sorry about drifting the thread, frogprince, it's just that I find the earth's inner core far more magnetic than Sarah Palin. Vote NO on asteroid collisions, nearby supernovae, gamma ray bursters, Sarah Palin for president, and all other major cataclysms. Don Firth |
|
28 Jan 09 - 08:30 PM (#2551547) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: McGrath of Harlow Put together in some dirty tricks section of the Democrat Party perhaps, with a view to wrecking McCain's chances, and going on to destroy the Republicans... In an age of Conspiracy Theories it must be worth running that one up the flagpole to see if anyone salutes it. |
|
28 Jan 09 - 11:08 PM (#2551602) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Little Hawk Most of the things that happen in the world of politics (and business) (and high finance) are accomplished by more than one person...by a group of people working together toward a common purpose, and they usually don't openly tell everyone else exactly what they're doing! That being the case, it's not a bit surprising that we have a lot of conspiracy theories, because we have a lot of conspiracies to theorize about. |
|
28 Jan 09 - 11:31 PM (#2551607) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Bee-dubya-ell If Governor Palen tries a run for President in 2012, she'll find that some of her Republican primary opponents (some of the same folks who were so fully supportive of VP candidate Palen) will be more than ready to point out the same weaknesses and lack of qualifications that Democrats were pointing out a few months ago. It's one thing to have the other party saying you're unqualified. It's quite another to have high-ranking members of your own party saying it. She hasn't had that experience yet because she hasn't participated in the national primaries. Guys like Mitt Romney or Rudy Giuliani would chew her a new anal opening without giving it a second thought. |
|
28 Jan 09 - 11:36 PM (#2551611) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Ebbie Not if God has ordained it. :) |
|
29 Jan 09 - 05:34 AM (#2551771) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Richard Bridge A hoax? No, surely she is a con-artist or as we say in the UK a "con". Or maybe as the French say, "une conasse". |
|
29 Jan 09 - 10:32 AM (#2551979) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Riginslinger Con-artist = Politician |
|
30 Jan 09 - 07:14 AM (#2552759) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Musket Occasionally, here in the UK, we get a politician who has character. Whether they are very good, very bad or a downright liability, they are that rare thing, interesting. Boris Johnson, the mayor of London is a good example. Sarah Palin may have caused some concern, and as the American leadership has more affect on the rest of the world than any other country leaders, we kept a close eye too. But just so long as she had no opportunity to actually go to Washington, the stories about her and even watching her in action was light relief and made the election something to watch. Perhaps a novelty item, and to be frank, she was not a good advert for The USA. But I hope she is around for the next one. Comics need people like her! |
|
30 Jan 09 - 08:18 AM (#2552794) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Ron Davies It's nice to know, that as a poster on another forum noted, we won't need a PAC to defeat her. All we'll need is Palin herself--and Tina Fey. |
|
30 Jan 09 - 10:20 AM (#2552887) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Bonzo3legs Perhaps she should take a week with Cristina Kirshner down there in Argentina - she's running for "whore of the century" by all accounts!! |
|
30 Jan 09 - 10:22 AM (#2552891) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Donuel The Palin LImbaugh 2012 ticket is gaining more lip service as we speak. |
|
30 Jan 09 - 10:28 AM (#2552901) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Ebbie It is interesting to see her altered appearance since she returned to Alaska. I guess your own personal makeup artist and hairdresser do make a difference. Remember how scrubbed and polished and shiny she looked during the campaign? These days in contrast she looks positively unkempt. Current videos show it better but here is one photo: Here |
|
30 Jan 09 - 10:54 AM (#2552922) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Donuel When she goes to visit Karl Rove in jail (for contempt of Congress) she will establish the new Republican Party as a martyr to the Democrat despots. I expect to see limbaugh lead the 'free Karl' demonstrations in DC. Karl is trying to prove that he has a lifetime pre emptive pardon for everything and anything since Bush declared such 4 days prior to Inauguration day for both Karl and Harriet Myers. Executive priviledge is supposed to only apply to an active President's advisors. |
|
30 Jan 09 - 10:57 AM (#2552924) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Donuel Sarah is moving to DC to rub shoulders with insiders. I expect an act of God will call her back to AK volcanic eruption |
|
30 Jan 09 - 11:45 AM (#2552973) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Big Al Whittle I still find it hard to believe that the Republican party picked Reagan and Bush junior as leaders of the party - and half the people voting Republican were shaking their heads in disbelief at the time that those two were the best America could come up with. And both those unlikely people got re-elected. So I don't think you should underestimate her. You have to wonder why the Republicans keep coming up with weirdoes. Nearly every other person you meet, who calls himself a Republican, seems more sensible than the people they elect as leaders. |
|
30 Jan 09 - 01:45 PM (#2553078) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: akenaton Well Al you certainly can't say that about the Dems! |
|
31 Jan 09 - 08:56 AM (#2553608) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Riginslinger "You have to wonder why the Republicans keep coming up with weirdoes." Al - I think it has to do with raising money. Just like MoveOn.org was able to orchestrate huge campaign donations for Barak Obama and left wing Democrats, Republicans now have to rely on "faith based" organizations to raise cash. That, I think, is why you see so much media attention devoted to people like Sarah Palin and Mike Huckabee. |
|
31 Jan 09 - 09:24 AM (#2553628) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Nick "You have to wonder why the Republicans keep coming up with weirdoes. Nearly every other person you meet, who calls himself a Republican, seems more sensible than the people they elect as leaders. " I think you have the answer, Al. You have 100 voters. Nearly every other one is more sensible - ie 49 voters. This leaves 51 voters (ie a majority) who are less sensible than the people they elect as leaders and majorities tend to win out. |
