|
10 Jun 18 - 12:32 PM (#3930134) Subject: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Keith A of Hertford Jim knows more about our music than most of us together. Music is Mudcat's raison d'etre, and BS just an add on. Please add your encouragements to stay here. |
|
10 Jun 18 - 01:01 PM (#3930143) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: punkfolkrocker Keith - What a good loyal pal.. here's a link for you... https://www.change.org/start-a-petition "On Change.org, people everywhere are starting campaigns, mobilising supporters, and working with decision makers to drive solutions." You can mobilise millions to persuade Jim to stay... As long as we don't have to wear fancy dress and hang around the streets with clip boards and collection buckets... I suppose I could volunteer to be the South West regional organiser of your campaign... |
|
10 Jun 18 - 01:45 PM (#3930148) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Senoufou Well I'd like him to stay, but of course he must decide for himself how he's feeling. He's already said he'll be along from time to time, which is good news. I liked Jim. Ooooh punkfolkrocker, I WANT to wear fancy dress! Please may I come dressed as a cat perhaps? In a furry jumpsuit with a tail attached? (I did think of being a giant crumpet, but couldn't work out how to make the costume...) My husband has just said, "You could go as a fat old lady. That wouldn't need any costume at all!" Cheeky bugger. |
|
10 Jun 18 - 01:52 PM (#3930149) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Steve Shaw I was invited to a fancy dress party. The host asked me what I was coming as. I told him I was coming as a Mediterranean island. Don't be Sicily," he retorted. |
|
10 Jun 18 - 02:20 PM (#3930153) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Senoufou Perhaps you were being a bit Capri-cious Steve! Did they serve Sardinia sandwiches at the party? |
|
10 Jun 18 - 02:35 PM (#3930158) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: David Carter (UK) I would love Jim to stay. I don't always agree with him, and I don't always agree with Keith, but I would hate for either to be driven away. |
|
10 Jun 18 - 02:46 PM (#3930161) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Iains Much as I argue with him, I really would prefer to see him back. |
|
10 Jun 18 - 03:00 PM (#3930163) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Stilly River Sage You want him to stay so you can keep fighting and closing down various topical threads when they turn into a series of ad hominem insults? None of us has any dispute with his musical knowledge, he's second to none in that area. But who would you fight with in the BS section if he leaves? If you can't control your impulse to push every hot button you know he possesses, you have only yourself to blame. |
|
10 Jun 18 - 03:01 PM (#3930165) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Jim Carroll "Did they serve Sardinia sandwiches at the party?"He meant Scilly - scilly! Jim |
|
10 Jun 18 - 03:53 PM (#3930167) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Dave the Gnome I went to a fancy dress carrying a girl on my back. The host asked what I was. "A ninja turtle" said I. "Who is that you are carrying then?" "Michelle" ... |
|
10 Jun 18 - 04:02 PM (#3930169) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Steve Shaw I thought that one was going to the fancy dress party with a naked girl on your back. "What have you come as?" "A turtle!" "So what's that naked girl doing on your back?" "That's Michelle!" |
|
10 Jun 18 - 04:04 PM (#3930170) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Senoufou Hahahahaaaaaa!!! The TV is rotten this evening, but I'm so enjoying all these jokes! |
|
10 Jun 18 - 04:06 PM (#3930172) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: punkfolkrocker Acme - what... Keith is being insincere...???... I'm shocked...!!! I was just in the process of getting "Keith says his pal Jim should stay" campaign T shirts ordered and printed.. |
|
10 Jun 18 - 04:51 PM (#3930177) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Dave the Gnome My mate Mike went to a fancy dress covered by a red sheet with just his head painted white and showing. He went as a boil. Doesn't really work until I tell you about the mouth full of custard... :D |
|
10 Jun 18 - 04:52 PM (#3930178) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Dave the Gnome Sorry Jim, this should be about you - Please stay! |
|
10 Jun 18 - 05:05 PM (#3930179) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Steve Shaw I went to a fancy dress party wearing nothing except a fancy ribbon round my left testicle. What the hell do you think you're doing!" exclaimed the host. "Oops, sorry," I said, "I thought you said fancy dress ball..." |
|
10 Jun 18 - 05:07 PM (#3930180) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Steve Shaw And Jim knows what I think already! |
|
10 Jun 18 - 06:21 PM (#3930190) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: meself Yeah, I'd like to see the man stick around - apart from anything else, he's a tremendous resource on the musical stuff. Jim, if you're reading: maybe just take a little break; most of us do when it's taking more out of us than it should ..... |
