|
17 Mar 09 - 07:59 PM (#2591429) Subject: Arsy versy string numbers.. From: McGrath of Harlow It came up when I was explaining about something to someone starting out with the mandolin - why is it that we number strings starting with the highest pitched and ending with the bass strings, but when we are naming them we do it the other way round? So we say the mandolin is nornally tuned GDAE rather than EADG and the guitar is EADGBE rather than EBGDAE, with the First Strings last. I mean, I can see that since we tend to read from left to right, it's natural enough to name the strings in that order - but why on earth don't we number them that way too? |
|
17 Mar 09 - 08:06 PM (#2591434) Subject: RE: Arsy versy string numbers.. From: s&r My mnemonic for guitar strings is 'Ee by gum don't ask Elvis' Stu |
|
18 Mar 09 - 04:32 AM (#2591566) Subject: RE: Arsy versy string numbers.. From: Dave Hanson I've played mandolin for a long time and it's always been, EADG Dave H |
|
18 Mar 09 - 08:44 AM (#2591678) Subject: RE: Arsy versy string numbers.. From: Harmonium Hero Some people do name the notes from the top down, but I think most - in UK at least - do it from bottom to top; perhaps it's t'other way round in US. I think it's for the same reason that we describe a scale as do re mi fa sol la ti do, rather than do ti la blah blah blah.... In part music, the first part is the top - melody -line. So perhaps the numbering of strings follows this convention; the top, or 1st string supposedly being the melody string. I dunno, I wasn't there... John Kelly. |
|
20 Mar 09 - 05:44 PM (#2593633) Subject: RE: Arsy versy string numbers.. From: McGrath of Harlow If I'm putting a new set of strings on a guitar I would probably start with the high E, so maybe that's the reason we number the strings with that as the first. (Or maybe it's the other way round, and the reason I string it first is because it's "the first string"...) |