|
31 Jan 09 - 10:27 AM (#2553663) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Richard Bridge Donuel - God will call her back to AK? Nah, too good for her. AK will call her back to God. AK47, that is. |
|
31 Jan 09 - 10:27 AM (#2553664) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: McGrath of Harlow Surely you need to be pretty peculiar to even want to become president. Occasionally that might be peculiar good, which is whta you've probably got now. But not too often. |
|
31 Jan 09 - 02:19 PM (#2553833) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Little Hawk You would have to be quite unusual, that's for sure. |
|
31 Jan 09 - 02:43 PM (#2553854) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Ebbie Richard Bridge, are you having a bad year? :) |
|
31 Jan 09 - 04:04 PM (#2553909) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: robomatic The problem with Palin is that there is a perception out there that she did not do this to herself, but the media did it to her. Therefore, there is a kneejerk reaction out there that will be ready to support her against all comers, who are perceived as persecutors. |
|
31 Jan 09 - 04:56 PM (#2553939) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Little Hawk Indeed. She has acquired the image of a feisty and somehow loveable underdog. If I were her, I would work with that and see what can be done. ;-) |
|
31 Jan 09 - 06:26 PM (#2554009) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: robomatic just as long as she stays away from those turkey pardoning power kill media events! Sarah 'pardons' turkey but behind her... |
|
31 Jan 09 - 07:01 PM (#2554040) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Don Firth Campaign tactic for 2012: . . . Shooting Democrats from a low-flying plane. . . . Don Firth |
|
31 Jan 09 - 07:36 PM (#2554073) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Richard Bridge Why Ebbie - because I believe in destroying evil? |
|
31 Jan 09 - 07:48 PM (#2554075) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Little Hawk Evil can't be destroyed. It's a moral concept, and you cannot destroy a moral concept. You can't destroy good, and you can't destroy evil nor can you destroy any other concept of that sort...but...you most certainly can destroy people you don't like (such as Sarah Palin), animals, the natural environment, buildings, cities, an economy, even entire nations.... Which did you have in mind for your specific crusade, Richard? Just Sarah? Or does it go farther than that? |
|
31 Jan 09 - 08:04 PM (#2554084) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Bobert Heck, I don't care who's doin' her makeup... She's still hot as a three dollar pistol and might make me buy my 2nd Playboy in my life if she posed nude but... ...this time I wouldn't be buyin' it fir the articles... Awww, jus' funnin' 'cause I'd at least... ...glance thru the articles... Now as fir bein' prsident??? Nah... She ain't too smart... ight of fact, I was wonderin' if she does actually write this book if she will read it??? (Well, Boberdz... If she did it would prolly be the first book she ever read...) That's my point... I don't think we need any more presiednts who can calim to have never actually read a book... B~ |
|
31 Jan 09 - 08:20 PM (#2554092) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: robomatic Someone else who needs glasses. Palin is about as hot as a isickle. awe shuks jus' funnin' |
|
31 Jan 09 - 08:44 PM (#2554110) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Bobert Now don't be like that roboz... No shucks gonna get ya' outta dissin' Ms. Sarah... Now say yer sorry and promise that if she poses fir Playboy that you'll buy a copy of it... I mean, it ain't like makin' a house payment... What, couple two or three bucks... Come on, roboz... Can she count you in fir a couple three losuy bucks, 'er what??? B~ |
|
31 Jan 09 - 09:22 PM (#2554124) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Little Hawk She's a sizzler. And a crack shot too. What more could you possibly want? ;-) Okay, she's so not as mean lookin' a femme fatale as Tura Satana was maybe, but that ain't easy, specially for a politician. Tura and friends |
|
31 Jan 09 - 10:41 PM (#2554158) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Don Firth You want hot? SHE's hot!! Don Firth |
|
31 Jan 09 - 11:56 PM (#2554172) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: katlaughing ...image of a feisty and somehow loveable underdog. Not hardly. By the end of the campaign her own party leaders were shaking their heads and distancing themselves from her. I think she and McCain came out of right field at them and they didn't know what hit them, BUT they figured it out and only the very conservative, evangelicals of them would support her now. I don't think they'd even use her as a front because they obviously could not control her. |
|
01 Feb 09 - 12:00 AM (#2554174) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Riginslinger Of course, she can use all the publicity she can get! |
|
01 Feb 09 - 12:49 AM (#2554188) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: EBarnacle LH, was that crack shot or crack pot? |
|
01 Feb 09 - 03:01 AM (#2554209) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Little Hawk Chongo says he can see a place for her in his organization. |
|
01 Feb 09 - 08:52 AM (#2554394) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Riginslinger "LH, was that crack shot or crack pot?" Or maybe just plain--crack! |
|
01 Feb 09 - 12:09 PM (#2554513) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: akenaton As we say in Scotland....she's a wee cracker! All you "liberals" should relax and forget the labels, right and left have good and bad in their philosophy and the good thing about Miss Sarah is her independence of spirit. That lady won't be ruled by no stinkin' system and she has the ability to carry people with her, to communicate her ideas and most importantly her self belief. If we want real change, we need someone who can inspire all of the people to get out there and take government by throat, not send them to sleep with reams of dusty "Liberal" rhetoric. |
|
01 Feb 09 - 02:42 PM (#2554645) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Richard Bridge System? She had her snout in it like few others. The Princess of Pork. |
|
01 Feb 09 - 03:13 PM (#2554671) Subject: RE: BS: Sarah Palin's at it again From: Don Firth People give Palin credit for cancelling the "bridge to nowhere." But as I understand it, she kept the Federal money. (Perhaps Ebbie can verify if I heard this correctly.) Don Firth |