|
10 Jun 18 - 07:09 PM (#3930194) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Steve Shaw It isn't Jim who needs to take a bloody break. |
|
10 Jun 18 - 10:00 PM (#3930204) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Stilly River Sage The lightning rod effect of having posted moderator remarks under my own account is that now we have a drop-in troll starting new threads to make accusations about the inner-workings of this site as if I have something to do with the decisions surrounding Jim and the combatants who come here to fight with him. I would like to see less fighting, and given my drothers, there are some always-fighting members I'd like to see take a hiatus, at the very least. But I can't and won't do that all by myself. This is a group of volunteers who work at mudcat first and foremost because we're interested in the music. And some of us hold our noses and wade around in the BS section to remove spam and the worst of the fighting. Occasionally enough of us concur on the bad behavior of a member and remove them from the membership. We don't always agree on that, and a couple of the worst offenders now are here because we haven't convinced enough moderators that they should go. Those who were kicked out are still able to participate as guests in the music section. I'm guessing the posts from "Publius" are exactly that - posts from someone who was kicked out or never allowed to join. Posts that speculate about moderation at Mudcat, that make spurious claims against the volunteers here, and that keep fights going just to fight are not allowed. And when the perpetrator is too pushy the thread is closed and sometimes that individual is put in an IP time out. Jim Carroll should stay. |
|
10 Jun 18 - 10:07 PM (#3930205) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Joe Offer Ditto. I argue with Jim all the time, but I really like him. -Joe- |
|
10 Jun 18 - 10:23 PM (#3930208) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: punkfolkrocker Jim should have been awarded a Queens honours for services to British folk music, so he could tell her where to shove it...... btw.. Jim don't you dare let us down and accept a knighthood... |
|
11 Jun 18 - 03:23 AM (#3930219) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Jim Carroll This really is extremely embarrassing - not to say, very moving I really am thinking hard about it - I really would miss being here; being able to discuss with you people, both sides of the line, has extended my understanding of subjects that interest and involve me to a degree I wouldn't have thought possible - part of a learning-curve. Mudcat has become a bit like Brer Rabbit's Tar Baby If only we could learn to talk to each other without driving others away.. "The TV is rotten this evening," The climax to 'Patrick Melrose' and a new 'Poldark' - wash yo' mouf out girl' - speaking of which... "mouth full of custard..." Minnie Driver tells a great one about that in 'Good Will Hunting' I'd love to join in the jokes about fancy dress parties, but I'm afraid some of you you are not ready for mine (miss-spent youth) Jim |
|
11 Jun 18 - 04:41 AM (#3930238) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Senoufou Hahahaha Jim! I must be the only woman in Britain who has no interest at all in Poldark. Apparently, they're all swooning over the chap and his bare, hairy chest. Myself, I fancy that black French teacher on the teaching recruitment advert. And Usain Bolt. Also Mo Farah. But they aren't on the TV much. sigh.. PS Please please stay. I'd miss you a lot. |
|
11 Jun 18 - 04:49 AM (#3930241) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Jim Carroll "hairy chest." Is that how you see us - hmmm!! Not just pretty whatsits Jim Carroll |
|
11 Jun 18 - 06:11 AM (#3930249) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Senoufou Nah, Jim, hairy chests do nothing for me! My husband has only got hairs on his chin (small beard). I've always found African men absolutely gorgeous. (swoons) |
|
11 Jun 18 - 06:44 AM (#3930252) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Donuel There are few who are as unabashed as Jim. Its as though he has nothing to lose except the truth. It may be his truth but so what? |
|
11 Jun 18 - 07:31 AM (#3930258) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Jim Carroll "Nah, Jim, hairy chests do nothing for me!" Some of my finest women had hairy chests Jim Carroll |
|
11 Jun 18 - 07:34 AM (#3930259) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Senoufou Pwaaaaagh! You'd better NOT leave Jim. You've made my day now!! tee hee |
|
11 Jun 18 - 08:10 AM (#3930264) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Donuel The union makes us strong. |
|
11 Jun 18 - 08:39 AM (#3930269) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: wysiwyg As one who has left many times (loudly or quietly at different times), my advice would be to just let the man have his break without all this fuss. The operative word there being BREAK, which reminds me that perhaps during said hiatus he can cultivate the all-important *paragraph break*. Line after line of text without white space between short paragraphs can come across as close-minded ranting (the same way all caps can make people feel shouted at). In today's pace of communication, most of us handle paragraphs of 2-3 sentences better than a page of Eben the most cogent thinking. Just to illustrate I'll say it again, adding that white space. . . As one who has left many times (loudly or quietly at different times), my advice would be to just let the man have his break without all this fuss. The operative word there being BREAK, which reminds me that perhaps during said hiatus he can cultivate the all-important *paragraph break.* Line after line of text without white space between short paragraphs can come across as closed-minded ranting (the same way all caps can make people feel shouted at). In today's pace of communication, most of us handle paragraphs of 2-3 sentences better than a page of even the most cogent thinking. When using a typewriter or word processor for printed matter (just as with newspapers/magazines), indenting a new 'graph without an added blank line saves paper/filing space. But on-screen, it's very hard to read! ~S~ |
|
11 Jun 18 - 08:51 AM (#3930272) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: The Sandman What has been happening on this forum? |
|
11 Jun 18 - 08:51 AM (#3930273) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Jim Carroll Sorry people - just plunged into the deep-end on another thread - I'll lie awake worrying about principles for a couple of nights Many thanks to you all - now where's that hairy chested woman I left on the boil ! Jim Carroll |
|
11 Jun 18 - 11:27 AM (#3930298) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: punkfolkrocker "where's that hairy chested woman I left on the boil" now that should have been a 1940s western swing chart hit... |
|
11 Jun 18 - 12:23 PM (#3930311) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Dave the Gnome How's about these then? :D tG |
|
11 Jun 18 - 12:27 PM (#3930312) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Will Fly A break from the Mudcat BS section is always a good idea. I post down here only occasionally, and then on what I hope are non-contentious threads - because I get fed up with the constant bickering, name-calling and general bullshit. However I might appear on here, I also have very strong social and political views - not necessarily always pro-right or pro-left. But I prefer to keep them to myself rather than air them on a forum where people constantly argue from fixed positions which never, ever change, revert to insult rather than reason, and get sucked into acrimony at the drop of a post. The reason to be part of Mudcat - for me - is for its huge fund of marvellous musical knowledge. And that's well above the line. |
|
11 Jun 18 - 02:40 PM (#3930335) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: MikeL2 Hi Will That is also my view. But you put it better than I would. cheers MikeL2 |
|
11 Jun 18 - 04:33 PM (#3930371) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Steve Shaw Susan, please don't castigate people who post without paragraph breaks, etc. Just read what they've said, or ignore it if you prefer. There are no rules, seriously. I'm biased, of course, as continuous prose is also my style. I'm fed up of people nitpicking about my style of posting and I think that such silliness gets us nowhere at all. End, mercifully, of short, paragraph-innocent rant. |
|
11 Jun 18 - 04:48 PM (#3930373) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Senoufou I rather like people's individual styles of posting. I don't feel there should be one standard format. |
|
11 Jun 18 - 04:55 PM (#3930374) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Steve Shaw Alleluia! |
|
11 Jun 18 - 05:06 PM (#3930376) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Vashta Nerada These dyslexic eyes find that solid block of text almost impossible to read. My two cents. |
|
11 Jun 18 - 06:56 PM (#3930394) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Steve Shaw Try harder. It's the way our ideas flow, so live with it or just ignore. Copy and paste our dense efforts into another program and insert your own spaces. You won't do that, of course. We're not important enough. |
|
11 Jun 18 - 08:44 PM (#3930403) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Joe Offer What's all this hairy chest stuff? Is Jim Carroll becoming a sex object? |
|
11 Jun 18 - 10:55 PM (#3930416) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Stilly River Sage Let's put it this way - if Jim, knowing that people have trouble reading concentrated blocks of text, wants people to more closely read what he writes, he'll have the courtesy of inserting a few line breaks. It's up to him. More air on the page, more readers. |
|
12 Jun 18 - 03:20 AM (#3930427) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: BobL Am I alone in having the opposite problem? I find text almost impossible to follow if it's broken up by blank lines after every sentence. |
|
12 Jun 18 - 03:41 AM (#3930428) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Jim Carroll "a few line breaks." I'm extremely grateful for being reminded of this - it has been commented on before I usually write during breaks from something else - transcribing tapes, annotating songs, organising sound files.... we have just bequeathed our collection to Limerick University and don't want them to have to sort out the mess of forty-odd years work My contributions tend to be a hurried knee-jerk reaction to something that has come up To tell the truth, I'm never sure who reads what I write so quite often I write for myself - doesn't everybody do that to a degree ? Must try harder "Is Jim Carroll becoming a sex object?" Not again, surely Joe !!! Joe Heaney once told us during a conversation in a tatty Euston cafe after a night at the Singers Club "It takes me all night to do what I used to do all night" Jim |
|
12 Jun 18 - 03:50 AM (#3930431) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Senoufou Since Jim likes women with hairy chests, I might buy one of those kinky swimsuits that Dave the Gnome showed us on his link. My husband however would fall to the floor in a dead faint. |
|
12 Jun 18 - 05:03 AM (#3930442) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Jim Carroll "Since Jim likes women with hairy chests," Used to Sen - I'm afraid I concur with Joe Heaney As the older men around here say "It's all gone up into the head now" Jim |
|
12 Jun 18 - 05:17 AM (#3930448) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Steve Shaw I'd suggest that those people who can cope only with broken-up text have been reading too many tabloids. When it comes to deciding what I'm going to read here, a quick look at the author's name at the top of the post is often sufficient. |
|
12 Jun 18 - 05:28 AM (#3930450) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Jim Carroll "Hairy Chests" Our late friend, fiddle player Bobby Casey, was once asked the title of one of his compositions THIS WAS HIS REPLY Jim |
|
12 Jun 18 - 06:14 AM (#3930459) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Andrez I don't know where in the posts above or below the line the issue of Jim leaving was first raised or why but I really hope you stay on Mudcat Jim! Your folk knowledge and generosity knows no bounds and I am personally so grateful for the opportunity to hear the bits and pieces of your folk archive collection shared with me and others to date. Thank you so much once again. Cheers, Andrez |
|
12 Jun 18 - 08:41 AM (#3930473) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Senoufou The Hairy Chested Frog Reel!! Hahahahaha!! |
|
12 Jun 18 - 09:05 AM (#3930478) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Stilly River Sage Dyslexia, Steve, is a real thing. One helpful accommodation is to have smaller blocks of text. It has nothing to do with reading the tabloids. There's generally a correlation between higher intelligence and this learning disability, because in essence it's the brain working a bit differently than "normal." Those of you who have taught should have already figured this out yourselves. |
|
12 Jun 18 - 10:15 AM (#3930493) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Raedwulf " If you can't control your impulse to push every hot button you know he possesses" Acme - I think you're being unfair on Keith. He doesn't deliberately push anyone's buttons. He is simply is what he is, and what I think of him I've said directly to him here in public, but elsewhere. Mind you, the screaming hypocrisy of him jumping into the thread you opened, and therefore getting it closed has not escaped me - I'm no fan of the blithering idiot. But that's what he is - a blithering idiot, not a WUM (wind-up merchant, for anyone not au fait with internet acronyms). He doesn't set out to push anyone's buttons. Jim - Censorship, which I somewhat circuitously gather is the issue here, is a thorny one. I've no idea how long you lurked before you joined, but there was a chap whose name only mentioned will cause the likes of Pore Ol' JoeO to wince (at least it's blessed memory, Joe!). I've even mentioned him to you in a PM - The Shambles, AKA Roger. He effectively banned himself in Apr07 (your first official post is from Dec07), by demanding that he be left uncensored or his account suspended. You can guess what happened. In most ways, he was a perfectly nice inoffensive chap. But on the subject of censorship, he was a thundering thumping, down in the dumping (recognise the quote? ;-) ), monomaniacal, OCD, utterly obsessed bore. Oddly enough, what he usually got censored for was, I think, banging on about censorship... I am not suggesting you are the same; far from it. I mention this only as a preamble to a simile I once used in argument against his tedious, tedious tub-thumping about censorship. It went something along these lines... A forum is a garden. It needs to be weeded from time to time. Careless weeding & pruning removes the good & valuable along with the weeds. But if you don't weed at all, the good growth is strangled & your garden is lost. If Shambles had been allowed to moderate, or we'd been moderated according to his diktat (& it was diktat), we'd have lost the garden, for sure. If I were to be more coarse, I might talk about kiddies sandpits & someone having to hoick out unwanted 'deposits'! ;-) It is a given that some form of censorship must take place for Mudcat (or any other forum - I've been a forum owner, and a moderator as well). It isn't an easy job to do - little praise, much complaining! I've had my own issues with MC censorship (though, oddly enough, I don't think I've ever actually been censored here. Which is a bit of a surprise, given some of the things I've said!). But I've also defended them, as well. Apart from the fact that, bar JoeO (& self-admitted Acme), I've little idea who most of them are, and I think I've avoided having a personal beef with any of them. Therefore, I've avoided feeling I was being picked on as well. I'm not suggesting you feel that way; I'm only trying to make clear that, whatever occasional disagreements I might have, I think Mudcat is very fairly moderated, with a very wide degree of latitude allowed. But the long & the short of it is that Mudcat is the gift of Max & Others to the rest of us. His sandpit, his playground, HIS rules. And that includes a certain amount of moderation, call it censorship if you prefer. That means accepting the mods decisions (at least publicly), which also means not repeating whatever it was you did. Which, I vaguely gather, you did, so my sympathies, so in the absence of better info, are more with the poor ol' mods! ;-) Notwithstanding... I have had little direct interaction with you; a couple of PM's, a couple of thread responses, probably. But I would also be sorry to see you depart, Jim. A bit too strident & passionate below the (BS) line, maybe? Mea culpa. But that's part of life below the line! If it's only censorship that is the reason, you won't find anywhere on the 'net that moderates better. I know that you are reconsidering your earlier decision. I hope you reverse it, even if it means staying strictly above us 'ere reprobates down wot where we is! ;-) |
|
12 Jun 18 - 10:32 AM (#3930498) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Donuel Raedwulf would prefer all censorship be in Jeff Session's hands or Brietbart editors. ;^/ |
|
12 Jun 18 - 10:34 AM (#3930500) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Raedwulf Raedwulf, pretentiously referring to himself in the third person, is more than happy with censorship here remaining in the MudElf's hands... ;-) |
|
12 Jun 18 - 10:39 AM (#3930502) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: punkfolkrocker I liked shambles... |
|
12 Jun 18 - 11:04 AM (#3930508) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Steve Shaw So how many people here are dyslexic, Acme? I've had my blocks of texts complained about many times but never on those grounds. I've just asked Mrs Steve about this: she was a special needs teacher for many years and the SENCO at a junior school for a lot of those years. She doesn't regard large blocks of text as a particular impediment for people with dyslexia, suggesting that the only real problem arising from it could be confusion due to losing one's place. If mudcat were a sanctuary for dyslexia-sufferers I'd behave differently. In the meantime, I don't mind being criticised for bad grammar or ambiguous sentence construction, etc., but I can't make allowances for everybody, and I'm not going to be indulging in tabloid-style writing any time soon. Yours unapologetically. |
|
12 Jun 18 - 11:49 AM (#3930515) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Stilly River Sage Steve, that's the problem - losing one's place, so not bothering to start at all unless one really must, and then making the screen so narrow the lines are short and it's easier to keep your place. Raedwulf, most of what we do is remove spam, a virtual form of taking out the trash. :) |
|
12 Jun 18 - 11:57 AM (#3930518) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: wysiwyg It's not just dyslexia. I worked for years in typesetting, and there is solid research about the human eye's need for a balance of type vs white space and the effects of different ratios. Really it just depends on whether you want ppl to read your best thinking, or react to the first sentence and swing at you from there. If it feels like ppl aren't bothering to read your whole post-- that nmay be due to basic physiology we all share... rather than a character flaw to attack. ~S~ |
|
12 Jun 18 - 12:08 PM (#3930521) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Jim Carroll "dyslexia" Graffiti from the sixties - "dyslexia lures KO" Jim Carroll |
|
12 Jun 18 - 12:09 PM (#3930522) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Steve Shaw Well I think I'll be carrying on as normal... |
|
12 Jun 18 - 08:32 PM (#3930586) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Stilly River Sage Even looking it up, I have no idea what that means, Jim. Or how to read it. This didn't help. |
|
12 Jun 18 - 08:57 PM (#3930587) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: bobad dyslexia rules OK.....maybe? |
|
12 Jun 18 - 09:20 PM (#3930590) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Stilly River Sage Does that mean something? |
|
12 Jun 18 - 09:44 PM (#3930591) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: bobad I have sex daily.......I mean dyslexia. |
|
12 Jun 18 - 10:10 PM (#3930593) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Joe Offer I liked Shambles, too, PFR. I even invited him to visit my home. But he thought it unfair that I would let him say things only once, and that I allowed only one thread on any given subject at a time, and that I didn't let him copy-paste the same word-for-word things in three threads all at the same time. He called that censorship. I admired his passion for his causes. But he seemed to think his causes demande that he repeat the same words over and over and over and over again - several times a day. If I could have disabled copy-paste on his browser, he would have been fine. -Joe- |
|
12 Jun 18 - 10:38 PM (#3930602) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Donuel I was watching Bill Mahre this week and he previewed the book 'Uncle Steve'. I thought of Mr. Shaw. (shh) Dyslexic's should stray... J.C. should save... Dyslexics play with language. Some call it mistakes with language. It's just over thinking language. But critisizing the overly critical about issues political things can get physical. Scrolling past extremly long posts doesn't mean you're dyslexic or crazy. It means you're lazy. |
|
13 Jun 18 - 03:28 AM (#3930617) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Raedwulf As I said, Roger was, for the most part, a perfectly nice chap. I seem to remember he did some good work in raising awareness of a couple of issues that would affect performers (the 'three in a bar' rule over venues having to have a performance licence was one; wasn't there something about copyright as well?). But on censorship? Oh boy... |
|
13 Jun 18 - 04:07 AM (#3930621) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Nigel Parsons Acme: Dyslexia lures KO There was a 'meme' (did we call them memes back then?) for graffiti showing support for a cause (or person/thing) of "_____ rules, o.k." Taking the widely held (if not strictly accurate) belief that dyslexics see the letters of words in the wrong order, the graffiti uses anagrams of both 'rules' & 'o.k.'. Cheers Nigel (Humour isn't funny if it has to be explained) |
|
13 Jun 18 - 06:09 AM (#3930632) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Donuel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tE0RGJirEts explaining jokes is funny. |
|
13 Jun 18 - 07:21 AM (#3930644) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Vic Smith The thread says "Jim Carroll should stay", Though some think he should call it a day. Just mention MacColl, And our Jim will stand tall, With both guns blazing away. |
|
13 Jun 18 - 07:32 AM (#3930648) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Jim Carroll Thank you Vic - nice to be summed up so well Jim |
|
13 Jun 18 - 08:37 AM (#3930660) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Nigel Parsons Expressing your feelings in rhyme, Is a good way of passing the time. And Vic’s on the ball, He did not take a fall, In finding a rhyme for MacColl. Obviously I avoided the obvious rhyme because it had ‘not a lot’ to do with the subject matter. |
|
13 Jun 18 - 10:38 AM (#3930686) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Donuel And some put it up to a vote but most post till they croak ;^/ |
|
13 Jun 18 - 11:09 AM (#3930688) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Jim Carroll "In finding a rhyme for MacColl." As long as it's not "filler" Nigel!! Jim Carroll |
|
13 Jun 18 - 11:28 AM (#3930691) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Kenny B (inactive) "but most post till they croak ;^/ " You pays your money and makes your choice So.…. Wee Sammy says to his grandma "can Grandpa do frog noises" "No" she says, "why do you ask" so wee Sammy says " Cos my mammy says when grandpa croaks we're all going to Tenerife" |
|
13 Jun 18 - 11:29 AM (#3930692) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: punkfolkrocker why should dyslexics get all the limelight...!!!??? wot about us folks getting older with fading eyesight.. My close up reading vision is now well buggered, and worse during the hours of day after waking up... Older folks have cataracts and other age related sight impairments... All we ask of other mudcatters, is a little consideration of how your posts will be viewed by diverse ability readers... Is that too much to ask...??? back to dyxlexsics... is there a medical condition foe us wot have forgotten how to spell properly.. [probably early onset dementia...???] |
|
13 Jun 18 - 12:26 PM (#3930698) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: Stilly River Sage "Control +" increases the font size on your browser, "Control -" reduces it. No need to use the shift key on the plus move. |
|
13 Jun 18 - 12:47 PM (#3930701) Subject: RE: BS: Jim Carroll should stay From: punkfolkrocker ACME - thanks, but already doing that to enlarge, and standing back about a metre from the 22" monitor to focus... [press Ctrl and using mouse wheel works for me..] Been very short sighted since I was 7 or 8.. Now I've reached a point where I can only read my 5" screen phone if I take my glasses off, and hold the phone about 3" in front of my eyes... But my mid distance everyday getting about, and big screen TV viewing vision has remained stable for decades... Getting old is weird... |